4
Midterm Paper Grading Rubric : 20 points Identifying and Interviewing a Researcher Needs Improvement : interview with researcher about the day to day management of his/her project’s data covers six or less of the components of the simplified data management plan Meets Expectations : interview with researcher about the day to day management of his/her project’s data covers all 7 components that are addressed in the simplified data management plan Exceeds Expectations : interview with researcher about the day to day management of his/her project’s data covers all 7 components of the simplified data management plan includes research and data challenges that the researcher encounters data sharing practices in the researcher’s field researcher’s plans for sharing or preserving their data post-project Creating a Data Interview Instrument Needs Improvement : instrument has fewer than eight questions is not semi-structured does not have defined themes does not include open- ended questions questions do not have researcher describe project, role, data management practices Meets Expectations : instrument is semi- structured meets minimum number of eight questions with minimum four open-ended questions questions rely heavily on a model questionnaire without addressing specific areas of the Exceeds Expectations : instrument is semi- structured includes questions covering all stages of the researcher’s project life cycle: data management planning and practices before, during, and after questions combine model

Midterm Project Grading Rubric

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

LIS 532G: Midterm Project Grading Rubric

Citation preview

Page 1: Midterm Project Grading Rubric

Midterm Paper Grading Rubric: 20 points

Identifying and Interviewing a Researcher

Needs Improvement:● interview with researcher

about the day to day management of his/her project’s data covers six or less of the components of the simplified data management plan

Meets Expectations:● interview with researcher

about the day to day management of his/her project’s data covers all 7 components that are addressed in the simplified data management plan

Exceeds Expectations:● interview with researcher

about the day to day management of his/her project’s data covers all 7 components of the simplified data management plan

● includes research and data challenges that the researcher encounters

● data sharing practices in the researcher’s field

● researcher’s plans for sharing or preserving their data post-project

Creating a Data Interview Instrument

Needs Improvement:● instrument has fewer than

eight questions● is not semi-structured● does not have defined

themes● does not include open-

ended questions● questions do not have

researcher describe project, role, data management practices and challenges in his or her own words

Meets Expectations:● instrument is semi-

structured● meets minimum number of

eight questions with minimum four open-ended questions

● questions rely heavily on a model questionnaire without addressing specific areas of the researcher’s project

Exceeds Expectations:● instrument is semi-

structured● includes questions covering

all stages of the researcher’s project life cycle: data management planning and practices before, during, and after

● questions combine model and self created questions based on the researcher’s project

Writing a Data Management Plan

Page 2: Midterm Project Grading Rubric

Needs Improvement:● data management plan is

less than two pages● does not provide a plan,

recommendation, tool, or resource for each of the questions covered in the students’ data interview instrument

Meet Expectations:● data management plan is

two pages● provides a plan,

recommendation, tool, or resource for each of the questions covered in the students’ data interview instrument

Exceeds Expectations:● data management plan is

two pages● provides a plan,

recommendation, tool, or resource for each of the questions covered in the students’ data interview instrument

● covers the management of the project’s data over its entire life cycle

Reflection Paper

Needs Improvement:● less than 3 pages● does not describe

experience creating interview instrument

● does not talk about experience with the interview process

● does not include all final written parts: interview instrument and DMP

Meets Expectations:● is in the 3-5 page range● briefly describes

experience creating interview instrument

● briefly talks about experience with the interview process

● includes all final written parts: interview instrument and DMP

Exceeds Expectations:● is in the 3-5 page range● fully describes

experience creating interview instrument

● fully talks about experience with the interview process

● includes all final written parts: interview instrument and DMP

No Assignment: 0 points Needs Improvement: 1-7 pointsMeet Expectations: 6-13 pointsExceeds Expectations: 14-20 points

Midterm Presentation Grading Rubric: 10 points

Presentation

Page 3: Midterm Project Grading Rubric

Needs Improvement:● difficult to follow and

understand● no logical progression● hard to hear or

understand speech with no eye contact

● no handouts● improper use of visuals● does not respond to

questions

Meet Expectations:● well thought out● good progression● clear speech with little eye

contact● some handouts provided● use of visuals● adequately answers

questions

Exceeds Expectations:● clear and well thought out● good progression● clear speech with eye

contact● handouts are provided● proper use of visuals● thoroughly answers

questions

No Presentation: 0 PointsNeeds Improvement: 1-3 pointsMeet Expectations: 4-7 pointsExceeds Expectations: 8-10 points