Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at 2014 Brightspace (by D2L) Ignite forum at Oklahoma City University. Oct 24, 2014. "Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using Brightspace" by Stacy Southerland, Bucky Dodd and Tracy Fairless, all of the University of Central Oklahoma
Citation preview
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using BrightspaceUNIVERS ITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA
Stacy Southerland, Ph.D.
Professor of Spanish
Tracy Fairless, M.A.Assistant Director of Instructional
Design
Bucky Dodd, Ph.D.Director of eLearning and
Innovations
eLearning@UCO
Online Hybrid
Self-Paced Online Interactive
Video
QUAL ITY
Instructional Design
FacilitationLearning Context
eLearningDesign Principles
Academic Departments
Support Services
QUAL ITY PROCESS
Colleges Select Faculty to Teach
Online
Faculty Complete Certification
Course
Colleges Select Courses for
Delivery
Course Development
Peer Review & Authorization
Course Scheduled
Course Delivery
eLearning Design Principles
5 Year Reauthorization Cycle
Support for Continuous Quality
S T RAT E G I C Q U A L I T Y S Y S T E M S
1.Facilitation Evaluation System
2.Faculty Mentor Program
Key Questions
• Technology as Support Platform
• Community Membership / Audience Diversity
• Needs, Goals, and Performance Outcomes
• Return on Investment
FACIL ITAT ION EVALUATION
SYSTEM
Resources
• eLearning Facilitation Review Dashboard (D2L)– Preparing the Department– Before the Review– The Review– After the Review
• Review Scorecard (Qualtrics)
• Self-Assessment Instrument (Qualtrics)
Process
What is Quality eLearning?
• Best practices• UCOnline
Quality• D2L• Types of online
quality
Preparing for the Review Process
• Setting timelines
• Using dashboard tools
• Using Qualtrics
Reviewing Online Facilitation
• The review process
• Examples• Completing the
scorecard survey
Consulting with Online Faculty
• Coaching vs. Mentoring
• Recommending support services
• Developing an action plan
Coaching for Quality
• Feedback
• Goals
• Professional Development
Lessons Learned
• Work Load for Evaluation Process
• Ownership of Evaluation Process
• Focus on community “space” and dialogue
FACULTY MENTOR
PROGRAM
Assessing the Need For A Faculty Mentor Program
Customize and Implement a Faculty Mentor Program
Develop a Program Model• Identify the value proposition• Identify the key stakeholders • Identify the project leaders • Identify a resource center
Resource Center
Develop a Resource Center• Identify needed services• Collect and segment resources• Generate communication templates• Create a method to share information
Re s o u rc e C e n t e r : Po i n t o f C o n t a c t
Planning Considerations• Responsibilities• Challenges• Resources• Projected Outcomes
R e s o u r c e C e n t e r :C o l l a b o r a t i v e W o r k s h o p s
Planning Considerations• Responsibilities• Challenges• Resources• Projected Outcomes
Re s o u rc e C e n t e r :G u i d e d S u p p o r t
Planning Considerations• Responsibilities• Challenges• Resources• Projected Outcomes
S T RAT E G I C Q U A L I T Y S Y S T E M S
1.Facilitation Evaluation System
2.Faculty Mentor Program
Lessons Learned
• Terminology and naming of program
• Fresh and dynamic information–Who uses the community dashboard?
• Create need to use resource - motivation
• Focus on community “space” and dialogue
Creating Faculty Evaluation and Mentoring Programs Using BrightspaceUNIVERS ITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA
Stacy Southerland, Ph.D.
Professor of Spanish
Tracy Fairless, M.A.Assistant Director of Instructional
Design
Bucky Dodd, Ph.D.Director of eLearning and
Innovations
