Upload
peped
View
190
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Revision Lesson; Supreme Court
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
The US Supreme Court• Judicial review• Appointment process• Checks and balances• Landmark cases• Civil liberties
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Judicial Review“The power of the judiciary to review laws and governmental
actions to see whether they conform to the Constitution. If they violate the Constitution, the court has the power to overturn them.”
Marbury v Madison (1803)Flying Fish Case Little v Barreme
(1804) Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
• The Court may void any actions or statutes that come into conflict with the constitution
• Judiciary can hold other branches of government to its own interpretation of the constitution
• Example in case of Bush v. Gore (2000) where Supreme Court overturned judgement of Florida Supreme Court, making Bush the 43rd president
Judicial Review
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Judicial Review and Limited Government
“The prime and most necessary function of the Court has been that of validation, not
that of invalidation. What a government of limited powers needs, at the beginning and
forever, is some means of satisfying the people that it has taken all steps humanly
possible to stay within its powers." --Professor Charles L. Black
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Appointment & Confirmation Process
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Steps Description Explain the power granted and how it acts as a check on another branch
President NominationPresident nominates candidates and submits the names to the Senate
Gives the President power to choose nominees for key government jobs and power to select members of another branch (the Judicial branch).
White House ReviewMembers of the Executive Branch review the qualifications of the nominee
Ensures that other members of the executive branch approve of the nominee and help ensure he/she supports the President’s efforts.
Paperwork Financial Disclosure
Nominee fills out forms (after all this is the government) and discloses information about their financial status.
FBI InvestigationFBI investigates nominees for past actions and any possible encounters with the law.
Senate Confirmation Hearings
Members of the Senate Judicial Committee interview and question nominees about a wide range of topics related to their qualifications and past cases.
Senate hearings ensure that representatives from the Legislative Branch (representing citizens) has an opportunity to verify the nominees’ qualifications.
Senate VoteThe full senate confirms or rejects the appointment of the nominee by a majority vote.
Majority vote from Senate ensures the Legislative Branch is in favour of the executive Branch’s nominee or rejects it because they feel the person isn’t qualified. Copyright © 2016 Active Educaton
peped.org/politicalinvestigations
Successful AppointmentsElena Kagan (Barack Obama) 2010• previously White House
Council and Solicitor General but no previous experience as a judge
• nomination endorsed by the deans of over a third of the nations law schools
• nomination and questioning uneventful
• described as an ‘Obama person’ i.e. moderate and favouring consensus
• approved by vote of 63-37
Sonia Sotomayor (Barack Obama) 2009• first Hispanic judge to sit
on Supreme Court bench• questioned about
comments that a Latina women would make a better decision than a white male in earlier speeches (Newt Gingrich branded her a racist)
• 3rd woman to sit on bench• approved by vote of 68-31
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Rejected Nominations
Clarence Thomas (George H W Bush) 1990• race based appointment?• had never written a legal
book, article, or brief of consequence, and had been a judge for only a year
• NAACP, and NOW opposed nomination because of his opposition to affirmative action and Roe v. Wade
• sexual harassment allegations from former colleague
• approved by vote of 52-48
G Harold Carswell (Richard Nixon) 1970• nominated after
Haynsworth nomination rejected
• questionable record on civil rights, women’s rights and favoured segregation
• painted as Southern right wing extremist, strict constructionist
• rejected by vote of 51-45
Close Call Appointments
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Rejected NominationsRobert Bork (Ronald Reagan) 1987• very right wing, nominated to
replace a moderate• wanted to roll back civil rights
decisions made by previous courts
• nomination opposed by civil rights groups including ACLU
• TV ads attacked him as extremist
• indicated he may have wanted to reverse Roe v. Wade
• rejected by vote of 42-58
Clement Haynsworth (Richard Nixon) 1969• right wing, nominated to
replace liberal• opposed by Democrats,
liberal Republicans and NAACP
• allegedly favoured segregation and anti-labor
• rejected by vote of 55-45
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Checks and BalancesChecks on…Checks by… The legislature The executive The judiciary
The legislature
• Amend/delay/reject legislation
• Override president’s veto
• Power of the purse• Declare war• Ratify treaties
(Senate)• Investigation• Impeachment, trial,
conviction and removal from office
• Impeachment, trial, conviction, removal from office
• Propose constitutional amendments
• Issue new legislation to overturn rulings
The executive
• Recommend legislation
• Veto legislation
• Appointment of judges
• PardonThe judiciary • Judicial Review • Judicial Review
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Checks by the Legislature• Senate confirmation of
appointments
• Congress decides how many justices
• Power of impeachment
• Congress can amend constitution
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Checks by the Executive• Nominates justices
• Can support or criticise a decision
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Other Checks• No power of initiation
• No enforcement powers
• Public opinion
• Can amend or overturn previous decisions
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Checks on the Judiciary by the Executive• President Obama signed
into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009.
• This effectively overturns the Supreme Court’s infamous 2007 ruling against Ms. Ledbetter in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., a ruling that made it much harder for workers who have been victims of unlawful pay discrimination to obtain compensation for that discrimination.
• Presidential pardon of Randy Eugene Dyer in 2011.
• Convicted of importing and trafficking drugs from Mexico in 1975 he spent 3 years in prison. After his release he became a God-fearing family man who has preached and ministered to prisoners for over 30 years.
• Obama has pardoned only 17 people in his presidency (9 people in December 2010 and 8 people in May 2011).
EXAMPLES
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Checks on the Judiciary by the Legislature• Judge G. Thomas Porteous,
a federal judge was found guilty on 4 articles of impeachment by the Senate in December 2008.
• In March 2008, the House of Representatives voted unanimously to impeach Porteous on corruption charges.
• He was found to have been corrupt, taken bribes, lied to the Senate and the FBI.
• 4 out of 27 amendments overturn Supreme Court decisions.
• The 11th Amendment overturned Chisholm v. Georgia (1793) by guaranteeing the immunity of states from lawsuits by citizens of another state or a foreign country.
• The 14th Amendment nullified Scott v. Sandford (1857) by guaranteeing the civil rights and citizenship of African Americans.
• The 16th Amendment overrode Pollock v. Farmers' Loan and Trust Co. (1895) by giving Congress the power to levy an income tax.
• The 26th Amendment negated Oregon v. Mitchell (1970) by permitting 18-year-olds to vote in state elections.
EXAMPLES
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Landmark Cases• Dred Scott v. Sandford
(1857) Blacks, whether free or slaves, cannot be U.S. citizens.
• Ableman v. Booth (1859) State courts cannot issue rulings that contradict the decisions of federal courts.
• Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) Segregated facilities for blacks and whites are constitutional under the doctrine of separate but equal, which held for close to 60 years.
• Roth v. United States (1957)Obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment.
• Engel v. Vitale (1962) Government-directed prayer in public schools, even if it is denominationally neutral and non-mandatory, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
• Roe v. Wade (1973) Struck down abortion laws restricting abortion
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Landmark Cases• Near v. Minnesota (1931)
Except in rare cases, censorship is unconstitutional.
• Brown v. Board of Education (1955) Segregated schools in the several states are unconstitutional in violation of the 14th Amendment.
• United States v. Nixon (1974) Ruled that the doctrine of executive privilege is legitimate, however the President cannot invoke it in criminal cases to withhold evidence.
• Roth v. United States (1957)Obscene material is not protected by the First Amendment.
• Engel v. Vitale (1962) Government-directed prayer in public schools, even if it is denominationally neutral and non-mandatory, violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
• Roe v. Wade (1973) Struck down abortion laws restricting abortion
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Landmark Cases• Texas v. Johnson (1989)
Law prohibiting burning of the American flag is unconstitutional as violating the First Amendment.
• Planned Parenthood of Seattle v. Casey (1992) Placed tighter restrictions on abortion by upholding parts of Pennsylvania's abortion laws.
• Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton (1995) Schools may implement random drug testing upon students participating in school-sponsored athletics.
• Bush v. Gore (2000)Ended the recount of ballots in Florida in the 2000 presidential election as violating the Equal Protection Clause, effectively resolving the election in favour of George W. Bush.
• Gonzales v. Carhart (2007)Held that the Congress can prohibit a specific abortion procedure known as partial-birth abortion.
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Landmark Cases• United States v. Nixon
(1974) Ruled that the doctrine of executive privilege is legitimate, however the President cannot invoke it in criminal cases to withhold evidence.
• Boumediene v. Bush (2008)Foreign terrorism suspects have constitutional rights to challenge their detention at the Guantánamo Bay naval base in United States courts.
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Civil liberties“Rights and freedoms that provide an individual specific rights. Civil liberties
include the rights of people, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech, and
additionally, the right to due process, to a trial, to own property, and to
privacy.”
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
The Importance of the Supreme Court
“The U.S. Supreme Court can be thought of as the last word in both legislative and
policy disputes. As the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court is charged with determining the constitutionality of lower court rulings. It is where the most serious civil and voting rights disputes, labor and
employment rules, and federal statutes go for final settlement.”
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Judicial Activism
• differences in interpretation of the same part of the constitution over a period of time can sometimes be the equivalent of legislation e.g. Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and Brown v. Board of Education (1954) on segregation
• can be argued court did not interpret constitution but amended it
• “The Supreme Court of the United States assumed quasi legislative authority” - John W Brocker
• drags the other two branches along
Judicial Restraint
• the court follows precedent and shows judicial restraint
• precedent can be challenged and changed but generally over a long period of time and several cases
• precedent is the norm and the Court moves slowly, if at all
• if the judiciary used power of review excessively or controversially, it may come under attack from the other two branches
• court has little power to enforce its decisions
Copyright © 2016 Active Educatonpeped.org/politicalinvestigations
Potential Exam Questions• Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme
Court’s powers. (15) • To what extent have Supreme Court Justices reflected the
political views of the Presidents who nominated them? (15) • What has been the effect of appointments to the Supreme
Court since 2005? (15) • Explain the significance of Supreme Court appointments
since 2004. (15) • In what ways is the independence of Supreme Court
Justices protected? (15) • Why is the issue of the composition of the Supreme Court
so controversial? (15) • How are Supreme Court judges appointed, and why has the
process become so politically controversial? (15) Copyright © 2016 Active Educaton
peped.org/politicalinvestigations
Potential Exam Questions• ‘The Supreme Court should interpret the Constitution
and its amendments by establishing their original meaning when they were adopted.’ Discuss. (45)
• Are Supreme Court justices ‘politicians in disguise’? (45)
• Does the Supreme Court have too much power for an unelected body? (45)
• Judicial activism cannot be justified.’ Discuss. (45) • A political, not a judicial institution.’ Discuss this view
of the Supreme Court. (45) • Can the Bill of Rights be respected while the threat of
terrorism remains? (45) Copyright © 2016 Active Educaton
peped.org/politicalinvestigations