.i__ - _-=
- - -- -. . . - . . .- .-* - -
20 2;"'f ATTACHMENT F
"'
. j ', ,rtwe Rav.isaon 19 -.
i. . . .
l(Page 1 of 2) Apri1 7, 14R?*?n
10CFR50.59 FORMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION^
STATION [A htLG boa UNIT //2SYSTEM Pverc-se 9/Gr ATrod TEST / PROCEDURE No [7P1240-4
TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE AN REVISION I'- ,
EqulPMENT NAME 12AR 4an es wd Anu Ice k l J
- - - - - . . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _
.
- ..
LAP-820-2... -.* :. - -- Rev.ision jo.. . -..- ..... ...-- . s_
_ _ . ._s_ __#PPII 7 1982, ..
' . , ..
ATTACHMENT F 21 final.' .-. .o- - (Page 2 of 2)' *
,
-m .SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (to cyg 3c,33).;-) ;* ,.
- TEST / PROCEDURE No. L tP I2co-4REV|5 ION r
e-
-
t --
Does this cons:Itu:e a change to preceduresas described in Safety Analysis Report?
-, ,
' -.!c ( M I'- . (2: ( ) !I-
,--' i;s a :.anga in **c "ac.31021 5:eC1 fica:1Cn.favcivec?
.s _ . ,.I
.-
'so( ) r .. .. . . .-,__
:P '5:',Ansner .ne felicwing cuestiens diu a 'y".:'SAfri / E7AL"ATICM:and ;::vids,s:ecific reas ns justifying :te tscisien:, . .
'Is :ne :r:bability of an ec: r snes. :ne ::nsecuence cf inC !. . as .rtvi:::17:ac:ican:, er m1 fun :1:n cf saft:y rels:ac ecut:: tat,'' increase?evatus:ad in the Final Safety analysis Ke:cet, .
Jes A No ,n
{": sa,rhp a , , dai- gc A-
'
Or maifuncti:n Of a diffr:n:.r['" 2.
Is :ne possibill:y f:r an accidan:ty:e man any Ortvicu:1y evalua ad in its Fina! Saft y ;
ly:i1^
1 Re:er c tatad?Yes X_ No .
T w & & O. A a. YG, LYY&
of saft:y, as ,.efined in the basis f:r any ~c:--i :13.. is :te :::aritC Scecification, rtducad? Yes A.lic ...) fddk k C' g.
-
p Any An!ser * Yes ( ) I AII An5*.eerT NC (k' -
, .. .
Recut inO t ? i'3-2 *!uci tar'E270 i 2 :Ory "J.Tr:r..$.51 :n'
100:0r7 21 * 17 ?;r Or!.702. ..
t .I f '
l ra n: :.:::n Eec2ivec ( ) |
-'
| u, ,L-
Int ".iata 7"00 wdct/TesD 3I*C15t.ati:nC **{ Q7"- :
-.
[N /%.ra. 80 ..ee ee o 3er':- ned bysneuid :e rt: rne i.. ::a--- :ne.uli rt: r, :: -: ';EC. f'jCata 12 do h,'
p-
| d
.
e
e
._
-
. '.7 - 2 _n, , , , . _ _ - - - _ - --- . _ _ _ _ . _ . .
k -LAi).82072; I; .. ..
ATTACHMENT F Revision 19 ]{* *'' ' - )?' * * --*(Page 1 of 2} April. 7,'19A?* ~t .
i -2n-
10CFR50.39 FORMAT FCR SAFETY EVALUATION
STATION bd UNIT OSYSTEM FfRS$ TEST / PROCEDURE No LN 8 330- 41
pensemmon er itm4,. roe da.w
.-;~.... - -w ..~!)y a
.
*- ; . - . :- .#'
. . ~ . , , ..Lpp.;910 2. '.
. ._
' ' j .1 '
_'- . . _
Rev.i s opn _ ; c..
.;. .: . :. . - . . . ..- _-__ -April 7, 1982
..
.. .. . .ATTACHMENT F 21 finaf*-
. ,
.. . . ,.(Page 2 of 2) -* -*
*
mSAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 50.53)
.
.;.) g* TEST / PROCEDURE No. / ?//3 70->/,. ,
REVISION M--
n..
p.
.
Does this conselcute a change to procedures._as described in Safety Analysis Report?
, ,
.| ti (c: ( ) .le M I .
'~~~
m ;s 1 .nanga in == "tennt:.1 I ectficac1:n'plinvolvec7.i . . , .
.| 'to tsA ,. _ . . . . . . ..*~:',-- Answr the felicwing cues:1cns d12 1 *y'::' :r.
SAFTr/ DALUAl'ICil:and pr:vids,s:ecific reascns justi*ying :Me decisien:
.
..
'Cs the :r:bability of (n, cecur sncs. es nsecuence of in
.
accicane, er .nalfunccien of saf t:y rtla:ad acut::snc, as ;rrit:::!yt.| , facrtsse?'| evalua:ad in Me Final Safaty analysis Re:crt, .
No , M M 0.% */ NW_YesE .& 'W '
I:Is de ;cssibill:y fer- an accicant cc .caifuncti:n :( t it!far:rty:e can any ;rtvicusly evalua: in :te Fina! Saft:7 4 lysis[ 2. tic, J @
. _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _.
+ . . . , , . . -,. . . , . _._ - g F% ~ , . 2,2 .. . - .. . . ,
. _ ._ _;a ;_ . . .
I ' AmCMENT F' , . 9' ,R I on,, ,'
{fage i of 21 Apri l 7, 19 A?.-
10CFR50.59 FORMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION
STATION (d UNIT hSYSTEM N TEST / PROCEDURE No C P/7 / 730 -d 3TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE hbdD , +) 0 AT'
EVISIONi ..~ 'EqulPMENT NAME
.
EQUIPMENT NUMBER~
__.___ ____.-- . _ . .
__
OESCRIPTION OF TEST / PROCEDURE' -
Mh M bra [U.Ad( H,' QAk/b MfO_ M CO C
.
.
SAFdTY EVALIJATION: Answer ths following questions with a "yes' er "no", and gide- sps=ifief-
masons Justifying the decisiom .
Is the pecbability ci en occurrence or the corcequence of en cecident, or malfunctica of.;
1.'%gaipment importent to seis es previously ownluated in ths .8inci Safety Anclysis Racert
-
, ,YesNo, Because: . g%~
u %, .4 Q .g gIAA7
.
'
Is the possi'aility fer en accident or malfunction of a different type then any previously2. Yes V No, Bec=use: ;evolucted in the Finci Scisty Anclysis Report enet d7'
A/# f||t
3. Is the mergin er ty, es defined in the basis f=r =ny Technic =1 Specific =rien, redue:d?Yes No, Secause: Gla. kp pdm
!
i
'
Any answer checked "YES" should be reported in the Annual Recor:.|* Note:
:o the NRC|
i
!
N
bed 0rfned dhpg
$hA .ss.b|h- Approwd ty y-
. _ . . . _ . . . _ . . _ _ . _
. .. . ::.. : - _ . . a .:. . --. u - w.- .. a .
. ... ~
. ~ . LAP-320,-2, ~~... .
e .'* Revisicn 39. . -
. _4-_. *.-
__ . _ . - . . .,, _._
A0ril 7. 1982* .> . .- . . ATTACHMENT F 21 finaf**..
. **. . . .
(Page 2 of 2) .' * -*
*
SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 50.59)- .
.;-)* * *
, ; TEST / PROCEDURE No. 2 M/f 'to -EJ,.
REVISION 'y. An
-
-y' .*
m Coes this constitute a change to preceduresas described in Safety Analysis Report?
, ,
.>s ,.!c 9 9 !', , I I:: ( )
,P 1 ;s a =anga in == acnnte:1 Dec1 fica:icn- .
.i.. , iinya1sec7 ...f fo ()4 T _ . . . . . . . .- -
Answer the fellcwing cuestiens with a 'ye:' r ' :" .r-. .gSAFITI DAL' ATIC:l:J ;and ;r:vids,s;ecific reascns justifying :he itcf sf en: !
L.,
'Is ce :r:bability of an ec: r sces. -he c=nsecuence of 2nC !. .' is ;rsvi:::17ac:Manc, er =alfune.ii:n' of saf t:7 rils:se aquf:= tnt.''avalustad in the Final Safety analysis Xe:ce., incrisse?
'.
Yes N' No , g 3.e M bF' t /f
% o.b : [ tka CO u.f~~. .
Is :he :essibill:y fer in ac:1 dent er maifune:4n :( a dif far:n:Ttype than any Ortvicusly evalua:ad in =a Final Saft:y
:ty f s[ 2..gY
'
/^Reccri crtstad? Yts '>o Ho , (% iO O/w -*d j,!! the ari n of saft y, as defined in :he basis f:r any ~ee-i::I _t i 'g
/71..
Scecificatica, reducad? Yes W No,I] . 4,Q:4 m.
y -,_ All Ans*.etrs 30 b,-
p _ Any An!ser * Its ( ) e.. .
l Recut::: 13 : P! 3!'ic W0 lear"P
'
:ey.:! 2::: / C.:::m.is 1 cn.' - - ~zu=:-~ n-' = ?nt
.
\ -
| 1-;U C M :*.*.i~n rec 2i'#ed ( ) || (-
,I ,L.'
Int:11ta Frt: w urt/Tese[03Itren02:103b '*lOTI:
{ [//
i- c:nr ses.ee =1:ue yes' ,sneui:: :e et::-ne in 22 7tr'Or-ed by
_
M---
1:nu11 ::::r~. = 22 .*'RC. h'! - b'
Ca:a.-
d
i-
.
.
1
e -
!_, _ _ . _ _ . - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ . -_. _ _ ___ - _ _ . -
x rO .. w ' -_ . _ . |-a-_ _ _ _ _ - .~:e ..:. - _ _ _ _ _ .
2UP 820 2 ,'. ATTACHMENT F'' ,RavisLon 1%e .,(Page 1 of 2) Apri l 7, ICE 7~
7010CFR50.53 FORMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION
'
STATION UNIT
SYSIEM TEST / PROCEDURE No d8/4570 ,/ber
. . _ _ _ . - --.--. . ...
- -- m. - . . - . . ..-...--..-..a.w..
. '
LAP @20-2-ATTACHMENT F Revisien 19 ,,
(f age 1 of 2) April 7, toA?2n
10CFR50.59 FCRMAT FOR SAFETY EVALUATION
STATION [A UNIT#
SYSTEM //#JJ _ TEST / PROCEDURE No /,,.2/ /JJC Q5'~di A's W a f
TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE #gIJ REVISION 2-
EQUIPMENT NAME
'EqulPMENT NUMBER
, . . , _ . = _z. m
DESCRIPTION OF TEST / PROCEDURE
h d'Y Y/}|ffftsj &n
- -
.
|.
SAFETY EVALUATION: Answer ths folicwing questiens with a "yes" er "no",and provide spnili:
-
reasons justifyirg the decisicmis the pecbability ci en occurrence or the comaquence ci en cccident, or malfuncticn of
I
es previously evclucted in ths Finc! Sciety Anclysis Rupert1,' .-ecpipment imper *cnt to scieit d? Yes No, Because: ~
Mh, fgr
Is the possi'aility ict en accident or malfuncticn of a different type th=n any previcuslyYes Y No, Beccuse:2.evolucW in the Finct Sciety Anclysis Report created?
W0 0 f01 3
Is the mergin ei sefery, es defined in the bcsis fer =ny Technic =( S=ecificerien, redue:d?| 3.'Yes V No, 34ccuse:
*fM h L 532gf 1 1answer checked "YES" should be reported in :he Annual Recert.G* Note: Any
:o the NRC
. .:/~ n_ =:= /.0 /4-
em.=rm=c :x
k .Ba eeAprrous4 tyM
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .. _
.
'. If . .b. . LAP-320-2 ' ,_...
Rev.sien 19. . _. .- i. . . . _ _ . . - . . .--
._ ._
ADFII 7. 1982. .. ...ATTACHMENT F 21 fina0* *
. .
..
.
. .
- - (Page 2 of 2)'-,
SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 30.39).;] , .- TEST /?ROCEDURE No. Q)D i]]O-pfi*
REVI$10N dn
-
'
. !
-- Does this constitute a change to procedures
as described in Safety Analysis Report?., ,
*t
1 I:: ( ) .!c(K I'
acr.nt:21 S:ecifica:icn -F } ;s 1 : .anga n. ==.i . , linrelved?
_.
e /M.| 'r , _ . . . . . . ._ .. _a-- - ,
Answer- the f:llowing :uesti ns wi a a *ys:' r ' :' , jSAFri / r/AL"ATIC;I: 1and ;r:vida,s:ecific reasens justi'ying me incisten: I
..
'Is ce :r:baciti:y of (n ec: r tnes. -Me =nsecuence of 2nb !. . 1:n of saf t:y esit:ac equi::sn:, 55 ;rtvt:::!yac:ican:, er :r.11! :::, ' inertise?evatustad in Me f r.al Safety analysis Re:crt, .
m yes g :
_.. .. . . ~ , . - _- _ ._ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ -
$~- . . LAP 320 2- -. ,ATTACH 9ENT F
<,
Ravisien 19' -* - @ age I of 2} April , tc Ah
-'
.-
2010CFR50.59 FCRMAT F ;R SAFETY EVALUATICN
STATION i f /' / 20 ^ O ', L O 1A(, E UNIT O
SYSTEM d2M TEST /PRCCEDURE No L E /'UC %_C4cn ftgut, CwrnMMEM RUL Ar* 3
TEST / PROCEDURE TITLE Ta t 4e81,, REV1SICH.
EQUlPMENT NAME-
EQUIPMENT NUMBER^
-
.:-, -u. -
.
DESCRIPTION CF TEST /PRCCEDURE-
OtN. Y % )* YALbkcS k(494i
.
.
..
.
. .
t -
SArcif EVALUATICN: Answer ths following questions with a "yes' er "no", and gwide s.oreift:i s
reasons [ustifyire the decision:Is the pechobility of en occurrence or the corzequence of en eccident, or malfunction of-I i F.s= ortegipment important to scieges previously ewslueted in ths Final Sciety Analys sSM.a @' . -
1.
, A /oP @j%No, 'oecausa:increased? , Yes -.
Is the possi~oility fer en accident or malfunction ci e different typs th=n any previouslyYes V No, Seccuse:2.evolucted in the Final Saisty Arelysis Report created?
-
a, , % @ * * -
!s the mergin ei seiery, es defined in the basis fer eny Technie=1 Specifie:rion, reduced?3._Yes % No, 34couse:
& +&p.fa,
Any answer enecked "YES" should be reported in :he Annual Recor:.-
* Note:to the NRC
N/ m ,= h {/ L.3 -.pe, =rm== sz// Joe
. spwa ty v_. . _
- _ . _ _ _ . . . I^^' ~~ ~
-.1. .. .-~
- .lap.320-2
_ ' . - . . .. ,. . ; , . . ~~Ra ision g.. -.-. -- . _ ._-_#APII 7' 1902* ., .~
.ATTACliMENT F 'l finaf..
.i . . .
(Fage 2 of 2)' --- -.
- .
SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST 0 CFR 30.33).;-) ; #TEST /PRCCEOURE No. / / sDo-4,. ,**
RC'!!SION 3-.
"g. < . .-
-Does this constitute a change to proceduresas described in Safety Analysis Repert?- ,
|"i.
'
1 (2: ( ) !!c?t
-
. . . . - - -- . _. - - . . . - - .. . ,-
*
.
2: LAP 820 2-ATTACHMENT F', Revisien 19*'' - -
''- @ age 1 of 2) April 7, 19A7-
D10CFR50.59 FCRMAT FOR SAFITY EVALUATICN
STATION d- M UNIT OSYSTEM MM TEST /PRCCEDURE No G A /J.?C c|)8
vh A Cina Gh-,
URE TITLE A7 . AM d MI REVISdN &TEST /PROCE-
-
EQUIPMENT NAMEe
EqulPMENT NUMBER.:-- ~ - - - -
1 z-
f DESCRIPTION CF TEST / PROCEDURE'-
b|W+Y & YSU1 ,4$ /4 r ) f Act n f sd >% Bu &
...
.
.
SAFcTY EVALUATICN: Answer the following questions with a *yes* cr''no", and ,,iwide sereific=
'
reasons justifyirg the decisicm.-
Is the prebobility of en occurrence or the coresquence of en accident, or malfunction of*1equipment important to sciety es prwviously evelueted in ths Final Sciety Anclysis P.scort
' . - 1.
increased? Yesd No, Because:
-
0 ly'> ,
Is the possi*aility fer en accident or malfunctico of a different typs then any previouslyX Na, Secaus,a:2. Yesevaluated in the Final Saisty Analysis Report created?
p-' .df. M AN[-
Is the mergin =f sefery, es defined in the basis f=r eny Technic =1 5=ecific=rien, redue:d?3.' Yes V No, Sac =use:
g }Any answer enecked "YES" should be reported in the Annual Report.d* Note::o :he NRC
,
W =4e, - %-tePerierrnec :y' _ - -
hf ,/ u.w 2, M Ma
--- -- - - - . _ . . ._ _ __
.., , ..
LAP-320-2- .;. . -. . .r . .. g,yg,,9
. - --- . ._ . - . . ._
_ _ _
April 7, 1982.. .- . . ATTAcangny y 21 finM' |- -.. , *. . . . ,.
(Page 2 of 2) -' * -*- - . '.
SAFETY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (10 CFR 30~d3.;d , .
,,
TEST /PROCECURE No. ( # /330 -* -REVI$ ION t--
.". -j ! ,-
- Does this constitute a change to procedures jas described in Safety Analysis Report?, ,
t..
'
J, I : ( ) 10 FJ _'' #
,5 is a manga in == Tecnnt:al 1:ec1 fica:1:n '3;invcivec7
.s . . , -en.I ..,. ,. . . . . . .: .--SAFITI I'/At.'.!ATIC:t: Answer ce fullcwing :vestiens wiu 1 'y'.
' :r ' :' ,.
an:1 pr:vids,s:ecific reas ns justifying t'.e incisten:|
. . .
' '
Is ce :r:babili:y cf (n, cccur snes. et ::nsecuence of 2nC t. .1.1 rtvi:u-lyac:icant, er ..:alfun :1:n of saft y esta:ad a;uf:. snt., 'evaluated in 2e Final Safaty analysis Re:cet, incrtsse? .
.t _Y es No,*-
(UJ/K(M. ,
--
- .
Is ce ; ssibility for in ac:ican: er maifune:i:n :( a :(!fut:i: .1r'L 2. ty:e can any Ortvicusly avaiuatad n es Fina) Saft y *.: lysis^t Racert cr: stat.? Yes
!fe ,
a= .S-. gp ' ~.
3.. Is ce ::aqin of saft:7. as :f tfined i t."basis f:r any ~c:n-it:I
Scecifica:1:n, rtducad7 Yes 'f e ,
; &. &'
-
.
.
? Anv Ansser * Yes ( ) I AllAnswersMc%,
.. .|
iecut:0 in teti ac 'D;0 lear| | Raget a::: f ;:m.ts1:n'I ,| I :: :-- 1: m !ae :rmee.
.
; t
I -
[ .' e=:- :::t:n Receivec ( ) |L- . ,
,
Inttista Pr:cuurt/ Test !,=,.
' .W
,* ,,
s -
n*[ f n$'dW $ f" af $3yS$
E d"~"3td Dy /IT| 7 sr. Oui: be .t:0*"*10 !5 ". 3
*
b1.a.a.uli "t *F* *: . NRC.""' _[ ' bOa".2
.-
r.' -1 ,.
O
__ y - _ _ - - 7 _._m---
,I. t , ..~
.
O* 'ATTACHMENT F. g ; cn
. .9
<* ~ (Page 1 of 2) April 7, 19R7*
'
10CFRSO.53 FCRMAT FCR SAFETY EVALUATION
STATION dd da f.f_f UNIT O
SYSTEM M MM TEST /PRCCEDURE No (_ ? / / J J 0 - J 2.Ibsr.nw asur Dwaas, as me [. REVISIONTEST / PROCEDURE TITLE 6,f a. Arawu wd'A -
.
~EqulPMENT NAME-
EqulPMENT NUM3ga_..- -
--_. _
DESCRIPTION OF TEST / PROCEDURE '- h&No cde & JU p|c psW cdA|dhoc/ '4. jj
:.' .. .
.
.
SAFETY EVA!.UATICN: Answer the following questions with a "yes* cr''no", and provide- :sseific=
reasons justifying the decisien:~
Is the pechobility of en occurrence or the corzequence of en cecident, or rnolfunction ei'1e9:ipawnt importent to sciety as previously ewluated in ths Final Sciety Anclysis h= ort
1.' -
increased? YesV No, Because:
'
.
!s the possi'aility fer en cecident or rnolfunction ei a different type then any previouslyYes T No, Beecus.3:2.evolvered in the Final Sciety Analysis hport created?
(hk
Is the mergin ci sciery, es defined in the basis fer eny Technic =i 5pecifie=rien, reduced?3._Yes 4 No, Seesuse:
ASOAny answer enecked "YES" should be rescried in the Annual Report.* Note::o the NRC s
,b
I cUn$
_ K2x pk,,,+-n,(J
--
_. . - - - . - ._ - _ . . .- _ -.
|
' ' " - - * = - + - ... , , , _ , _
0
...
i .? t.Ap.320 2- . .j
.
.j....*e g,y;, g 9 1.-. . .. - . ~ . . ..-. _ . . .
_ - _ _ #0fII 7 I982 |... . .
ATTACHMENT F 21 fino.f'- *... *
.. . . ,.(Page 2 of 2) -~ ," --
m .SAFETY EVALUAil0N CHECKLIST (10 CFR 50.53).; ) g
# TEST /PRCCEDURE No. 4PfdJo.3L,. ,_REVISION /-
-
n *
. f ,,.
-. Does this constitute a change to procedures ,
'
as described in Safety Analysis Report?, ,
.'6!c %. -, I I:: ( )
-
I;s 1 :.anga n . : Tecn=te:.! 3:ec1ti:2:1cn---plinvolved?.s.., .. *e& _- T . . . . . . ..| 's'_ .. --
:r '':'.Answer the fell wing :uestiens wi*h t 'y*.:'.gSAFET/ I'/ALUATIC*l:[.. and pr:vids,s;ecific reascas justifying :he feef sfen: I
'
Cs :nt :r:babilf:y of (n, cec::r snes. ht ::nsecuence Of in12 ;rtvi:u:!y.
b t. ac:teanc. cr malfunctica of saf t:y rill:ac equi:= tnt.'. incrtsse?svaluated in :ne Final Safaty analysis Re: ort, ..-m Yes T No,:F.. p o ,O r, a
.,...
- ,
f:r an acciden cr ma functi:n :( t tiffren:*r' Is the :cssibill:7
ty;s nan any Ortvicusly evaluatad in =e Final 54f t-/ .-:ly:f s,[ 2.^Re cre : st:at? Yes V No ,, , %' -Ou-, ' ~ 8M . -* g,
1
Is the = art n of safety, as defined in :he basis f:r any ~c:nni: ;i3..S ecificatten, rtducad? Yes N-No ..
a wTn- .a.-AllAns. vert |{ojdl- .
f- _ Anv Anrser * Ye(( ) e.. .
secus:: in t:sive Weisar-'?.eg:!1::: / Can.is f.:n'tu:. :--:1-9 m % :. ene?. *|' ,
| - .
[[' ?.u--- ---' n Rec 2ivec ( ). ,L-
In1tia:a Pr::wcrt/ Test l!.cIementa:1:n