Upload
clarkshahnelson
View
2.060
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Presentation for COIL Conference @ SUNY Purchase, November 14, 2008 by Sarah Guth and Clark Shah-Nelson
Citation preview
Sarah GuthEnglish Language Teacher
University Language CentreUniversity of [email protected]
Clark Shah-NelsonCoordinator of Online EducationState University of New York Delhi College of Technology
COIL Conference, 14 November 2008
Cross-Cultural 2.0
Break-Out Sessionhttp://tinyurl.com/coilweb20
agenda
Introductions (5 min.) Exploring the Galaxy of Web 2.0: (20 min.)
tools, task design examples of good practice
Group work: your own proposal (40 min.) Wrap-up (10 min.)
Web 2.0 ↔ CMC & LMS
autonomy create customization free
informallearning integration mash-up
interoperability multimedia open openstandards personalization
remoteservers responsibility self-directedlearning
share transportableskills
Building Contents
Telecollaborative Tasks:Collaboration and Product CreationProblem Solving
i.e.
students collaboratively create contents wiki, C-map, google doc, podcasts, video
Managing Sources
Create a distributed research network for…Information Exchange Information Collection and AnalysisCollaboration and Product Creation Problem Solving
using
social bookmarking, social annotation and/or RSS feeds
Course portal or platformwiki, social networking sites (Ning), Netvibes, etc.
Sharing Media
Telecollaborative Tasks:Information ExchangeComparison and AnalysisInformation Collection and Analysis
ofcontents on the Webteacher-created contentsstudent-created contents
using
blogs, wikis, photo sharing, video sharing, podcasts, presentation sharing
Communicating
Telecollaborative Tasks:Information ExchangeComparison and AnalysisInformation Collection and AnalysisInterpersonal ExchangeCollaboration and Product CreationProblem Solving
many to many asynchr.: personal blogs, Twitter, Ning, Netvibes/Pageflakes, Google Docs, social bookmarking, Facebook, photo/video/audio sharing
1 to 1 (or more) synchr.: Skype, Wimzi, Meebo, Flashmeeting, DimDim, Yugma, Second Life
1 to many synchr.: Skype, IM, Meebo, Flashmeeting, DimDim, Yugma, Second Life
many-to-many synchr.: Flashmeeting, DimDim, Yugma, Skype (chat/audio only), Second Life
1 to many asynchr.: Chinswing., Voicethread, blogs, Twitter, podcasts, social bookmarking
What is lost? What is gained?
individual ownership collective ownership – attribution
content quality and usability greater sense of responsibility
clear division between personal / educational tools
broader range of skills that can be transportable to different learning experiences in real-life contexts
teacher control student control
“traditional” tracking mixed assessment: collective + individual
sole focus on formal learning focus on informal learning
top-down bottom-up
1 centralized learning space managed by technicians
teachers must have competences in different areas and be creative
increased autonomy
peer learning
Example: Web 2.0 Tools Embedded into Moodle LMS Course
From University at Albany School of Education: ETAP 687 Introduction to Online Teachingby Alejandra M. Pickett, 2008
potential barriers or "keep in minds"
privacy - many Web 2.0 sites allow a certain amount of privacy, but some less so. Instructor must carefully consider how to navigate such issues. If students are creating materials and posting them publicly to Flickr, YouTube, Odeo, etc. - are there considerations that need to be taken for their privacy? Release or consent forms to be filled out by students?
logins - how do students and faculty manage all the logins for the various sites? Is there a "best practice" defined for this? Many sites allow "invitations" to be sent out via email, but each site is different- so must be navigated when setting up the course and explained to students
potential barriers or "keep in minds"
support - many faculty are used to getting support from within their organization. When using Web 2.0 tools, faculty may need to learn to work within new systems of support, such as signing up for and using user help forums, documentation wikis, and/or whatever help/support system is in place for each individual tool. (Luckily, most Web 2.0 sites have excellent systems set up for this!) This will also need to be spelled out to students- where they go for technical site support, as opposed to calling their local helpdesk.
longevity - how long are the materials keep on the various sites? Generally, each user would need to monitor how long (if not forever) they exist or delete them when ready. Although we may expect these materials to be available in perpetuity, it is possible that some of these sites will not survive a harsh financial climate. How can we be prepared for such a situation?
orientation to students - what are best practices for orienting students to the various tools to be used in a course?
“The exciting promise of the Web [2.0] is that it offers an environment in which a creative teacher can set up authentic
learning tasks in which both processes and goals are stimulating and engaging, and which take individual student differences into
account.”Ushi Felix, 2002
Now let’s see how creative you can be!
(Our shared bookmarks: http://delicious.com/tag/coilweb20 )