Upload
alexandre-kalup-vasconcelos
View
135
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
COPCOST OPTIMIZATION
PROGRAM
Alexandre Kalup Vasconcelos
MBA Exe FIA T39
AGENDA
1. Introduction
2. Process
3. Behavior
4. System
5. Case study – Behr Brasil
COP
1. I
NT
RO
DU
CT
ION
1.1 Crises history
1.2 Definition
1.3 ConceptCOP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COP
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
2011
CRISE EUROPEIA
O Velho Mundo , berço do Iluminismo,
Renascimento, Ideologias, filosofias e a
transformadora Revolução Industrial , diante do
mundo garantiu o status de uma região de alto
desenvolvimento econômico e bem-estar social .
Mas a imagem construída ao longo dos séculos
agora está associada a turbulências de mercado,
ao descontrole das contas públicas e políticas
assumidas que conduziram a zona do euro para
uma crise financeira que é muito mais grave do
que imaginaram e de difícil superação a curto e
médio prazo. Desemprego, altos impostos, preços
elevados e medidas de austeridade mexem com
a vida dos europeus.
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
COPDécadas 50 70 9060 80 00Dutra Vargas Jucelino Janio Ditadura Sarney Collor FHC Lula
1. INTRODUCTION1.1 CRISES HISTORY
“Isto não é o fim. Nem mesmo
é o começo do fim. Talvez seja
o fim do começo” - Winston
Churchill.
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.2 DEFINITION
COP
1. Operation: Increase company productivity
2. Market: Improve company competiveness
3. Customer: Achieve customer satisfaction
4. Sales: Increase company business
5. Financial: Increase company profitability
Cost Optimization Program
FIT TO COMPETE
COP
1. INTRODUCTION1.3 CONCEPT
PROCESSDevelopment steps
Initiatives
Target Setting
BEHAVIOROrganization
Mindset Change
Communication
SYSTEMData base
Progress Reports
Continuous system management
2. P
RO
CE
SS
2.1 Process Flow
2.2 Idea Generation
2.3 Idea Data Sheet (IDS)
2.4 Development Steps (DS)
2.5 Initiatives
2.6 Target Setting
"Nós sempre podemos fazer
melhor: nós sempre podemos ir
mais longe; nós sempre
podemos encontrar novas
possibilidades. É preciso estar
sempre fazendo e progredindo"
Henry Ford.
COP
2. PROCESS2.1 PROCESS FLOW
Idea
Generation
Several sources
and activities
generate new
ideas.
Idea
Description
The idea author
fulfill the idea
data sheet (IDS)
and input in the
system.
The idea owner drive
the idea
implementation
across the
development steps
(DS)
Idea
Development
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
DS6
BEST
PRACTICES
2. PROCESS2.2 GENERATING IDEAS
Resources - materials, people and
information available to perform the
work - after all are the people who
innovate, not companies.
Techniques - skills in managing
innovation in the different levels of the
organization and focused on the design,
development and implementation of
creative ideas.
Motivation - the most important
component of the catalyst actions for
innovation.
Support Organization - recognition
of creative work, mechanisms for
developing new ideas, limited number of
hierarchies, flexible rules and less
bureaucracy, Management flexibility,
acceptance and encouragement of new
ideas, favorable relationships, dialogue,
trust and exchange of experiences
between members and staff.
I N
N O
V A
T I
O N
2. PROCESS2.3 IDEA DATA SHEET
DS1
Registered idea
DS2
Investigated idea
DS3
Validated idea
DS4 - Prepared idea
DS5 - Idea Implemented
DS6 Saving
Idea validated!
Idea not double counted!
Idea Owner defined!
Technically feasible!
Analysis of profitability!
Approval of the customer!
Implementation decision!
Using the Budget set!
Approval of the client to invest!
Design / Work Plan / List organized!
Revised calculation of production costs!
Change of production / vendor made!
Change Design / Work Plan revised!
Parts List active!
Stock reset!
Saving confirmed!
2. PROCESS2.4 DEVELOPMENT STEPS
Initiatives Responsible Description
COM Purchasing
Material cost reductions due to supplier
commercial negotiations, resourcing
activities and technical modifications
PRO-1 Product Engineering
Material cost reduction due to techncial
modifications, changes of specification,
development hours optimization
PRO-2 Process Engineering
Process cost reductions due to men
power (blue collar) and machine cost
optimization
PLA Plant Production
Production cost reductions due to
maintenance, quality and losgistics
optimization
ADM Administrative
Administrative cost reductions due to
men power (white collar), material office
and service expenses
SAL Sales
Sales cost recovery with the customers
due to material cost, labor and
overheads increase
TOTAL
COP
2. PROCESS2.5 INITIATIVES
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
DS6
2. PROCESS2.5 INITIATIVES
Initiative Guideline
To clarify all initiatives, the program has a guideline
The initiative guideline explain the main rules of
COP
The guideline contain the cost calculation scheme for
each kind idea
The guideline is built by COP Head and Controlling
area
The guideline is signed by the CEO and all Manager
staff
The COP team is trained to apply the initiative
guideline
The guideline is a key document to avoid
misunderstanding and conflicts
Split in functional Initiatives LONG TERM goal 2013-2015
Initiative Managers 2013 2014 2015 Total
COM Purchasing 2,1 2,5 2,7 7,3
PRO-1 Engineering1 0,5 0,6 0,6 1,7
PRO-2 Engineering2 0,7 0,8 0,9 2,4
PLA Plant 0,7 1,0 1,1 2,8
ADM Administrative 0,0 0,0 0,4 0,4
SAL Sales 0,6 0,8 0,6 2,0
Σ CEO 5,0 6,0 6,8 17,7
2. PROCESS2.6 TARGET SETTING
SMARTSpecific
Measurable
Attainable
Realistc
Timely
COP Head is the main responsible to assure the target setting
process while the CEO is the major responsible for the company
target achievement supported by his\her Managers.
BEST CASE
DS2 – DS6
FORECAST
DS4 – DS6
2. PROCESS2.6 TARGET SETTING
DS1
DS2
DS3
DS4
DS5
DS6
January current year
100% in BC situation and
30% in FC
April current year
140% in BC condition and
50% in FC
July current year
90% in FC situation
December current year
100% in FC condition
September previews
year
Starts to fill up ideas
YEARLY
MILESTONES
Workshops brainstorming
starts take place
Year end rally
Speed up investigation and
validation process
Speed up implementation
process
2. PROCESS2.6 TARGET SETTING
3. B
EH
AV
IOR
3.1 Organization
3.2 Mindset Change
3.3 Communication
A clareza sobre os valores e
comportamentos não adianta
muito sem estímulos. Para que os
valores realmente signifiquem
alguma coisa, as empresas devem
recompensar as pessoas que os
demonstram e punir as que não
os demonstram. Acredite-me, isso
é muito importante para a
vitória” Jack Welch (2005). COP
Line
Managers
Manager
CEO COP Main Sponsor
COP Head
COP Initiative Responsible
3. BEHAVIOR3.1 ORGANIZATION
Full time
Part time
HEAD
COP
PU
Manager
Engineering
Manager
Plant
Manager
ADM \HR
Manager
Sales
Manager
COM PRO PLA ADM VEN
Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator Coordinator
COM PRO PLA ADM VEN
Controlling
COP
3. BEHAVIOR3.1 ORGANIZATION
33
Responsible to drive the process in his initiative in order to achieve the company
goal supported directly by the Initiate coordinator
Answering directly to COP Head, is responsible to assure the COP controlling
guideline application and resp. for the system administration. Special reports
construction and new users COP training are also tasks below this function.
The idea owner is in charge of idea development from step 2 till step6. The timing
plan and saving calculation fields are under his responsibility.
Responsible for the initiative tracking in the idea level, system monitoring
assuring all data entering, up-to-dateness, data quality, tracking of timelines and
support the project teams. Define the idea owner, promote workshops and use of
the best practices are tasks of this function.
Responsible to participate of COP forums supporting the Initiative responsible to
take decisions and achieve the company goal
Main responsible for the program management, driving the process, monitoring
the progress, preparing Board reports, inform and motivate the organization
The idea author is responsible to fill out the idea registering as much as possible
details in the data base available
COP Steering
Committee
COP Head
Initiative Coordinator
Initiative Responsible
Idea Owner
COP Controlling
Idea Author
COP
3. BEHAVIOR3.1 ORGANIZATION
The Six Stages of COP Implementation
TO BE DESIGNED
DESIGNED INSTALLEDMECHANICAL COMPLIANCE
UNDER-STANDING
OWNERSHIP / USAGE
0 1 2 3 4 5
Perf
orm
ance /
Susta
inable
•Accurate and relevant information is displayed to a level of at least 90% compliance
•The system element is monitored
•Action are being taken
•Information / data from the system element is used to raise awareness of problems / opportunities
•Action are being taken to address variations from plan
•Individuals involved in its use can train others
•Examples of improvement are communicated and learning are shared
•Individuals demonstrate continuous improvement
•Actions being used to drive the business forward
•Area manager understands and accepts the need for the system element
•Design and format of system elements have been agreed
•The element has been introduced and is in operation
•Individuals involved with the element have had training in it’s use and purpose
•The element is easily available for all
3. BEHAVIOR3.2 MINDSET CHANGE
Information
Change
of mindsetMotivation
Inform about objectives,
organization, structure &
progress and results of
COP
Motivate to identify with the
objectives of COP and
contribute to the success of
the program
Enhance cost optimization
oriented thinking and
behaviour throughout the
organization
3. BEHAVIOR3.3 COMMUNICATION
Information
Change
of mindsetMotivation
COP Target
Monthly results
Who is involved
Best practices
Milestone progress f-up
Award program for best ideas
Sucess case studies publication
Target achieved celebration
Service Promises
Why COP?
Campaign avoiding waste
Awareness!!!
3. BEHAVIOR3.4 COMMUNICATION
4. S
YS
TE
M
4.1 Data base
4.2 Progress Reports
4.3 Continuous Management
“O que separa os inventores dos
inovadores é a capacidade de
pensar em todas as condições e
conexões necessárias para
permitir que uma solução se
encaixe perfeitamente no
compasso diário de quem a
utilizará. Isto é pensamento
sistêmico.” Mattew E. May
(2007) COP
4. SYSTEM4.1 DATABASE
How to track hundred ideas with more than 20 edit fields
at the same time, across 6 development steps for 6
initiatives in 2 economical scenarios *best case &
forecast, taking in account at least 2 years of life time
and generating 10 different reports during 52 weeks
per year with the minimum resources?
4. SYSTEM4.1 DATABASE
1. The system is the third key success factor for COP
2. Just with the tool system, we are able to manage the COP
process and drive *not just control, the company behavior
3. The system is responsible for the whole data bank management
4. All reports are generated automatic with option, manual by
demand
5. Just with a good system installed, the COP dedicated team can
be reduced
6. Working with a system, you can manage different plants locally
and worldwide
7. Software recommendation: use WEB environment able to
communicate and set on alarms for DS approvers by email as
well as extract reports
8. Alternative: EXCEL *not recommended
4. SYSTEM4.2 PROGRESS REPORT
The progress report is the main tool for the program tracking
and controlling
Main reports:
COP Total
Initiative level
Idea level
Pocket card
TOP10 Potential BC (DS2-6)
TOP10 Potential FC (DS4-6)
TOP10 Overdue Milestone FC
TOP10 Overdue Milestone BC
TOP10 Potential DS6
TOP10 Potential DS1
TOP10 Audit checked red
COP- Manager F-up(area related)
LE
VE
L 2
MANAGER
Coordinator
Idea Owner
* Agenda: F-up cockpit, action plan, bridge of the last two weeks and preview next
COP- Team F-up (ratio project related)
LE
VE
L 3
COORDINATOR
Idea Owners
Team members
* Agenda: Track ratio ideas, f-up action plan, bridge of the last week and preview next weeks
LE
VE
L 1
COP- Board F-up (initiative related)
President\CEO
Managers
* Agenda: F-up cockpit, bridge of the last month and preview next month
Once a month
Each two
weeks
Weekly
4. SYSTEM4.3 CONTINUOUS MANAGEMENT
6. C
AS
ES
TU
DY
BE
HR
BR
AS
IL
6.1 BEHR Group
6.2 Project P2010
6.3 Main Challengers
6.4 Actions & Results
Welcome at
Behr Brasil
Updated
29/11/11
Behr GmbH & Co. KG, Stuttgart, is a systems partner
of the international automotive industry. A specialist
for automotive air conditioning and engine
cooling systems, the Behr Group is one of the world’s
leading manufacturers and suppliers of original
equipment for light vehicles and trucks. Group sales
in the 2010 business year came to around 3.3 billion
EUR. Currently, Behr employs some 16,500 staff at 9
development locations, 22 production sites and 10 joint
ventures worldwide.
6. CASE STUDY6.1 BEHR GROUP
45
6. CASE STUDY6.1 BEHR GROUP
46
BEHR’S MARKET STRATEGY
Fully competitive
Cost
Quality/Reliability
Global presence
No. 1 worldwideTechnology
Customer support
Performance
Leadership
6. CASE STUDY6.1 BEHR GROUP
47
6. CASE STUDY6.1 BEHR GROUP
48
6. CASE STUDY6.1 BEHR GROUP
49
6. CASE STUDY6.1 BEHR GROUP
COP
6. CASE STUDY6.2 PROJECT P2010
COP
6. CASE STUDY6.2 MAIN CHALLENGERS
Process not defined (no step development implemented);
Lack of understanding of program objectives and responsibilities of the team;
Meeting with many conflicts and poor performance;
Assertiveness of implementation dates low;
Forecast equivocal results (lack of Best Case Scenarios and Forecast);
Lack of monitoring and control of the program as a whole;
Lack of alignment between major areas: Eng, Comp, Log, Wed, Prod, Control, Sales;
Problems of logistics management during the implementation of new ideas (old stock);
Lack of rules for saving calculation - no "guideline" defined;
Lack of transparency in the disclosure of the results;
Lack of a common goal, involving the entire management and board;
Lack of a budget (budget) to specific activities of optimizing series of projects;
Lack of clear knowledge about the rules and stages of approval and modification of customers;
Several ideas implemented without the approval of the Quality;
Lack of alignment with the internal program "Suggestions for Improvement";
Lack of motivation of the supplier to suggest technical improvements;
None identified motivation program for employees and suppliers;
Lack of dedicated staff;
Lack of priority in the daily agenda of Managers and Directors;
Process setting goals not aligned with the mission, vision, values the company;
Establishing and division goals inappropriate;
Lack of a communication plan to inform, motivate and emphasize organizational culture
The lack of a prize for the best suppliers;
PR
OC
ES
S
Recovered the suggestion program
credibility
Suppliers deep involved in the process
Process well defined and trained
Initiatives covering all cost center areas of
the company – value chain
Best case and Forecast scenarios well
clarified
Target aligned with Mission, Vision and
Values
Define long term target at least 3 years
ahead
Splited the target between the initiatives
and the responsible areas
Kept the target year milestones on track
6. CASE STUDY6.3 ACTIONS & RESULTS
BE
HA
VIO
R
Structure well defined
COP Team function roles known by all
organization
Management level deep involved and
committed
President speech emphasizing the COP
importance for the whole company,
FREQUENTELY
Developed a communication plan
approaching the 3 main communication
clusters
COP Target milestones dates and results
frequently informed
Built a good award program to compensate
the best ideas and higher savings
6. CASE STUDY6.3 ACTIONS & RESULTS
SY
ST
EM
It was a key factor to connect Process
and Behavior
Software developed in WEB
environment, with direct link to the
email application
The administration under COP
Controlling responsibility
Continuous management system
implemented (high dicipline)
The idea data sheet converted in
electronic data
Suggestion Program changed working
electronic in the same base of P2010
Standard reports created - Not accepted
parallel reports out of the system (use
just one source)
6. CASE STUDY6.3 ACTIONS & RESULTS
More than 600 ideas implemented per year (just Behr Brasil), 3.000
worldwide;
5% of cots reduction achieved over net sales per year, 450 MEUR
worldwide;
Competitive capacity improved with margin increase;
Customer satisfaction improved;
3 Awards of cost reduction won from three different customers;
Mindset changed “each cent counts!” cost reduction culture;
In 3 years, 3 cars given by Behr Brasil Award Program;
End 2010, the program was extended for more 3 years.
6. CASE STUDY6.3 ACTIONS & RESULTS
COP
CONTATO
Alexandre Kalup Vasconcelos
Phone: (11) 99 629 5086
Skype:ale30071974
OBRIGADO