Upload
kamal-vora
View
502
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Lecture SeriesKNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENTLecture Series
VRDE, Ahmednagar
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Dr K C Vora
Why KM?Change is AcceleratingChange is Accelerating
1618
Optical
121416
pNetwork Speeddoubles every 8months
68
10 Storagecapacitydoubles every
246 12 months
Computingpower doubles
00 6 12 18 24 30 36
every 18months
dot COM storage requirements double every 90 days
What is KM? An Enterprise Perspective
The strategies, processes, and technologies employed to enable anenterprise to acquire, create, share, and make actionable theknowledge needed to achieve mission objectivesknowledge needed to achieve mission objectives
Influences
EnablingTechnologiesand Processes
CoPsLeadership
Best PracticeDBs
Strategy
DBs
KM Process
StrategyReward &Recognition
Framework
KM Enablers
Knowledge-Enabled Outcome States
State 2Harvesting the Benefits
State 1Fostering Knowledge Development
State 0Where We Were
State “V”Ultimate Vision
KM Targets
Enterprise Processes
K l d Di
DevelopmentCommon KM Understanding
Center Pilots
Ad Hoc Processes
Local Initiatives
Di t Vi f
Embedded KM
Known Knowledge Discovery
Tool/Process integration
Knowledge Creation
Consolidated Resource View
Greater Tool Standardization
Disparate Views of Resources
Low Tool Standardization
Knowledge Value
Pervasive Infrastructure
Innovative OutcomesKnowledge Creation and Re-use Impact
Standardization
Knowledge-Sharing
Collaboration Valued
Innovative Outcomes
Knowledge Management Capability Maturity Model (KM CMM)Capability Maturity Model (KM CMM)
Level 5: Optimizing• Business process alignment• Process change management
Where we want to
be
Level 4: Managed• Integrated knowledge processes• Quantitative process management
g g
p g
Where we aregoing
‘01
Level 3: Defined• Organizational processes • Knowledge mapping• Intergroup coordination • Training program
Where
Level 2: Repeatable• Program planning • Content QA process• Requirements process • KFP identification
Intergroup coordination Training program
Wherewe are
‘00Level 1: Initial• Adhoc processes• Partial technical infrastructure
Level 0:Not Practiced• Failure to perform KM• Culture counter to learning, sharing
Stages of KM Implementation
Develop interest andenthusiasmNo formal business
Select pilots oridentify grass
Scale up; buildcapabilityBusiness caseand measuresbecome moreformal
KM embedded inbusiness model
Support pilotsBusiness case ispotential gainNo formal business
case; belief in thevalueDefine KM in termspeople understandCapitalize on intranetUnderstand
identify grassroot effortsBusinessobjectives arespecific to pilotsForm a cross-functional KM
KM coordinationteamIdentify roles andresources for theKM functionEstablish awardsand recognition
OrganizationalalignmentProject work withactivity andknowledge basesupport
from pilotsShare pilotlessons learnedDevelop methodologiesthat can bereplicatedUnderstand
organizationalreadiness
u ct o atask force
and recognitionStandards
Pilot PathStrategic
Pilots
OpportunisticPilots
Improve
Expand
Disengage
Way ofdoingbusiness
Decision
replicated
g g
Process
Expertise & KnowledgeKnowledge Discovery
KNOWLEDGEINFORMATION
KnowledgeRequirement
Customer(s)
Knowledge TeamFormation
INFRASTRUCTURE(KII)
Customer(s)
Knowledge Creation
Knowledge Delivery
ToR KM
TERMS OF REFERENCETERMS OF REFERENCE
FOR FOR
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENTKNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
BACKGROUND
• For any company knowledge is core of all its activities. A knowledge management system is to identify,
t t di t ib t d bl d ti create, represent, distribute and enable adoption ‘what it knows’ and ‘how it knows it’.
• Proper system for knowledge management is essential Proper system for knowledge management is essential to avoid re-inventing the wheel and to go forward to higher levels from the existing levels in a quick and efficient way efficient way.
• Presently, the knowledge management is in formative stages. It will be better if a proper system of g p p yknowledge management is thought about and implemented as early as possible in order to meet the immediate target of changing the pattern of work –immediate target of changing the pattern of work to go to more of R&D from certification.
OBJECTIVES
• To establish and implement a system of To establish and implement a system of knowledge management in the shortest possible time – by the year 2010 a basic possible time by the year 2010 a basic system and by year 2012 an advanced working systemworking system.
12
SCOPE1. To identify fields where the knowledge management system
should be established and their priorities.
2. In each field, identify implicit (tacit) and explicit (codified)knowledge areas and generate appropriate methodology forcapturing them.
(Implicit or tacit knowledge is often subconscious, internalized, andthe individual may or may not be aware of what he or she knows andy yhow he or she accomplishes particular results.
At the opposite end of the spectrum is explicit or codified knowledgeh h f k l d h h d d l h ld l l dwhich is often a knowledge that the individual holds explicitly and
consciously in mental focus and may communicate to others throughemail, proposals, PPT, PDF, technical papers, reports, softwares, etc.
In the popular form of the distinction, implicit knowledge is what is inour heads, and explicit knowledge is what we have codified).
SCOPE (Contd..)3. To train the personnel in knowledge sharing and knowledge
management and generate an atmosphere of openness to takeup the activity of knowledge management.up the activity of knowledge management.
4. Generate suitable formats for documentation – this may bedifferent for different areas and fields and finalize themdifferent for different areas and fields, and finalize themafter periodic review and discussions.
5 Establish a system for multi disciplinary activities5. Establish a system for multi-disciplinary activities.
6. Generate a suitable system of consolidation, storage andi l i b h h d / f iretrieval – using both hardware/software expertise,
consultancy, etc. for different areas and fields.
7. Create an appropriate search engine for storage andretrieval.
SCOPE (Contd..)G bl d l f8. Generate a suitable and appropriate control strategy foraccess of this information to various levels of personnel.
9. Benchmarking of knowledge management in R&D Companies.
10. Establish a mechanism for operating the ‘Knowledge10. Establish a mechanism for operating the KnowledgeManagement System’ : defining stakeholders, roles,responsibilities.
11. Making of resource, financial and quality plans.
12 Finalizing work break down structure and schedules12. Finalizing work break-down structure and schedules.
13. Establish a system of periodic review against time targetsd ti d d ti f th tand corrective measures and updating of the system.
CURRENTLY IDENTIFIED AREAScorporate pMemory
Search engine
Bench A d
Library -Knowledge
Centre
Bench Marking
IT Quality
Academy -Education
ARAI KM
IT Manage-
ment
P j t HR &
Quality Manage-
ment
KM Project Manage-ment &
LessionsLearnt
HR & Perform-
anceManage-
ment
Asset Manage-
ment
Certifica-R&D and
Seminar & Confe-rences
tion & Services
Legal & Intellec-
tualProperty
R&D and Techno-
logy
ACTIONS REQUIRED
HOW TO GO ABOUT HOW TO GO ABOUT AND
WISH LISTWISH LIST
FOR
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT
Knowledge Identifiction
KNOW-HOW SKILLSExplicit knowledge Tacit knowledge
Formalized and Specialized Acquired with practiceAdaptable
Explicitable or non-explicitableData, procedures, models, algorithms, People’s abilities, professional knack, Data, procedures, models, algorithms,
documents of analysis & synthesis, drawings..People s abilities, professional knack,
private knowledge..
Heterogeneous, incomplete or redundant, Often marked by circumstances of it’s creation
D t “ k d ”
Often transmitted orally and tacitly according to a Master- to- Apprentice b h iDoes not express “unspoken words” behaviour
Disseminated Located
ll d h f d d d l dAll stored in archives, cabinets, software systems and individual’s mind.Characterizes a company capability to design, produce, sell & support its product and/or services.
Representative of the company experience and culture.
T
Knowledge Conversion…..To
Tacit Knowledge Explicit Knowledge
…..From
Socialization Externalization
Tacit Knowledge
Explicit Knowledge Internalization CombinationExplicit Knowledge
Conduct Competency Mapping Conduct Competency Mapping (Example Engine Testing)(Example Engine Testing)
Instrumentation Knowledge
(Example Engine Testing)(Example Engine Testing)
8
10n Knowledge
Engine Knowledge
Knowledge of Emission
Parameters4 8
8
4
Engine Test Report
Parameters
8
54
6 0Engine
InstallationTest Report /Calculation
55
Engine TestingTest Analysis
Knowledge of Test Standards
Conduct Competency Mapping Conduct Competency Mapping (Example Engine Design)(Example Engine Design)( p g g )( p g g )
Prepare Technology Road Map (Example Engine Development Lab)(E amp Eng n D opm nt La )
• Engine • Engine design P t fl
CNG E4• Manifold
Injection
Fuel CellsLPG/CNG E3
• TBI
Engine upgradation by system design
• Engine design from concept
• Port flow simulation
HCCI Combustion
HCNG• Lean burn• Sequential Injection
Hydrogen E5• Lean burn
• EDC 1100 bar
• Rotary FIE 700 bar
• TCIC • 4V CRS 1600 bar
E 4 - 50 kW / l E 5 - 75 kW / l• CRS 1800 /2000
bar• Cooled
EGR, DPF
CC Co bust o
C S 600 ba• VNT, Cooled
EGR, DOC, DPF• BMEP 16 bar
E 3 DevE 2 Dev E 4 Dev • DeNOx• Variable swirl
Performance Simulation
Hydraulic Simulation
CFD Vehicle cycle simulation
Combustion simulation
Chemical kinetics
2000 2004 2006 2008 2010 20122002 2014
KM ArchitectureUser Interface
Knowledge Applications
Knowledge Application
Search Engines
Knowledge MapApplication Architecture
Storageg
Pl tf /N t k S iEnterprise
Platform/Network ServicesInfrastructure
Decide Knowledge Discovery Tools
Sources
Summarize(WebSumm)Disseminate/
Retrieve
Collect
Extract(Alembic) Translate
Retrieve(TIDES, QANDA)
Collect (CyberTrans)Monitor(SIAM)
Finance Energy Trans. Telecomm Z-Ave
Cluster/MineCollaborate Browse/Visualize Cluster/Mine(QueryFlocks)
Collaborate(KEAN, Scout, ExpertFinde
r, XperNET)(GeoNODE)
Detect, Translate, Extract, SummarizeToday is a significant day in the history of our national liberation struggle, it marks the end of a year during which we have resisted and fought against the biggest ever offensive operation launched by the Sri Lankan
•Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE)
ever offensive operation launched by the Sri Lankan armed forces code named "Jayasikuru”...
•Sri Lanka•Velupillai Pirapaharan•Rebellion
Org Leader HQ LossesSinhala Kumaratunga 3000LTTE Pirapaharan Wanni 1300
The objective of the Sinhala chauvinists was to utilize maximum man power and fire power to destroy the military capability of the LTTE and to bring an end to the Tamil freedom movement.
Tamil documentg
Before the launching of the operation "Jayasikuru" the Sri Lankan political and military high command miscalculated the military strength and determination of the LTTE.
Vision: Ask Questions, Get Answers
Multilingual,M lti diMultilingual,M lti di
Question: What type of coating on the piston skirt should be used? Question: What type of coating on the piston skirt should be used?
Multimedia,Multiparty Resources
Multimedia,Multiparty Resources
Answer: KS uses LofriKS and NanofriKSAnswer: KS uses LofriKS and NanofriKS
Today
Answer: KS uses LofriKS and NanofriKScoatings on the skirt. Both uses PAI (Polyamideimide) with graphite fillers. In NanofriKS, TiO2 & ZnS nanoparticles are used.
Answer: KS uses LofriKS and NanofriKScoatings on the skirt. Both uses PAI (Polyamideimide) with graphite fillers. In NanofriKS, TiO2 & ZnS nanoparticles are used.
Today
Documents, Not answersDocuments, Not answers
TomorrowAnswers & Drill downAnswers & Drill down
Search Engine Indexing/Keywords (Example)( p )
Engine System / Part NameCylinder Block
Cylinder Head
G k tGaskets
Piston Assembly
Con Rod Assembly
Crankshaft
Flywheel
Balancer Shaft & TV Damper
Bearings & Bushes
Valve Train
Timing Gear
Engine Mounts
Cooling System
Lubricating Systemg y m
Fuel Injection System
Turbocharger
EGR
AlternatorAlternator
Starter
Exhaust System
After Treatment Devices
Expert Discovery• Find global Experts
– quickq– accurate– comprehensivep
• Challenge: Overcome limitations of manually managed skills/expertise databases managed skills/expertise databases (e.g. Dataware - experts self nominate)– incomplete incomplete – expensive– out of date– out of date
Expertise Management ArchitectureResources
E-dB
Finder
Services
ServiceBroker
MII
Qualification
Selection
WWW
Q&A
Registration
Q
FinderAgencies
Consulting
Q
ConsultingGroups
Expert Finder (Example)
Goal: Place a user within one ph n ll f n xp t
IntegratedE l
User Issues Simple
Results of Expert Finder Query: HR Expert
phone call of an expert
EmployeesRanked by
EmployeeDatabase
Simple Query
Results of Expert Finder Query: HR Expert•N.V.Marathe, Dy Director•Dr. M.V. Uchgaonkar, Asst. Director•Y.K.Upadhyay, Manager
Name: Uchgaonkar M.V. Dr.Phone: 30231210Email: [email protected]: PAHID N
Ranked by Mentions
ID.No.:
Uchgaonkar M.V. Dr.
Mentions of Employee inCorporate
“Dealing with Performance” by Dr. Mohan V. Uchgaonkar, AD – PAH, The Indian Express (Pune Edition), 04 Dec 2008.
Communications
Enterprise EmployeeProject Database
Relevant EmployeePublications
Evaluation
• Compare performance of ExpertFinder with (20) expert human resource managers
• Task: Find top 5 corporate experts in a given domain
• Measures– Agreement among humans– Agreement of machine with human(s)
• PrecisionR ll• Recall
• Chance: # experts/450 employees = often less than 1%less than 1%.
The ExpertFinder QuestionnaireI am performing an experiment. Your participation will remain anonymous if you so desire and should only take a few short minutes. Please answer the following questions (preferably without any assistance, but if you use assistance indicate what kind you used):
1. Who are the top 5 "data mining" experts at ARAI (List them in rank order, most expert first. List as many as you can but no more than 5)?
assistance indicate what kind you used):
List as many as you can but no more than 5)?2. the top 5 “marketing" experts? 3. the top 5 “design" experts? 4. the top 5 “development" experts? 5. the top 5 “testing" experts?6. the top 5 “Report/Paper writing" experts? p p p g p7. the top 5 “review" experts?8. What is your department’s top area of expertise (in a few
words) and who do you consider to be the top 5 people in the words) and who do you consider to be the top 5 people in the company in your area of expertise?
Cooperative Searching
Hypothesis
Group (coordinated) searching can be more effective p ( ) gthan multiple (independent) searchers working
autonomously
Collaborative Virtual Workplace
Lessons Learned• People, and the cultures that influence their behaviors, are the
single most critical resource for successful knowledge creation, dissemination, and application. dissemination, and application. Understand and influence them.
• Cognitive, social, and organizational learning processes are essential to the success of a knowledge management strategyessential to the success of a knowledge management strategy.Lets focus our strategy on enhancing these processes.
• Measurement, benchmarking, and incentives are essential to l h l i d d i l l h accelerate the learning process and to drive cultural change.
Lets create a tailored balanced scorecard to target what you want to improve.y p
• Knowledge management programs can yield impressive benefits to individuals and organizations if they are purposeful, concrete andaction-oriented. Lets make ours so.
Some Grand Challenges• User, Group and Organization Modeling,
including knowledge, beliefs, goals and plans• Universal knowledge access independent of
user physical, perceptual and cultural h t i ticharacteristics
• Organizational strategies for knowledge sh insharing
• Knowledge strategies in global, multicultural enterprisesenterprises
• Security & Access.
Words of “Wisdom”
• In times of profound change • In times of profound change, learners inherit the Earth, while
the learned find themselves beautifully equipped to deal with beautifully equipped to deal with
a world that no longer exists.
• Strategy
REFERENCES
• StrategyPeter Senge“Learning Organizations”
• ProcessTakeuchi and NonakaTakeuchi and Nonaka“Organizational Knowledge
Creation”
• BenchmarkingNorton and Kaplan“Balanced Scorecard”
THANK YOU.