COMENIUS 2102-2014EVALUATION OF THE PROJECT:

«INFLUENCE OF THE WEATHER ON THE NATURALAND URBAN LANDSCAPE OF DIFFERENT

EUROPEAN REGIONS»The evaluation of the project has been done via questionnaires. Questionnaires have beengiven to the students and the teachers who participated in every meeting to evaluate the elements of the project, the organization of the meetings and the accommodation.

The questionnaires that have been given were the following:

FOR THE STUDENTS

A. PROJECT:

The project is meaningful and worthwhile.

I’m aware of progress and products made within the project.

I like the presentation for this meeting.

I have learned much about the traditions and the culture of the host country.

I like being engaged in this project.

B. ORGANISATION:

The program for the trip was distributed in time.

There was a good balance between work program and cultural program/spare time.

The program was interested and instructive.

All materials necessary for the work program were present.

Planned activities occurred on time.

I’ve learned more about life and school in the visited country.

The food was good and healthy.

C. ACCOMODATION:

There was a good relation with the host family.

The host family offered a clean residence.

The host family suggested leisure time activities.

The host family welcomed me hospitality.

I intend to keep in touch with my host family.

FOR THE TEACHERS

A.PROJECT:

The project is meaningful and worthwhile.

I like the presentation for this meeting.

I have learned much about the traditions and the culture of the host country.

The activities motivate the teachers to increase the number of foreign languages they speak.

I became more aware of the daily life of the host country.

The project promotes enhancing awareness of different cultures.

I like being engaged in this project.

B.ORGANISATION:

The program for the trip was distributed in time.

There was a good balance between work program and cultural program/spare time.

The program was interested and instructive.

All materials necessary for the work program were present.

Planned activities occurred on time.

I’ve learned more about life and school in the visited country.

The food was good and healthy.

C.ACCOMODATION:

Check in and check out procedure was good.

Quality of food & beverages served.

The hotel offered a clean residence.

The staff was friendly.

The price was reasonable.

The food was good and healthy.

I had a positive attitude towards the hotel.

1 st meeting December 2012 Poland

2 nd meeting February 2013 Finland

full disagree disagree agree full agree

project 0 2 8 45

010203040506070

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in Poland by 11 of the students

full disagree disagree agree full agree

05

10152025

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in Poland by 4 of the teachers

2 rd meeting February 2013 Finland

Evaluation of the meeting in Finland by 13 of the students

0

20

40

60

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 2 24 39

organization 0 2 45 44

accomodation 1 3 19 42

full disagree disagree agree full agree

Evaluation of the meeting in Finland by 11 of the teachers

0

50

100

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 0 22 55

organization 0 1 13 52

accomodation 0 1 16 60

full disagree disagree agree full agree

3 rd meeting April 2013 Spain

Evaluation of the meeting in Spain by 12 of the students

0

50

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 2 19 39

organization 2 11 36 35

accomodation 2 2 13 24

full disagree disagree agree full agree

full disagree disagree agree full agree

020406080

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in Spain by 12 of the teachers

4 th meeting June 2013 Romania

full disagree disagree agree full agree

05

101520

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in Romania by 5 of the students

full disagree disagree agree full agree

project 0 1 7 48

0102030405060

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in Romania by 8 of the teachers

5 th meeting October 2013 Italy

Evaluation of the meeting in Italy by 15 of the students

0

20

40

60

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 1 5 30 39

organization 1 10 49 45

accomodation 3 7 16 49

full disagree disagree agree full agree

Evaluation of the meeting in Italy by 4 of the teachers

0

10

20

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 6 6 16

organization 4 8 0 12

accomodation 0 4 11 13

full disagree disagree agree full agree

6 th meeting November 2013 Turkey

Evaluation of the meeting in Turkey by 4 of the students

0

5

10

15

20

25

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 0 0 20

organization 0 0 5 23

accomodation 0 0 2 18

full disagree disagree agree full agree

full disagree disagree agree full agree

020406080

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in Turkey by 12 of the teachers

7 th meeting April 2014 Greece

Evaluation of the meeting in Greece by 11 of the students

0

20

40

60

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 2 10 43

organization 0 1 20 56

accomodation 0 1 11 43

full disagree disagree agree full agree

Evaluation of the meeting in Greece by 8 of the teachers

0

20

40

60

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 0 0 12 44

organization 0 0 16 32

accomodation 0 0 12 44

full disagree disagree agree full agree

8 th meeting June 2014 France

full disagree disagree agree full agree

project 0 0 7 58

020406080

100

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in France by 13 of the students

full disagree disagree agree full agree

project 0 0 2 42

01020304050

Título del eje

Evaluation of the meeting in France by 6 of the teachers

TOTAL EVALUATION OF ALL MEETINGS

EVALUATION OF ALL THE MEETINGS BY THE 84 STUDENTS

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 2 14 105 299

organization 4 29 200 355

accomodation 6 14 77 304

full disagree disagree agree full agree

EVALUATION OF ALL THE BY 65 TEACHES

0

100

200

300

400

Τίτλ

ος ά

ξονα

project 1 10 90 356

organization 5 20 77 289

accomodation 0 6 92 357

full disagree disagree agree full agree