13
The ITEAM Project (integrating technology enhanced assessment methods for improved student support and self-regulation) Rolling out institutional technologies – Electronic Voting Systems (EVS) Sharing the lessons from the ITEAM Project: integrating technology enhanced assessment methods Julie Vuolo and Janet Webber

Rolling out institutional technologies

  • Upload
    jisc

  • View
    63

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The University of Hertfordshire ITEAM project reflect on the steps required to successfully roll out institutional technologies, their work has looked at voting technologies, but there are commonalities across a number of technologies. Jisc conference 2012

Citation preview

Page 1: Rolling out institutional technologies

The ITEAM Project (integrating technology enhanced assessment methods for improved student support and self-regulation)

Rolling out institutional technologies – Electronic Voting Systems (EVS) Sharing the lessons from the ITEAM Project: integrating technology enhanced assessment methods Julie Vuolo and Janet Webber

Page 2: Rolling out institutional technologies

The University of Hertfordshire is one of its region’s largest employers with over 2,700 staff and a student community of 23,000, including more than 2,000 international students from over 85 countries

Page 3: Rolling out institutional technologies
Page 4: Rolling out institutional technologies

Background

• Internally funded Assessment and Feedback project 2010-11 • Formulation of Assessment-for-Learning principles • Recognition of effectiveness and efficiency issues • Use of EVS to reduce assessment load and encourage active

learning and engagement • Local use supplemented by provision of 3,845 electronic voting

handsets across 8 academic Schools • JISC funding provided support for further Assessment and Feedback

project 2011-2013 • Schools purchased own EVS handsets 2011-12 (2975) • Lifecycle – logistics of implementing across an organisation

Page 5: Rolling out institutional technologies

Lifecycle

• Considers the different phases of implementing EVS across institution

• 5 phases in total • Not discrete; overlapping and interdependent • Work in progress!

Page 6: Rolling out institutional technologies

Decision Phase • Consider pedagogical rationale for use • Decide implementation approach e.g. Top

down • Agree type and number of handsets required • Identify training needs • Ensure technical and administrative support

in place

Page 7: Rolling out institutional technologies

Purchase Phase • Identify preferred supplier • Agree pricing framework • Confirm order-to-delivery times • Agree ordering process with procurement teams • Identify delivery point • Request named contact identified for receipt of

goods

Page 8: Rolling out institutional technologies

Distribution Phase • Agree personnel responsible for assigning handsets

to students (barcode scanner to EVS database), ensure scanners available, train personnel in use

• Agree timing of distribution (not at registration) • Give essential information* to students at point of

distribution (EVS info card & EVS info sheet) • Ask Programme Tutors / Module Leaders to signpost

students to EVS support page • Ensure re-issued handsets have new batteries and

are cleaned before distribution

* Essential handset information includes what to do if it is lost and an URL for the EVS web page

Page 9: Rolling out institutional technologies

Usage Phase • Professional staff /first line contacts know how to use the technology • Students know how to replace handset batteries & to recycle old ones • Faulty or lost handsets are replaced using the agreed replacement

procedure • Students are reminded that misuse of the handset may be construed as

academic misconduct

• Teaching staff happy with technology • Students know to bring their handsets to every class • Teachers explain to students how & why EVS is used • Technical support provided by Help Desk; L&T support provided by

Learning and Teaching Institute/Champions

Page 10: Rolling out institutional technologies

Usage Phase • Test conditions are employed where appropriate • Formative vs summative • Feedback on tests is timely with opportunities to discuss • Timing of release of results agreed; errors in reporting

identified and rectified promptly

Page 11: Rolling out institutional technologies

Return Phase • A process for return is agreed which includes a specified return

point and a return by date • Students are informed in advance (e.g. module handbook,

email, verbally), module teams re-enforce message • The handset is un-assigned from the student at the point of

return • Batteries are replaced / handset cleaned for re-issue • Students who fail to return the handset are recorded as debtors

at the discretion of the School • A list of student EVS debtors is sent to the Student Centre by

the agreed deadline

Page 12: Rolling out institutional technologies

Lessons to share (?success factors)

• Walking the ‘handset journey’ in advance

How did I get here? Who are they giving me to? How will this person know how to use me? What happens if my battery is flat? What happens if I break? What happens if I am lost?

Page 13: Rolling out institutional technologies

Lessons to share (?success factors)

• Identifying key players from pro-VC to goods inward to supplier to teacher to technicians to manufacturer and so on…..

• Take account of organisational developments/ changes

• Keep everyone informed, keep conversations going • Provide just-in-time support • Expect the unexpected, assume nothing!