Transcript
Page 1: INTERNATIONAL AUDIO LABORATORIES ERLANGEN · soumitro. 5. Simulation Experiment 6. Conclusions • ULA with M=5 • Source B placed at I = 37 discrete points • Anechoic environment

•AmethodtoanalyzetheabilityofISFtoobtainanarbitrary,user-defined,desiredspatialresponseattheoutputofthefilterwaspresented.•WithperfectknowledgeofthesourceDOAsthedesiredspatialresponsecanbeobtainedattheoutputoftheISF.•ThroughtheanalysisitwasshownthatrobustnessagainstDOAestimationerrorsisimportantandessentialfortheISFframework.

E-Mail:

soumitro.

E-Mail:

soumitro.

5. Simulation Experiment

6. Conclusions

•ULAwithM=5

•SourceBplacedatI=37discretepoints

•Anechoicenvironment

•Source-microphonedistance:1.8m

Obtained vs Desired : Known DOAs

Obtained vs Desired : DOA errors + Different passband widths

SDI Obtained vs Desired Array Gain: Source B

•DOAerrorvariance:15O

•Passbandwidths:20Oand30O

•DOAerrorvariance:5Oand10O

•Passbandwidths:20Oand30O

✓̂A(n, k) = ✓A +✓A(n, k),

✓̂B,i(n, k) = ✓B,i +✓B,i(n, k)

DOA estimates with error

σ2DOA = E{✓2}

Simulation Setup

Error variance

[1]O.Thiergart,M.Taseska,andE.A.P.Habets,“Aninformedparametricspatialfilterbasedoninstantaneousdirection-of-arrivalestimates,”IEEETransAcoust.,Speech,SignalProcess.,vol.22,no.12,pp.2182–2196,Dec2014.

Source A

Microphone Array

Source B

positionsI= 9

4. Proposed Analysis Method

Average Directional Array Gain

Ad,i =1

card(Ti)X

(n,k)2Ti

GA(n, k)

GB,i(n, k)

GA(n, k) =|X̃A(n, k)|2

|XA(n, k,d1)|2

•Proposed method can also be used for L =1 or L > 2.

•By varying the input signal-to-interference ratio (iSIR) the proposed method can be used to identify the critical iSIR where the single plane wave signal model is violated.

GB,i(n, k) =|X̃B,i(n, k)|2

|XB,i(n, k,d1)|2

•Assumption:L=2

•SamplecompleteDOArangeatIdiscretepoints.

•SourceAiskeptstaticatbroadside

•SourceBismovedthroughthewholeDOArange,placingitattheIdiscretepoints.

Setup

Ti = {(n, k) : |XA(n, k,d1)| ≥ ✏A ^ |XB,i(n, k,d1)| ≥ ✏B}

0 30 60 90 120 150 180

−40

−30

−20

−10

0

Magnitude[dB]

DOA θ[◦]

•Thespatialresponseisanarbitrary,user-definedfunctionthatcanbepotentiallycomplexvaluedandfrequencydependent.

•Thedesignofthedesiredspatialresponsefunctionisalsodependentontheapplication.

3. Desired Spatial Response

2. Informed Spatial Filter: Review

•Considerauniformlineararray(ULA)ofMmicrophoneslocatedat.Themicrophonesignalsaregivenby

•Assumingsignalcomponentsaremutuallyuncorrelated

•Desiredsignal

•Estimateofthedesiredsignal

•Microphonesignalofl-thplanewave• Soundpressureofl-thplanewave

•m-thelementofsteeringvector

•NoisePSDmatrix

•Directiondependentgain

•Filterweights

•PropagationvectorsofLsources

Definitions

•Formulation:s.t.

•Solution:with

•Thedirectiondependentgaincorrespondstothevalueofanarbitraryspatialresponsefunctiong(✓, k),evaluatedattheDOAofthel-thplanewave.

Informed LCMV filter

d1...M

y(n, k) =

LX

l=1

xl(n, k)

| {z }x(n,k)

+xn(n, k)

y(n, k) = E{y(n, k)yH(n, k)}= x(n, k) +n(n, k)

Z(n, k) =

LX

l=1

G(✓l, k)Xl(n, k,d1)

xl(n, k) = [Xl(n, k,d1) . . . Xl(n, k,dM )]T

xl(n, k) = a(✓l, k)Xl(n, k,d1)

am(✓l, k) = exp{jrm cos ✓l(n, k)}

n(n, k) = n(k) I

G(✓l, k)

w(n, k)

A = [a(✓1, k), . . . ,a(✓L, k)]

w(n, k) = arg minw

wHn(n, k)w wH(n, k)a(✓l, k) = G(✓l, k)

w(n, k) = 1n A

⇥AH1

n A⇤1

g

G(✓l, k)

g = [G(✓1, k), . . . , G(✓L, k)]H

bZ(n, k) = wH(n, k)y(n, k)

1. Introduction

•Proposeamethodtoanalysetheobtainedspatialresponseandcompareittothedesiredresponse.•Gaininsightintotheobtainedspatialresponseattheoutputofthespatialfilter.•AnalysetheeffectofDOAestimationerrorsontheobtainedspatialresponse,andprovideanobjectivemotivationfortheneedofrobustnessagainstDOAestimationerrors.

Aim

A Method to Analyze the Spatial Response of Informed Spatial Filters

Soumitro Chakrabarty, Oliver Thiergart, Emanuël. A. P. Habets

International Audio Laboratories Erlangen

E-Mail: [email protected]

INTERNATIONAL AUDIO LABORATORIES ERLANGENA joint institution of Fraunhofer IIS and Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

•Informedspatialfilters(ISFs)[1]aredesignedtocapturemultiplesoundsourceswithadesired,arbitraryspatialresponseateachTFinstantwhileattenuatingundesiredsignalcomponents.•Thedesiredspatialresponsefunctionisdifferentfromthedirectivitypatternofthespatialfilter.

•Acomparativeanalysisoftheobtainedandthedesiredspatialresponsehasnotbeenperformedyet.

Motivation