PHILIPPINE LEGAL DOCTRINESDoctrine of absolute privilege
Doctrine t!at protects persons fro" clai"s alleging #efa"ation
$!ere t!e allege# #efa"ator% state"ents $ere "a#e b% "e"bers of
legislative asse"blies $!ile on t!e &oor of t!e asse"bl% or
co""unications "a#e in t!e conte't of (u#icial procee#ings) as part
of a trialDoctrine of absorption of co""on cri"es Also calle#
Hernan#e* #octrine T!e rule enunciate# in People v Hernan#e* +,,
P!il Rep -.- /.,-012 t!at t!e ingre#ients of a cri"e for" part an#
parcel t!ereof) an# !ence) are absorbe# b% t!e sa"e an# cannot be
punis!e# eit!er separatel% t!erefro" or b% t!e application of Art
34 of t!e Rev Penal Co#e +Enrile v A"in) GR ,555-) Sept .5) .,,62
It !el# t!at t!e cri"e of rebellion un#er t!e Rev Penal Co#e of t!e
P!ils is c!arge# as a single o7ense) an# t!at it cannot be "a#e
into a co"ple' cri"eDoctrine of actio personalis "oritur cu"
persona Lat +T!e #octrine t!at2 personal action ter"inates or #ies
$it! t!e person +Santos v Sec of Labor) L89.093) 9: ;eb
.,042Doctrine of a#!erence of (uris#iction Re" La$ . T!e principle
t!at once a court !as ac
