5
ARCS Motivational Design Whitney Kilgore University of North Texas SATISFACTI ON

Satisfaction ARCS Motivational Design

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Understanding the importance of Student Satisfaction. While the numbers can be good, we may never achieve 100%

Citation preview

Page 1: Satisfaction ARCS Motivational Design

ARCS Motivational Design

Whitney KilgoreUniversity of North Texas

SATISFACTION

Page 2: Satisfaction ARCS Motivational Design

ARCS Motivational Design

Attention Relevance Confidence Satisfaction

A1 Perceptual arousal

R1 Goal orientation

C1 Learning requirements

S1 Intrinsic reinforcement

A2 Inquiry arousal R2 Motive matching

C2 Success opportunities

S2 Extrinsic rewards

A3 Variability R3 Familiarity C3 Personal control

S3 Equity

Page 3: Satisfaction ARCS Motivational Design

Source: 2012 National Adult Student Priorities Report and the 2012 National Online Learners Priorities Report.

Page 4: Satisfaction ARCS Motivational Design
Page 5: Satisfaction ARCS Motivational Design

Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. Shaw & A. J. Trott (Eds.), Aspects of Educational Technology Volume XVII: staff Development and Career Updating. London: Kogan Page.

Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2 – 10.

References

Image CreditsThumbup http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2268/2243271306_862c4eba39.jpg?v=0Satisfaction Guaranteed http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumblarge_592/1300562646832YoW.jpg Graph Satisfaction http://blog.noellevitz.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/compare-college-satisfactio.png