Upload
florence-dujardin
View
222
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Paper presented at the LCSS PhD 2013 Conference on Methodological Choices and Challenges
Citation preview
Adapting ethnographic action research to study responses to educational technologies
Florence Dujardin(Sheffield Hallam University)
LCSS 2013 PhD conference – April 2013
Overview
• Online learning context• Initial research design • Adapting a methodology from Development
studies
Online MA programme in Professional Communication
A digital immigrant?(Prensky 2001)
Or... a potential digital resident?(White & LeCornu 2011)
Second-order digital divide
Initial research design
Action research
Reading
Social bookmarking
Reflection
Collective blogging
Feedback
Screencasting
Multiple case studies
WeaknessContext of culture
Context ofsituation
Practice /Media
Higher Education
Tutor-reader
student-writer
home
community/ieswork
Adapted from Lillis (2001)
Key features of EAR
Social mapping
Socio-cultural animation
Communicative ecology
Context of culture
• Local practices situated in the wider context of culture
• ‘entanglements’ of social practice and technology
• Does new media challenge anything?
Why borrow EAR?
Original design
• Focus on local practices / media
• Technologically deterministic?
• Difficult to discuss the context of culture
• Emancipatory intention hidden
Ethnographic action research
Conclusion
• A productive and flexible methodology for researching educational technology issues
• Well adapted to look at technology use in context, including in entirely online context
• Potential for connections with wider issues (second-order digital divide, pedagogy, andICT use in HE)