Upload
ukabuka
View
478
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Citation preview
Business Valuation
Session 3
AbhimanyuAugust 30, 2009
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 2
Value and Price
• Value of a particular business or asset may be different for different parties depending upon strategic intent, synergies or for other reasons.
• Value must be clearly distinguished from price and businesses may justifiably undertake to consummate a transaction at a price which does not fall within an assessed fair value range.
• Given the valuations or valuation range / band suggested by valuers, the prerogative to decide upon a specific price is finally with the management and the Board of Directors of the Company.
• The valuation is only a tool to aid management in decision-making.
• The valuation is also time dependent.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 3
Valuation Methods
• Asset Approach– Book Value, Adjusted Book Value, and Liquidation Value
• Income Approach– Capitalization of Earnings, Capitalization of Excess Earnings, and
Discounted Future Earnings/Cash Flows, Discounted Future EVAs.• Market Approach
– Current Market Prices, Historical Market Prices, Price to Earnings, Price to Revenue, Price to Book Value, Price to Enterprise Value
• Comparable Transactions/Relative Valuations– Comparable International and Domestic Transactions.
• Sum-of-parts Method
• Real Options Value
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 4
Asset Approach
• May be important in capital intensive industries or in acquisitions where valuable non-operating assets can be stripped after the purchase of the company to recover part of acquisition cost.
• Where there are no (or very little) intangibles.• This approach is inappropriate in case of
acquisition/sale of minority interests.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 5
Asset Approach: Premises of Value
• Sale as a going concern:– Value-in-use
• Fair market value of assets and liabilities
• Sale on a liquidation premise:– Liquidation value (value-in-exchange)
• Orderly liquidation.• Forced liquidation
• Treatment of non-recurring/ non-operating assets and liabilities in case of valuation of controlling/ minority interest.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 6
Income Approach
• It is more often used than market/asset approaches.
• It is a preferred approach for closely held (and also widely held) knowledge based companies.
• It is also used in case of service industries.• Of course, it suffers from accounting
distortions. Hence caution is advised.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 7
Income Approach: Methods
• Single-period Capitalization Method:– Valuation is based on the net income of one
year only and hence it can produce reliable value only if the income chosen is representative of the company’s anticipated long-term future performance.
• Multi-period Discounting Method:– Discussed under DCF method.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 8
DCF Method: Certain Issues
• Forecast Variables• Forecast Horizon:
– Period should be long enough to portray all anticipated variations in the entity’s cash flows and until a stabilized cash flow is achieved.
• Continuing Value• Cost of Capital
– Debt cost– Equity cost– Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 9
Cost of Capital
• Cost of Debt:– Direct Approach.– Weighted Average Method.
• Cost of Equity: CAPM– What is the risk-free rate?
• Logic of using a long-term rate.
– What is your equity beta?– How much is the equity risk premium (ERP)?
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 10
Cost of Equity
• CAPM:– Re=Rf +β(ERP)
• Modified CAPM (used for closely held targets)– Re=Rf +β(ERP)+SCP+SCRP
• Where SCP=Small company premium and SCRP=Specific company risk premium (unsystematic risk- also known as ‘α’).
• Buildup Method (used for closely held targets)– Re=Rf +ERP+SCP+SCRP
• The size of SCRP is usually smaller when used in MCAPM than when used in buildup method.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 11
Risk Free Rate
10 Year Govt. of India Bond Yield
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
Nov-04 Jul-05 Mar-06 Nov-06 Jul-07 Mar-08 Nov-08 Jul-09
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 12
Beta
0.340.800.720.82-0.520.43CNX-500
0.340.860.600.90-1.050.56NIFTYHEROHONDA
0.340.650.430.140.100.35CNX-500
0.380.650.380.170.160.38NIFTYBERGER
0.630.600.400.600.470.84CNX-500
0.790.670.370.750.601.15NIFTYITC
0.850.961.101.030.640.80CNX-500
1.061.051.141.210.911.10NIFTYRIL
1.611.191.642.122.031.39CNX-500
1.581.332.051.962.340.98NIFTYWIPRO
5-yearly03-0402-0301-0200-0199-00IndexCompany
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 13
ERP
13.149.8210-yearly average
83.7222.5411.3095.0233.841999-2000
-10.36-11.5212.031.670.511998-99
4.764.8312.2717.0317.101997-98
-15.33-10.5214.01-1.323.491996-97
-17.80-10.4715.67-2.135.201995-96
-27.44-29.3515.39-12.05-13.961994-95
47.8241.1013.3861.2054.481993-94
-73.77-68.3413.23-60.54-55.111992-93
113.99124.5113.36127.35137.871991-92
25.7735.4412.3038.0747.741990-91
ERPERPRisk freeBSE 100SENSEXYear
BSE 100SENSEXLong-term Risk Premium
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 14
Specific Company Risk Premium
• Should reflect the analysis of the competitive conditions in which the company operates. Some common company-specific risk factors:– Lack of access to capital– Ownership structure and stock transfer restrictions.– Company’s market share and the market structure of the
industry– Depth and breadth of the management– Heavy reliance on individuals with key knowledge, skills or
contracts.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 15
Control Premium and Illiquidity Discount
• Such premium or discount should be applied in adjusting cash flows rather than in the discount factor.
• If the target is a closely held company in which a controlling interest is being acquired, do notautomatically assume that a control premium and a discount for lack of marketability must be applied to each value determined for the company.
• The correct methodology is to identify the nature of the value initially computed by each appraisal method.
September 12, 2009 Corporate Restructuring | Session 1 16
Valuation: Concluding Remarks
• Valuation exercise involves more judgments than precise facts.
• The success of a valuation exercise depends on how scientific were you in your intuitive judgments.
• Hence, valuation is an artistic science.