31
Distinguishing ourselves Experiences of ORCID iD implementation and the Jisc-ARMA pilot Janette Colclough Research Support Manager, Information Directorate, University of York UKSG Breakout session 2015

UKSG Conference 2015 - Distinguishing ourselves: experiences of ORCID iD implementation and the Jisc-ARMA pilot Janette Colclough University of York

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Distinguishing ourselvesExperiences of ORCID iD implementation and

the Jisc-ARMA pilot

Janette ColcloughResearch Support Manager, Information Directorate, University of York

UKSG Breakout session 2015

This session Background to ORCID iDs and the Jisc-ARMA ORCID

pilot

A detailed case study from the University of York

Experiences from other JISC-ARMA pilot sites

Next steps and key contacts

Questions

Background

ORCID and the name ambiguity problem

Names are not unique but an Open Researcher and Contributor Identifier is

Open, non-profit, community-driven organisation

– Registry of iDs and activities/outputs

– API to link systems

Free for individual researchers

Membership basis for organisations

– Basic or Premium, Trusted Party or Creator

Over 1 million iDs issued

For more information see http://orcid.org/

Jisc-ARMA ORCID Pilot project

Follows Joint statement in support of ORCID Jan 2013

– ARMA, HEFCE, HESA, JISC, RCUK, UCISA, Wellcome Trust

8 HEI-based pilots May 2014 – Jan 2015

Aims

– Streamline implementation at universities

– Develop best value approach for potential UK-wide adoption

Objectives

– Explore embedding of iDs into systems and workflows

– Assess costs, benefits and risks

– Gather evidence for national ORCID membership

Implementing ORCID iDs at the University of York

University of York Context

Founded 1963

Research intensive (14th in REF)

Member of the Russell Group and White Rose Consortium

16,000 students, 1,400 academic and research staff

>30 departments in humanities, social sciences, sciences

High duck density

Key features of the York project

Voluntary registration for iDs by researchers, with institutional support and advocacy

Backed by institutional policy (University Policy on the Publication of Research)

Technology: Integration of ORCID iD functionality into CRIS (Pure)

Technology: Use EPrints connector to populate the shared repository (White Rose Research Online) with ORCID iDs

Joint Information Directorate and Research Strategy andPolicy Office project

Technical set up

Membership of ORCID

– Basic Creator licence enabling one API integration

Easy to activate once Pure options were available and working

Initial problems with EPrints connector (now solved)

See Julie Allinson’s York ORCID blog entry for more information

Pilot stage exercise: Technical/advocacy issues

3 week trial with 4 departments

– Range of subject areas

– Included online survey

Over 70 iDs in Pure

– Uptake 17% - 40%

– No patterns by discipline

Add/Create options in Pure

– More instructions needed

– Discrepancy between no. of iDs in Pure and listed on ORCID

– Researchers did not Save their iD into Pure

– Unsaved changes request to Pure

Pilot stage exercise: further findings

There appears to be no information in

the ORCID account Did you already have an ORCID iD?

Pre-pilot >200 iDs with York email address

It's useful to attribute work to the right author

Role of research administrators• Increased uptake• But can remove ownership of

iD from researcher?

Implementation for academic and research staff

Email from Pro-Vice Chancellor for Research

– Direct request to create/add iD into PURE

– Key message: credit for high quality research

Website modified from pilot stage exercise

– www.york.ac.uk/orcid

– Added instructions

– More on benefits of Pure

– Clear that iD only

Pre-launch promotion

– Bookmarks distributed to researchers

– York Research Administrators Forum

Uptake to date (March 2015) > 500 ORCID iDs in Pure

35% of staff with Pure profiles

> 850 iDs with York email

Higher for academic staff

15.43

20.51

64.06

Uptake: iDs by Faculty

Arts & Humanities

Social Sciences

Sciences0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%

25.00%

30.00%

35.00%

40.00%

26.70% 27.48%

36.07%

Uptake rate by Faculty

Other progress

EPrints connector to repository (WRRO) now live

– Need to monitor impact on repository

– Consider reload of data

Ensure iDs visible in York Research Database

– Plan and funding in place to update Pure portal

Initial steps towards implementation for postgraduate research students and staff without Pure profiles

– PGR students are an investment in the future

Next steps at York

Target postgraduate research students

– Work with new York Graduate Research School and GSA

Work on sustainability issues

– Continuing costs; monitor JISC consultation on national agreement for ORCID membership

– ORCID iDs for new staff and students

Maintain awareness of new use cases

– Metadata round trip

– Export from Pure to ORCID profile

Integration into other IDM systems

Benefits of our approach Voluntary sign-up

– Match culture of the organisation

– Avoids issues of bulk create

ORCID iDs embedded in the CRIS

– Core system for researchers

– Uses existing Pure functionality

– Associated with research outputs

– Feed out to repository via EPrints connector

– Maximise potential re-use / system interoperability

Policy on the Publication of Research

– Demonstrates institutional commitment

“ORCID has allowed us to distinguish - and

other people to distinguish - between

one person's work and the other's”

Research Fellow, Arts & Humanities

Lessons learned Initial signs are that voluntary sign-up can work

– But we are still at an early stage!

– Potential negative association with CRIS

– Difficult to demonstrate immediate benefit to researchers

Top-level buy-in is essential

Cross-team working is essential

– And brings additional benefits

The communications strategy vital

– And needs to be targeted

It can never be made too easy for researchers!

“It is a no

brainer”Prof Computer Science

Concerns going forward Dependence on systems

suppliers and ORCID

– Trust that systems will work

Sustainability issues

– Resourcing, membership

When will we see the benefits?

– Still in early stages of adoption

– Integration into grant applications, research outcomes (ResearchFish) and REF?

– Burgess Review recommendations

– New use cases

Find out more about the York project

See York ORCID blog http://yorkorcid.blogspot.co.uk/

– Users and use case

– Technical approaches

– Lessons learned

– Our approach

– Latest updates

Other experiences of the Jisc-ARMA ORCID Pilot

Acknowledgments

Aston: Heather Whitehouse ([email protected])

Imperial: Torsten Reimer ([email protected])

Kent: Kirsty Wallis ([email protected])

Jisc / ARMA ORCiD Pilot Projects 2014/15

Aston University

23 %

academics

registered

during

project

Web based

training material

High level buy-in

Click and Connect

set up in Pure: Click

on link in Pure to

create or register

ORCiD

Confusion with

other Author ID

systems used for

citation metrics

Prepared for

future system

integration

Email and

‘meetings’

campaign

Orcid @Imperial (Jisc-ARMA-ORCID pilot)

Project aims:

• Raise awareness of ORCID

• Issue researchers with an iD

• Encourage uptake of ORCID

Approach:

• Capture existing iDs via Symplectic Elements

• Offer an opt-out

• Create iDs on behalf of academics via API

• Pre-populate profiles, but leave academics to decide what will be made public

• Encourage academics to linkiD to Symplectic Elements

Date Activity

06/11 • ORCID web pages go live

• ORCID support in Symplectic Elements goes live

• Email from the Provost to all staff

14/11 • Follow-on email from ORCID project to all staff

20/11 • Reminder distributed via Heads of Departments

27/11 • Final day to opt-out or add an existing iD to

Elements

03/12 • Email to all staff who had not opted out informing

them that ORCID creation is imminent

• ORCID iD creation process

• ORCID claim email sent from ORCID

11/12 • ORCID identified 325 staff who already had an iD

but did not link it to Elements before 03/12; as a

result no iDs were created for them. The project

emailed these colleagues, encouraging them to add

their iD to Elements.

08/01 • Reminder email to staff who had not linked their

ORCID to their Symplectic Elements' account

Achievements / Lessons

• Academic interest – 1155 iDs claimed and linked back to College within 7 weeks.

• Privacy concerns did not prove to be a major concern – engage proactively.

• Clear communications and strong support across the university, incl. senior

management, were essential for smooth process. Clear messages, clear workflow.

• Number of iDs used is important, not number of iDs created.

Project report: https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk:8443/handle/10044/1/19271

Contact: Dr Torsten Reimer [email protected]

Project in numbers #

Overall number of staff included initially 4,347

Staff excluded (because they had chosen not to be listed in the College's public staff directory) 332

Staff opting out through the online form 25

Staff who added their existing ORCID iDs to Symplectic Elements before the roll-out 439

Staff with existing iDs, as identified through ORCID de-duplication 325

New staff iDs created 3,226

Metadata on publications ("works") added to the ORCID registry >240,000

Staff iDs linked to Symplectic (as of 19/01/15) 1,155

Staff asking for their newly created iD to be deleted (usually because they already had one that

was missed by the de-duplication)

7

Kent Early ORCID Project

• Large scale awareness raising and advocacy project

• Project used a team comprised of PhD students and Early career researchers as advocates

• Provided a wide range of materials for outreach activities:

• ORCID t-shirts and hoodies

• Posters and leaflets

• Assorted gifts and branded sweets

Results:• Over 200 independent sign-ups to ORCID at the University of

Kent and increasing

• Web content and ongoing support in place

• Widespread awareness of ORCID in all user groups

• Plans for continued advocacy in place across the university

www.kent.ac.uk/library/research/orcid

[email protected]

The other project sites

Northumbria University

– Moving ORCID Upstream: iD mandatory part of postgraduate research student project approval in student records; link to HESA return

University of Oxford

– Integration with core user identity systems (pilot)

Southampton University

– ORCID Service linking to University identity

Swansea

– Embedded into HR system, linked to Research Information System and repository

Next steps and key contacts

Next steps for Jisc-ARMA ORCID Pilot Project reporting:

– Summary reports from participating sites

– Final project report

– Institutional implementation and cost benefit analysis

Consultation on ORCID consortium membership for the UK

Reconvening implementation group

Considering other support options e.g. technical

See Jisc-ARMA ORCID pilot project website

– http://orcidpilot.jiscinvolve.org/wp/

Key contacts

Jisc-ARMA project contact:

– Verena Weigert ([email protected])

Cost-benefit analysis contact:

– Rob Johnson ([email protected])

ORCID Regional Director, Europe

– Josh Brown ([email protected])

Any further questions?

Thank you for listening

UKSG Breakout session 2015

Janette ColcloughResearch Support ManagerInformation DirectorateUniversity of YorkEmail: [email protected]: www.york.ac.uk/library

orcid.org/0000-0003-4767-6801