19
The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate Tuesday, 6/25/2013

The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

  • Upload
    pcmahq

  • View
    719

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Session: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate Presented by: Midori Connolly , Principal, AVGirl Productions Date and time: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 10:00am pcma.org/educon

Citation preview

Page 1: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

The Attendee Engagement

Technology DebateTuesday, 6/25/2013

Page 2: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

“Us”

Midori Connolly, AVGirl Productions @AVGirl Midori

Panelists:Lauren Mulherrin, @bXb_GroupCulture 22 – bXb Group LLC, Account Executive

Eric Olson, @Eric_OlsZerista, COO

Anthony Miller, @ActiveBusinessActive Network Business Solutions, VP Strategy & Business Development

#pcmaec

Page 3: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

“You”

•Google Docs

•Prezi

•Voting

•Twitter: #pcmadebate

•Post-session Follow-up

#pcmaec

Page 4: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

What does

ENGAGEMENT

mean to you?

Page 5: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Exposure.Education.

Entertainment.

The Terms of EngagementEmotion.

Page 6: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Debate #1Point by Chairman Naught S. Shur,

30 year Member, Society of Outdated Concepts:

Technology is a distraction at our meetings, the younger

generations are the only ones using it and there is no way to

measure value.

#pcmaec

Page 7: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Debate #1

CounterPoint by Lauren Mulherrin

#pcmaec

Page 8: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Table Discussion and Notes

Please take your notes here:

http://bit.ly/TechEngage1

(Case Sensitive)

#pcmadebate

Page 9: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Who Wins?

Page 10: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Debate #2Point by Countess Beans, CEO, Abacus:

Measuring engagement is just a catch phrase that my tech vendors use to sell their

products. This is an intangible concept, hence there is no data

that can make this a viable metric.

#pcmaec

Page 11: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Debate #2

CounterPoint by Eric Olson

#pcmaec

Page 12: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Table Discussion and Notes

Please take your notes here:

http://bit.ly/TechEngage2

(Case Sensitive)

#pcmadebate

Page 13: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Who Wins?

Page 14: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Debate #3Point by Stuch N. Mudd,

Executive Director, National Pudding Manufacturer

Association:Technology is moving too fast. I

receive a new email every day that is a new mobile, social or other

interactive technology, it’s ridiculous for us to try to keep up with it all.

#pcmaec

Page 15: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Debate #3

CounterPoint by Anthony Miller

#pcmaec

Page 16: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Table Discussion and Notes

Please take your notes here:

http://bit.ly/TechEngage3

(Case Sensitive)

#pcmadebate

Page 17: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Who Wins?

Page 18: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

The session isn’t over!

Single Google Doc:Twitter notes, Link to Prezi

“Living” doc!

Prezi – your notes/takeaways++

Page 19: The Attendee Engagement Technology Debate

Talk to us!

Midori [email protected] Event Technologies@AVGirlMidori

Eric [email protected] and Community Solutions@Eric_Ols

Lauren [email protected] Communications and Interactive Technologies@bXB_Group

Anthony [email protected] Events Management Technology@ActiveBusiness

#pcmaec