93
Teaching and Learning for the 21st century

Corning Roundtable

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

 

Citation preview

Page 1: Corning Roundtable

Teaching and Learning for the

21st century

Page 2: Corning Roundtable

Agenda8:00 - 9:30 Session 19:45 - 11:15 Session 211:15 - 12:45 Lunch12:45 - 3:15 Session 3 (break as needed)

Page 3: Corning Roundtable

Comments Questions??

Ah- Ha Concerns

ISSUES BIN

Page 4: Corning Roundtable

MYP: 2014Changes to subject groups

Language BLanguage A Humanities TechnologyPhysical

Education

Language acquisition

Language and literature

Individuals and societies

DesignPhysical and

health education

Mathematics Arts SciencesPersonal Project

Mathematics Arts Sciences MYP projects

Current MYP

MYP (first teaching)

September 2014

Interdisciplinary

Page 5: Corning Roundtable

Speed Dial

Questions

Player 1 Player 2 Player 3 Player 4 Player 5

Page 6: Corning Roundtable

Day 1 Objectives

• Inquire into 21st century teaching and learning practices

• Develop and practice understanding of concept-based learning

• Inquire into the design of a MYP Unit Planner for 2014 and beyond

Page 7: Corning Roundtable

Dead Poet’s Society

✴Break into 3 even groups (by looking to see what group needs more or less people) and choose a sense (see, feel, hear)

✴Watch the video clip

✴Each sensory group notes on a piece of paper with a T-Chart what they inferred (traditional/21st century) from the clip using their sense as a filter.

✴Share out your findings

Page 8: Corning Roundtable

Traditional 21st Century

Page 9: Corning Roundtable

From the Agriculture Age to the Conceptual Age

18th century 19th century 20th century 21st century

Agricultural Age

(farmers)

Industrial Age

(factory workers)

Information Age

(knowledge worker)

Conceptual Age

(creators and

empathizers)

ASCD Allen Parish 2010; Rye and Herold

Page 10: Corning Roundtable

10

1.Begin with the unit you are revising for teaching Spring 2014

2.Choose drop down MYP Year (1 - 5)

3.Type in # of hours (60 min hours.....)

Step-by-Step MYP

unit planning

21st Century

Page 11: Corning Roundtable
Page 12: Corning Roundtable

The First Q

uiz...

Page 13: Corning Roundtable

POWER

Page 14: Corning Roundtable

POWER

Page 15: Corning Roundtable

POWER

Page 16: Corning Roundtable

POWER

Page 17: Corning Roundtable

POWER

Page 18: Corning Roundtable

POWER

Page 19: Corning Roundtable
Page 20: Corning Roundtable
Page 21: Corning Roundtable

How does it stack up?

• Use the Harvard video for data points to inquire further into...

1.Why might concept-based learning be considered by some to be a powerful way to learn?

2.How and why might that approach have affected the Harvard graduates?

3.What key concept might have anchored the “weather” learning

data

Page 22: Corning Roundtable

Key concepts

Aesthetics ChangeCommunicati

onCommunities

Connections Creativity Culture Development

FormGlobal

interactionsIdentity Logic

Perspective RelationshipsTime, place and space

Systems

Choose 1 for your

unit!

Page 23: Corning Roundtable

REFLECTION

• Visible Thinking Strategy • (Harvard Project Zero)

• On a sticky note, as a “break exit ticket”, write your reflection on the learning in Session 1 and post on the comments section of the issues bin:

• I used to think………

• Now I think…………..

Page 24: Corning Roundtable

break

Page 25: Corning Roundtable

While the KEY concepts provide breadth, the RELATED concepts provide depth and focus

Students are pointed towards full conceptual understanding through the related concepts that emerge from the discipline

There are 12 prescribed related concepts for each discipline within a subject group. These all should be used over the course of the five years in your discipline. (Not necessarily EACH year)

Related Concepts

Page 26: Corning Roundtable

RELATED

CONCEPTS

Choose 2 for your

unit

Page 27: Corning Roundtable

Merging key and related concepts

CommunicationPurpose

Audience Imperatives

Purposeful communication enhances audience engagement.

Conceptual Understanding

Page 28: Corning Roundtable

• Provide a context for the inquiry at hand

• Only choose one: Natural flow with the conceptual understanding.

Global Contexts

Page 29: Corning Roundtable
Page 30: Corning Roundtable
Page 31: Corning Roundtable

Global Contexts

• Identities and relationships

• Orientation in time and space

• Personal and cultural expression

• Scientific and technical innovation

• Globalization and sustainability

• Fairness and development

Page 32: Corning Roundtable

Consider what global context a student might explore in this photo

Page 33: Corning Roundtable

Global Contexts

• Identities and relationships

• Orientation in time and space

• Personal and cultural expression

• Scientific and technical innovation

• Globalization and sustainability

• Fairness and development

Page 34: Corning Roundtable

34

1 Key Concept + 2 Related Concepts +1 Global Context= Statement of Inquiry

Statement of Inquiry

Tips: Use active, present tense

verbs •Avoid proper & personal

nouns & pronouns•Avoid forms of the verb ‘to

be’

Page 35: Corning Roundtable

Creating the Statement of Inquiry

Choose ONE key concept from the

chart

Choose 2 related concepts

Conceptual Understanding

+ Global Context = Statement of Inquiry

Page 36: Corning Roundtable

An Example from Language and

LiteratureKey concept: Communication

Related concepts: Purpose, Audience Imperatives

Global Context: Personal and Cultural Expression (analysis & argument)

Statement of InquiryPurposeful communication using analysis and argument enhances

audience engagement.

Page 37: Corning Roundtable

Statement of InquiryGuides the inquiry of the unitProvides the resource for inquiry questionsLinks the conceptual learning directly to the authentic assessmentRepresents a contextualized, conceptual understandingDescribes a complex relationship that is worthy of inquiryExplains clearly what students should understand and why that understanding is meaningfulUnpacked through a series of inquiry questions

Page 38: Corning Roundtable
Page 39: Corning Roundtable

Reflect

Choose one practice from C3 (Teaching and Learning), and consider how the statement of inquiry would drive at least one of these practices from the IB Standards & Practices.

Page 40: Corning Roundtable

2. Engages students as inquirers and thinkers.

3. Builds on what students know and can do.

5. Supports students to become actively responsible for their own learning.

13. Engages students in reflecting on how, what and why they are learning.

15. Encourages students to demonstrate their learning in a variety of ways.

C3 – Teaching

and Learning:

Page 41: Corning Roundtable

lunch

Page 42: Corning Roundtable

Constructing Inquiry Questions

Page 43: Corning Roundtable

Develop inquiry questions

•The inquiry questions encourage looking at the statement of inquiry through multiple perspectives.

•We want to lead students from academic knowledge to thoughtful action, helping them to develop positive attitudes and a sense of personal and social responsibility.

Page 44: Corning Roundtable

Students will investigate what an

author does to create a compelling character

Students

will

exam

ine

how auth

ors d

escrib

e

the h

uman co

ndition

from

multi

ple p

oints

of

view

Stu

dents

will

explo

re h

ow

auth

ors

com

munic

ate

What constitutes character?

How important are

multiple points of view to arrive at an understandin

g?

What makes communicatio

n ethical?

Statement of Inquiry

Page 45: Corning Roundtable

• What will students need to look into in terms of concept/content to adequately wrestle with the statement of inquiry?

Students will . . . (choose one):

• Explore

• Discover

• Inquire into

• Seek

• Search

• Investigate

• Examine

Process of developing inquiry questions...

“Lines of Inquiry”

begin the process...and begin with

Students will + Inquiry Verb

Page 46: Corning Roundtable

• Students will begin to analyze how they will engage with their student audience in order to open minds to future possibilities by means of a well thought out argument.

 • Students will investigate how to make their communication with their

audience purposeful and motivational.

• Students will purposefully explore their academic choices with respect to their

options following graduation.

Page 47: Corning Roundtable

To turn each of these “lines of inquiry” into questions:

Remove the content

Keep the concept!

Allow for multiple perspectives and answers

Factual - may start with “what” and can be looked up

Conceptual - may start with “how/why” and should not lead students to a specific answer

Debatable - make it provocative where there are at least two sides to the issue at hand

Develop inquiry

questions

Page 48: Corning Roundtable

• Students will begin to analyze how they will engage with their student audience in order to open minds to future possibilities by means of a well thought out argument.

Factual: What engages audiences? • Students will investigate how to make their communication with their

audience purposeful and motivational.Conceptual: How do I use language to communicate?

• Students will purposefully explore their academic choices with respect to their options following graduation.

Debatable: How do the choices I purposefully make now affect my tomorrow?

Creating the Questions....

Page 49: Corning Roundtable

Students will investigate what an

author does to create a compelling character

Students

will

exam

ine

how auth

ors d

escrib

e

the h

uman co

ndition

from

multi

ple p

oints

of

view

Stu

dents

will

explo

re h

ow

auth

ors

com

munic

ate

What constitutes character?

How important are

multiple points of view to arrive at an understandin

g?

What makes communicatio

n ethical?

Statement of Inquiry

Page 50: Corning Roundtable

• Each person at the table reads aloud the following without any explanation and dialogue of their own:

• key concept

• related concepts

• statement of inquiry

• Inquiry questions

Table Group Share

Page 51: Corning Roundtable

• write 3 things learned all on one sticky note

• 2 new questions... one per sticky note,

• 1 ah- ha on one sticky note

Page 52: Corning Roundtable

Agenda8:00 - 9:30 Session 49:45 - 11:15 Session 511:15 - 12:15 Lunch12:15 - 3:00 Session 6 (break as needed)

Page 53: Corning Roundtable

Day 2 Objectives

• Inquire into 21st century teaching and learning practices

• Develop and practice understanding of concept-based learning

• Inquire into the evolution of the MYP Unit Planning Process for 2014 and beyond

Page 54: Corning Roundtable

REAL World Experience

What is areal life

experiencethat you’ve recently had

that you learned

something from?

Page 55: Corning Roundtable

Key research findings

“Authentic tasks increase student motivation to learn.” — Stipek (2002)

“Student’s beliefs about real-world significance of what they are learning were a strong predictor of their interest and enjoyment of math class.” — Mitchell (1993)

“Students give highest interest ratings to classes that make them think hard and require them to participate actively in thinking and learning.” — Newmann (1992) 55

Page 56: Corning Roundtable

Creating, Revising or Rethinking

• What do you think your summative assessment is? should be? or could be?

• How is what you are thinking about asking students to do, something that is authentic in order to show what they know?

Page 57: Corning Roundtable
Page 58: Corning Roundtable

Goal Role Audience Situation Product, Performance, and Purpose

Standards and Criteria for success

Grasps

Wiggins & McTighe 2005

Page 59: Corning Roundtable
Page 60: Corning Roundtable

(G) The goal is to show an understanding of how purposeful

communication uses analysis and argument to enhance audience

engagement. (R) You are a presenter at a TED talk with a student

audience. (A) You need to convince each student in the audience to

pursue the most rigorous course of study possible during their high

school years. (S) The challenge involves dealing with students and

parents who think the basic NY State requirements are good enough.

(P) You will create a multi-media presentation in order to convince

students and parents that the most rigorous coursework opens a variety

of opportunities following graduation. (S) Your performance needs to

be at least 10 minutes long, involve at least two different digital media

tools, systematically outline how academic choices influence their

future, and must allow for appropriate interaction with the audience.

Example from our unit planner

Page 61: Corning Roundtable

Create a summative assessment task that asks for a performance of understanding.

Set it in a real world context

Use the GRASPS process to help design your assessment.

Consider what we already know about authentic assessment and 21st Century skills as we work through our design

Now you try it . . .

Page 62: Corning Roundtable
Page 63: Corning Roundtable
Page 64: Corning Roundtable

• Success. (This is not the place to use ONLY MYP criteria, but also CCSS and criteria for what the teacher would like in terms of their own expectations)

• Your performance needs to _____________

• Your work will be judged by _____________

• Your product must meet the following standards ______________

Standards for Success

Page 65: Corning Roundtable

Does the Task allow students to perform at the high end of the rubric?

Achievement Levels

Descriptors

0

1 - 2

3 - 4

5 - 6

7 - 8

Page 66: Corning Roundtable

Gallery Walk

Page 67: Corning Roundtable

REFLECTION

• What might the school experience be like for students when units of work are grounded by an authentic assessment task(s)?”

Page 68: Corning Roundtable
Page 69: Corning Roundtable
Page 70: Corning Roundtable

Inquiry

Reflection

Action

The HOW!

The Inquiry

Cycle

Page 71: Corning Roundtable

•For inquiry: “HOW does the task allow students to inquire into the topic and show a deeper understanding of the statement of inquiry?”

• For action: “HOW does inquiry within the task promote action or the possibility for action?”

• For reflection: “HOW does inquiry within the task present the opportunity for reflection?”

• In table groups share out findings. Your thinking will be recorded on chart paper, one for each part of the inquiry cycle… Inquiry/Action/Reflection?

Inquiry Cycle Investigation

Page 72: Corning Roundtable

Objectives and Assessment Criteria

Represent the structure of knowledge and encompass 4 dimensions:

Factual

Conceptual

Procedural

Metacognitive

The MYP objectives and their strands provided in each subject guide for years 1,3, 5 their use is mandatory at least twice each year whenever a summative task is assessed

Page 73: Corning Roundtable

Criterion A – Analysing (Yr. 5)

• Analyze the effects of the creator’s choices on an audience

Criterion B – Organizing (Yr.5)

• Organize opinions and ideas in a sustained, coherent and logical manner

• Use referencing and formatting tools to create a presentation style suitable to the context and intention.

I OBJECT!

Page 74: Corning Roundtable
Page 75: Corning Roundtable

lunch

Page 76: Corning Roundtable

How are you feeling????

Page 77: Corning Roundtable
Page 78: Corning Roundtable

Approaches to Learning - ATL

ATL is concerned with:•intellectual disciplines, attitudes, strategies and skills “learning how to learn”

• awareness of thought processes and their strategic use

ATL results in:• critical, coherent and independent thinking• capacity for problem solving and decision making

ATL is a shared responsibility:• core of all curriculum development and all teaching• logical progression over time.

Page 79: Corning Roundtable

Skills A skill is the learned capacity to carry out pre-determined results and/or the ability to choose and perform the right technique at the right time, effectively and efficiently.

Take Note:

• Skills need to be both implicitly and explicitly developed

• Almost any skill could potentially be explored in a given unit, so it is important to be strategic regarding what skill is most important for what units.

Page 80: Corning Roundtable

ATL skill categories MYP skill clusters

Communication Communication

Social Collaboration

Self management Organization

Affective

Reflection

Research Information literacy

Media literacy

Thinking Critical thinking

Creative thinking

Transfer

Page 81: Corning Roundtable

• How do I know what skills have been taught before?

• What is my justification for teaching this skill?

Consider Prior Knowledge

Page 82: Corning Roundtable

What cognitive skill or affective skills are actually inherent in the objective strand you have chosen?

Communication

Social

Self Management

Research

Thinking

Ask: In order to master this objective strand, what skill or skills will the student be expected to demonstrate?

The corresponding achievement levels determine the level of mastery (achievement) of those skills.

Consider . . .

Page 83: Corning Roundtable

….with an objective strand….

• C (Communicating) (Yr 1)

Use appropriate mathematical language (notation, symbols, terminology) in both oral and written statements

In order for students to [strand:] use appropriate mathematical language (symbols, terminology) in both oral and written statements students must [skill:] comprehend and use language with accuracy, clarity, and discernment (ATL Category: Thinking, Skill Cluster: Critical Thinking)

Page 84: Corning Roundtable

¥ In order for students to analyze the effects of the creator’s choices on an audience students must gather and organize relevant information to formulate an argument. (ATL Category: Thinking, ATL Cluster: Critical Thinking).

¥ In order for students to organize opinions and ideas in a sustained, coherent and logical manner students must structure information in summaries, essays and reports (ATL Category: Communication, ATL Cluster: Communication)

¥ In order for students to use referencing and formatting tools to create a presentation style suitable to the context and intention students must communicate information and ideas effectively to multiple audiences using a variety of media and formats. (ATL Category: Research, ATL Cluster: Media literacy)

Language and Literature

Page 85: Corning Roundtable

Your turn!

Choose an objective strand for your unit and make sure it is the appropriate year

Look at the ATL Skill Categories and choose the most likely Category based on the strand

Look at the ATL Skill Cluster(s) within the Category and choose the most likely Skill Cluster

Choose a skill

Preface the strand with “in order to” and end the strand with students must.....by identifying discrete skill(s) using the ATL skill chart to be taught.

Page 86: Corning Roundtable

ATL and Authentic Assessment

When considering all skills: Don’t forget to analyze the process of completing the task from the student’s point of view

What strategies and skills might be needed for students to succeed with this task? Add a skill or two should you want to teach that explicitly.

Use the chosen objective strands to make informed decisions about what ATL skills to discretely teach.

You might use the CCSS to also inform choice of skills.

Page 87: Corning Roundtable

Making “Task Specific Clarifications”....

Achievement Levels

Descriptors

1 - 2

3 - 4

5 - 6

7 - 8

Page 88: Corning Roundtable

88

“Examine the words in the strand(s)”

• When there are words such as a “wide range” it is appropriate to say “at least 4” or give a range such as 4-7.

• If there is a specific word count range then insert this in the task-specific clarification.

• If there is a selection of things to choose from in the published descriptors that are separated by commas, then it is appropriate to delete those that are not being measured by the task.

• If the wording states “and/or”, then, once again, it is appropriate to keep both or delete one. However, it it says “and” then the task must provide for such.

Page 89: Corning Roundtable

89

• For students who require further accommodation, the rubrics remain the same if those students are in the SAME course to ensure a standardized approach. However, the task may be modified to allow all students the equal opportunity to achieve should they have documented learning differences and should be modified according to their individual learning plan that has been agreed upon at the school.

Accommodation

Page 90: Corning Roundtable

Devise an ATL skill learning activity that:

Uses 21st century strategies

Builds the skill

Allows for differentiation when appropriate

Page 91: Corning Roundtable

devise a formative assessmentFor this same learning activity . . .

Based on which of your inquiry questions?Will you also be activating prior knowledge?What kind of feedback will you give?

Page 92: Corning Roundtable

Educate = e (out, up) + duc (lead, pull) + ate (act of)

The act of leading up or drawing out - from the Latin educatus

TEACHERS

Page 93: Corning Roundtable

Need to know

Excited

Stance on Next Chapter Unit Planning

Worried