Upload
ballstate1
View
36
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Blaine F. Aikin, CEO of fi360, presented this topic during the 2013 Ball State Foundation PAC Seminar.
Citation preview
© 2013 fi360 Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2
Best Practices for the Selection of Investment
Service Providers
Blaine F. Aikin, AIFA®, CFA, CFP®
CEO, [email protected]
3© 2013 fi360 Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Topics
• The fiduciary standard as the basis of procedural prudence• A process-driven approach to due diligence• Service provider selection generally• Investment due diligence
Note: We will reference the Prudent Practices Handbook for Stewards during this discussion
4© 2013 fi360 Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Duties Associated With the Fiduciary Standard
Fiduciary Standard
Duty of Loyalty
Avoid/Manage Conflicts
Disclosure Proxy Policy Principal Trades
Suitability
Both Duties of Loyalty and
Care
Best ExecutionReasonable
Fees & Expenses
Duty of Care
Safeguard Client Assets,
Privacy
Procedural Prudence
Due Diligence Monitoring Record-Keeping
Global Fiduciary Precepts
1. Know standards, laws, and trust provisions.2. Diversify assets to specific risk/return profile of
client.3. Prepare investment policy statement4. Use “prudent experts” and document due
diligence5. Control and account for investment expenses6. Monitor the activities of “prudent experts”7. Avoid conflicts of interest and prohibited
transactions
Establishing “Reasonable” Service Provider Relationships
• A service agreement isn’t reasonable if you don’t know the service provider’s– services– compensation arrangements– fiduciary status
7
Delegation Requires Care, Skill, and Caution in…
• Selecting an agent• Establishing the scope of the engagement• Monitoring the agent’s performance and compliance
with terms of the engagement• Setting fees
Benefits of Effective Due Diligence
• Make good service provider selections• Delineate roles and responsibilities• Reduce regulatory and litigation risks• Serve the best interests of beneficiaries through
fiduciary excellence
9
Role and Responsibilities of Financial Intermediaries
Product Originator Traditional Broker Adviser
counter-party agent fiduciary
manufacturer salesperson professional
opposite side of table intermediary same side of table
buyer beware buyer be aware trust assumed (verify)
“product safety” fair dealing best interest
rules-based rules-based principles-based
10
Four Step Service Provider Selection Process
1. Define the services (benefits) to be delivered2. Identify providers capable of delivering the desired
services3. Evaluate the capabilities of competing providers to
deliver the services at a fair and reasonable cost4. Engage and monitor the top-ranked provider
11
Best practices
1. Apply a formal Request for Proposals (RFP) process2. Monitor service provider relationships regularly
a. monitoring of investment managers is ongoingb. other service provider relationships should be evaluated
approximately every three years
3. Replace service providers when you no longer have confidence in their ability to most effectively and efficiently perform the services for which they were hired
4. Typically, selection and monitoring criteria are the same
12
Hierarchy of investment decisions
13
Five Fundamental Principles of Prudent Investing
1. Prudence standard is applied at the portfolio level2. Risk/return tradeoff is the central consideration3. No investment is inherently imprudent4. Diversification is required, unless it is prudent not to do so5. Delegation to prudent experts is permitted/encouraged
14
Common Due Diligence Criteria
• Risk-adjusted returns• Returns relative to peer group• Portfolio composition• Style consistency• Expenses• Management tenure• Product inception date and assets• Qualitative factors (e.g., support)
15
Complex Investments Involve Additional Due Diligence
• Regulatory oversight• Firm background• Investment methodology• Risk management process• Management/personnel• Compensation/fees• Reporting capabilities• Recommendations from third party expects
16
Substantive and procedural prudence
I know of no case in which a trustee who has happened—through prayer, astrology or just blind luck—to make (or hold) objectively prudent investments ... has been held liable for losses from those investments because of his failure to investigate and evaluate beforehand. Similarly, I know of no case in which a trustee who has made (or held) patently unsound investments has been excused from liability because his objectively imprudent action was preceded by careful investigation and evaluation. In short, there are two related but distinct duties imposed upon a trustee: to investigate and evaluate investments, and to invest prudently.
- Judge Antonin ScaliaFink v. National Savings and Trust Co.
© 2013 fi360 Inc. All Rights Reserved. 17
Questions?
Blaine F. Aikin, AIFA®, CFA, CFP®CEO, fi360
www.fi360.com