Click here to load reader
Upload
tony-sherborne
View
469
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Healthy Chocolate?
Examine
Teacher’s notes
Teacher assessment criteriaiteriaEvaluating evidence Communication
3 points CompetentCovers some questions on the validity checklist Occasionally answers each question in terms of how the experiment was done Gives an overall conclusion with an argument to support it
5 points ExpertClear, logical organised, allowing the audience to follow the reasoning.Fluent use of scientific termsUse of a good graphic such as a table, or data that enhances the oral explanation
3 points CompetentGenerally clear and well organised. A few minor points may be confusingGenerally careful use of scientific termsUse of visual material, but which does not enhance the oral presentation
1 point DevelopingAudience can follow presentation with effort. Some arguments are not clear. Organisation is lacking.Limited use of scientific termsNo visual material that enhances the oral presentation
1 point DevelopingCovers one or two questions on the validity checklist Answers the question, but without referring to how the experiment was done Gives an overall conclusion, but without a good argument
Peer assessment form
Group Evaluating evidence
Communic-ation
Comments
1
2
3
4
5
Level Evaluating evidence Communication
Expert (5 points)
Covers 5 or more points on the checklist ■Everything they say makes sense■Uses a table or graph
Competent(3 points)
Covers 3 or more points ■Uses scientific terms■Gives reasons
Developing (1 point) Covers 1 or more points ■Says how valid the claims are