Upload
whitney-kilgore
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Understanding the importance of Student Satisfaction. While the numbers can be good, we may never achieve 100%
Citation preview
ARCS Motivational Design
Whitney KilgoreUniversity of North Texas
SATISFACTION
ARCS Motivational Design
Attention Relevance Confidence Satisfaction
A1 Perceptual arousal
R1 Goal orientation
C1 Learning requirements
S1 Intrinsic reinforcement
A2 Inquiry arousal R2 Motive matching
C2 Success opportunities
S2 Extrinsic rewards
A3 Variability R3 Familiarity C3 Personal control
S3 Equity
Source: 2012 National Adult Student Priorities Report and the 2012 National Online Learners Priorities Report.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. In K. Shaw & A. J. Trott (Eds.), Aspects of Educational Technology Volume XVII: staff Development and Career Updating. London: Kogan Page.
Keller, J. M. (1987). Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Journal of Instructional Development, 10(3), 2 – 10.
References
Image CreditsThumbup http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2268/2243271306_862c4eba39.jpg?v=0Satisfaction Guaranteed http://thumbs.dreamstime.com/thumblarge_592/1300562646832YoW.jpg Graph Satisfaction http://blog.noellevitz.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/compare-college-satisfactio.png