Upload
nix1
View
494
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
© Loughborough University 2009
…enables every team member to recognise individual contributions to group work
Nicola WilkinsonSupporting the iGeneration, University of Ulster,22 January 2009
© Loughborough University 2009
A well known criticism of assessed group
work is that each student receives the
same team mark, regardless of
individual performance
© Loughborough University 2009
By using WebPA to peer assess group work, each student received an adjusted mark
Marked by students, the people that know!
© Loughborough University 2009
1998
History of WebPA
Paper based system
20082007
open to all at Loughborough
University
2005
JISC WebPA project
20062002
PASS System
Became WebPA
2004
Open source version of WebPA
© Loughborough University 2009
It is a sophisticated, yet quickquick and easyeasy to set up
a formativeformative or summativesummative assessmentassessment.
How do teachers benefit from using WebPA?
© Loughborough University 2009
FlexibilityFlexibility to create assessment criteria, scoring ranges and groups to suit the way you teach, in any any subject disciplinesubject discipline
How do teachers benefit from using WebPA?
© Loughborough University 2009
The generation of individual student marks
is automated using a researchedresearched and trustedtrusted
method.
How do teachers benefit from using WebPA?
© Loughborough University 2009
Students are involvedinvolved in the assessment process, reflectingreflecting on their own and their peers’ performance
How do learners benefit from using WebPA?
© Loughborough University 2009
It is a fair and confidentialconfidentialway of assessing individuals
within group work activities
How do learners benefit from using WebPA?
© Loughborough University 2009
It positively impacts upon individual performanceperformance and team dynamicsteam dynamics, enriching the overall learning experiencelearning experience.
How do learners benefit from using WebPA?
© Loughborough University 2009
Case Study: Geography (Remote Sensing & GIS ) • 90, 2nd year undergraduates
• teams of 5-6, in streamed groups reflecting ability
• looking at process
• provide students the identified skills required by employers
• students produced a higher standard of course work
To what extent were you and your group members 'team players'?
Team dynamics:
To what extent were you and your group members prompt at arriving for meetings, emailing information, or phoning etc?
Time management:
To what extent did you and your group members keep in touch with each other during the project?
Communication:
Online at: http://www.webpaproject.com/?q=node/358
© Loughborough University 2009
Case Study: Information Science
• 80, 2nd year undergraduates
• Self-selected groups of 3-5
• Looking at the process of the group work
• Reflective learning and peer teaching
1 Little input provided
5 Provided good design input - considered options
Provided input to the design/concept generation of the database
1 Provided few suggestions, did not perform tasks
5 Provided a lot of input and delivered top quality work
Contributed effectively to the work of the group
Online at: http://www.webpaproject.com/?q=node/382
© Loughborough University 2009
“Overall, marking is honest and credible”
Dr Keith PondBusiness SchoolLoughborough University
Dr Carol RobinsonAssistant Director (Teaching and Learning) Mathematics Education Centre Loughborough University
“Students are much more satisfied – complaints have almost disappeared.”
© Loughborough University 2009
Student Experiences
• Would like to leave justification of scores given in the assessment (feature added after research carried out)
• Enhances deeper reflection• A wish to know what their peers feel about then
through the tool (feedback mechanism)
© Loughborough University 2009
The student perspective
• 12 departments over 3 faculties (8.5% response rate)
• 79% happy to self assess (11% unhappy)
• 87% happy assessing peers (7% unhappy)
• 70% happy with peers assessing them (17% unhappy)
• 63% believe the assessment is fair (19% unfair)
© Loughborough University 2009
“Some of the best modules during my degree were group based modules. The combination of the team working and the peer assessment was a great introduction to working in a team within industry.”
Alan Curtis Research Engineer
JCB Power Systems Ltd
© Loughborough University 2009
"WebPA is now embedded in our first year and will be for the next five years. Typically 180-200 students will be subjected to.. [WebPA] ..every year."
Dr Bob Cherry Manchester Metropolitan
University
“We are impressed with the success of the WebPA project and the impact on group work in higher education.”
David KernohanProgramme Manager
eLearning Team JISC
© Loughborough University 2009
Project Website: www.webpaproject.comwww.webpaproject.com
WebPA Demonstrator: http://webpaos.lboro.ac.uk http://webpaos.lboro.ac.uk
WebPA mail list: http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/WEBPA.htmlhttp://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/WEBPA.html
Contact email: [email protected] [email protected]