Rocío Dresser 71
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instructionon Teachers and Students
Rocío DresserSan José State University
Issues in Teacher Education, Spring 2012
Scriptedreadingprogramshavehadanegativeimpactonteachersandstudentsaroundthecountry.Manyschooldistrictshaveadoptedtheseprogramsasawaytocomplywithstateandfederalmandates(Griffith,2008;Milosovic,2007).Thismovefromteacherledtoscriptedinstructionhasleftteachersfeelingpowerlessandoverwhelmed.Theyareoftencaughtbetweenwhattheyareaskedtodoandwhattheyknowisrightfortheirstudents(MacGillivray,Ardell,Curwen,&Palma,2004).It isevenmoreproblematicforteacherswhentheyseethatEnglishlearnersandotherstudentswithspecialneedsarenotmeetingtheiracademicgoals. Thequestioneducatorsaskiswhatmakesastudentaproficientreader? Last fall a young woman approached me and asked me if Irememberedher.Minervawasoneofmyfifth-gradeEnglishlearningstudentsandwasnowaseniorincollege.Shefondlyremembersourfifth-gradeclass,includingtheplays,songs,andbookclubs.ShewastheleadactorforoneofourplaysthatdealtwiththeAmericanRevolution.Thatyearthestudentsreadmanyselectionsrelatedtothishistoricalperiodandlaterwroteascriptfortheplay.Inmiddleschool,Minervajoined the school theater and participated in several performances.EventhoughshewasnotproficientinEnglishduringthefifthgradeandshecamefromafamilythathadlimitedresources,shewasableto
Rocío Dresser is an associate professor in the College of Education at San José State University. Her email address is [email protected]
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction72
Issues in Teacher Education
achievehereducationalgoals,includingbecomingaproficientreader.LikeMinerva,childrenaroundthecountrycanbecomeavidreadersiftheylearntoenjoyreading. Today,effectiveandcreativeteacherdesigned instruction isbeingreplacedbyscriptedreadingprograms.Theseprogramsarechangingtheroleoftheteacherintheclassroomfromprofessionalstomeretransmittersofknowledge.Theideathattheroleoftheteacherhadchangedbecameevidentwhileconductingastudywithelementaryschoolteachersfromalocalschool.ThefiveparticipatingteacherswereconcernedabouttheirEnglishlearners(ELs)notmeetingtheiracademicrequirements.Theyattributedtheirstudents’low-testscorestothefactthatalargenumberofthemwereproficientdecoders,butstruggledwithreadingcomprehensionandcontentknowledge.Theyfeltthatthescriptedliteracyprogramwasrushedanddidnotgivethemenoughtimetotakeacloserlookatstudents’individualreadingneeds.Thisarticlebeginswithabriefoverviewoftheinitialstudyandpresentssomeoftheunexpectedfindings.Thearticlealsoexploressomeoftheunintendedconsequencesofscriptedreadingprogramsaswellastheclaimsmadebysomeproponents.Attheend,itprovidessomealternativestoscriptedinstruction.
The Study
ThiswasanActionResearchstudy.Inactionresearch,thegoalisforteachersandtheresearchertoworktogethertoidentifytheproblem,formulatetheresearchquestion,collectandanalyzethedata,andinter-pretthefindings(Savin-Baden&Wimpenny,2007).Theparticipatingteachersdidnotthinkthescriptedreadingprogramtheywereusingwaseffectiveinthatalargenumberofstudentshaddifficultycomprehend-ingtextandrememberingcomplexconcepts.Inanattempttoaddresstheseneeds,thisstudyexaminedtheimpactofblendingtwowell-knownteachingmethods,ReciprocalTeachingandNarrowReading.Thegoalwasfortheparticipatingteacherstolearnhowtoimbedthesetwomethodsintothescriptedreadingprogramandacrossthecurriculum.Scriptedreadingprogramsarecommerciallydesignedand“scientifically-based”literacyprograms inwhich language instruction ishighlycontrolled(Milosovic,2007,p.28).ReciprocalTeachingandNarrowReadingwereselectedbecauseithasbeennotedthatinstructionalmethodsthatdealwiththeintegrationoftwotypesofknowledge:(a)declarativeknowledge(knowledgeofconceptsandprinciples)(Chi&Ceci,1987;Heibert,1986),and(b)linguisticcontentknowledge(academiclanguage)(Cummins,2000)aremosteffective(Dresser,2000). Reciprocal Teaching helps students develop knowledge modules
Rocío Dresser 73
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
inlong-termmemorythatcanbeaccessedbythelearnerwhenneeded(Brown&Palincsar,1985;Lubliner,2001).Studentslearncognitivestrat-egiessuchaspredicting,questioning,clarifyingandsummarizing.Theyworkingroupsoffourwheretheydiscussthereadingselection.Eachstudentisresponsibleforoneofthestrategies.Learnerswhomasterthesestrategiestendtohavebetterreadingcomprehensionskills(Brown&Palincsar,1985;Takala,2006).ThegoalofNarrowReadingistoincreasevocabularyandcontentknowledgebyreadingselectionsfromonegenre,author,ortheme(Cho,Ahn,&Krashen,2005;Schmitt&Carter,2000).This recycling provides the reader with familiar context, backgroundknowledgeandvocabulary,whichincreasesreadingcomprehensionandlearning(Cho,Ahn,&Krashen)asdepictedinFigure1. Anintegratedthematiclanguageartsandscienceunitwasdesignedandimplementedinallfourthgradeclassesinaninnercityelementaryschoolforsixweeks.Thesciencecomponentforthisunitconsistedofrocksandminerals,whichisalignedwiththeCaliforniasciencecontentstandardsforpublicschoolsforfourthgrade(http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/sciencestnd.pdf).Threepreandpost-tests(QualitativeReadingInventory[QRI],anessay,andacontentareateacher-designedtest)wereadministeredtoallstudents.TheQRIincludesacollectionofexpositoryandnarrativereadingmaterials.Itassessesstudents’priorknowledge,readingfluency,vocabulary,readingcomprehension,retellingandtheirabilitytorespondtoimplicitandexplicitquestions(Leslie&SchudtCaldwell,2005). Asteacherspredicted,thepre-testsshowedthat18%ofthestudentsweredecodingbelowgradelevelandhadlimitedcomprehension.Seventy-onepercentofthestudentsweredecodingatgradelevel;incontrast,theywereatafrustrationorinstructionallevelinreadingcomprehen-sion.Elevenpercentofstudentsreadatanindependentlevelandwereataninstructionalorindependentlevelinreadingcomprehension. Atthebeginningofthestudy,teachersandstudentsparticipatedinReciprocalTeachingreadingactivities.Oncestudentsunderstoodtheirroles and learned how to use the reading comprehension strategies,theyreadinsmallgroups.Alargecollectionofbooks,videosandalist
Figure 1Comprehension and Learning
ComprehensionandLearning
FamiliarContext BackgroundKnowledge Vocabulary
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction74
Issues in Teacher Education
ofwebsitesthatdealtwithrocksweremadeavailableforstudentsandteachers.Thestudentsreadseveralselectionsonrocksandminerals,participatedinexperiments,drewtherockcycle,classifiedrocks,devel-opedvocabularylists,andwrotepredictions,questionsandsummaries.TheyalsoviewedvideosandusedtheInternettoaccesswebsites.Attheendofthestudy,thedatawerecollected,codedandanalyzed.Theresults showed that12%of thestudentsweredecodingbelowgradelevelandhadlimitedcomprehension.Therewasasmallimprovementamongthisgroupofstudents.ThefactthattheywerelimitedEnglishspeakersmayexplainwhytheyhaddifficultyreadingandwriting.TheintermediateEnglishlearnersmadethelargestgains.Seventypercentofthestudentsreadatgradelevel.Only5%wereatafrustrationlevelinreadingcomprehensionwhereastherestofthestudentsachievedaninstructionallevel.Thestudentsreadingatanindependentlevelrosefrom11%to18%.Amajorityofthesestudentsachievedanindependentlevelofreadingcomprehension. Thefirstassessmentsshowedthatstudentshadlittleornoknowledgeofrocks.Theyrespondedtothecontentknowledgequestions(Whatisamineral?)withoneortwowordresponses(“big,alot”)ortheywrote,“Idonotknow.”Attheendofthestudy,studentsrespondedincompletesentencesandusedthevocabularyrelatedtorocksandminerals.Danielwrote,“Someofthethings[materials]youmightfindinrocksarelava,soil, and minerals.”They wrote summaries that demonstrated theirunderstandingofrocksandminerals.Mayrawrote:
IhavejustreadthearticleMagma.Itsaysthatwhenmagmarisesuptothesurface[oftheearth]itmakescrackstomakespace.Themagmamightmeltsomepartsoftherocks,thenitcoolsdown.Thecrystalshavetimetogrowbecausethemagmacoolsslowly.Graniteisonethatcoolsslowly.Pegmatiteandgabbroarealsorocksthatformwhenmagmacoolsdown.(M.Martinez,personalcommunication,March24,2009)
ItwasevidentthatReciprocalTeachingandNarrowReadinghadapositiveimpactonstudentsreadingcomprehensionandcontentlearning.Nevertheless,oncethestudywasoveronlyoneoftheteachersoccasion-allycontinuedusingReciprocalTeachingandNarrowReading.
Unexpected Findings
TheparticipatingteachersattendedthreeprofessionaldevelopmentsessionsatthebeginningofthestudytolearnhowtoteachandimbedReciprocalTeachingandNarrowReadingintothecurriculum.Throughoutthetraining,theywereinvolvedandresponsive.Anunexpectedfinding,however,emergedfromthisstudy.Theteachers’eagernessdissipated
Rocío Dresser 75
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
soonaftertheyrealizedthatthestudyrequiredteacher-designedlessonsandassessments.Theirroleslowlymorphedfromactiveparticipantsintopassivedeliverersofinstruction.Theweekthatthestudywasgoingtobeginoneteacherdroppedoutcomplainingthathehadtoomuchwork.Theotherfourteacherscommentedthattheydidnothaveenoughtimeorthepropermaterialstodesignthelessonsandassessmentsforthestudy.TheyrequestedthatIteachthenewmethodstothechildren.Theyalsoaskedforthecompletesetoflessonplansandmaterialsneededforthedurationofthestudy.Therequestsweregranted.Thetwomethodswereintroducedtothestudentsandtheinitiallessonsweretaught.Ad-ditionally,aseriesofinterdisciplinarylanguageartsandsciencelessons,includingmaterials,wereprovided. Ayearafterthestudyended,theteacherswerecontactedandaskedto provide feedback on the interventions. The teachers found thesemethodstobevaluableandengaging.Oneteacherwrote,
IreallyenjoyedusingReciprocalTeachingandNarrowReading.Ilikedthateachstudenthadaspecificroleinreadingthetextandapplyingareadingstrategy.Itengagedallstudentsandmadedifficulttexts(e.g., science) more readable. (M. Rosell, personal communication,April15,2010)
Anotherteacheroffered,
Mystudentsdefinitelybecamemoreindependentlearners.Theysortofinternalizedwhatitmeanstotakechargeoftheirowneducationandhowtolearnwithouttheconstantguidanceofateacher.(A.Campbell,personalcommunication,April19,2010)
Itisunfortunatethattheseteachersdidnotcontinueimplementingtheinterventions.Theyallfeltthesemethodshadapositiveeffectonstudentachievementandinterest.Nevertheless,theyexpressedtheirinabilitytoaddnewinstructionalmethodstowhattheywerealreadydoingbecauseoftheirmanyresponsibilitiesandtimeconstraints.Oneteachercommented:
IamnotusingReciprocalTeachingrightnowbecauseofmyhesita-tionwithsettingupanewsystem[program].[I]amtoocaughtupintheday-to-dayandmanagingmycurrentsystems[scriptedprogram]thatIhaven’tfoundanopportunitytopushitinandkeepitgoing.(M.Rosell,personalcommunication,April15,2010)
Onecannothelpbutaskwhatmadehardworkinganddedicatedteachersarriveataplaceofsuchpowerlessnessandreluctancetowardsteacher-designed instruction? Ihave taught literacycourses forovertenyearsataStateUniversityinNorthernCalifornia.Thelasteight
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction76
Issues in Teacher Education
yearsteachingthesecourseshasbecomemoreandmorechallenging.Studentteachersoftencommentthattheeffectivepracticestheylearnedinclassdonotmatchscriptedreadingprogramstheyareaskedtouseintheschools.Theyarguethatthecurrenteducationaltrendhasleftthemtrappedintoprogramandtestdriveninstruction.Teachersfeelthattheseprogramsdonottakeintoconsiderationtheirprofessionaljudgmentortheindividualneedsofthestudents(Moustafa&Land,2002).Ateachercandidateshared:
Ibelievethatthesevariousteachingstyles[methods]areawonder-fulideabuttheschooldistrictsarenotimplementingthemintotheschools.Asteachers,ourhandsaretiedandwearetoldtoteachtothetestorgiveourstudentscountlessassessmentsbothformalandinfor-mal.Itappearsthattheseteachingstyles/methodsareconceptualized[contained]withinuniversities.Ourschooldistrictsandtheeducationsystemarenotintunewithbothteachersandstudents.(F.Burnham,personalcommunication,September18,2010)
The Unintended Consequences of Scripted Programs
ScriptedreadingprogramslikeOpen Court,Reading Mastery,andSuccess for Allhavebeenaroundforsometime(McGraw-HillCompa-nies,n.d.;BusinessRoundtable,n.d.;NationalAssociationofElementarySchoolPrincipals,2002;U.S.DepartmentofEducationInstituteofEduca-tionSciences,2006).Thepushfortheseprograms,however,beganwiththereleaseofastudybytheNationalReadingPanel(NRP)in2000insupportofsystematicphonicsandphonemicawarenessinstructioninearlygrades(McIntyre,Rightmyer,&Petrosko,2008;Milosovic,2007;U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServicesPublicHealthService,2000).TheNRPpanelwasnotabletoidentifywithcertaintythetypeofactivities,strategies,andinteractionsthatweremosteffective(U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServices,2002).Additionally,thepaneldidnotendorseaparticularscriptedprogramandcautionedthatmoreresearchshouldbedoneinthisarea.Inspiteofthequalificationsofthereport,thefindingsoftheNRPstudyinsupportofsystematicphonemicawarenessandphonicsinstructionintheearlygradeswereutilizedasafoundationforendorsingorpromotingReading First(Griffith,2008).Reading FirstunderTitleIofNoChildLeftBehind(NCLB)includesasectionthatstatesthatresearch-basedprogramsandmaterialsmustbeusedtoensurethateverychildwillbeabletoreadatgradelevelbytheendofthirdgrade(U.S.DepartmentofEducation,2002,p.27).Furthermore, school districts that adopt scientifically based readingprograms for students in kindergarten through third grade receive
Rocío Dresser 77
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
funding.Thisresolutionlimitsschooldistrictstocommerciallydesignedreadingprogramsandnarrowstheselectionofteachingmethodsthatcanbeused. Schoolteachersarecurrentlydealingwiththeunintendedrepercus-sionsoftheNCLBlegislation.Thedrivetocomplywithfederalandstatemandateshasleftteachersindissonancebetweentheirownphilosophyofeducationandthatoftheirschools(MacGillivray,Ardell,Curwen,&Palma,2004).Theyareaskedtofollowreadingprogramsstep-by-step,treatingteachinglikeamerecookingrecipe.Giroux(2010)callstheseclassrooms a “dead zone” where critical thinking, self-reflection andimaginationarebeinglefttooutsidesources.Thereisnoroomforcre-ativemethodsofinstructionlikethoseusedinMinerva’sclass.Scriptedinstructiontakestheplaceoftheteacher.Theprogramdetermineswhattheteacherwillsayanddo,aswellasthepaceofthelesson(Hall,2009;MacGillivray,Ardell,Curwen,&Palma,2004). Teachercandidatesfirstfeeltheclashbetweenwhattheylearninteacherpreparationprogramsandwhatisdoneinschoolswhentheyentertheteachingprofession.Manynoviceteachers,whoareforcedtoshiftfromdesigninginstructionthattargetstheindividualneedsofthestudents,oftenresist“aonefitsall”instructionthatreliesonexternalsolutions(Griffith,2008;MacGillivray,Ardell,Curwen,&Palma,2004).Someoftheteachersfightbackandtrytodesignmoreindividualizedcurriculum,butlatersurrenderaftertheyareadmonishedfornotfollowingtheschool’sadoptedscriptedprogram(MacGillivray,Ardell,Curwen,&Palma,2004).Thedrive to scripted instruction is contradictory towhat researchershavefoundtobeeffective.Itiswellknownthatitisnottheprogramormethodofinstructionthatmakesanimpactonstudentachievement.Itisaknowledgeableandeffectiveteacherwhomakesadifference(Arnon&Reichel,2007;Griffith,2008;Milosovic,2007;Ruddell,2006). Notonlydoesitappearthatscriptedliteracyprogramsinterferewithandundermineateacher’sabilitytoteachliteracy,butinfactevi-denceshowsthatscriptedprogramsnegativelyaffectstudents’readingdevelopment.Researchindicatesthatstudentsinschoolswherescriptedprogramswereusedfortenyearsormoretendtolagbehindstudentsinschoolswithnon-scriptedprograms.MoustafaandLand(2002)con-ductedastudyinCaliforniawithsecondthroughfifthgradestudentsfrom153schools.TheyfoundnoevidencethattheOpen Courtprogrampromoteshigherearlyreadingachievementamongchildrenfromlowsocio-economicgroups.Instead,theirresultsshowedthatstudentsinnon-scriptedprogramsoutperformedstudents inschoolsusingOpen Court. Other researchers have conducted similar short-term studiesandfoundnosignificantdifferencebetweenstudentsinphonics-driven
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction78
Issues in Teacher Education
programsandthoseinnon-scriptedprograms(McIntyre,Rightmyer,&Petrosko,2008). Amajorconcerneducatorshaveaboutscriptedreadingprogramsisthattheycantakeuptothreehoursperday,leavinglittletimetoteachothersubjects(Milosovic,2007;Moustafa&Land,2002).Eventhoughthereisablockoftimeallocatedforlanguagearts,manyteacherscom-plainthatthelessonsarerushed.Thereisnotenoughtimetorevisitcomplex concepts students have not mastered. In many low-incomeschools,thetimeallocatedtosubjects likescience,socialstudies,artandphysicaleducationisminimalornon-existent.Thiscanincreasethegapbetweenunderrepresentedandmoreaffluentstudentpopulations.Forexample,English learnersusingOpen CourthavebeenfoundtolagbehindEnglishspeakers(Lee,Ajayi&Richards,2007).Oneofthemainproblemsthesestudentsarefacingisthattheyarenotacquiringthenecessaryacademiclanguagerequiredforthemtosucceedinschool(August&Hakuta,1997;Cummins,2000).Theonlywaythestudentscanachievehighlevelsoflanguageandcontentknowledgeisiftheylearnthecontentandthelanguagerelatedtoallsubjects.Forinstance,itisdifficulttounderstandwhytheartshavebeenoneofthemostignoredcontentareasinschoolsinthelastfewyears.Theartspromoteinterestandlearningacrossallareasofthecurriculum(Appel,2006,Dresser,2003;Eisner,2003).Throughthearts,studentscanlearnmanythingsincludingmathematics(e.g.,shapes),vocabulary(e.g.,perspective,rhythmand surface), discipline and creativity. Brouillette (2010) found thattheartspromotesocio-cognitiveunderstandingamongEnglishlearn-ers.Studentslearnthatcomprehensionandexpressionareinfluencedbyculture.ThiscanhelpEnglishlearnersadaptmoreeasilytoanewcultureandlanguage.
Supporters of Scripted Programs
Supportersofscriptedinstructionclaimthattheseprogramsareeffectiveanduserfriendly.Open Court Readingisdescribedontheirwebsiteasaresearch-basedcurriculumgroundedinsystematic,explicitinstructionofphonemicawareness,phonics,wordknowledge,compre-hensionskills,inquirystrategies,andwriting(OpenCourt,2002).Thewebsitestatesthatstudentswill“mastervirtuallyeverysound/spellinginthelanguage”(http://www.opencourtresources.com/ocr/about/about.html).Someteacherslikethefactthattheseprogramspromotedirectphonemic instruction and have helpful graphic organizers (Griffith,2008).Teacherswhohavehadminimalexperienceteachingreadingandliteracyfindscriptedreadingprogramshelpfulbecausetheycomewith
Rocío Dresser 79
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
ateacher’sguide,students’textbooksandworkbooks.Mostimportantofall,noviceteacherslikefactthatmanyprogramsincludepre-designedlessonplans.Somearguethatteacherscanalwaysenhancescriptedinstructionlikeatalentedactorwhobringsthescriptofaplaytolife(Commwyras,2007).Supportersoftheseprogramsaffirmthattheresultscanbemeasuredobjectively.Additionally,somescriptedprogramshavedemonstratedanincreaseinliteracyrates(Milosovic,2007).McIntyre,Rightmyer,andPetrosko(2008)cautionthattherehavebeenmanystud-iesconductedontheeffectivenessofscriptedprograms.However,onlyafewofthearticlesthatemergedfromthesestudieshavebeenpublishedinpeer-reviewedjournals.Themajoritythemhavebeenpublishedinjournalsfromtheuniversitieswheretheseprogramsweredeveloped.
Alternative to Scripted Programs
Manydistrictsareusingscriptedprogramsasapanaceatosolvetheacademicproblemsofthestudents.Duncan-Owens(2009)quotesan old Chinese proverb as a metaphor to scripted instruction.Theproverb states that giving a man a fish only solves an immediateproblem.Teachingthemantofishprepareshimforalifeofsuccess.Insteadofrelyingonexpensivecommerciallydesignedprogramstoeducatechildren,districtsandteachereducationprogramscouldformpartnershipsthatsupportteachersduringtheinductionpartoftheircareers (Doolittle,Sudeck,&Rattigan,2008;Hamos,Bergin,Maki,Perez,Prival,Rainey,etal.,2009).Thepurposeshouldbetograduallyreleasethenoviceteacherintothechallengingprofessionofteachingwithouthavingtorelyonapre-packagedkittoteachreading(Barry,1997;Commwyras,2007). In1988theCaliforniaNewTeacherProject(CNTP)leadastudyandfoundthatnoviceteachersdobenefitfromamentoringprogramduringtheirinitialyearsworkingintheclassroom.Basedontheresearchfind-ingsoftheCNTPstudy,thestatesenatepassedSenateBill(SB)1422,whichcreatedtheBeginningTeacherSupportandAssessment(BTSA)Inductionprogram(Lovo,Cavazos,&Simmons,2006).BTSAprovidesindividualizedsupportandformativeassessmentfornewly-credentialteachers(CaliforniaInductionBTSABeginningTeachersSupportAs-sessment, 2008). In 1998, subsequent legislation (SB 2042) changedteacherrecruitment,certificationandlicensing.Traditionally,collegesanduniversitieswereresponsiblefortheeducationofteachers.Duetotheshortageofteachersduringthe1980s,thestateapprovedmultiplepathwaystocertificationincludingthecontextstoteacherpreparationtoschooldistrictsandcountyofficesofeducation(Hafner&Maxie,2006).
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction80
Issues in Teacher Education
TheSenateBillSB2042extendedtheeffortsofSB1422byforminganAdvisoryPanelforDevelopmentofTeacherPreparationStandards. AccordingtotheDevelopmentofTeacherReporttotheCaliforniaCommissiononTeacherCredentialing(2006),thepanelwasresponsiblenotonlyfordevelopingtheteacherpreparationstandards,butalsofor:
redesigningteacherpreparationprogramstoensuretheintegrationof subject matter studies and professional preparation, including astandard-basedteacherperformanceassessment,andprovidingatwoyearinductionprogramforallnewteachersasameanstoearntheirCaliforniaClearCredential.
TheobjectiveofBTSAInductionprogramsisforteacherstohaveasmoothtransitionfromtheirteacherpreparationprogramsintotheclassroom.Candidatesworkwithveteranteacherswhoareprimarilyresponsibleforprovidingrigorousindividualizedsupportandmentor-ing(Meckel&Rolland,2000).Someadditionalimportantgoalsoftheprogramincludeteacherretention,andstudentachievementthroughan inquiry based professional development model (Lovo, Cavazos, &Simmons,2006).Currentlegislationencouragesthecollaborationamongschooldistricts,universities,andcountyofficesofeducation. The NCATE Blue Ribbon Panel Report (2010) proposed anothermodel,aclinical teachereducationprogramthatgoesbeyond induc-tion.Thisrigorousclinicalprogramprovidesteachercandidateswiththeopportunitytolearnabouttheory,researchandcontentwhiletheyareteaching.Thepanelrecommendsthatteachereducationprogramsanddistrictsformpartnershipswithacommonmissionthatincludescarefulselectionofteachercandidatesandclearexpectations.Account-abilityisevidence-basedinthatthemeasurementofteachercandidates’effectiveness is based on student outcome.Partnerships suchas theoneproposedbytheBlueRibbonPanelcanserveasabridgethathelpsbeginningteachersconnectcourseworkwithclassroompractice.Thisclinicalmodelprovidesopportunitiesforprofessionaltrainingandsup-portforteachers,whichwillresultinacademicachievementforstudents(Mullen&Hutinger,2008). Asidefromstronginductionteachereducationprogramsnoviceteacherbenefitfrom:(a)developingasenseofmission(Banks,2001;Nieto,2005);(b)becomingknowledgeable(Ruddell,2006);and(c)developingasenseofmoralandsocialresponsibility(Freire,1970;Nelson&Harper,2006).
Sense of Mission
Teacherswhoviewteachingasamissiontendtohaveahighersenseofsatisfactionandasaresultcanbemoreeffective.Theyarededicated
Rocío Dresser 81
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
individualswhohaveasenseofperseverance(Ripley,2010).Thismeansthattheyaddresseverydaychallengeswithdeterminationandmaturity.Theyareflexibleandunderstandtheimportanceoflookingattheworldfromdifferentperspectives(Dresser,2003;Doll,1993;Freire,1970;Nelson&Harper,2006).Theyhavestudent-centeredclassroomswherestudentinterestandexperiencesaretakenintoconsiderationtodesigninstruc-tion.Theteacherknowsthecurriculumwell,butencouragesstudentstotaketheinitiative.Theyknowthatlearningoccurswhenstudentsareinvolvedandchallenged(Vygotsky,1962).ThiswasdifficulttodoinMinerva’sclassbecausetherewerestudentsatdifferentlinguisticandacademiclevels.However,teacherscanadaptthecurriculum,materi-alsandpracticestomakeitinterestingforthestudentsandtoensureacademicsuccess.Itisimportanttoviewlearningasanongoingprocessnotonlyforthechildrenbutalsoforteachers(Ada,2003).Teacherswithasenseofmissionareconstantlylookingforwaystoimprove.Teachersrequiredtousescriptedliteracyoftenlosethissenseofmissionwhentheyfeelthattheirknowledgeandexpertisearenotvalued.
Knowledgeable Teachers
Effectiveteachersareknowledgeableabouttheirstudentsandthecurriculum.They know the students’ linguistic and academic levels(Nieto,2005;Peregoy&Boyle,2000).Theseteachersareawareoftheirstudents’physical,emotional,social,andacademicstrengthsandneeds.Theychallengestudentstoviewissuesfromcomplexanddifferentper-spectives(Nelson&Harper,2006).Theyencouragelearnerstobecriticalthinkersandtoquestionthestatusquo(Doll,1993;Dresser,2003).Theseteachersknowthatforstudentstodowellthestudentsmustbeactivelearnersinsteadofpassivereceiversofknowledge.Studentsneedtobeinvolvedincurriculumdevelopmentandevaluation. Forexample,Minervaandherclassmateschosetowriteascriptandputontheplayaspartoftheirsocialstudiesfinal.Teacherswhoworkatschoolswheretheyplayapivotalroleincurriculumdevelopmentandimplementationtendtobeopentochangeandaremorepleasedwiththeirprofession(Griffith,2008).Theydesigninstructionthatisrigor-ousyetflexibleenoughtoincludetheinterestsoftheirstudents(Doll,1993;Gándara,2004).Theyusetextbooksandmaterialsasresourcestoenrichinstruction.Teachersshouldbeabletoadaptthecurriculum,includingscriptedreadingprograms,tomeettheneedsofalllearners.Theyshouldhavetimetoengageinmeaningfuldiscussionsandlearn-ingactivitieswiththestudents.
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction82
Issues in Teacher Education
Moral and Social Responsibility of Teachers
Teacherswithasenseofmoralandsocialresponsibilityareproac-tiveagentsof change.Theyappreciate their students’ linguisticandculturaldifferencesand they see thosedifferencesasassets insteadofweaknesses(Banks,2001;Ford,2010;Unrau,2003).Theypreparestudentstoberesponsiblecitizensoftheworld.Theylookatwaystoextendinstructionbeyondtheclassroomtohelpchildrenseethattheyarepartofalargercomplexsociety.Theseteachersusetechnologyandotherresourcestomakelearningandteachingalive. Most importantly, dedicated educators understand that their re-sponsibilitygoesbeyondtheclassroom(Nieto,2005;Shor,1992).Theyareinvolvedinschoolaswellaslocalassociationsandorganizationasawaytoimpacteducationallegislation.Manyteachersusingscriptedprogramsareafraidtorejectorevenquestionschooldistrictadoptedprograms,evenwhenstudentsare failing. Instead, they complyandfollowalimitedprepackagedmodelofeducation.
Conclusion
There isaneed to look carefullyat scriptedprogramsand theirimpactonstudentsandteachers.Thedriveforstandardizedcurriculahas leftmany childrenunpreparedand teachersdisillusionedabouttheirprofession(Griffith,2008;Milosovic,2007).Theeffectivenessoftheseprogramshasbeenquestionedassomeevidenceindicatestheyhavenotbeenfoundtomeettheneedsofindividualstudents.Scriptedprograms keep education and learning at a superficial level in thattheynarrowopportunitiesforteachersandstudentstobeinnovative.Theycannotdeviatefromthescriptedcurriculumtoexploreoransweraquestiontheymighthaveortoincludestudents’interests.Teachersfeelthatthereisnotenoughtimetoreviewortorevisitsomeimportantconcepts.NelsonandHarper(2006)callthisapproachthe“CliffNotes”methodtoeducation,whichleaveslittleroomfordeeperlevelsofthink-ingand“processingwhichshortchangesthestudentsbyprovidinganimpoverishededucationalexperience”(p.7). Motivatedandknowledgeableteachers,whoareaskedtorelinquishtheirviewsonbestpracticestofollowascriptedprogram,feeloverwhelmedandfrustrated.EventhoughthestudyonReciprocalTeachingandNar-rowReadingreferredtoearliershowedapositiveimpactonstudents’reading comprehension skills, vocabulary development and contentlearning,theteachersfelttheyhadnooptionbuttorevertbacktotheirscriptedreadingprogram.AsMartacommented,they“hadnotimetotrynewmethods”(M.Rosell,April15,2010,personalcommunication).
Rocío Dresser 83
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
Abetteroptiontoscriptedinstructionistoprepareteacherswiththenecessaryknowledge,dispositionsandskillstosucceed.Districtperson-nelandteacherpreparationinstructorsneedtotakeacloserlookatwaystoensureamoresecureandsuccessfulinductionpathforteachercandidates.Itisessentialforteacherstolearnandalsotoreceivethemessageinreturnfromtheirschooldistrictsthattheyplayapivotalpartinstudents’success(Nieto,2005).Similarly,teachersmustunderstandthatbeinggoodteachersisnotenough(Jong&Harper,2005).Educa-torsmustbecomeadvocatesfortheirstudentsbysearchingforwaystoimpactlegislation. Iwasaschoolteacherformanyyearsandrememberwellmyfirstyearofteaching.Ihadaclassof32veryenergeticfifth-gradebilingualstudents.OneofthemostenergeticoneswasMinerva.ThestudentswereallEnglishlearnerswithdifferentlinguisticabilitylevelsinEnglishandSpanish.Ibegantheschoolyearwithnothingintheclassroombutstudentdesksandaball.Thedistrictgaveme$92dollarstopurchasematerialsfortheyear.Manyofmystudentswerealreadyinvolvedingang-relatedactivities.Formanyofthemeducationwasnotaprioritybecausesomeoftheirbasicneedslikefoodandshelterwerenotmet.Oneofmystudentswasshotduringafightamongrivalgangsnexttoour school.Theprincipalwas caught sellingdrugs toanundercoverpoliceofficer.ThesewereonlyafewoftheproblemsIhadtoendureasanoviceteacher.TheonlywayIwasabletomakesocialstudiesandothercontentareasrelevantformystudentswasthroughtheartsandotherrelatedactivities(Dresser,2003). Iknow,therefore,howdifficultitisforteacherstotaketimeofffromtheirbusyschedulestoparticipateinotheractivitiesasidefromtheirclassroomresponsibilities.However,theonlywaylegislationcanchangeisifeducators,administrators,andthecommunitymakelegislatorsawareoftheproblemswithscriptedinstruction.Newinstructionalmodels,inwhichtextbooksandothermaterialsareusedtoenhancelearning,needtobedesigned.Strongpartnershipsbetweencollegesofeducationandschooldistrictsmustbeinplaceasawaytoprovidesupporttoteachercandidatesthroughlong-termmentoringmodels.Moreshorttermandlongitudinalresearchneedstobeconductedondifferentlanguageandliteracymodels.Finally, it is critical that the teachingprofessionbereturnedtothetrueexperts,theteachers.
ReferencesAda,A.F.(2003).A magical encounter: Latino children’s literature in the class-
room.Boston:Allyn&Bacon.
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction84
Issues in Teacher Education
August, D. & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda.Washington.D.C.:NationalAcademicPress.
Appel, M. (2006).Arts integration across the curriculum. Leadership, 36(2),14-17.
Arnon,S.,&Reichel,N.(2007).Whoistheidealteacher?AmI?Similarityanddifferenceinperceptionofstudentsofeducationregardingthequalitiesofagoodteacherandoftheirownqualitiesasteachers.Teachers & Teaching, 13(5),441-464.
Banks,J.(2001).Multiculturaleducation:Characteristicsandgoals.InJ.Banks&C.McGeeBanks(Eds.),Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives(pp.402-426).NewYork:JohnWiley&Sons.
Barry,A.(1997).Highschoolreadingprogramsrevisited.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(7),524.
Brouillette,L.(2010).Howtheartshelpchildrentocreatehealthysocialscripts:Exploringtheperceptionsofelementaryteachers.Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1),16-24.
Brown,A.,&Palincsar,A.(1985).Reciprocal teaching of comprehension strate-gies: A natural history of one program for enhancing learning.Cambridge,MA:Bolt,Beranek,&Newman.
CaliforniaCommissiononTeacherCredentialing.(2006).Report06-03.http://www.ctc.ca.gov/reports/CCTC-Report-Moving-Forward-2006.pdf
CaliforniaInductionBeginningTeacherSupportAssessment(BTSA).(2008).http://www.btsa.ca.gov/BTSA_basics.html
CaliforniaStateBoardofEducation.(1998).Content standards: Fourth grade sciences standards for California public schools.http://www.cde.ca.gov/be/st/ss/documents/sciencestnd.pdf
Cho,K.,Ahn,K.,&Krashen,S.(2005).Theeffectsofnarrowreadingofauthen-tictextsoninterestandreadingabilityinEnglishasaforeignlanguage.Reading Improvement, 42(1),58-64.
Commwyras,M.(2007).Scriptedreadinginstruction?What’sateachereducatortodo?Phi Delta Kappan, 88(5),404-407.
Cummins,J.(2000).Academiclanguagelearning,transformativepedagogy,andinformationtechnology:Towardsacriticalbalance.TESOL Quarterly, 34(3),537-548.
Doolittle,G.,Sudeck,M.,&Rattigan,P.(2008).Creatingprofessionallearningcommunities:Theworkofprofessionaldevelopmentschools.Theory into Practice, 47(4),303-310.
Doll,W.E.(1993).A post-modern perspective on curriculum.NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.
Dresser,R.(2000).TeachingmetacognitvestrategiestoEnglish-languagelearnersintheupperelementarygrades:Aparticipatorystudywithbilingualteach-ers.(Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation,UniversityofSanFrancisco).
Dresser,R. (2003).Teachingbeyondthestandards inabilingualdemocraticclassroom.The Multilingual Educator Journal, 4(1),32-35.
Duffy-Hester,A. (1999).Teachingstrugglingreaders inelementaryschool:Areviewofclassroomreadingprogramsandprincipals foreducation.The Reading Teacher, 52(5),480-495.
Rocío Dresser 85
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
Duncan-Owens, D. (2009). Scripted reading programs: Fishing for success.Principal, 88(3)26-29.
Eisner,E.(2003).Theartsandthecreationofmind.Language Arts, 80(5),340-345.
Ford,D.(2010).Culturallyresponsiveclassrooms:Affirmingculturallydifferentgiftedstudents.Gifted Child Today, 33(1),50-53.
Freire,P.(1970).Pedagogy of the oppressed.NewYork:Continuum.Gándara,P.(2004).Buildingbridgestocollege.Educational Leadership, 62(3),
56-61.Griffith,R.(2008).Theimpactofascriptedreadingprogramonteachers’profes-
sionalspirits.Teaching & Learning, 22(3),121-133.Giroux,H.A.(2010).Rethinking education as the practice of freedom. Paulo Freire
and the promise of critical pedagogy.http://www.truthout.org/10309_Gir-oux_Freire
Jong,E.J.,&Harper,C.A.(2005).PreparingmainstreamteacherforEnglish-languagelearners:Isbeingagoodteachergoodenough?Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2),101-124.
Hafner,A.L.,&Maxie,A.(2006).Lookingatanswersaboutreform:FindingsfromtheSB2042implementationstudy.Issues in Teacher Education, 15(1),85-102.
Hall,L.(2009).“Anecessarypartofgoodteaching”:Usingbookclubstodeveloppreserviceteachers’visionsofself.Literacy Research & Instruction, 48(4),298-317.
Hamos,J.,Bergin,K.,Maki,D.,Perez,L.,Prival,J.,Rainey,D.,&VanderPutten,E.(2009).Openingtheclassroomdoor:Professionallearningcommunitiesinthemathandsciencepartnershipprogram.Science Educator, 18(2),14-24.
Lee,S.,Ajayi,L.,&Richards,R. (2007).Teachers’perceptionsoftheefficacyoftheOpenCourtprogramforEnglishproficientandEnglishlanguagelearners.Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(3),19-33.
Leslie,L.,&Caldwell,J.S. (2005).Qualitative reading inventory.NewYork:Allyn&Bacon.
Lovo, P., Cavazos, L., & Simmons, D. (2006). From BTSA to induction:Thechangingroleofschooldistrictsinteachercredentialing.Issues in Teacher Education, 15(1),53-68.
MacGillivray,L.,Ardell,A.,Curwen,M.,&Palma,J.(2004).Colonizedteachers:Examiningthe implementationofascriptedreadingprogram.Teaching Education, 15(2),131-144.
McGraw-Hill Companies, Business Roundtable, & National Association ofElementarySchoolPrincipals (2002).Results with Open Court Reading.RetrievedfromERICdatabase.ED464189
McIntyre,E.,Rightmyer,E.,&Petrosko,J.(2008).Scriptedandnon-scriptedreadinginstructionalmodels:Effectsonthephonicsandreadingachieve-mentoffirst-gradestrugglingreaders.Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24(4),377-407.
Meckel,A.&Rolland,L.(2000).BTSAMODELSforsupportprovision.Educa-tional Leadership, 29(3),18-20.
The Impact of Scripted Literacy Instruction86
Issues in Teacher Education
Milosovic,S.(2007).Buildingacaseagainstscriptedreadingprograms.Educa-tion Digest, 73(1),27-30.
Moustafa,M.&LandR.E.(2002).Thereadingachievementofeconomically-disadvantagedchildreninurbanschoolsusingOpenCourtvs.comparablydisadvantagedchildreninurbanschoolsusingnon-scriptedreadingpro-grams.The Online Yearbook of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research. AERA SIG: Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research,pp.44-53.http://www.aera-ultr.org/Web%20Site%20Files/Publications/Publications.html.
Mullen,C.,&Hutinger,J.(2008).ThePrincipal’sroleinfosteringcollaborativelearningcommunities through facultystudygroupdevelopment.Theory into Practice, 47(4),276-285.
Nelson,C.,&Harper,V.(2006).Apedagogyofdifficulty:Preparingteacherstounderstand and integrate complexity in teaching and learning. Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2),7-21.
Nieto,S.(2005).Why we teach.NewYork:TeachersCollegePress.OpenCourt.(2002).http://www.opencourtresources.com/ocr/about/about.htmlPeregoy,S.F.&Boyle,O.F.(2000).EnglishlearnersreadingEnglish:Whatwe
know,whatweneedtoknow.Theory into Practice, 39(4),237-248.Reportof theNationalReadingPanel. (2000).Teaching children to read: An
evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: NationalReadingPanel.Retrievedfromhttp://www.nationalreadingpanel.org/Pub-lications/summary.htm
Retter, J. (1996). Euclid assesses the California BTSA and finds the whole greater than the sum. Pathwise (TM)-the Educational Testing ServiceComponent. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED393843&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED393843
Ripley,A.(2010).Whatmakesagreatteacher?Atlantic Magazine.http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/01/what-makes-a-great-teacher/7841/3/?sms_ss=email&sms_ss=email.
Ruddell,R.B.(2006).Teaching children to read and write: Becoming an effective literacy teacher.Boston:Allyn&Bacon.
Savin-Baden,M.,&Wimpenny,K.(2007).Exploringandimplementingparticipatoryactionresearch.Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 31(2),331-343.
Schmitt,N.&Carter,R.(2000).Thelexicaladvantagesofnarrowreadingforsecondlanguagelearners.TESOL, 9(1),4-9.
Shor,I.(1992).Empowering education: Critical teaching for social change.Chi-cago:UniversityofChicagoPress.
SuccessforAllFoundation.(2010).http://www.successforall.net/Takala,M.(2006).Theeffectsofreciprocalteachingonreadingcomprehension
inmainstreamandspecial(SLI)education.Scandinavian Journal Research, 50(5),559-576.
TheNationalCouncilforAccreditationofTeacherEducation.(2010).Transforming teacher education through clinical practice: A national strategy to prepare effective teachers.ReportoftheBlueRibbonPanelonClinicalPreparationandPartnershipsforImprovingStudentLearning.http://www.ncate.org/
Rocío Dresser 87
Volume 21, Number 1, Spring 2012
LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=zzeiB1OoqPk%3D&tabid=715Unrau,N.(2003).Content area reading and writing: Fostering literacies in middle
and high school cultures.Columbus,OH:Pearson,Merrill,PrenticeHall.U.S.DepartmentofEducationInstituteofEducationSciences.(2006).http://
www.successforall.net/.U.S.DepartmentofEducation.(2002).No Child Left Behind Act: A desktop refer-
ence.Jessup,MD:EDPubs,EducationalPublicationsCenterhttp://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/nclbreference/reference.pdf
U.S.DepartmentofHealthandHumanServicesPublicHealthService.(2000).National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based as-sessment of the scientific research literature for reading and its implications or reading instruction.http://www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.cfm.
Vygotsky,L.S.(1962).Thought and language.Cambridge,MA:M.I.T.Press.