18
Designed by Karen Saucier Lundy to supplement the textbook Families in Context: Sociological Perspectives, by Gene H. Starbuck and Karen Saucier Lundy. For publication information about the text: http:// www.paradigmpublishers.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?pro ductID=409768

Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation pub 1.5

  • Upload
    kslund1

  • View
    45

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Designed by Karen Saucier Lundy to supplement the textbook Families in Context: Sociological Perspectives, by Gene H. Starbuck and Karen Saucier Lundy. For publication information about the text: http://www.paradigmpublishers.com/Books/BookDetail.aspx?productID=409768

Page 2: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

“Friend” our page and keep up with the latest news and research about the family!

Families in Context: Sociological Perspectivesauthors will be accessible to students and faculty via Facebook page for questions, comments, and discussion questions.

Meet and interact with other students and faculty who have adopted the text.

Page 3: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

“If the family were a container, it would be a

nest, an enduring nest, loosely woven,

expansive and open.” Letty Cottin Pogrebin

Page 4: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Define family: not so easy is it? Our ideas and images influence study of

family Nuclear family: man woman child

(nucleus=smallest unit) Conjugal unit: “to join”

Unrelated persons as members

Page 5: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Basics of defining a family

Extended family – 3 generations

Two different TYPES of nuclear units:

Family of orientation

Family of procreation

Page 6: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

So what has changed?

Stepfamilies

Reconstituted

Blended

Page 7: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Common criteria for determining “family” status

•Households are declining in US.

•What does this mean? (Table 1-1)

Page 8: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Purpose (functions) Shared values Traditional values vs non traditional values Norms (rules and guidelines)

Formal – written socially regulated mechanisms

Informal – norms not enforced as strictly

Pronatalism

Page 9: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Role = part we play Script = proscribed behaviors and ‘are’. Functional = micro and micro Structural definition – US Census

Share housing unit, united by adoption, blood, or marriage.

Kin groups

Fictive kin

Page 10: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Rite of passage = wedding Incest taboo Pronuptialism Common law marriage Alternatives to marriage: Nayak, Kibbutz

Page 11: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Ideal type – Max Weber Dichotomy Continuum Gender: power, tasks, residential,

inheritance. Authority: patriarchy and matriarchy Power vs authority in marriage

Page 12: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Descent Inheritance Residence

Patrilocal

Matrilocal

Neolocal

Page 13: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Assignment of tasks based on gender Androgyny (andro=male) (gyny = female) Types of Gender Roles (John Money)

Sex-irruducible gender roles

Sex-influenced roles

Sex-arbitrary roles

Page 14: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

The family in decline debate Pessimistic position

Broken, cannot be fixed

Less influential, other institutions have taken over family functions

Divorce and parent-less children

Post modern/post nuclear family: matrilocal.

Increased individualism vs familism

Page 15: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

We need a new structure for the family Marxist view Feminism Increased importance of family and marriage We have nostalgic view of 50s family that

may have never existed.

Page 16: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5
Page 17: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

"Glad it changed" optimists on the family decline debate are likely to cite which of the following in defense of their position?

A. The high divorce rate.

B. High rates of out-of-wedlock births.

C. Increased individual freedom, especially for women.

D. Both (a) and (b) above.

E. None of the above.

Page 18: Starbuck and lundy chapter 1 defining fam variation  pub 1.5

Which of the following terms is MOST clearly true as a descriptor of the United States today?

A. Patrilineal

B. Egalitarian

C. Patrilocal

D. Matrifocal

E. Neolocal