73
ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF LEARNING OUTCOMES UNDER THE K to 12 BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM MERCY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC. Caloocan City Professional Education Presented by: CHRISTIAN D. EVANGELISTA MARIANNE T. EVANGELISTA, MSHRM

K to12 assessment and rating

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

k-12

Citation preview

Page 1: K to12 assessment and rating

ASSESSMENT AND RATING OF LEARNING OUTCOMES UNDER THE

K to 12 BASIC EDUCATION CURRICULUM

DIVINE MERCY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC. Caloocan City

Professional Education

Presented by:CHRISTIAN D. EVANGELISTAMARIANNE T. EVANGELISTA, MSHRM

Page 2: K to12 assessment and rating

DepEd ORDER No. 73 S. 2012General Guidelines for the Assessment and

Rating of Learning Outcomes

• Effective School Year () 2012-2013, the standards-based assessment and rating system shall be implemented to support the progressive roll-out starting with grades 1 and 7 of the K to 12 Basic Education Curriculum in public and private elementary and secondary schools nationwide.

Page 3: K to12 assessment and rating

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

• Philosophy of Assessment• Nature of Assessment and Its

Purpose• Levels of Assessment• Assessment Tools• Levels of Proficiency and

Equivalent Numeric Value• Rating System• Assessment Rubric• Frequency of Assessment

Page 4: K to12 assessment and rating

WHAT IS “K TO 12

PROGRAM”?

Page 5: K to12 assessment and rating

K TO 12 PROGRAM• The K to 12 Program covers: • Kindergarten and 12 years of basic

education (six years of primary education, four years of Junior High School, and two years of Senior High School [SHS]) 

Page 6: K to12 assessment and rating

A. PHILOSOPHY

• Assessment shall be used primarily as a quality assurance tool to track student progress in the attainment of standards, promote self-reflection and personal accountability for one’s learning, and provide a basis for the profiling of student performance

Page 7: K to12 assessment and rating

B. NATURE AND PURPOSE

OF ASSESSMENT• Assessment shall be holistic, with

emphasis on the formative or developmental purpose of quality assuring student learning.

• It also standards-based as it seeks to ensure that teachers will teach to the standards and students will aim to meet or even exceed the standards.

• The students’ attainment of standards in terms of content and performance is, therefore, a critical evidence of learning.

Page 8: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 9: K to12 assessment and rating

LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE AND UNDERSTANDING

Page 10: K to12 assessment and rating

C. LEVELS OF ASSESSMENT

• The attainment of learning outcomes as defined in the standards shall be the basis for the quality assurance of learning using formative assessments.

• They shall also be the focus of the summative assessments and shall be the basis for grading at the end of instruction.

Page 11: K to12 assessment and rating

LEVEL OF LEARNING OUTCOMES

• Knowledge • Process or Skill• Understanding• Products and

Performances

– The levels of Assessment are defined as follows:

Page 12: K to12 assessment and rating

KNOWLEDGE

• The substantive content of the curriculum, the facts and information that the student acquires

Page 13: K to12 assessment and rating

PROCESS • Skills or

cognitive operations that the student performs on facts and information for the purpose of constructing meanings or understandings.

Page 14: K to12 assessment and rating

UNDERSTANDING(S)

• Enduring big ideas, principles and generalizations inherent to the discipline, which may be assessed using the facets of understanding which may be specific to the discipline

Page 15: K to12 assessment and rating

PRODUCTS / PERFORMANCES

• Real-life application of understanding as evidenced by the student’s performance of authentic tasks.

Page 16: K to12 assessment and rating

LEVELS OF ASSESSMENT

These levels shall be the outcomes reflected in the class record and shall be given corresponding percentage weights as follows:LEVEL OF ASSESSMENT

PERCENTAGE WEIGHT

Knowledge 15%

Process or Skills 25%

Understanding (s)

30%

Products / Performances

30%

TOTAL = 100%

Page 17: K to12 assessment and rating

ASSESSMENT TOOLSKNOWLEDG

EPROCESS /

SKILLSUNDERSTA

NDINGSPRODUCTS

& PERFORMA

NCESTraditional Tools: Transform a

Textual Presentation into a Diagram

Facets of Understandings

Authentic products or performance tasks that a student is expected to do to

Paper and Pencil Tests

~ Outline, Organize, Analyze, Interpret, Translate, Convert or Express Information

~ Self Knowledge

Demonstrate his or her understanding.

~ Multiple Choice

~ Flow Chart ~ Empathy ~ Self Understanding

~ True or False ~ Construct Graphs

~ Perspective ~ Self Monitoring

~ Matching Type

~ Graphic Organizers

~ Explanation ~ Self Assessment

~ Constructed Response Tests

~ Draw Analogies

~ Interpretation

~ Permit choices of combinations of oral, written, visual and kinesthetic modes

Page 18: K to12 assessment and rating

LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

AND ITSEQUIVALENT

NUMERICAL VALUE

Page 19: K to12 assessment and rating

The performance of the students shall be described in the report card, based on the following levels of proficiency

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

Beginning (B)

Developing (D)

Approaching Proficiency (AP)

Proficient (P)

Advanced (A)

Page 20: K to12 assessment and rating

While, the level proficiency shall be based on a numerical value which arrived form summing up the results of the student’s performance on the various level of assessment. EQUIVALENT

NUMERICAL VALUE 74% and Below

75 - 79%

80 - 84%

85 - 89%

90% and Above

Page 21: K to12 assessment and rating

LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

Page 22: K to12 assessment and rating

LEVELS OF PROFICIENCY

Page 23: K to12 assessment and rating

FEED BACK

• Results of the assessment across levels should be fed back immediately to the students, so that they know what to improve further, and then they can plan strategically how they can address any learning deficiency

Page 24: K to12 assessment and rating

PROTOTYPE RUBRICS FOR THE

DIFFERENT LEVELS OF

ASSESSMENT

Page 25: K to12 assessment and rating

WHAT IS RUBRIC:• A rubric is a guideline for rating

student performance.

• It must define the range of possible performance levels. 

• Within this range, there are different levels of performance which are organized from the lowest level to the highest level of performance. 

• Usually, a scale of possible points is associated with the continuum in which the highest level receives the greatest number of points and the lowest level of performance receives the fewest points.

Page 26: K to12 assessment and rating

BENEFITS OF RUBRIC

–The rubric provides assessment with exactly the characteristics for each level of performance on which the students and the teacher should base their judgment.   –The rubric provides the

students with clear information about how well they performed and what they need to accomplish in the future to better their performance.

Page 27: K to12 assessment and rating

RUBRICS CRITERIA & PERCENTAGE

CRITERIA PERCENTAGE

Knowledge 15%Skills 25%Understanding (s)

30%

Transfer of Understanding

30%

TOTAL:

100%

Page 28: K to12 assessment and rating

LEARNING OUTCOME #O1KNOWLEDGE

Page 29: K to12 assessment and rating

PAPER AND PENCIL INSTRUMENTS

• Paper-and-pencil instruments refer to a general group of assessment tools in which candidates read questions and respond in writing.

• This includes tests, such as knowledge and ability tests, and inventories, such as personality and interest inventories.

Page 30: K to12 assessment and rating

MOST COMMON RESPONSE

FORMATS ARE:1. MULTIPLE CHOICE2. TRUE OR FALSE3. MATCHING TYPE4. IDENTIFICATION5. CONSTRUCTED

RESPONSE / ESSAY

Page 31: K to12 assessment and rating

A. KNOWLEDGE (15%)

Page 32: K to12 assessment and rating

LEARNING OUTCOME #O2

SKILLS

Page 33: K to12 assessment and rating

TRANSFORM TEXTUAL PRESENTATION INTO A

DIAGRAM• Outline, Organize, Analyze,

Interpret, Translate, Convert or Express Information by using:

1. Flow Chart2. Graphs3. Analogies4. Graphic Organizers

Page 34: K to12 assessment and rating

PROTOTYPE PIE GRAPH

Result of Midterm Exam

PERCENTAGE LEVEL OF PRO-FICIENCY

B

D

AP

P

A

30%

10%5%

15%

40%

LEGEND

Page 35: K to12 assessment and rating

B. SKILLS (25%)

Page 36: K to12 assessment and rating

CONTINUATION:

Page 37: K to12 assessment and rating

CONTINUATION: #02

Page 38: K to12 assessment and rating

CONTINUATION: #03

Page 39: K to12 assessment and rating

PROTOTYPE ASSESSMENT MATRIX FOR

“TLE” (Technology Livelihood

Education)

Page 40: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 41: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 42: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 43: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 44: K to12 assessment and rating

BASIS FOR PROMOTION AND RETENTION

LEVEL OF PROFICIENCY

EQUIVALENT NUMERICAL

VALUE Beginning (B)

74% and Below

Developing (D)

75 - 79%

Approaching Proficiency (AP)

80 - 84%

Proficient (P)

85 - 89%

Advanced (A)

90% and Above

Page 45: K to12 assessment and rating

PROMOTION AND RETENTION

• Promotion and Retention of students shall be by subject

• Students whose proficiency level is Beginning (B) at the end of the quarter or grading period shall be required to undergo remediation after class hours so that they can immediately catch up as they move to the next grading period

• If by the end of school year, the students are still at the Beginning level, then they shall be required to take summer classes

Page 46: K to12 assessment and rating

RATING SYSTEM

Page 47: K to12 assessment and rating

LEARNING OUTCOME #O3

UNDERSTANDING

Page 48: K to12 assessment and rating

UNDERSTANDING• Understanding as

expressed using any three of the six facets of understanding

• The facets are explained (adapted from the paper, “Understanding by Design Framework in the Philippines” by Mc Tighe and Grant Wiggins, p.5)

Page 49: K to12 assessment and rating

FACETS OF UNDERSTANDING

CONCEPT

EXPLAIN

INTERPRE

T

APPLY

PERSPECTI

VE

EMPATHY

SELF KNO

WLEDGE

Page 50: K to12 assessment and rating

FACET # 01 “EXPLANATION”• Concepts,

principles, and processes by putting them in their own words, teaching them to others, justifying their answers and showing their reasoning.

Page 51: K to12 assessment and rating

• By making sense of data, text, and experience through images, analogies, stories and models;

FACET # 02 “INTERPRETATION”

Page 52: K to12 assessment and rating

• Effectively using and adapting what they know in new and complex texts

FACET # 03 “APPLICATION”

Page 53: K to12 assessment and rating

• Demonstrate perspective by seeing the big picture and recognizing different points of view.

FACET # 04 “PERSPECTIVE”

Page 54: K to12 assessment and rating

FACET # 05 “EMPATHY”• Display

empathy by perceiving sensitively and putting one’s self in someone else’s shoes;

Page 55: K to12 assessment and rating

• Have self knowledge by showing met cognitive awareness, using productive habits of mind and reflecting on the meaning of the learning and experience.

FACET # 06 “SELF KNOWLEDGE”

Page 56: K to12 assessment and rating

UNDERSTANDING MAYBE ASSESSED BASED ON THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA

Page 57: K to12 assessment and rating

Continuation:

Page 58: K to12 assessment and rating

LEARNING OUTCOME #O4

PRODUCT / PERFORMANCES

Page 59: K to12 assessment and rating

TRANSFER OF UNDERSTANDING

• Transfer of understanding to life situations maybe assessed as demonstrated through the following:

1. PRODUCTS – Outputs which are reflective of learner’s creative application of understanding;

2. PERFORMANCES – skillful exhibition or creative execution of a process, reflective of masterful application of learning or understanding.

Page 60: K to12 assessment and rating

STUDENT IS EXPECTED TO DEMONSTRATE

HIS/HER UNDERSTANDING BY

MEANS OF: • Self Understanding• Self Monitoring• Self Assessment

Page 61: K to12 assessment and rating

SELF UNDERSTANDING• Also known

as Self knowledge

• Is the ability to understand one's own actions

Page 62: K to12 assessment and rating

SELF MONITORING

• Used in behavioral management where a person will keep a record of behavior patterns.

• A personality trait for the ability to change behavior in response to different situations.

Page 63: K to12 assessment and rating

• It is the process of gathering information about yourself in order to make an informed career decision.

• A self assessment should include a look at the following: values, interests, personality, and skills.

SELF ASSESSMENT

Page 64: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 65: K to12 assessment and rating
Page 66: K to12 assessment and rating

Continuation:

Page 67: K to12 assessment and rating

PROTOTYPE FORMATIVE

AND SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

TOOLS

Page 68: K to12 assessment and rating

PRE ASSESSMENT TOOL

• Pre-assessment allows the teacher and student to discover what is already known in a specific topic or subject.

• It is critical to recognize prior knowledge so students can engage in questioning, formulating, thinking and theorizing in order to construct new knowledge appropriate to their level.

Page 69: K to12 assessment and rating

PROTOTYPE PRE-ASSESSMENT TOOL

Page 70: K to12 assessment and rating

FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT

• The goal of formative assessment is to gather feedback that can be used by the instructor and the students to guide improvements in the ongoing teaching and learning context. These are low stakes assessments for students and instructors.

Examples:1. Asking students to submit

one or two sentences identifying the main point of

a lecture2. Have students submit an

outline for a paper.3. Early course evaluations4. Giving quizzes to check

student understanding

Page 71: K to12 assessment and rating

SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT

• The goal of summative assessment is to measure the level of success or proficiency that has been obtained at the end of an instructional unit, by comparing it against some standard or benchmark.

• The outcome of a summative assessment can be used formatively, however, when students or faculty take the results and use them to guide their efforts and activities in subsequent courses.

• Examples of summative assessments include:

a midterm exam a final project a paper a senior recital

Page 72: K to12 assessment and rating

PROTOTYPE SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENT TOOL

THROUGH AUTHENTIC PERFORMANCE TASK

Page 73: K to12 assessment and rating

Presented to:

DR. BELLA LAUREANOAnd the students under Professional

Education of The Divine Mercy College Foundation Inc

(Batch 2013)