Transcript
Page 1: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

Team Problem Solving and Conflict

Resolution

Maggie McHugh-ParrishSouthern Polytechnic State

[email protected]

Page 2: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

THUMB WRESTLING

Goal: to score as many points as you can

1. Choose a partner.

2. You score one point each time your partner’s thumb is press down.

Page 3: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

Group TeamMembers represent individual goals andpursue individual purpose ("I" focus)

Members share a common goal ("we"focus)

No clear rules/norms Create norms and rules and runsaccording to norms

No clear role/responsibility Goal is more important than theindividual

No individual accountability Generally held accountable by groupNo evaluation method Assessment methods usedMore competitive/argumentative Debate ideas vs. argue positionsIndividual work roles may not be linkedoutside of the meeting

Work lives of members often linked

Usually run by chair/Roberts Rules Often are self-directed/autonomous orfacilitated

Members often bring/use positionauthority

High trust, low focus on position

Usually finite May be finite or continuing

GROUPS vs. TEAMS

Page 4: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

TERMS:

Position - What you decided you want in a particular situation; a specific solution.

Interests - What caused you to decide; the specific need in a situation which caused you to take a particular position or select a specific solution.

Problem-Solving Models - Communication patterns for transitions in principled negotiations that result in generating options.

Page 5: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

The Conflict Resolution process generally has three components:

•Discussion about the PAST

•Discussion in the PRESENT

•Discussion about the FUTURE

How do we experience this in the work team?

What happened???

How are we feeling/dealing with it now?

What is our plan to fix it?

Page 6: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

GOAL of the problem solving model: to create a shift from

YOU vs. MEto

YOU & ME against the problem(like Thumb Wrestling!)

HOW???

Utilize the (“HOW TO”) problem statement

Page 7: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

Maggie’s Vacation Dilemma

Mexico Key West

Page 8: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

Mexico Key West

Maggie’s Position

Mexico

Nancy’s Position

Key West

Page 9: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

Mexico Key West

Maggie

PositionPosition Mexico

InterestsInterests Near water Social/dancing Inexpensive Ability to meet others

I

Nancy

PositionPosition Key West

InterestsInterests Near water Quiet, low stress Good restaurants Comfortable

Interests

Page 10: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

How To, or, Problem Statement:

How to have a quiet, low stress,

comfortable vacation at low cost with

access to water, socializing, good eats

and dancing.

SO, where did we go???

Page 11: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

11

Once you have a “How To” statement. . .

Goal: Utilize this tool to help team members move from their original (individual) positions to a new position (acceptable to all team members).This begins as team members identify solutions that meet the “requirements” of the How To statement.

*FROM Neil Katz & John Lawyer, 1985

Page 12: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

So, how to start writing the How To?

You need to identify interests.

One method of doing this is referred to as: “chunking”*

*FROM Neil Katz & John Lawyer, 1985

Page 13: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

13

“CHUNKING”is a questioning method to identify interests after

you’ve heard initial positions.Chunk UP . . . to interests . . . by asking

questions like:

“What would having that do for you?”

“What is that good for?”

“In what ways is that helpful?”

“How is that useful?”

USE THESE INTERESTS TO CONSTRUCT THE “HOW TO” STATEMENT! Then,

Page 14: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

14

“CHUNKING”

Chunk DOWN . . . to potential - new - shared position(s) . . . by asking questions like:

“What is a good way of doing that?”

“How could that need be satisfied?”

“What specifically . . .?”

“What are other ways of (meeting the need)?”

Page 15: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

15

“CHUNKING”

first: Chunk Up . . . to interests

Broadens the views of the team members

WRITE THE HOW TO

then: Chunk Down . . . to new position

Narrows the views of the team members

UP

DO

WN

interests

positions

Page 16: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

finally: The team evaluates the potential, new shared positions by evaluating the ability of each solution to satisfy the requirements of the How To statement.

Page 17: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

A review of this problem-solving model...

1. Listen to initial positions.

2. Use Chunking Up questions to identify interests.

3. Write a How To statement (with the team).

4. Use Chunking Down questions to identify potential new positions (solutions).

5. The team reviews each solution, evaluating them against the requirements of the How To statement.

6. The team selects the new, shared, position/solution, and makes an action plan if necessary.

Page 18: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

The KATZ & LAWYER Dilemma

POSITIONS:

Neil: “My name must be listed first! This research could not have been completed if I hadn’t joined the team, I’m up for tenure, AND my name will help sell textbooks.”

John:” My name must be listed first! The book was my idea, my contacts in the publishing business got us this contract AND I have high name recognition in the public sector.”

WHAT ARE THEIR INTERESTS???(what do they need?)

Page 19: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

19

The “How To” StatementThe Katz and Lawyer Dilemma

How to . . .

give both Katz and Lawyer authorship recognition for their book that will benefit their careers and recognize their individual significant contributions to the project.

(Now, how did they resolve this?)

Page 20: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

20

What are some examples of conflicts that occur in the work team where this model can be

applied?

Page 21: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

21

Your team is charged with implementing an e-commerce web site for the company. Although the web site is live, the “go live” date for a major build supporting e-commerce is set for one week from today. The company has a $20M national media advertising campaign, already in progress, advertising the “go live” date. Architecture is firm (3-tier, MS Internet Information Server, SQL Server -database, Visual Basic and Java-Script, all running on NT; front end Active Server Pages, middle is Component Object Model objects, data layer is the SQL Server.) Load testing at 500 page requests/second was successful (slowest transaction ran at 5-7 seconds.) The team’s been working 15-20 hours days for the past three weeks, but it’s almost over.

Today your project team is meeting the with management team to review 36 outstanding issues, all in progress. A new (2 weeks w/company) Director of Merchandising is part of the management team. He raises a new issue: the company should rethink it’s web site to incorporate the ‘character’ used in the TV and print ads…the radio ads are a cult favorite everywhere they’re run, and TV ads premier tonight.

Page 22: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

22

But, when the web site was developed, the character did not exist. And, some of your team members think that the elegant design of the site doesn’t fit with the “cartoony” character. There is some discussion, and it’s clear that the members of the work team are not in agreement with the request; there seems to be a clear division between the web designers/developers and the marketing/business folks on the project team.

The CEO speaks for the management team, and instructs the work team to meet to consider the issue, and to bring an issue resolution recommendation to him by 5pm.

ISSUE: The company now has a successful “spokesperson” character who is visible and popular with the public. Should the Project Team redesign the web site to incorporate this character in time for the go-live date?

Page 23: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

23

POSITIONS:

Designers: The go-live date is in one-week; we are already working max hours, and there are 36 other critical issues that need resolution; in addition, the current design of the site is traditional and elegant (like our product), and is not a good fit for the ad character.

Marketing/Business: The character in the ads is a cult favorite; people have called radio stations requesting that the ads be played; customers identify the character with the company, and he’s “become” the company; customers will expect to see him prominently active on the web site. Changing the web site, even at this late date, will enhance sales.

You will be assigned to represent either the design or marketing/business group.

Step 1, Identify the interests of the group you DO NOT represent.

Page 24: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

24

Step 2, Verify that the interests you identified are accurate.

Step 3, Use the knowledge of all interests to develop a “how to” statement.

Step 4, Use the “how to” statement as a basis for generating ideas.

Step 5, Evaluate the ideas.

Step 6, Select the recommendation(s) the team will send to the CEO.

Page 25: Team Problem Solving and Conflict Resolution Maggie McHugh-Parrish Southern Polytechnic State University maggie@spsu.edu

25

Based on real circumstances at

Send.com (Waltham, MA), Nov. 1999

(out of business, January 2001)

Cartoon character: The Giver

See a sample of the television ad at: http://www.adcritic.com/content

/send.com-the-giver.html


Recommended