27
STRUCTURAL FAILURE THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA , ITALY BY JIL SHETH UC5713

Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

STRUCTURAL FAILURE

THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA , ITALY

BY JIL SHETH

UC5713

Page 2: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• NAME OF STRUCTURE: TOWER OF PISA, THE LEANING TOWER OR BELL TOWER PISA , ITALY

• TYPE OF FALIURE: EXCESSIVE TILTING OF TOWER

• CAUSE :POOR SUBSOIL CONDITIONS

Page 3: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA IS PROBABLY THE MOST FAMOUS EXAMPLE OF PLACING A

STRUCTURE IN A VERY PROBLEMATIC LOCATION.

CONSTRUCTION WAS STARTED IN 1174 AND COMPLETED IN 1272.

Page 4: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

TECHNICAL INFORMATION• THE TOWER CURRENTLY STANDS

AT A HEIGHT OF 55.86 M (183.27 FT) ON THE LOW (SOUTH) SIDE AND 56.7 M (186.02 FT) ON THE HIGH (NORTH) SIDE.  THE WEIGHT OF THE TOWER IS ESTIMATED TO BE 16,000 TONS.  THE TOWER CURRENTLY LEANS AT AN ANGLE OF 3.97°, BUT LEANED AT AN ANGLE OF 5.5° PRIOR TO THE STABILIZATION EFFORTS IN THE LATE 20TH TO EARLY 21ST CENTURIES

Page 5: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

PIC SHOWS PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION OF LEANING TOWER OF PISA.

Page 6: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• THE TOWER IS 200 FT. HIGH. THE SKETCH IN NEXT SLIDE SHOWS THE SUBSOIL CONDITIONS BELOW THE TOWER TO A DEPTH OF ABOUT 150 FT. THE TOWER STARTED TO LEAN ALMOST IMMEDIATELY WITH THE HIGHEST RATE OF INCLINATION AROUND THE END OF THE 13TH. CENTURY.

Page 7: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure
Page 8: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

•  THE RATE OF LEANING HAS BEEN CONTINUOUSLY REDUCED SINCE THAT TIME. VARIOUS STABILIZING FEATURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED IN RECENT TIMES SUCH AS CONCRETE PUMPED INTO THE GROUND AND THE USE OF SUPPORT CABLES.

Page 9: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

CONSTRUCTION HISTORY• THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA IS PERHAPS THE MOST WELL-

KNOWN ARCHITECTURAL ODDITY IN THE WORLD.  THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE TOWER OCCURRED IN THREE PHASES, SPANNING NEARLY TWO CENTURIES, AS WAR AND SOCIAL UNREST MIRED THE CONSTRUCTION.  THE EVIDENT TILT OF THE TOWER WAS FIRST NOTICED DURING THE INITIAL PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION WHICH BEGAN IN 1173 AD.  ENGINEERS TRIED TO COMPENSATE FOR THE TILT BY MAKING THE COLUMNS AND ARCHES OF THE THIRD STORY SLIGHTLY TALLER ON THE SINKING SIDE; HOWEVER, POLITICAL UNREST HALTED CONSTRUCTION BEFORE THEY COULD CONTINUE TO THE FOURTH STORY.

Page 10: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

•  ADDITIONAL ADJUSTMENTS WERE ATTEMPTED ON THE FIFTH AND SIXTH STORIES, BUT CONSTRUCTION WAS ONCE AGAIN HALTED BEFORE THEY COULD CONTINUE TO THE SEVENTH.  NEARING THE COMPLETION OF THE TOWER IN 1372, THE BUILDERS MADE A FINAL ATTEMPT TO COMPENSATE FOR THE LEAN BY ANGLING THE EIGHTH (TOP) STORY BELL CHAMBER.  REGARDLESS OF THESE ATTEMPTS TO CORRECT FOR THE LEAN, THE TILT CONTINUED TO WORSEN THROUGHOUT THE CENTURIES.

Page 11: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• CAREFUL MONITORING, HOWEVER, DIDN’T BEGIN UNTIL 1911, WHEN MEASUREMENTS REVEALED THAT THE TOP OF THE TOWER WAS ACTUALLY MOVING AT A RATE OF AROUND 0.05 INCH A YEAR.  WHILE THE PERIODS OF UNREST WERE NO DOUBT A BANE TO THE TOWER BUILDERS, IT IS VERY LIKELY THAT HAD THESE CONSTRUCTION RESPITES NOT OCCURRED AND ALLOWED TIME FOR THE UNDERLYING SOILS TO SETTLE, THE TOWER WOULD HAVE TOPPLED WELL BEFORE COMPLETION.

Page 12: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

CAUSE OF LEANING

THE EXACT CAUSE OF THE TILT WAS NOT FULLY UNDERSTOOD UNTIL 2001, WHEN A SERIOUS STABILIZATION EFFORT (WHICH BEGAN IN THE 1990’S) WAS COMPLETED.  IT WAS KNOWN PRIOR TO THE START OF THIS STABILIZATION EFFORT THAT THE TOWER HAD BEEN BUILT ATOP AN INADEQUATE FOUNDATION (WHICH WAS ONLY 3 METERS THICK); AND WAS CONSTRUCTED ON VERY SOFT SILTY SOIL.  HAD THESE BEEN THE ONLY FACTORS AT WORK, UNIFORM SETTLEMENT OF THE TOWER COULD HAVE BEEN EXPECTED; AND THE CITY OF PISA WOULD PLAY HOST TO A SIGNIFICANTLY LESS FAMOUS (ALBEIT MORE VERTICAL) TOWER.

Page 13: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure
Page 14: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• THE 800 YEAR OLD MYSTERY WAS FINALLY SOLVED BY JOHN BURLAND, AN ENGLISH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, WHO DISCOVERED THAT THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF THE TILT WAS A FLUCTUATING WATER TABLE WHICH WOULD PERCH HIGHER ON THE TOWER’S NORTH SIDE, CAUSING THE TOWER’S CHARACTERISTIC SLANT TO THE SOUTH.

Page 15: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

ADDITIONAL CAUSES

• ENGINEERING WAS THROUGH TRAIL AND ERROR DUE TO LACK OF TECHNOLOGY THAT TIME

• THE FOUNDATION WAS POORLY CONSTRUCTED AND WAS ONLY THREE METERS THICK.

• IT WAS BUILT ON ANCIENT RIVERBED JUST 6 FT. ABOVE SEA LEVEL, MADE UP OF WEAK SAND AND CLAY.

• CONSTRUCTION WAS DONE IN MARBLE WHICH INCREASED SELF WEIGHT OF STRUCTURE.

• DUE TO ITS LEAN, CENTER OF GRAVITY SHIFTED CAUSING IT TO LEAN FURTHER.

Page 16: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

STABILIZATION EFFORTS

• THE LEANING TOWER OF PISA HAS UNDERGONE MANY REPAIRS AND RENOVATIONS DESIGNED TO KEEP IT STANDING DESPITE THE OBVIOUS TILT.  THE FIRST MODERN ATTEMPT AT STABILIZATION OF THE TOWER OCCURRED IN 1935, WHEN ENGINEERS ATTEMPTED TO SEAL THE BASE OF THE TOWER BY DRILLING A NETWORK OF HOLES INTO THE FOUNDATION AND THEN FILLING THEM WITH A CEMENT GROUT MIXTURE.  HOWEVER, THIS ONLY WORSENED THE PROBLEM BY SLIGHTLY INCREASING THE LEAN.  THE FAILED STABILIZATION DID RESULT IN MORE CAUTIOUS APPROACHES BY FUTURE PRESERVATION TEAMS.

Page 17: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• IN 1990, THE TOWER WAS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC AND APARTMENTS AND HOUSES IN THE PATH OF THE TOWER WERE VACATED FOR SAFETY.  THIS WAS PARTIALLY SPURRED BY THE ABRUPT COLLAPSE OF ANOTHER ITALIAN TOWER (CIVIC TOWER OF PAVIA) DUE TO MASONRY DEGRADATION.  CITY OFFICIALS WERE CONCERNED THAT IF THE TOWER OF PAVIA COULD COLLAPSE SIMPLY DUE TO MASONRY DEGRADATION, THEN COLLAPSE OF THE TOWER OF PISA, WITH ITS MORE THAN 5° TILT, MUST HAVE BEEN EMINENT.  IN 1991, AN INTERNATIONAL TEAM OF GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS, STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, AND HISTORIANS WERE GATHERED IN AN ATTEMPT TO SAVE THE FAMOUS LANDMARK. 

Page 18: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• STILL, DENIZENS OF THE CITY CONSIDERED IT VERY IMPORTANT TO RETAIN THE TILT OF THE TOWER, DUE TO THE ROLE THAT THIS ELEMENT PLAYED IN PROMOTING THE TOURISM INDUSTRY OF PISA.  THE PRESERVATION TEAM (LED BY JOHN BURLAND) FINALLY TOOK ACTION IN 1992 WHEN THE FIRST STORY WAS BRACED WITH STEEL TENDONS, TO RELIEVE THE STRAIN ON THE VULNERABLE MASONRY; AND IN 1993 WHEN 600 TONS OF LEAD INGOTS WERE STACKED AROUND THE BASE OF THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TOWER TO COUNTERWEIGHT THE LEAN.  WHILE THE PRESERVATION TEAM ASSURED CITY OFFICIALS THAT THESE WERE ONLY TEMPORARY MEASURES UNTIL A PERMANENT SOLUTION COULD BE FOUND, THE MOVES INFURIATED THE GENERAL PUBLIC OF PISA WHO VIEWED THE MEASURES AS EYESORES THAT WOULD BE ANOTHER BLOW TO THE TOURISM INDUSTRY, WHICH HAD ALREADY DECLINED BY ABOUT 45 PERCENT SINCE THE TOWER HAD BEEN CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC.

Page 19: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

•  IN RESPONSE, IN 1995, THE TEAM OPTED FOR 10 UNDERGROUND STEEL ANCHORS, TO INVISIBLY YANK THE TOWER NORTHWARDS.  HOWEVER, THIS ONLY SERVED TO BRING THE TOWER CLOSER TO COLLAPSE THAN EVER BEFORE.  THE ANCHORS WERE TO BE INSTALLED, 40 METERS DEEP, FROM TENSIONED CABLES CONNECTED TO THE TOWER’S BASE.  IN VIEW OF PISA’S HIGH WATER-TABLE, THE TEAM FROZE THE UNDERLYING GROUND WITH LIQUID NITROGEN BEFORE ANY ANCHORS WERE INSTALLED, TO PROTECT THEIR EXCAVATIONS FROM FLOODING.  HOWEVER, IT WAS NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT THAT WATER EXPANDS WHEN IT FREEZES.  THE GROUNDWATER PUSHED UP BENEATH THE TOWER AND, ONCE THE FREEZING HAD CEASED, CREATED GAPS FOR FURTHER SETTLEMENT OF THE TOWER.

Page 20: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

•  ON THE NIGHT OF SEPTEMBER 7, 1995, THE TOWER LURCHED SOUTHWARDS BY MORE THAN IT HAD DONE IN THE ENTIRE PREVIOUS YEAR.  THE TEAM WAS SUMMONED FOR AN EMERGENCY MEETING AND THE ANCHOR PLAN WAS IMMEDIATELY ABANDONED AND ANOTHER 300 TONS OF LEAD INGOTS WERE ADDED IN A DESPERATE ATTEMPT TO PREVENT THE LOSS OF THE TOWER.

Page 21: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure
Page 22: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• CONSENSUS WITHIN THE PRESERVATION TEAM DID NOT COME EASY, BUT ALL EVENTUALLY AGREED THAT SOIL EXTRACTION WAS THE ONLY VIABLE SOLUTION THAT WOULD BE ACCEPTABLE TO ALL CONCERNED PARTIES, AS IT HAD THE ADVANTAGE OF NOT TOUCHING THE TOWER ITSELF, THEREBY PLACATING THE ART HISTORIANS.  THE PROCESS INVOLVED THE INSTALLATION OF HELICAL DRILLS SURROUNDED BY HOLLOW STEEL CASINGS TO REMOVE SOIL FROM BELOW THE HIGH NORTH SIDE OF THE TOWER.  THIS WOULD CREATE A CONDITION OF CONTROLLED, LOCALIZED, SUBSIDENCE; AND ALLOW GRAVITY TO COAX THE STRUCTURE BACK UPRIGHT.

Page 23: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• WORK BEGAN IN 1999 AND HALTED IN 2001 AFTER APPROXIMATELY 77 TONS OF SOIL HAD BEEN REMOVED AND THE TOWER HAD BEEN STRAIGHTENED BY 44 CENTIMETERS, RETURNING TO ITS 1838 INCLINATION.  WHILE MORE SOIL COULD HAVE BEEN REMOVED, THE SOIL EXTRACTION PROGRAM REDUCED THE STRESS ON THE VULNERABLE FIRST STORY ENOUGH TO BE SAFE, YET ALSO MAINTAINED THE DISTINCTIVE LEAN OF THE LANDMARK.  THE TEAM ESTIMATED THAT IT WOULD TAKE APPROXIMATELY 200 YEARS FOR THE TOWER TO RETURN TO ITS PRE-STABILIZATION INCLINATION, AND THE TOWER WAS REOPENED TO THE PUBLIC IN DECEMBER 2001.

Page 24: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• IN 2003, MR. BURLAND INTRODUCED A NEW DRAINAGE SYSTEM BENEATH THE PIAZZA’S NORTH SIDE; UPON DISCOVERING THAT THE ROOT CAUSE OF THE LEAN WAS A PERCHED WATER TABLE UPON THE UPPER SILT LAYER BELOW THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TOWER, WHICH FLUCTUATED DURING THE RAINY SEASON, SOMETIMES COMING WITHIN 12 INCHES OF THE SURFACE.  THE NEW DRAINAGE SYSTEM ADDRESSED THIS CONDITION, AND IS HOPED TO PERMANENTLY ALLEVIATE ADDITIONAL MOVEMENT. 

Page 25: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure
Page 26: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

• THE INCLINATION CONTINUES TO BE MONITORED DAILY AND REVEALED THAT THE TOWER DID NOT MOVE AT ALL BETWEEN 2003 AND 2009.  THIS IS THE FIRST TIME IN ITS HISTORY THAT MOVEMENT OF THE TOWER HAS COMPLETELY CEASED.  THUS, THE TOWER HAS BEEN DEEMED SAFER THAN EVER, LIKELY TO THE CHAGRIN OF TOURISTS HOPEFUL TO HAVE BEEN PRESENT WHEN THE TOWER FINALLY TOOK THE PLUNGE.

Page 27: Leaning tower of pisa; structural faliure

THANK YOU!