2

Click here to load reader

Michael de Percy Teaching Feedback 2004 2011

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

This is my teaching feedback from 2004-2011. Please note that the questionnaire changed in 2010, so my latest feedback will appear in a new file.

Citation preview

Page 1: Michael de Percy Teaching Feedback 2004 2011

Year Term Unit Role Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 Q10 Q11 Q12 Q13 Q14 Q15 Questions2004 S2 IP Tutor 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.0 4.0 4.6 4.1 4.0 4.0 4.2

2005 S1 SM Tutor 7.0 4.8 4.8 5.0 4.8 5.0 4.4 5.0 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.4 4.6 4.2

2005 S1 GBR Tutor 6.1 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.7 4.5 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.5

2005 S1 PDN Tutor 6.0 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.6 4.1 3.9 3.7 4.3 4.4 4.1 4.2

2005 S2 GBR Both 5.5 3.9 4.0 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.9 4.3 3.7 3.3 3.4 4.0 3.9 3.7 3.9

2006 S1 GBR Lecturer 5.3 4.0 3.9 4.4 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.6 3.9 4.0 3.6 3.6

2006 S2 LIC Lecturer 5.8 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.4 4.0 4.4 3.8 4.1 4.0 4.3 4.2 3.9 4.1

2007 S1 GBR Lecturer 6.0 5.8 5.7 6.3 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.5 5.2 5.7 5.7 5.3 5.0

2007 S2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.7 5.8 6.0 5.7 6.1 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.4 4.8 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.6

2008 S1 GBR Lecturer 5.8 5.7 5.6 6.1 5.6 6.3 5.5 5.3 5.1 5.5 5.0 5.6 5.7 5.5 4.6

2008 S2 LIC Lecturer 5.9 5.8 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.1 5.7 5.7 5.5 5.7 5.3 5.7 5.6 5.4 5.5

2009 S1 GBR Lecturer 5.9 6.0 5.8 6.4 5.4 5.9 5.5 5.0 5.4 5.5 5.4 5.8 5.7 5.5 5.3

2010 T1 GBR Lecturer 6.3 6.2 6.3 6.0 6.2 6.6 6.1 6.1 6.0 6.1 N/A 6.1 6.1 5.9 6.0

2010 T3 GBR Lecturer 6.1 6.0 6.0 6.2 5.9 6.4 5.9 6.0 5.9 6.0 N/A 5.9 5.9 5.9 6.0

2010 HKT4 GBR Lecturer 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2 N/A 6.2 6.2 6.2 6.2

2011 SGT1 LIC Lecturer 6.4 5.6 6.0 6.2 5.8 6.4 6.0 6.0 6.2 6.0 N/A 5.6 5.4 5.4 5.8

Legend: LIC = Leadership, Innovation & Change IP = International Politics

GBR= Government-Business Relations PDN = Politics of Developing Nations SM = Strategic Management

1.  All things considered, how would you rate the teaching of this lecturer in this unit?

2.  The lecturer made the objectives clear for each session.

3.  The lecturer was able to explain concepts clearly.

4.  The lecturer seemed well prepared for each session.

5.  The lecturer taught the unit matter in a way that helped me understand it.

6.  The lecturer tried to make the unit interesting.

7.  The lecturer demonstrated the relevance of the unit to the whole course.

8.  The lecturer made opportunities to ask questions.

9.  The lecturer was available for consultation.

10.   The lecturer made clear the criteria used to assess student work.

11.  The lecturer gave adequate feedback on assignments and other prescribed work.

12.   The unit covered what the unit description said it would.

13.   Assessment tasks set and/or exams were related to unit goals.

14.   Assessment tasks allowed me to demonstrate what I had learnt.

15.   The workload was comparable to other units at this level.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

Graph 1: Longitudinal Feedback Summary

IP s2 2004 SM s1 2005 GBR s1 2005 PDN s1 2005 GBR s2 2005 GBR s1 2006 LIC s2 2006 GBR s1 2007 LIC s2 2007 GBR s1 2008 LIC s2 2008 GBR s1 2009

GBR UCC T1 2010 GBR UCC T3 2010 LIC SG T1 2011

Question Number

Res

ult

ou

t o

f 7