18
A way to divide numbers that doesn’t require structure David Coulson, 2014

A different way to divide

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Rebuilding division

Citation preview

Page 1: A different way to divide

A way to divide numbers

that doesn’t require structure

David Coulson, 2014

Page 2: A different way to divide

Nobody ever uses it after they leave primary school. It’s a procedure that people hardly ever need to use, and when they do need to use it, they can’t remember it. Catch-22.

Remember this thing?

Page 3: A different way to divide

Nobody ever uses it after they leave primary school. It’s a procedure that people hardly ever need to use, and when they do need to use it, they can’t remember it. Catch-22.

It’s also a procedure that requires strict adherence to structure: you have to make sure numbers go in the right places, which means good handwriting.

Remember this thing?

Page 4: A different way to divide

Nobody ever uses it after they leave primary school. It’s a procedure that people hardly ever need to use, and when they do need to use it, they can’t remember it. Catch-22.

It’s also a procedure that requires strict adherence to structure: you have to make sure numbers go in the right places, which means good handwriting.

This procedure is quickly going the way of the dinosaur. There are more intuitive methods for simple calculations that don’t require precise positioning of sub-totals.

Remember this thing?

Page 5: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 6: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 7: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 8: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 9: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 10: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 11: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 12: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 13: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 14: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 15: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 16: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 17: A different way to divide

Here’s an alternative that doesn’t require such finicky writing.

Page 18: A different way to divide

David Coulson, [email protected]

The point is to make arithmetic operations intuitive again without compromising speed. That classic method that we all learned at school was invented a century ago for grown-up accountants and engineers who had no electronic alternatives for crunching numbers. Teaching it at school was a sideline. It was never designed for kids.

Now even the little kids have calculators. So if they are ever going to learn paper-and-pen methods for crunching numbers, the procedures have to be easy, fast and intuitive. Otherwise all we’re doing is keeping their minds busy until they leave school.