33
April 26, 2011 The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy Presenters: Dr. Robert D. Atkinson, President, ITIF Stephen J. Ezell, Senior Analyst, ITIF Respondents: Mark Rice, President, Maritime Applied Physics Corporation Ro Khanna, Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Trade Admin. Aric Newhouse, Senior Vice President, National Association of Manufacturers

The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

  • View
    512

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

U.S. manufacturing is in crisis, with almost 6 million jobs lost and 42,000 factories closed over the last decade. Even worse, we are losing know-how and ultimately control over our future. While the U.S. retains important strengths, U.S. manufacturing competitiveness is slipping rapidly. There is no reason to resign ourselves to defeat or to sugarcoat the challenges we face. We possess the tools, talent, and resources to revive manufacturing. But to do so we need a national strategy for manufacturing renewal. This report explains the five key reasons why we need to act quickly and boldly to revitalize our manufacturing sector.

Citation preview

Page 1: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

April 26, 2011

The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy Presenters: Dr. Robert D. Atkinson, President, ITIF Stephen J. Ezell, Senior Analyst, ITIF Respondents: Mark Rice, President, Maritime Applied Physics Corporation Ro Khanna, Deputy Assistant Secretary, International Trade Admin. Aric Newhouse, Senior Vice President, National Association of

Manufacturers

Page 2: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Today’s Presentation

3

2

Why We Need a National Manufacturing Strategy

The State of U.S. Manufacturing 1

2

4 Outlines of a Strategy

Why Manufacturing is Important

Page 3: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

U.S. Manufacturing: The Agriculture Story?

Page 4: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

U.S. Manufacturing: Or the Rust Belt Story?

Flickr: Aphex Twin

Page 5: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

-400%

-300%

-200%

-100%

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

Overall Manufacturing Grew Slower than GDP

Total manufacturing

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Percentage Change in Real Value Added, 2000-2009

GDP

+5% +15%

Page 6: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

-400%

-300%

-200%

-100%

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

And Most Manufacturing Sectors Shrank

15 of 19 manufacturing sectors shrank

Total manufacturing

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Food, beverage and tobacco products Electrical equipment and appliances Chemical products Machinery Printing Wood products Motor vehicles Fabricated metal products Paper Products Primary Metals Nonmetallic mineral products Plastics and rubber products Apparel and leather Textiles Furniture

Percentage Change in Real Value Added, 2000-2009

Page 7: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

-400%

-300%

-200%

-100%

0%

100%

200%

300%

400%

500%

Only Four Sectors Grew

Average share of manufacturing output

in 2000: 79%

Average share of manufacturing output

in 2000: 21%

Total manufacturing

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

Computer and electronic products:

+260.5%

Petroleum and coal products: +73.0%

Percentage Change in Real Value Added, 2000-2009

Page 8: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

8

Real Manufacturing Value-Added As Share of GDP

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

1987 88 89 1990 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 2009

Manuf

Page 9: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

9

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Manuf

Nondurables

Real Manufacturing Value-Added As Share of GDP

Page 10: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

10

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Manuf

Durables

Nondurables

Real Manufacturing Value-Added As Share of GDP

Page 11: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

11

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Manuf

Durables

Nondurables

Computers

Real Manufacturing Value-Added As Share of GDP

Page 12: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

12

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Manuf

Durables

Durables - computers

Nondurables

Computers

Real Manufacturing Value-Added As Share of GDP

Page 13: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

13

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

0.0%

2.0%

4.0%

6.0%

8.0%

10.0%

12.0%

14.0%

Manuf

Manuf - computers

Durables

Durables - computers

Nondurables

Computers

Real Manufacturing Value-Added As Share of GDP

Page 14: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Capital Stock For Many Manufacturing Sectors Has Fallen

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

-27% -29%

-6%

-21%

-14%

-5%

-3% -2%

-7%

Primary metals

1981

Textiles

1997

Wood products

2000

Apparel and leather

2001

Paper products

2002

Electrical equipment

2002

Plastics and rubber

2002

Food, beverage and

tobacco

2002

Motor vehicles

2003

Year of Peak Capital Stock and Percentage Decline Since

Page 15: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

350%

400%

1959-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1999 1999-2009

Percentage Change in Fixed Asset Investment, by Decade

Manufacturing

Total private fixed assets

Performing arts and spectator sports

Funds, trusts, and other financial vehicles

Overall Growth in Manufacturing Assets Has Stalled

Page 16: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

350%

400%

1959-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1999 1999-2009

Percentage Change in Fixed Asset Investment, by Decade

Manufacturing

Total private fixed assets

Performing arts and spectator sports

Funds, trusts, and other financial vehicles

Falling Behind Growth in Total Private Fixed Assets

Page 17: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

-50%

0%

50%

100%

150%

200%

250%

300%

350%

400%

1959-1969 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1999 1999-2009

Percentage Change in Fixed Asset Investment, by Decade

Manufacturing

Total private fixed assets

Performing arts and spectator sports

Funds, trusts, and other financial vehicles

As U.S. Moved from a Manufacturing to a Financial Engineering Economy

Page 18: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Today’s Presentation

3

2

Why We Need a National Manufacturing Strategy

The State of U.S. Manufacturing 1

18

4 Outlines of a Strategy

Why Manufacturing is Important

Page 19: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why is Manufacturing Important?

1. Robust manufacturing sector needed to close the trade deficit.

0.0%

5.0%

10.0%

15.0%

20.0%

25.0%

Services Exports Non-manufactured Goods Exports

Manufacturing Exports

Compound Annual Growth Rate, 2000-2010 Compound Annual Growth Rate to Close Trade Deficit, 2010-2019

Export Growth Required to Close Trade Deficit

Page 20: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why is Manufacturing Important? 2. Manufacturing is a key source of employment and good jobs.

0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0

10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0

Employment Multipliers by Industry

Page 21: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why is Manufacturing Important? 3. Manufacturing is a key source of R&D and innovation activity.

0% 5%

10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45%

Product Innovation Process Innovation

Percent of Companies Reporting Innovation by Industry

Page 22: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why is Manufacturing Important? 4. Manufacturing and services are inseparable and complementary.

Page 23: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why is Manufacturing Important? 5. Manufacturing is vital to U.S. national security.

Page 24: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Today’s Presentation

3

2

Why We Need a National Manufacturing Strategy

The State of U.S. Manufacturing 1

24

4 Outlines of a Strategy

Why Manufacturing is Important

Page 25: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why We Need a Manufacturing Strategy 1. Other countries have manufacturing strategies.

Page 26: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why We Need a Manufacturing Strategy 2. Systemic market failures affect manufacturing activity.

Page 27: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Why We Need a Manufacturing Strategy 3. Unlikely to get back key mfg. sectors once their lost.

Page 28: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Today’s Presentation

3

2

Why We Need a National Manufacturing Strategy

The State of U.S. Manufacturing 1

28

4 Outlines of a Strategy

Why Manufacturing is Important

Page 29: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

What Should Washington Do?

Page 30: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Start Looking out for Number 6

Page 31: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Getting the 4 T’s Right

Flickr: marzzelo

Flickr: Alan Miles NYC Flickr: Nedral

Tech Talent

Trade Tax

Page 32: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Supported by a

National Innovation and Competitiveness

Strategy

Getting the 4 T’s Right

Page 33: The Case for a National Manufacturing Strategy

Robert Atkinson [email protected]

Facebook: facebook.com/innovationpolicy

Blog: www.innovationpolicy.org

YouTube: www.youtube.com/user/techpolicy

Website: www.itif.org

Twitter: @robatkinsonitif

Follow ITIF:

Thank You Stephen Ezell [email protected]