Cryptomathic white paper 2fa for banking

  • Published on
    17-May-2015

  • View
    382

  • Download
    4

Embed Size (px)

Transcript

  • 1. White PaperTwoFactorAuthenticationforBankingBuildingtheBusinessCase

2. Two-Factor Authentication for Banking- October 2012Building the Business Case Version 1.22 2012, Cryptomathic A/S. All rights reservedJgergrdsgade 118, DK-8000 Aarhus C, DenmarkThis document is protected by copyright. No part of the document may be reproduced in anyform by any means without prior written authorisation of Cryptomathic.Information described in this document may be protected by a pending patent application.This document is provided as is without warranty of any kind.Cryptomathic may make improvements and/or changes in the product described in thisdocument at any time. The document is not part of the documentation for a specific versionor release of the product, but will be updated periodically.www.cryptomathic.com 3. October 2012 Two-Factor Authentication for Banking-Version 1.2 Building the Business Case31 Executive SummaryAs a leading security vendor to the financial sector, Cryptomathic have extensive experiencein developing and delivering two-factor authentication solutions.This White Paper aims to share that experience, providing an up-to-date overview of Internetbanking threats and the range of authentication technologies available to counter them,explaining the key advantages and disadvantages of each.We go on to explain how the business case for deploying two-factor authentication extendsbeyond a simple fraud minus costs calculation to include a wide range of other factors. Ouraim is to ensure strategic decision makers fully understand the range of opportunities forbusiness development and cost reduction offered by two-factor authentication, and therebyenable a more positive, realistic business case.Finally, we present our vision of a secure, scalable, flexible and token-vendor independentauthentication infrastructure, supporting a comprehensive range of authentication methods.This approach enables banks to offer the optimal user experience across a range ofapplications and channels, whilst reducing development and deployment costs and avoidingtoken-vendor lock-in.Cryptomathics existing product portfolio delivers this vision, and has been proven in large-scale deployments with major international financial institutions. Working withCryptomathic offers financial institutions access to the expertise, practical experience andtechnology necessary to successfully deploy two-factor authentication to their customer base. 4. Two-Factor Authentication for Banking- October 2012Building the Business Case Version 1.24IntroductionThe Internet is the fastest growing banking channel today, both in the fields of corporate andretail banking. The development is no longer just driven by the banks desire to reduce costs:first and foremost it is a manifestation of customers demand to access bank services on-lineat any time and from any location.The importance of Internet banking is obvious for several reasons. Firstly, it offers a cost-efficient alternative to telephone and branch banking due to the relatively low capital andmaintenance costs, and its fully-automated processing of most transactions. Secondly, itoffers unparalleled customer convenience by enabling 24-hour access to a wide range ofservices.Despite this win-win proposition, Internet banking is not without its drawbacks. Foremostamong these in recent years has been the widespread targeting of on-line banking systems byinternational criminal gangs, by means of a variety of attacks.1 2 3The cost of different banking channelsBranch Telephone Internet 5. October 2012 Two-Factor Authentication for Banking-Version 1.2 Building the Business Case52 Threats and Countermeasures2.1 Attacks on Internet BankingThe first phishing emails targeting on-line financial systems were seen in 2001, as a Post911 ID check following the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Centre1. From 2004onwards, the industry has seen a dramatic rise in attacks against both large and smallfinancial institutions worldwide.In parallel with this growth in attack volume, there has been a parallel rise in the variety andcomplexity of attacks. Banking security experts must now be familiar with a bewilderingarray of techniques and terminology: phishing, pharming, spear phishing, session hijack,man-in-the-middle, man-in-the-browser, Trojans, Rock Phishthe list goes on.Despite the diversity in attack methods, most aim to achieve the same objective: to obtainconfidential user information, such as usernames, passwords, credit card numbers and socialsecurity numbers. These are all static credentialsthey dont changeand therein lies theproblem. Once obtained, they can be used by the attacker to impersonate the customer toperpetrate fraud.1Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phishing 6. Two-Factor Authentication for Banking- October 2012Building the Business Case Version 1.262.2 Two-Factor AuthenticationWhilst it is useful to try to counter specific attacks (and as part of a layered security strategy,we would always recommend this), the only long-term, strategic solution is to move awayfrom the current dependence on static credentials.Traditionally, all authentication mechanisms can be placed into one of the following threecategories: Something you knowa secret, such as a password. Something you area biometric, such as a fingerprint. Something you havea device or object or some kind, such as a credit card.With this approach, it can readily be seen that the problems with phishing arise from an over-reliance on the first category. Strong authentication can be achieved by employing twodifferent authentication credentials in parallel, from different categories. This is known asTwo-Factor Authentication (2FA).For reasons of cost, complexity, reliability and privacy, biometrics are not widely used inbanking. There are however a wide variety of low-cost, dependable security devicesavailable.Typically, such devices generate and display a One-Time Password (or OTP). As the namesuggests, an OTP is valid for a single use only, and many are also time-limited. Rather thanbeing static, OTPs are dynamicnew OTPs can be generated on demand, from aninexhaustible sequence that is unique to each device.The OTP is copied from the device to the web terminal by the customer. To the bank,knowledge of a valid OTP demonstrates proof of possession of the device, which whencoupled with a traditional static password can offer an extremely effective defence againston-line attacks.2.3 Attacks Against 2FAA small number of successful attacks against 2FA-enabled Internet banking systems have ledto press reports that 2FA as a general approach has been broken. The reality is rather morecomplex, as we shall discuss below.An attacker may obtain a valid OTP from a customer using the same methods as those usedto obtain a static password. If the bank has deployed a simple system with 2FA used for log-in only, this attack may succeed.To understand how to mitigate or eliminate this risk, it is first necessary to understand howattackers operate. Rather than one individual or organisation being responsible, attacks arecarried out by loose associations of individuals or groups, each with their own specialist role.Different parties cooperate, each providing a service: creating a fake web site, sending spamemail, collecting passwords, and finally using those passwords to obtain cash.Passwords and other credentials are bought and sold between groups. This takes time. Sincemost OTPs include an expiry mechanism, the attackers standard operating model is nolonger effective, and a considerably more complicated model of real-time attacks is being 7. October 2012 Two-Factor Authentication for Banking-Version 1.2 Building the Business Case7adopted. This explains the continuing technological advances in on-line attacks which wediscussed earlier.Is this a never-ending arms race, or will there eventually be an outright winner? Happily, thestrongest forms of 2FA available today offer a long-term, provably secure solution. The keyis to move from authenticating the customer, to authenticating the transaction which thecustomer wishes to perform.The user experience remains simple: the user simply enters the beneficiary account numberand transaction amount into their authentication device, by means of an integral keyboard.The OTP thus created acts as a digital signature on those transaction detailseven if obtainedby an attacker, the OTP cannot be used for any other purpose.Whilst this step may not be necessary today, many banks are deploying 2FA solutions withthe option to upgrade to transaction authentication in the future. By this route, theircustomers first gain familiarity with the simplest form of the technology, and the bank isstrategically placed to respond to future threats. 8. Two-Factor Authentication for Banking- October 2012Building the Business Case Version 1.283 Deployment Options3.1 Authentication MethodsAny bank considering deploying 2FA must choose between a wide range of possibleauthentication devices. The following list, whilst not exhaustive, gives a representativesample.EMV Card and ReaderMasterCard has devised a scheme based on existingretail banking smart cards and PINs. Dubbed the ChipAuthentication Program (CAP), it has also beenadopted by Visa, under the Dynamic PasscodeAuthentication (DPA) banner.The customer is supplied with a small, hand-held cardreader, into which their existing EMV Chip and PINcard is inserted. On entering the card PIN, the chip onthe card is used to generate an OTP, which isdisplayed on the readers screen. Additional functionson the reader also support transaction authentication.The advantages include a high security, whilst byleveraging existing cards and issuance processesdeployment and management costs are reduced.However, the user experience, whilst familiar, is morecomplicated than with other tokens.Hardware & Software OTP TokensMany vendors offer OTP-generating tokens.They are available in a wide range of shapesand sizes, and many offer custom brandingoptions.The simplest tokens are suitable for userauthentication only. More advanced tokensincorporate a keyboard, making them suitablefor transaction authentication.Most vendors employ proprietary algorithms togenerate the OTPs. However, the Initiative forOpen Authentication (OATH, seewww.openauthentication.org) is an industryconsortium promoting standardisation andinteroperability. 9. October 2012 Two-Factor Authentication for Banking-Version 1.2 Building the Business Case9Hardware-based PKI TokensA PKI system employs a private key, used to makedigital signatures that are validated using a public key.The public key is held by the bank, and the private keyby the customer.Chip-card or USB devices are commonly used tosecure the customers private key. Since PKI tokenscannot generate OTPs, they must instead be connectedto the customers PC.Devices and keys are often managed using aCertificate Authority.They offer a high security level, although PC-basedattacks may use the token illicitly. By including theability to sign transactions and other instructions, theyoffer great flexibility to banking applications. As aresult, they are more common in business bankingthan consumer banking.Software-Based PKI TokensRather than storing PKI private keys in a physicaldevice, they can also be stored on the customers PC,protected by software. By eliminating the device, suchsystems offer significant cost savings in distributionand maintenance.However, the software-based signing key may bevulnerable to PC-based attacks, and since the key isinstalled on a particular PC, customer mobility isreduced.SMS-based OTPsAn appealing alternative to deploying tokens is to usesomething the customer already hastheir mobilephone. In this case, the bank generates the OTP andsends it to the customer as an SMS message. Thecustomer returns the OTP to the bank through theirweb browser.Naturally, this approach relies on the bank maintainingcurrent details of the customers telephone number andthe customer being able to receive messages at theparticular moment of logon.Additionally, a transaction summary may be includedin the SMS. This enables the user to detectfraudulently modified transactions.AnyBank OnlineTo confirm payment of 500to account xxxx4204, pleaseenter the following securitycode: 394GYB 10. Two-Factor Authentication for Banking- October 2012Building the Business Case Version 1.21001 492380 11 80343202 952334 12 34203903 102875 13 68945204 028942 14 43977305 680328 15 56903406 240935 16 18494307 023941 17 43902308 678304 18 64935709 802439 19 09349410 225894 20 748399TAN ListsTAN (Transaction Authentication Number) lists arepaper-based lists of one-time passwords. They aresecurely generated by the bank and issued to eachcustomer.The customer provides an OTP every time she logs onor submits a transaction. The OTPs are either used insequence, or the bank requests a specific OTP using anindex.Whilst offering a lower security level, this low-technology approach offers a combination ofsimplicity, reliability and low cost.Matrix CardsAlso called grid card, this is a random grid of numbersor letters typically printed on a credit-card sized pieceof plastic issued by the bank.The customer is prompted to supply the contents of 2or 3 cells during logon or when submitting atransaction. For example, the prompt A4, C7 wouldgive the log-on response 5, 8 using the card shown.With similar advantages to TAN lists, the card formatis convenient and durable. Whilst re-use of cells makethe security analysis less clear, it also allows for amore flexible expiry policy.3.2 Pros and ConsTo compare authentication methods, they must each be assessed against a range of criteria: Customer acceptabilityease of deployment and use, portability and reliability Costinitial purchase, deployment, support, lifetime and replacement Effectivenesshow effective is it against a wide range of simple and advanced attackscenarios? 11. October 2012 Two-Factor Authentication for Banking-Version 1.2 Building the Business Case11Table 1 below gives a simple comparison of the main features of the authentication methodsdiscussed previously.Advantages Method DisadvantagesSimple to useTimely authenticationHardwareOTPtokensUser authentication onlyon simple modelsCost of tokensSimple to useMany users already carrycapable smart phonesTimely authenticationLow costSoftwareOTPtokensUser authentication only on simpleapplicationsApplications can be compromisedTransaction & userauthenticationCard PIN provides 2ndfactorno need for separate passwordSimple deploymentCAP/DPA Cost of card readersPossible card reissuing costsUsability for some customersSmall form-factorLow costEasy to useMatrix card/ TAN listUser authentication onlyLower security levelEasy to copyRelatively short lifetimeTransaction & userauthenticationTimely authenticationLow initial costMost users already carry mobilephonesSMS Customer management expensiveAvailability to all customersAva...

Recommended

View more >