This article was downloaded by: [University of Utah]On: 07 October 2014, At: 03:34Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH,UK
New Zealand Journal ofAgricultural ResearchPublication details, including instructions for authorsand subscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnza20
The peat soils of the AucklandIslandsM. L. Leamy a & L. C. Blakemore aa N.Z. Soil Bureau , Alexandra and WellingtonPublished online: 12 Jan 2012.
To cite this article: M. L. Leamy & L. C. Blakemore (1960) The peat soils of theAuckland Islands, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 3:3, 526-546, DOI:10.1080/00288233.1960.10426636
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1960.10426636
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all theinformation (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make norepresentations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and viewsexpressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, andare not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of theContent should not be relied upon and should be independently verified withprimary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for anylosses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly orindirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of theContent.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone isexpressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found athttp://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
526 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
THE PEAT SOILS OF THE AUCKLAND ISLANDS
By M. L. LEAMY and L. C. BLAKEMORE, N.Z. Soil Bureau, Alexandraand Wellington.
(Received for publication, 11 March 1960)
Summary
This paper contains a description of the peat soils on part of theAuckland Islands which lie in the South Pacific Ocean approximately~WO' miles south of New Zealand. Peat forms a blanket over the surfaceof the Islands and is the parent material of most of the soils. In thearea examined in detail the average thickness of the peat blanket wasapproximately 6 feet. A fossil soil horizon in the peat was dated by theradiocarbon method as 6290 ± 110 years before present. This istentatively correhted with the post-glacial thermal maximum periodany by applying the chronology established elsewhere for this period it isconcluded that the blanket peats of the Auckland Islands beganaccumulating at least 40DO years ago. A thickness of from 2 to6 feet of blanket peat has been built up in this time. The peat blanketis discussed with regard to origin and development, decompositIOn,movement and erosion, the underlying mineral material, animalcontributors and chemistry.
INTRODUCTION
The Auckland Islands consist of one large and five smaller islandsand lie between 500 26' and 50 0 56' S. latitude and 165 0 52' and1660 22' E. longitude. The main island covers 179 sq. miles. AdamsIsland, the second largest, 31t sq. miles in area, lies to the south and isseparated from the main island by Carnley Harbour. The total areaof land covered by the group is 220 sq. miles (Fig. 1).
The islands are composed largely of basic volcanic rocks whichwere erupted from two main vents, one near Disappointment Islandand the other at Carnley Harbour (Falla 1948). Marine erosion onthe wind-swept west coast is rapid and in some places the western coastline has been cut back almost to the east-west divide. The east coastof the main island, with its drowned indented shoreline providing aseries of fine harbours, stands in striking contrast to the high steep cliffson the west.
The climate is not rigorous, but high humidity, persistent lowcloud obscuring the sun, and frequent high winds give it a subantarcticcharacter (Falla 1948). Most of the surface of the islands, even steepslopes, is covered with a blanket of deep peat. This peat blanket wasstudied by a pedologist who was included in an expedition whichtravelled to the Auckland Islands on HMNZS Tui in November1954. A map of the islands showing the route taken by the Tui is shownin Fig. 1. The expedition spent only 8 days on the Islands. Detailedpedological observations were confined to the immediate vicinity ofRanui Cove, and, more particularly, the area between the camp and theLookout, a wartime coast-watching station situated on a plateau 180 ftabove sea level and about half a mile north-west of the camp (Figs. 1, 2).
NZ. J. agric. ReS. 3: 526-546
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 527
il!
IDw.,poiN'f"·llf I/s'-lq
I
i AuddanyI hlJ.nd\ i
Lij
~."~"'~h',,'I ","c,"
Zal:and
, /I "
,
~-+
IIF..-- N.Z.
I,;
I
/ _5O"~S_~1bY- / " "- ~~I!c,!,:!
- Ro" ~--.;;.;~!: _!~C~""'-'
~1 00'0E-. 1."
_~rO~/~::.., (""I \E'~ ""=-1"/f C.... \~--'-"-, I
- I
;;J7 I i;;~)L,~ !)~M_""M' i~ . i
cc.cs~,. i
~~ I+ -------" To N.Z.211<· ,"-_ " !
I~)~ 21'"" ,71 :I c;:/ J I I
}'- ~,' II -~J\ ........-.-, .1 . ~/ 5OSOS._\..' <! ---'; / _. .". ( '\I" ' / __>/~
0:\ J\:z.~_<_c.~~':.z;;y____ /59--1, ~~ __.:/ c L~)__ '("~~'5,t:"=-=---':l,""""d----:-7"" "-:::::"'"::.~ "=- -'v
I'm L, AI>AMS ISUNIl _
'0.~
C,u;se of H.M.N,Z.S. Tui SIIown Thllli;-
Scaleofmil~
10
Fig, 1,--Map of the Auckland Islands,
DESCRIPTION
ClimateSome climatic data arc available for the Auckland Islands. Observa
tions were made from 1941 to 1944, mainly at Carnley Harbour in thesouth, and the results are set out in Table 1. Temperatures (OF)range from an extreme maximum of 68° to an extreme minimum of27° with a mean temperature of 46°. The mean annual rainfall at PortRoss is 59.8 in. and at Carnley Harbour 82.6 in. over 331 rain days,An estimated mean over the group is 70-75 in.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
NN
ESS
W(Jl
N 0:> z ~ ~ N ~ ;, t"' ;,- Z tl '--< o C t:l Z ;, t"' o >,oj > o t:l o C t"' ..., ~ t"'
~ ~ UJ ~ ~ o ::r:
200'
150'
100'
Alt
itu
de
Scal
e
(App
rox.
)
CDQ
lQ
lG
)
Rot
aSc
rub
Tuss
ock
Veg
etat
ian
Leie
nd
9Q~
'Id
ltl'''
(i)
@(f
)
I
fl
o5°
,;.~
==-1r
/l~~--8:
~~'_J2
3'4~~/'
----
----
-
Ir,
/y'T
;;'I
'-"
~"~
~"dk
.
A~~:
::::<;
~"-~-__/__
~fLc~~·"-~
-------
-----.-t
;;USk~
e~:~Si
:irgrl
2.
2-~'
cI~~
~.u
sky
red
peal
01
_.....
•I
',.
,"'.
..I
:_~----
~../
II
•
-~------
-----
I""--.
:/'
,,-"~"
''''''
\~.
....,-
_---/-
I'
v.d
US
kvred
P,a
l04
M£
?W
lr'
_____
___~
:.:-~-
=--_
'I~.'e
ddlShblo
ckpe
at0
5rl
,red
dlS
h.b
faC
kpe
at0
2I
•.dk
."'
awn
faom
yv.
dusk
y-re
dpe
at02
:
Tuc
ker
Poi
ntI
\pe
at2
7'
v.du
sky
red
p\
;~~~
rack
.3
6'
dk.r
eddi
shbra
':~~;~
tOJ
\'tIfG
lx
xx
xfJ
'v.
dk.
braw
npe
aty
foam
nSII
redd
ish
bx
xx
xro
ck.
3911
vd
kro
wn
peat
03--
4.
usy
red
peat
03.
.
140+
"re
ddis
hbl
ack
peat
@ Coo
.to1
Sec
tfon
fJ!i.h
9"v.
dusk
yre
dpe
at03
.i
1/7"
redJ
ish
blac
kpe
at02
.
I1
9-bl
ack
p<at
05.
/0"
brow
nto
dk.
brow
nsi
ltlo
am.
xx
xx
xx
xro
ck.
72
2s
Fig
.2
.-D
iag
ram
mati
cS
ecti
onsh
owin
gth
ere
lati
on
ship
bet
wee
nth
ep
eat
bla
nk
etan
dto
po
gra
ph
y.
Ho
rizo
nta
lsc
ale
app
rox
imat
ely
20y
d~
Iin
.In
set
show
slo
cati
ono
ftr
anse
ctan
dto
po
gra
ph
yin
the
vic
init
yo
fR
an
ui
Co
ve.
'--< C Z ~
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
TA
BL
E1.
MET
EOR
OLO
GIC
AL
DA
TA,
AU
CK
LAN
DIS
LAN
DS
(CA
RN
LEY
HA
RB
OU
R)
(May
19
41
-May
1944
)
~ <D'
0'> o t""
t'1 ;I> :::: >< ;I> Z tl to'
t"" ;I> ~ t'1 :::: o :>;1 I 'i::t
t'1 ;I> >-l
(f} o t=: m
.~
>::0
!o-l
'-N
~8
n
>::"';
:;;
b/]
i(j0
t:~
0]
211
510
-1
-1
-
--1
-2
-2
-3
-1
-3
-2
2 21
22
-1
1-
2 1-
;: g1
';;JrF
l1
::r::
=Iz
,-
15
11
15
15
1
103
,6
2I
75
73
71
48
29
I1
8
12674
!-
Ave
rage
No.
ofD
ays
of
"-
Mea
nR
ainf
all
7.21
I25
1.61
65.
661
241.
682
5.73
!26
I1.
095
9.79
128
14.
0'4
79.
2529
1.94
77.
3629
2.46
45.
3329
1.16
47.
33I
30
I1.
136
5.88
290.
818
5.06
290.
957
1.15
.43
251.
368
•8.
5828
1.23
9
1 ' 82-:6
133
1-
73Ii
4.04
8.9
8.6
9.2
9.5
9.1
8.8
8.5
8.8
8.9
8.7
8.7
9.0
8.9
83 87 87 89 89 93 91 88 87 83 81 85 87
Mea
n*
Mea
n1-
---
-,R
elat
ive
I,C
lou
dI
Ik;
-H
um
idit
yA
mo
un
te
n';
;J
(%)
II(t
enth
s)~
~r~
,.c
:>::
Ix~
<l)
Iu
·"';
C\i...
.......
.......
I~
~::
g~0
35 38 37 29 27 30 29 28 30
31 30>
27 27<l) 8 b
dx'~
j:iI::
g
<l) 8 <l)
•...
x..
.til
~::g
68
4565
4566
4568
426
038
5238
5638
58
3755
3959
3961
406
041
I62
41
§~
§d
Q)
roil
l..
...
::g:
:gl
::g::g
Tem
per
atu
re(O
F.)
-1
-
I, I50
5551
565
055
4751
4347
4246
434
842
474
449
4450
4551
4753
4651
971
984
980
979
982
972
985
987
977
985
967
983
II
"-
k;-
>-...
";;J
'@~
•t;
+-
~!
~§
:Bj
~
Pre
ssur
e*(m
b)
~ til <l) ::g
Mo
nth
,I
Jan
.1'
00'5
I10
27F
eb.
1006
1027
I
Mar
.10
0810
25A
pr.
1004
1O'3
0!M
ay10
0610
32Ju
n.
,10G
'810
'31
1.lu
I.'1
01
010
33A
ug.
I10
0910
25S
ep.
1005
1023
Oct
.10
G8
I10
33N
ov.
1003
1024
Dec
.10
031
02
3!
Mea
ns
10
06
-T
otal
s-'
-I
Ext
rem
es1
1033
967
I
*O
bser
vati
ons
at09
00h
./N
.Z.S
.T.
(213
0G
.M.T
.)t
im
ean
dail
y(m
ax.
+m
in.)
NO
TE
.-A
nn
ual
rain
fall
atP
ort
Ros
sov
erth
epe
riod
May
19
41
-May
1945
was
59.8
inch
es.
An
esti
mat
edm
ean
ann
ual
rain
fall
over
the
grou
pis
70
-75
inch
es.
Tem
per
atu
rere
cord
sw
ere
inco
mpl
ete
du
rin
g19
43.
Ut
K>
<.0
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
530 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
Physiography
Most of the 220 square miles of land surface of the AucklandIslands is covered with peat. During the eight days spent on theislands the only peat-free areas observed were rock outcrops andapproximately 20 acres of sandhills behind Sandy Bay on EnderbyIsland. The rock outcrops, which appeared to be lava flows, giverise to small screes. Apart from these screes no obvious erosion scarswere observed on any of the islands, although the hummocky surfaceof the peat on hilly and steep slopes might indicate a downhill movement. In the vieinity of Port Ross, between Ranui Cove and TuckerPoint, the peat-covered surface terminates abruptly in cliffs up to 15 fthigh, but there seems to be a tendency for the peat to flow over theedge of the low cliffs and to produce an even slope down to the water'sedge.
The main island is drained by small streams, most of which flowin broad V-shaped gullies. The water in the streams flowing intoRanui Cove is stained dark brown by dissolved organic matter andappears to carry little material in suspension.
Vegetation
The plant associations growing on the peat may be divided intothree broad groups.
Fig. 3.~A section of the track to the Lookout, Ranui Cove. Tussock(D. antarctica) in the foreground, scrub (mainly Dracophyllumand Suttonia) in the middle background and rata forest in
the far background.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 531
1. Southern rata (Metrosideros umbellata) forest occurs In abelt around the coast, extending about a quarter of a mile inland.On exposed sites trees are stunted and deformed but in shelteredplaces individual trees attain a height of up to 30 ft. (Fig. 3). Underrata forest the ground is covered with a close mat of moss, liverwortsand lichens, which makes a very slippery surface (Fig. 5). Isolatedpatches up to 2 in. thick of dead rata leaves lie on the surface. Associatedtrees and shrubs include several species of Coprosma, the haumakoroa(Nothopanax simplex), the inaka (Dracophyllum longifolium) , andSuttonia divaricata (Cockayne 1927).
Fig. 4.-Dense vegetation conslstmg of mainly Suttonia, Dracophyllum,and rata in the vicinity of Ranui Cove.
2. Above the forest line there is a dense vegetation of rata andscrub in which Suttonia divaricata is dominant. It is associatedwith stunted rata, inaka, and several species of coprosma (Fig. 4).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
532 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGR1CULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
Fig. 5.-Section through the top horizons of profile 4. Note the mossliverwort-lichen mat on the surface.
3. A mixed association of tussock grassland, consisting mainlyof the large tussock (Danthonia antarctica) and various herbaceousplants, is dominant at higher altitudes. Its lower limit varies fromabout 300 ft above sea level in the north to about 100 ft above sealevel in the south (Fig. 6). In the north, patches of D. antarctica andthe subantarctic poa (Poa litorosa) occur interspersed among the rataforest and scrub associations at altitudes lower than 300 ft.
In detail this vegetation pattern is a mosaic. Thus althoughthe plateau upon which the Lookout is situated lies within the ratascrub zone, it supports an association consisting mainly of Oreoboluspectinatus and Gaimardia ciliata, with some stunted rata and tussock(D. antarctica) (Moar 1958 p.452).
The PeatIn order to study the relationship between the peat blanket and
topography, a transect was selected (Fig. 2) which traversed a variety
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
19(0) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 533
of slopes from the Lookout plateau to the lowland approximately 100 ftbelow. Eight sites were examined, and the observations are summarisedin Fig. 2. The section along this transect line shows that a layer ofpeat with an average thickness of approximately 6 ft overlies rock onall slopes. Depths recorded by Moar show appreciable thickening ofthe peat to about 23 ft on the flat platcau top (site 1) and to about15 ft in a depression on the lowland below (site 7).
Fig. 6.-Adams Island from Carnley Harbour. The rata and scrub atlow levels give way to tussock with increasing altitude.
Full profile descriptions at sites 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 are given inAppendix 1. These sites were also sampled for chcmical analyses andthe results are given in Table 2.
In all profiles studied in detail some mineral material lay betweenthe peat and the underlying rock (see also Moar 1958 pp. 458-9). Atsite 3 there was i to 1 in. of very dark grey peaty loam at 71 in. At site4 the peat was slightly loamy at 66 in.; at 72 in. there were dark brownto brown patches of peaty loam which merged with increasing depth intodark brown to very dark brown peaty loam. At site 5 a 12-in. layerof very dark brown loamy peat was identified at 40 in. At site 8,lOin. of brown to dark brown silt loam was found under 36 in. ofpeat. This mineral horizon is distinct both in colour and texturefrom the overlying peat and lies immediately beneath a horizon ofstrongly decomposed black peat which differs markedly in colour anddegree of decomposition from the peat higher in the profile (Fig. 7).
A striking feature of all the profiles examined was their unexpecteddryness. Four pits were dug on slopes of 1°,43°, 6°, and 17° and wereleft open for periods of up to 24 hours. Ground water did not run
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
534 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
Fig. 7.-Peat and underlying mineral soil exposed in a small cliff.The declivity of the cliff has been reduced by peat sliding overthe edge--the white line marks the top of the cliff. The stonesimbedded in the peat to the right of the spade are thoughtto have been deposited there by waves during storms.
into any of them. Two feet of water collected in the bottom of onepit that was left open overnight, but heavy rain fell during the nightand the pit was in a position to collect surface run-off. Furthermore,water disappears quite rapidly from the surface after rain. Eighthours after a period of heavy rain which lasted for 24 hours, the surfaceunder rata and scrub was in the same condition as it had been beforethe rain i.e. moist and slippery but not wet-no pools of water layon the ground.
In every profile described in detail the degree of decomposition ofthe peat in the major horizons was estimated according to a field scale(D1-DlO) following that used by von Post (1937) and based on anestimation of the amount of organic colloids present. Nowhere was therefound a state of decomposition greater than D6, i.e. strongly decomposed.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 535
Profiles 5 and 8 were the only two in which rock was exposed beneaththe peat and in both cases the lowest organic horizon of reddish-blackto black peat was determined as D6.
DISCUSSION
Origin and Development
The dominance of peat formation throughout the AucklandIslands under various plant communities and on a wide range of slopessuggests a climatic cause.
Rainfall is high and temperatures are low, the estimated meanannual rainfall over the group being 70-75 in. and the mean annualtemperature 46°F. The high mean relative humidity (87%) andthe high mean cloud cover (8.9), allied to the low atmospherictemperatures, must result in a low rate of evaporation from the soil.On Chatham Island Wright (1959) suggested that salts blown inlandfrom the sea had assisted peat development through retardation ofplant decomposition. This suggestion may equally well apply to theAuckland Islands where large amounts of cyclic salt would be expectedin the rainfall.
Aston (1909) concluded from his observations on their moisturestatus that the soils of the Auckland Islands, considering that theyreceive a daily or almost hourly rainfall, are naturally well drained.The following observations support this conclusion:
(a) the relative dryness of the top horizons.
(b) the distinct change in the depth of the peat and in the natureof its vegetative cover on sites that are naturally poorly drained.Two such localities were observed (Fig. 2, sites 1 and 7).In both these places features such as depressed margins andraised centres suggest raised bogs or convex basin peats (Moar1958, p. 459). At both these sites the vegetation consists of anassociation of tussock grassland and herbaceous plants.
(c) the relatively rapid disappearance of surface water from theground after rain (p.533).
Apart from the higher parts of some raised bogs, intrazonal peatdeposits are invariably slow draining.
Climate would thus appear to be the dominant factor in peatformation in the Auckland Islands, blanket peat being the zonal soilof the region. Variations are due mainly to the intrazonal influenceof topography which may produce a local accumulation of groundwater and a consequent thickening of the peat blanket.
Decamposition
Field observation on the peat soils of the Auckland Islands suggestthat they are not, in general, strongly decomposed. The moderatelylow D numbers, which are a measure of the organic colloidal materialpresent, and the fact that in most horizons there are recognisableplant remains, provide the main field evidence for this conclusion.Chemical evidence is not so conclusive. All the horizons analysed have
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
536 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
very high values for cation-exchange capacities (112 to 233 me.%),probably indicating strong decomposition. However, this is by nomeans certainly established on the basis of these figures alone, for theredoes seem to be a correlation between strong acidity and high cationexchange capacity. In intrazonal peats of the North Island of NewZealand, strongly acid peats generally have higher cation-exchangecapacity and lower base-saturation figures than less acid peats. TheAuckland Island peats are extremely acid (pH range 3.7 to 4.6) andhave low base-saturation figures (440/0 to 19%).
All the profiles examined in detail were developing under apparentlypredominantly aerobic conditions with humification probably thedominant process of decomposition. The high C IN ratios (46-68)for all samples, except 6638 A-D which are discussed later, suggestthat if humification is an active process it is not very effective, possiblybecause the parent material of these peat soils is supplied by predominantlywoody plants and probably contains a high proportion of substanceswhich are relatively resistant to decomposition. Furthermore, it ispossible that in profiles occupying well-drained positions (e.g. profiles3, 4, and 6) eluviation and subsequent downslope flushing have removeda considerable amount of the colloidal products of humification, leavingresistant residues which have relatively high C/N ratios and relativelylow D numbers.
It seems probable that anaerobic conditions exist in the lowerhorizons of profiles 1 and 7 which are situated on small raised bogs.The vegetation, structure, and position in the landscape of these raisedbogs suggest an abnormal accumulation of ground water. The slowingdown of decomposition because of anaerobic conditions has led to arelative increase in accumulation and a consequent thickening of thepeat blanket in these localities.
Marked profile differentiation was seen in two profiles (Nos. 5and 8). In profile 5 a reddish black horizon of strongly decomposed,friable, greasy peat with a high C/N ratio (59) and a very high cationexchange capacity (233 me. %) occurs at approximately 2 ft below thesurface. The upper horizons are very weakly to moderately decomposedand have slightly lower cation-exchange capacities (112, 191 me. %)although there is little difference in C IN ratios (58, 46). In profile8 the lowest peat horizon about 2 ft below the surface consists ofblack, soapy, -strongly decomposed peat with a relatively low C/Nratio. The upper horizons of this profile also have low C/N ratios,the reasons for which are discussed later. This lowest peat horizonin profile 8 has been dated by radiocarbon method at 6290 -+- 110years before present (Messrs Fergusson and Rafter, pers. comm.). Thisindicates that the marked profile differentiation in these two profiles iscaused by the presence of a fossil soil buried by 2 to 3 ft of more recentpeat. The peat in the fossil soil horizons is strongly decomposed becauseit is older than the overlying peat and because, in all probability, itwas formed under a warmer climate. Profiles 3, 4 and 6 show littleprofile differentiation apart from colour changes.
Movement and ErosionAston (1909) observed evidence of bog slides on the Auckland
Islands and noted seveml fresh scars, particularly around Carnley
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 537
Harbour, which he attributed to this form of erosion. No recognisablescars were seen during the 1954 expedition, but the following evidenceindicates that the peat does move down slope:
(a) the steep slope on which the section was located at theObservation Spot, Port Ross, is broken by several undulations.The largest of these takes the form of a depression with a distinctmound at the outside edge (see profiles 5 and 6, Figure 2).There is an appreciable thinning of the peat in the depressionbehind the mound, and a thickening on the mound itself. Thisfeature may have been caused by a small peat slide checkedperhaps by a dense growth of forest. There appeared to be.no thinning of the peat on the steep slope behind the depressionand in fact shallow profiles were recorded only immediatelybehind the mound. If the peat is constantly moving downslope the scar caused by this peat slide on the steep slopeimmediately behind the depression could have been healedfrom the slopes above and only on the gentle slope of thedepression behind the mound are the effects of the slide stillnoticeable.
(b) In many places along the stretch of coast between Ranui Coveand Tucker Point the peat almost completely covers the faceof a low cliff (Fig. 7) .
It is apparent from (a) that in addition to slow flow the peatblanket is subject to rapid slides. These appear to take place onsteep slopes where the slow down-slope movement of the peat isimpeded by vegetation. The peat builds up behind the obstructionuntil the increasing weight overcomes the barrier and a small landslide occurs. Thus slow movement of peat down-slope, acceleratedoccasionally by a rapid slide, is the major process of erosion operatingon these soils.
It would seem that two processes are affecting the surface levelof the peat. Creep and slides are lowering the surface; and densevegetation and slow decomposition are adding to the peat deposits. Thelatter process is more effective than the former with the result that thepeat deposits and the land surface in general are building up at thepresent time.
Nowhere in the Auckland Islands was any evidence seen thatwould indicate the degeneration of the peat by the natural developmentof cracks or channels, and consequent erosion, as has been observed onsome Northern Hemisphere blanket peats (Fraser 1933).
Underlying Mineral Material
In all the profiles described in which rock was reached, a horizonwith high mineral content was encountered immediately above therock. As described in Appendix 1, the mineral horizon ranges froma few inches of black loamy peat to lOin. of brown to dark brownsilt loam. This material may possibly be derived from the weatheringof rock outcrops in the uplands and carried down in the peat. However, the fine texture of the material and the well defined nature ofthe horizon does not support this view. In the high-moor peats of
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
538 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
Macquarie Island, which are from 3 to 5 ft thick, mineral matter occursboth evenly distributed throughout the peat and also as a distinct,sharply defined horizon. The evenly distributed material is consideredto be derived from landslips (Law and Burstall 1956).
Alternatively, it is possible that this mineral material is beingweathered at present from the basalt underlying the peat, but the datingof the peat horizon immediately above the 10 in. of silt loam in profile8 at 6290 -+- 110 years suggests that these two horizons represent afossil soil, and that the silt loam was weathered from the basalt beforethe accumulation of the present blanket peat. Such a soil woulddevelop under warmer conditions than at present prevail in the AucklandIslands. The date of 6290 -+- 110 years suggests a correlation with thepost-glacial thermal maximum period which has been dated by Horberg(1954, quoted by Stevens 1956, p.227) as 7000 to 4000 years ago.The date obtained from the Auckland Islands may not mark theclose of the thermal maximum because the sample site was an estimated5 ft above sea level and Stevens (1956, p.227) concluded that thehighest sea level attained during the thermal maximum in the HuttValley district was 10 ft above present-day mean sea level, which hetentatively dated as about 4000 years ago. It seems strange that theAuckland Island fossil soil has remained so well preserved if indeed ithas been inundated by a rise of sea level, but in view of the dates obtainedin other parts of the world for the close of the thermal maximum period,this possibility cannot be excluded. By applying the date establishedoverseas for the close of the thermal maximum it would appear thatthe blanket peats of the Auckland Islands are at least 4000 years old.
On the evidence of profiles 5 and 8, where the fossil soil wasdefinitely identified, between 2 and 3 ft of blanket peat have accumulatedin this time, but in profiles 3 and 4, where peaty loam textures are theonly indication of a fossil soil, the evidence suggests that a blanket ofpeat 5 to 6 ft thick has been formed in the present cycle.
Animal Contributors
The Auckland Islands abound in sea lions and oceanic birds suchas penguins, shags, and petrels (Falla 1948, p.142). Many of thesecreatures make periodic contact with the soil either by burrowing intoit, settling temporarily on it or travelling across it, and some of thechemical features of profile 8 and the profile sampled on CampbellIsland provide an interesting example of the effect animal life canhave on soil formation.
The total nitrogen values of samples from these two profiles arevery high and they display lower carbon-to-nitrogen ratios than dothe others. In New Zealand, ratios of 50-60 are usual for acid peats(see Soil Set 110, p.214, N.Z. Soil Bureau Bull. n.s. 5) and comparedwith these the ratios for samples 6638 A-D and 6644 A-C are low for acidpeats and may not express exactly the degree of decomposition. Theymay be partly influenced by an influx of nitrogen from animals and thisview is supported by the following observations:
(a) The samples having lower C IN ratios were taken from nearthe sea where modification by birds and seals could well occur,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 539
(b) Several soil samples analysed previously, and known to havebeen altered by animal life, have shown similarly low C INratios. Examples are shown in Table 3 and it may be seenfrom these results that:
Sample No. 2976A from Bream Island had a pH of 3.5,a C/N ratio of 13 and contained free nitrate.Sample No. S.B. 6668, a sample collected by Dr Falla fromthe bottom of a petrel's burrow on Ocean Island, AucklandIslands had a pH of 3.3 and while the organic carboncontent was very high, the C/N ratio was kept low (13)by a very high nitrogen content.Sample Nos. S.B. 6663 A, B, C, D, collected by Mr W. T.Ward from Stephens Island, had a top-soil C/N ratio of 11,dropping to 5 further down the profile.
(c) High citric-soluble-phosphorus figures were obtained from thesoils in Table 3 and may be regarded as resulting from animalexcreta. The lower horizons of the soils from site 8 and fromCampbell Island are also higher in phosphorus than are othersamples in Table 2. The mineral horizons of these two profilescontain extremely high contents of citric-soluble phosphorusand it may be that most of the phosphorus from the animalshas passed through the peat to be held by the underlyingmineral material. On the other hand, the extremely highfigures may be due to the naturally high phosphorus content ofthe basaltic parent material of these mineral horizons.
(d) Potassium figures are higher in the lower horizons of profile 8than in those of profile 5 which is to be expected if animalexcreta have been added to the former. The exchangeablepotassium figures in the samples quoted in Table 3 are also high,especially in relation to the other bases present.
Chemistry
Analyses of profiles 8, 5, 6, 3, 4, a sample of calcareous sand fromEnderby Island, and also of a soil sampled at Campbell Islandare shown in Table 2.
With the exception of samples 6638D, 6641, 6644B and 6644C(which are minel'al soils) the samples analysed are peats which havesimilar losses on ignition and which are all extremely acid.
The cation-exchange capacities of the organic layers are all veryhigh and vary considerably. The cation-exchange capacities of themineral horizons 6638D and 6644C are also very high and this isprobably due to the decomposed basalt parent material which can havehigh ion-exchange properties without being strongly weathered, ashas been found by Dr L. D. Swindale (pers. comm.) for soils derivedfrom basalt in Central Otago, N.Z.
Samples 6638 and 6639 were analysed both for exchangeable basesand for bases in the ash. They were chosen for more detailed analysesbecause they afforded interesting comparisons between a coastal profile(Profile 8-6638) and a profile from a higher altitude and further fromthe sea (Profile 5-6639). As well as the probable differences due to
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
TA
BL
E2
(a).
CH
EMIC
AL
AN
ALY
SES
Auc
klan
dIs
land
sS
ampl
esco
llec
ted
byM
.L
.L
eam
y.
..
<..n
Cam
pbel
lIs
land
sS
ampl
esco
llec
ted
byN
.M
.R
idg
way
Ana
lyse
dby
E.
A.
Chr
IstI
ean
dJ.
C.
Jenn
mgs
.6
Ana
lyse
so
fA
sh
.~.
Z.
ci0
l::::\;
0-~.
ML
ocat
IOn
ZZ
~t"
-c
~-
C~
g]~
~~:::::
v~
C~
§§
'2v
:s~
did
i.
~~N
-0
.-B
20
';l;":::
S~
....;-
S-
S-
v0
t"l
['§
So
.,..,
bZ
~'2
~..c:
0~
~b
/)~
Su
;.-
~V3
Q0
ZU
j~
~~
~~;
~c3
~~J
~~
8~
IZ
Tu
cker
Po
int
-8-
-;6~
8AI~-
955
*2.
10'
2695
.753
-~~;;;
35.1
4.2
,;
Po
rtR
oss
6638
B1
0-2
055
*1.
7931
95.9
550.
1315
.429
.23.
4c:
6638
C2
8-3
45
0*
1.38
3687
.428
7.80
19.7
18.4
1.9
~
6638
D3
6-4
03.
00.
1520
10.4
12i8
5.0
4.7
9.8
1.3
~B
elow
..O
bs.
566
39A
1-
4I
56*
0.97
5897
.538
0.19
20.9
20.8
3..6
t"'
Sp
ot,
Ran
ui
6639
B5
-25
55*
1.20
4697
.152
0.14
27.0
32.4
1.1
0C
ove,
Po
rt66
39C
26
-40
55*
0.93
5996
.366
0.28
35.0
41
.00.
9'1
lR
oss
I66
39D
41~5
252
*0.
8561
90.7
294.
5419
.017
.0'
0.8
~A
sfo
r66
396
I66
40A
OL
856
*0.
8963
98.4
30~
I66
40B
8--4
756
*0.
8963
98.3
30'
0O
bs.
Spo
t,R
anu
i3
6642
A6
-12
56*
1.1
748
98.3
43~
Cov
e,P
ort
Ros
sI'
6642
B1
3-1
856
*0.
8368
97.9
46'"'
466
43A
3-
756
*0.
9857
97.8
35c:
As
for
66'3
9I
6643
B8
-35
II'56
*0.
8764
97.6
41~
6643
C3
6-4
855
*0.
8465
96.7
53t"
'I
~---------
.---....;-
t"l
Per
seve
ranc
eH
ar.[
I664
4A1
2-4
856
*1.
65I
3497
.626
Ig;
Cam
pbel
lIs
lan
dI
6644
B4
8-1
08
30.6
1.13
127
67.2
18I
~66
44C
10'8
-114
1.1
0'.0
'814
5.3
13(l
Beh
ind
San
dy
:~
Bea
ch,
En
der
by
.Is
lan
d66
412
-12
1.5
0.25
6I
17.2
~ '--<
-------
c:*
As
ou
rso
ilan
alys
ism
etho
dsar
en
ot
suit
able
abov
e4
0%
carb
onth
ese
Zb
d.
dL
oss
on
igni
tion
t"l
figu
res
have
een
eter
mm
eb
y:-
-----1
.75
---
di.
-S
~b
/)
35.1
29.2
18.4
9.8
20.9
20.8
32.4
41
.017
.0'di
-S
~ ~c3
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
TA
BL
E2
(b).
CH
EMIC
AL
AN
ALY
SES
Auc
klan
dIs
land
sS
ampl
esco
llec
ted
byM
.L
.L
eam
yh
"d
'to
Cb
IIIId
SI
IIt
db
NM
R'd
Ana
lyse
dby
E.
A.
Cns
tIe
anJ.
C.
Jenm
ngs.
0)
amp
es
ans
amp
esco
ece
y.
.I
gway
0
Cat
ion
Exc
hang
eR
esul
tsI
1%
Cit
ric
Sol
uble
P20
5
~-----------~
----
.~
*.~
.o
·.
~>::
Lo
cati
on
ZZ
>::*.
Soj
§~
~"
~.:;
-~
'"~
~P
o<
S'
S~
.~oj
ojt":
oj~
C'-
C;~
;;:::Po<
-B0
0i~
...S
S"'S
SbD
"":l
>::"0
r~
SPo<
.,
~'
.....;:l
...,~
.....
t'1e
C'i$
(1)
~~o
~~
IIQ~!
C'i$
bJJ
ro0
0o
+->
>-~
rfJ
1=4Po<
I=4Z
0Eo
-<'§
'-rf
Ji
0~
;:;:::
Z..:i
[...,'§
'-'Q
~_
__
__
_I
~
I
II
II»
Tu
cker
Po
int
866
38A
1-
94.
6D
414
463
4413
.71
20
.24.
329
.20'
.028
0.02
9I
97Z
6638
B10
'-20
4.1
D3
174
6C'
351'
0.5
20.0
3.2
38.0
0.01
801
.020
I90
t:I66
38C
28
-34
3.8
D6
144
5337
6.8
15.6
1.5
19.0
'0.
019
0.02
286
~66
38D
36
-44
4.4
5317
:)23.
18.
91.
46.
80.
241
0.37
0I
65»
Bel
owO
bs.
566
39A
1~4
4.::3
D3
112
4238
18.1
13.9
3.6
6.1
0.04
70.
052
91~
6639
B5
-25
4.]
D5
191
5629
I20
.819
.50.
86.
30.
006
O.O
OS
75~
6639
C2
6-4
04.
2D
623
31
723
1'
28.6
29.4
0.9
6.7
0.00
40.
004
100
066
39D
41
-52
4.0
150
3020
12.3
14.0
0.5
4.0
0.0'
0'7
0.00
'710
0[:;
As
for
6639
A6
6640
A0
-8
3.9
D4
-513
433
250.
022
0.0'
2588
I66
4GB
8-4
73.
7D
417
533
190'.
ODS
0.01
08
0."
Beh
ind
San
dy
~B
each
,E
nd
erb
y66
412
-12
7.7
...,Is
lan
d(f
1
Obs
.S
pot,
Ran
ui
366
42A
6-1
24.
0D
312
128
230:
.n10
0.01
283
8C
ove,
Po
rtR
oss
6642
B13~18
3.9
D2
19
046
2401 .0
090.
0'10
90
i;;66
43A
3-
73.
9D
314
640
270.
023
0.02
785
As
for
6639
A4
6643
B8
-35
3.9
D4
203
5929
0.01
5G
l.016
9466
43C
36
-48
4.0
D4
I21
363
30'
G.O
G3
0.00
475
Per
serv
eran
ceH
ar.
6644
A1
2-4
83
.6.
11
44-;----1
-5
-1
--,
0.G
'07
0.00
'710
0C
ampb
ell
Isla
nd
6644
B4
8-1
08
3.7
i95
1312
0.18
60.
206
90
6644
C10
'8-1
445.
1'I
59
1830
0.31
10.
313
99I
~_
__
_~
c--_~_
___
'___
____
..,.
*A
sd
eter
min
edby
M.
L.
Lea
my
inth
efi
eld.
,.....
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
Lo
cati
on
Bre
amIs
.
Oce
anIs
.
Ste
ph
ens
Is.
TA
BL
E3.
SOIL
SAM
PLES
AK
ALY
SED
PREV
IOU
SLY
WH
ICH
HA
VE
BEE:
oIA
LTER
EDBY
AN
IMA
LL
IFE
D~pth
1%C
itri
cI
CN
CIN
.IC
.E.C
.B
.S.
Exc
h.L
ab.
No.
pH
Sol.
P,O
,o/t
0/(
C'l.
m.
%G
0m
e.%
%m
e.%
--
---------
I29
76A
0-
63.
50.
955
11.8
0.92
1356
.7
I11
I4.
2B
6-1
22.
70.
813
6.7
0.38
185
6.0
31.
4
S.B
.666
8I
3.3
0.07
031
.42.
5013
IS
.B.6
663A
I0
-6
3.8
0.46
28.
30.
7611
38
.014
3.0
S.B
.666
3B6
-12
3.0
0.41
56.
80'
.60
1139
.62
0.2
S.B
.666
3CI
12
-18
3.0'
0'.4
385.
90'
.45
1339
.12
0.2
S.B
.666
3D18
-24-
3.0'
0.43
80.
70'
.13
519
.54
0.1
-----
NO
TE
.-P
rofi
les
2976
and
S.B
.666
3co
ntai
ned
free
nitr
ate.
VI .... ~ Z t'
j ... < N t'j > t"" :>- Z t1
Exc
h.E
x:h
.I
Exc
h.'-
< 0!'.J
1o,-.
K.
Na
c::m
c.%
me.
%m
e.%
:<l Z :>- t""
22
I1.
5I
00.
7I
0.9
OJ > Cl :<l 0
0.8
0.70
0.7
c::0.
00.
650.
3t"" >-1
0.2
0'.8
50.
5c::
G.O
0/55
0.1
:<l :>- t"" :;0 t'j
[fJ
t'j :>- :<l
0 ~
~ '-< c:: z t'j
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 543
animal activity, there may be differences caused by degree of exposure tocyclic salt. The results indeed show a marked difference in sodiumfigures-those for the coastal profile being much higher than those forthe inland profile. However, the rise for magnesium, which is usuallyassociated with cyclic salt effect, is not apparent and is possibly beingmasked either by return of magnesium from vegetation or by mixing ofthe peat with the underlying olivine basalt.
It is interesting to note that the increase in calcium and magnesiumin the more strongly decomposed horizon of profile 5 (6639C) is notacompanied by an increase of potassium. The potassium content of thetop horizon is high and it would seem that this due either to leachingof the older material or to a faster uptake and return of this element bythe vegetation.
CONCLUSIONS
In this study, the peats of the Auckland Islands have been treatedas soils rather than as accumulations of plant remains, in the belief thatpedological techniques can add to the understanding of peat deposits.The main conclusions are:
( 1) That blanket peat is the zonal soil of this region.
(2) That the thickness of the peat blanket is approximately constanton all angles of slope from 1° to 43°, with the exception ofpoorly drained flat surfaces or depressions where the development of intrazonal peats produces an appreciable thickeningof the blanket.
(3) That the main processes operating in the zonal soils areaccumulation, aerobic decomposition, and possibly eluviation.
(4) That accumulation of blanket peat is opposed by only weakerosive forces, which is resulting in the land surface of theAuckland Islands being slowly built up.
(5) That the present peat-forming period dates from the closeof the post-glacial thermal maximum period.
(6) That the activities of animals such as birds and seals have considerably affected the chemistry of some coastal soils.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledge the help of the following:Mr N. T. Moar, Botany Division, DSIR, who supplied some of themeasurements of peat depths and also identified many plants.
Officers of the N.Z. Meteorological Service who supplied dataon the climate of the Islands.
Officers and men of HMNZS Tui who provided transport andassistance in the field.
REFERENCES
Aston, B. C. 1909: The Soils and Soil Formers of the SubantarcticIslands. In C. Chilton (Ed.) "The Subantarctic Islands ofNew Zealand". Vol. 2 pp. 745-77. Government Printer,Wellington, N.Z,
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
544 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
Cockayne, L. 1927: New Zealand Plants and their Story. N.Z. Boardof Science and Art, Manual No.6.
Falla, R. A. 1948: The Outlying Islands of New Zealand. N.z. Ceogr.4(2): 127-54.
Fraser, G. K. 1933: Studies of Certain Scottish Moorlands in Relationto Tree Growth. For. Comm., Lond. Bull. 15.
Horberg, L. 1954: Rocky Mountain and Continental PleistoceneDeposits in the Waterton Region, Alberta. Ceol. Soc. Amer.Bull. 65: 1093-1150'.
Law, P. G.; Burstall, T. 1956: Macquarie Island. Aust. Nat. Antarct.Res. ExPed. Inter. ReP. 14.
Moar, N. T. -1958: Contributions to the Quaternary History of theNew Zealand Flora: 1. Auckland Island Peat Studies. N.Z.].Sci. 1: 449-65.
N.Z. Soil Bureau 1954: General Survey of the Soils of North Island,New Zealand. N.Z. Soil Bur. Bull. n.s. 5.
Stevens, G. R. 1956: Stratigraphy of the Hutt Valley, New Zealand.N.Z. ]. Sci. Tech. B38: 201-35.
von Post, L. 1937: The Geographical Survey of Irish Bogs. Irish Nat.]. 6: 211.
Wright, A. C. S. 1959: Soils of Chatham Island (Rekohu). N.Z.Soil Bur. Bull. 19.
APPENDIX I-DETAILED PROFILE DESCRIPTIONS
Profile 3
Location:Height:Slope:Aspect:Vegeta tion :
Profile:i-I in.
3i in.
8 in.
19 in.
Profile 4
Location:Height:Slope:Aspect:Vegetation:
Profile:2 Ill.
6 Ill.
11 yards NNE of Observation Spot, Ranui Cove.184 ft. above sea level.1,0.NNE.Rata (Metrosideros umbellata)-4 to 5 ft high, stunted;Dracophyllum longifolium-2 to 3 ft high; tussock (Danthoniaantarctica) ; lichen and moss, liverwort.
dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2) peat; D3; plant remains predominantly mosses, liverworts and lichens, many rata roots(living); the surface is covered with a mat of liverwort, moss,and lichen; when this peat is squeezed a little turbid brown waterappears; clear wavy boundary;dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2) peat; D3; plant remains finematted roots and tussock leaves, many rata roots (living);clear smooth boundary;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) peat; D3; plant remains rootsand twigs of woody plants (probably rata) and some tussockleaves; gradual irregular boundary;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) peat; D2; plant remains largepieces of woody plants black throughout and some tussockleaves.At 5 to 6 ft the peat becomes black (5YR 2/1) and so drythat no moisture was extracted by hand pressure. No recognisable plant remains. At 6 ft the basalt was reached. Thereappears to be "bout! to 1 in. of mineral soil above the rockvery dark grey (5YR 3/1) peaty loam.
About 30' yd NNE of Observation Spot. Ranui Cove.166 ft above sea level.43°NNEMo&~, liverworts, and lichens, Dracophyllum longifolium, Hebeelliptica, Suttonia divaricata, Uncinia sp., rata (M. umbellata).
reddish black (lOR 2/1) peat; D3; abundant roots, plantremains moss, liverwort, dracophyllum; abrupt smooth boundary;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) peat; D3; abundant rootsincluding large rata roots; plant remains small roots, medium
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
1960) LEAMY AND BLAKEMORE-PEAT SOILS 545
'2.7 m.
30'-36 m.
Profile 5
Location:Height:Slope:Aspect:Vegetation:
Profile:4 m.
21 m.
15 in.
12 m.
on
Profile 6
Location:Height:Slope:Aspect:Vegetation:
Profile:8 m.
39 m.
on 40 m.
Profile 8
Location:
Height:Slope:Aspect:Vegetation:
roots, and some small woody twigs, friable; diffuse wavyboundary;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) peat; D4; many roots; plantremains rata roots and twigs; there are some firm, fibrous, shinywhen broken, veined remains which may be rata leaves; firm;clear smooth boundary;dark reddish brown (5YR 2/2) friable peat; D4; few tomany roots, plant remains woody twigs and roots.At 66 in. the peat is slightly loamy. At 72 in. spots of darkbrown to brown mineral material of peaty loam texture appear.Between 72 and 80 in. this becomes a dark brown to very darkbrown greasy peaty loam. Basalt at 85 in.
About 75 yd NNE of Observation Spot, Ranui Cove.150- ft above sea level.6'°.NNE.Liverworts, moss, Suttonia divaricata, Nothopanax simplex,rata (M. umbellata) , Dracophyllum longifolium.
reddish black (lOR 2/1) peat, fibrous; D3; abundant roots;plant remains sedge-like le:lVes, rata leaves, small roots;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) firm peat; D5; many roots;plant remains woody twigs and roots (probably rata) alsosedge-like leaves; large round patches (up to 9 in. in diameter)of a dark reddish brown (2.5YR 3/4) colour throughout thishorizon seem slightly less decomposed (D4); clear smoothboundary;reddish black (10R 2/1) friable greasy peat; D6; few roots;woody branches or twigs the only recognisable plant remains;lighter patches of a very dusky red (lOR 2/2) colour which arefirmer than the matrix, but are more diffuse and less welldefined than those of the above horizon; peat silty at the baseof this horizon;very dark brown ( 10'YR 2/2) greasy loamy peat, massive,sticky, non plastic, contains carbonaceous material includingrecognisable twigs and branches; a discontinous brown (1 OYR4/3) band at the top of this horizon.weathered basalt.
About 90' yd NNE of Observation Spot, Ranui Cove.154 ft above sea level.17°.NNE.Ratel (M. umbellata) , Suttonia divaricata, Dracophyllumlongifolium, moss, lichen.
reddish brown (5YR 2/2) friable peat; D4-5; abundant roots;plant remains small woody twigs and roots;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) firm fibrous peat; D4; manyroots; plant remains mostly large red woody fragments (rata);reddish black (lOR 2/1) soft non-fibrous peat containing fewroots and medium and large woody fragments.
At the head of the first bay NNW of Ranui Cove. Profileexposed in cliff section.About 5 ft above sea level.12°.N to NE.Uncinia sp. (a sedge), tussock (D. antarctica) , Hebe elliptica,rata, Dracophyllum longifolium, small ferns, Poa litorosa, moss,and liverworts.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4
546 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH (JUNE
Profile:2 m.
i- In.
9 m.
17 m.
9 m.
10 m.
on
dead twigs, leaves and bark of dracophyllum tussock, hebeand rata;dark reddish brown (5YR 212) matted roots of small plantsprobably liverworts and moss; clear wavy boundary;very dusky red (2.5YR 2/2) peat; D4; many living roots;plant remains small roots, tussock stems and leaves, woody twigs(probably hebe) -sometimes lighter coloured patches areassociated with the woody material; clear smooth boundary;reddish black (l'OR 2/1) peat; D3; abundant living roots; plantremains a few dead roots unidentified; weakly developed fineand very fine granular structure; abrupt wavy boundary;black (5YR 2/1) peat, slightly silty at the base of the horizon,soapy; D6; abundant live roots; plant remains twigs and smallbranches almost completely carbonised, many small lumps ofcarbon present; irregular smooth boundary; 629'0 ± 110 yearsB.P. by C14 determination (Messrs Fergusson and Rafter,pers. comm.)brown to dark brown (7.5YR 4/2 to 3/2) silt loam; firm;mas~ive with a suggestion of a weak fine granular structure;many dark streaks of carbon mark root channels; manyliving roots; few distinct fine light yellow, greyish greenand red brown spots mark less weathered patches; betweenthis horizon and the one above is a compact layer of hardenedbrown silt loam which breaks out in lumps;dark olive grey and dark reddish brown (5Y 3/2 and 2.5YR3/4) weathered rock (fine grained olivine basalt).
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
ity o
f U
tah]
at 0
3:34
07
Oct
ober
201
4