Large-Area Identification of Wind Projects and Optimization of Farm Layout
A. Singh, S. Giannoulakis, N. Chokani, R. S. Abhari
Laboratory for Energy Conversion, ETH Zürich
February 6, 2013 EWEA 2013, Vienna
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 2
Overview1. Introduction
2. Motivation
3. Objectives
4. Approach
5. Results
6. Summary
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 3
Introduction – Growth of Wind Industry • In EU, 15.6% annual growth rate of installed wind power capacity (1996-2011)
• EU member states adopted binding renewable energy goals for 2020
• Wind power capacity to reach 230GW, from 94GW in 2011
• On-shore wind power capacity to double
* Data: EWEA, 2011
2011 20200
50
100
150
200
250
Inst
alle
d W
ind
Pow
er C
apac
ity (
GW
) –
Euro
pean
Uni
on *
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 4
Challenges – Identification of Viable Wind Projects • At 3MW/km2, over 35000km2 of land identification for wind farm development
• Large-area (country/state) prospecting for wind farm development is time and resource intensive
Wind project development dependent on local factors - environmental, geographical, anthropological, policy and finance
Site assessment and feasibility study takes 1-2 years
Simultaneous assessment of large number of sites - Difficult
• Performance/assessment of wind farms is susceptible to systemic uncertainties and exogenous risks
Relative risk assessment of spatially distributed potential projects - Necessary
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 5
Research Objectives Develop Geographical Information Systems (GIS) based integrated econometric assessment tool for planning of wind power development; capable of
• Large-area assessment of land for site identification
• Long-term performance and financial assessment
• Model performance risk for optimum portfolio development
• Model auxiliary systems – Transmission grid, hydro storage etc.
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 6
Site Identification• Identification of wind farm development constraints based on anthropological, geographical,
environmental factors – 16 in case of Poland
• Map each constraint at spatial resolution of 30m x 30m (more than 350 million pixels/map for Poland)
• Test exclusivity of each pixel from development constraints and corresponding regulatory buffer areas for identification of ‘eligible areas’
0 300km
• 38% of land area eligible for siting
• More than 30,000 sites
Case: Poland
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 7
Performance Assessment• Life cycle assessment of energy yield and performance uncertainty
Wind Distribution (WRF) – Weibull Maps (1-5 years; 10x10 sq km)
Turbine Selection – Lowest cost of energy turbine for local wind regime
Monte Carlo Uncertainty PropagationVertical
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 8
Financial Assessment
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 9
Mapping – Risk & ReturnsIRR on Equity
(Debt/Equity:70/30)Standard Deviation in IRR
• Mapping expected returns and performance risk facilitates creation of portfolios according to investors’ preferences
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 10
Optimum Portfolio for Poland’s 2020 RE targets
• Portfolio constraints
• Higher IRR for a fixed value of risk (3%)
• Proximity to transmission grid and load centers
• Time for analysis of Poland – 72 hours
• Analysis provides a ‘crude’ portfolio based on meso-scale assessment
Further refinements using micro-scale wind resource assessmentPortfolio – Poland 2020
Number of Projects 60
Capacity 6600 MW
Avg. Performance Uncertainty 10.1%
Average IRR 15.6%
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 11
Meso-scale to Micro-scale – Refining PredictionsMesoscale wind simulation using WRF
Grid Resolution – 10x10km
Micro-scale wind farm simulations –in-house RANS CFD solver
Grid resolution – of the order of rotor diameter
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 12
Micro-scale Refinement – Farm Layout Optimization
• Evolutionary optimization technique for placement of turbines
Invasive Weed Optimization
• Behavior of weeds – fast and greedy search for resources
• In resource rich regions - High rate of growth and reproduction (and vice versa)
• Objective:
minimize(Cost of energy production for each wind turbine)
Explore wind rich regions
Decrease wake losses
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 13
Farm Layout Optimization – Rules for Turbine Placement
Probability space for turbines’ relative placement
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 14
Farm Layout Optimization – An Example
• Turbines relocated from poorer to richer wind regions (from (2) to (1))• Optimized layout avoid wake interactions
Norm
alized Mean Velocity Profile
Real wind farm (80MW) and micro-scale wind resource map (100x100 sq m)
Optimized layout for the wind farm
Dominant wind directions (80 percentile)
NWN
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 15
Layout Optimization – Improved Energy Extraction
• The cost of energy production improved by €0.2cents/kWh • Increasing revenue by €400,000/annum
Iterations
Cost
of E
nerg
y Pr
oduc
tion
(ce
nts
€/kW
h)
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 16
Other Capabilities1. Grid infrastructure modeling –
Optimal power flow modeling2. Logistics of farm development –
Turbine transportation modeling
3. Hydro-storage modeling – Improved wind power penetration and risk hedging
4. View-shed development – Reducing ‘NIMBY’ effect
5. …
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 17
Summary• Integrated approach to identify economically viable sites over large areas is
demonstrated
Analysis of Poland is presented, identifying 38% of area eligible for development
A portfolio of wind projects to meet Poland’s 2020 targets is developed
• Micro-site layout optimization technique - based on Invasive Weed Optimization - is demonstrated to reduce the Cost of Energy Production
• Other capabilities developed within the framework are introduced
February 6, 2013 Antriksh Singh 18
Thank you.