PM MeetingGlasgow Middle School
Wednesday, October 2, 2019
Focus of Classroom Visits
➔ What is the task and target?
➔ What scaffolds can you see?
One person from each group share out a trend.
Scaffolds
Help students to
perform a task
that would
otherwise be out
of reach
October PM Meeting
• Updates
• SIIP Goals
• English
• Math
• Science
• Individuals & Society
Teacher Return Week
• Day 1 - Who We Are
– Our Staff and Our Students
• Day 2 - What We Do
– Super Collaborators & Seeing the Work
• Day 3 - How We Do it
– Getting Better & Warm Demanders
FIT Instruction Begins - 10/1
• Enrichment FIT
• Math FIT
• Reading FIT
• Science FIT
• Speciality FIT
October 14 Schoolwide
• General Session
– Seeing the Work of Teams
• Department Meetings
• Poe, Holmes, Glasgow
Literacy Symposium (English & SS)
– Next Steps in Workshop
October PM Meeting
• Updates
• SIIP Goals
• English
• Math
• Science
• Individuals & Society
SIIP Goals
- English - Increase the overall unadjusted pass rate on Glasgow MS’ English SOL by 4 percentage points, 68% to 72% from the SOA Workbook
- Math - Increase the overall unadjusted pass rate on Glasgow MS’ Mathematics SOL by 3 percentage points, 76% to 79% from the SOA Workbook. The adjusted pass rates will increase from 88% in the SOA workbook to 90%.
- Science - Increase the overall unadjusted pass rate on Glasgow MS Science SOL by 5 percentage points, from 66% to 71% (from the SOA academic workbook) .
SIIP Goals
- Civics - Increase the overall unadjusted pass rate on Glasgow MS Civics SOL by 3 percentage points, from 80% to 83% (from the SOA academic workbook).
- Caring Culture - During the 1920 school year, we will increase students reporting on the following questions by 5% in the following questions through implementation of PBIS program and structured classroom supports.
SIIP Strategies
• Instructional Focus– Learning Target, Academic Task, Scaffolds &
Evidence of Student Learning
• Collaborative Teams– Moving our teams through the cycle
• Walkthrough Process– Walkthroughs, Debrief, High Leverage Moves,
Observation & Feedback
October PM Meeting
• Updates
• SIIP Goals
• English
• Math
• Science
• Individuals & Society
Framing Questions
What evidence do we have that our teams are moving through
the cycle to meet the needs of our students?
English
Progress Monitoring:
• Common lesson planning document– Unpacking and refining units
• School-wide writing sample, baseline • Vertical articulation in grammar • Grammar baseline in all grades• Teacher data sheets• Collecting evidence of student learning in Tier
1 instruction to drive differentiation• Data dialogues• Small group instruction
English
Schoolwide BOY Writing Sample
% of students
18196th
(n=568)
19206th
(n=600)
18197th
(n=396)
19207th
(n=581)
18198th
(n=373)
19208th
(n=494)
18 - 24 (pass)
9% (n=54)
12% (n=70)
37% (n=145)
28% (n=164)
34% (n=127)
16% (n=78)
169%
(n=51)8%
(n=47)8%
(n=30)16%
(n=92)11%
(n=40)6%
(n=28)
14 and below
82% (n=463)
81% (n=483)
56% (n=221)
57% (n=325)
55% (206)
79% (388)
BOY Writing Sample - Grade 8% Pass AAP Honors Gen Ed SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Overall15%
(N=515)
33% (N=127)
16% (N=209)
0% (N=81)
0% (N=29)
0% (N=30)
5% (N=39)
Teacher 42%(N=28)
26%(N=92)
Teacher 37%(N=49)
0%(N=41)
Teacher 24%(N=50)
0%(N=40)
Teacher 0%(N=29)
0%(N=12)
Teacher 9%(N=23)
5%(N=39)
Teacher 0%(N=18)
Teacher 9%(N=94)
BOY Writing Sample - Grade 7 % Pass AAP Honors Gen Ed SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Overall27% (N=598)
43% (N=163)
28% (N=233)
23% (N=109)
0% (N=22)
0% (N=35)
0% (N=17)
Teacher 34%(N=80)
9%(N=47)
Teacher 23%(N=52)
Teacher 8%(N=25)
Teacher 52%(N=83)
5%(N=22)
Teacher 70%(N=47)
34%(N=35)
Teacher 50%(N=50)
0%(N=17)
Teacher 6%(N=16)
0%(N=35)
Teacher 4%(N=89)
BOY Writing Sample - Grade 6% Pass AAP Honors Gen Ed DB SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Overall11% (N=620)
47% (N=121)
7%(N=111)
2% (N=203) 2%(N=83)
0% (N=54)
0% (N=41)
0% (N=44)
Teacher 12%(N=25)
4%(N=46)
Teacher 0%(N=24)
Teacher 0%(N=19)
0%(N=37)
Teacher 39% (N=74) 0%(N=17)
Teacher 60%(N=47) 2%(N=44)
Teacher 0% (N=44)
Teacher 24%(N=21)
2%(N=51)
Teacher 0%(N=30)
0%(N=20)
Teacher 0%(N=24)
0%(N=21)
Teacher 0%(N=22)
2%(N=54)
Dept MTG & PD - English
August 22 - Strengthening Vertical Articulation in Grammar and Composition
• Grammar Instruction PD (Capitalization)• Teachers College Reading Institute Share Out
October 14 - Upcoming Department Meeting & PD
• Grammar Instruction PD (Parts of Speech)• Data dialogue (BOY)• OSS PD Workshop • Literacy Symposium Pt. 2 (Holmes, Poe, and Glasgow)• Continue to guide teams through the CT cycle
Department MTG - 8/22
Next Steps - English
6th 7th 8th
● Data dialogue on Unit 1
● Use High Leverage Moves to shift workshop to create student autonomy
● Doing the work of the students
● Analyze student work to create purposeful small groups
● Walkthrough debriefs 9/30-10/4
● Use evidence of student learning on pre-assessment to guide instruction
● Plan scaffolds● Create formative
and summative assessments for Unit 2
● Data dialogue using writing baseline to influence:○ Instructional
planning○ Small groups○ FIT instruction
● Implementation of student choice
CT Meetings - English
October PM Meeting
• Updates
• SIIP Goals
• English
• Math
• Science
• Individuals & Society
Math
Progress Monitoring:
• Refining assessments aligned to standards
• Data conversations to create an action plan at CT level
• Teacher data sheets• CT cycle self-assessment• teacher modeling
Math 6 2019 Data:Unit 1: Ratios
• Unit 1 eCART summative given 9/25 &
9/26
• Data sent to OSS on 9/26; data
received 9/30
• CT data dialogue scheduled for 10/2
Math 6 2018 Data:Unit 4: Ratios
% Pass Gen Ed SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Overall 67% (N=366)
76% (N=274) 58% (N=40) 6% (N=18) 41% (N=34)
Teacher 70% (N=27)
Teacher 81% (N=53)
Teacher 75% (N=53)
Teacher 74% (N=54)
Teacher 69% (N=45)
Teacher 78% (32)
Teacher 58% (N=40) 0% (N=7)
Teacher 9% (N=11)
Teacher 41% (N=34)
Teacher 90% (N=10)
Math 6 2019 Data:Unit 1: Ratios
% Pass Gen Ed SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Overall46% (N=436) 54% (N=351) 21% (N=53) 6% (N=32)
Teacher 51% (N=70)
Teacher 53% (N=72)
Teacher 68% (N=74)
Teacher 53% (N=32)
Teacher 47% (N=43)
Teacher 47% (N=60)
Teacher 23% (N=40)
Teacher 15% (N=13) N/A**
Teacher 6% (N=32)***
Math 7 2018 Data:Unit 1: The Rational Number System
% Average Score
AAP Gen Ed SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Teacher 74%
Teacher 91% 74%
Teacher 77%
Teacher 93% 79%
Teacher 89%
Teacher 76% 77%
Teacher 85%**
Teacher 61%
Criterion A: Knowledge
Math 7 2019 Data:Unit 1: The Rational Number System
% Average Score AAP Gen Ed SPED TT SPED SC ESOL TT
Teacher 81%
Teacher 74%
Teacher 78%
Teacher 92% 74%
Teacher 93%
Teacher 74% 76%
Teacher 63%
Teacher 63%
Teacher 77%
Criterion A: Knowledge
Data Conversations
PreAlgebra Data:Unit 1: Real Numbers Part 1
% Pass Rate Comparison
2019-2020 2018-2019
Honors 99% 87%
Gen Ed 92% 44%
SPED TT 61% 19%
SPED SC 50% 31%
ESOL TT 51% 23%
Data Conversations
Math Department Meetings
• September 24th:– FIT Instruction & data collection
• October 14th:– Walkthroughs- Round 1– Teacher data sheets– Role of data collector as a math workshop teacher– CT conversations on how might we collect data on
our students to support differentiation – Teachers determining their method for collecting
formative data – CT self-assessment
• Stages of the CT cycle
Next Steps - Math
6th 7th 8th
● Unit 1 data dialogue● Reflection on Unit 1
pacing & process● Finalize vetting of Unit
2 lessons● Unpack Unit 3● OSS Support- linking
academic tasks to learning targets
● Determine formative & begin progress monitoring for guided groups
● Common FIT planning● Unpacking Unit 3 ● Review & update Unit
3 summative● Pace & lesson plan● Unit 2 data dialogue● Determine formative &
begin progress monitoring for guided groups
● Unpacking Unit 3 ● Review & update Unit
3 summative● Plan & vet Unit 3
lessons● Unit 1 Part 2 data
dialogue● Determine formative &
begin progress monitoring for guided groups
October PM Meeting
• Updates
• SIIP Goals
• English
• Math
• Science
• Individuals & Society
Science Progress MonitoringWhere are teams in the CT Cycle?
Where are teams in Stages of Team Development?
1920● ALL--Anchoring daily in VDOE Curriculum Framework
1819
6th
● Walkthrough buckets* ○ Targeted small-group instruction, modeling,
collaboration● Whole-group lesson planning w/new standards● BOY assessment given (data dialogue planned for Oct. 14th)● Teachers pulling small groups
● Walkthrough buckets *○ Checks for understanding, use checks
for understanding to guide next steps● Whole-group lesson planning● BOY assessment given (data not used)
7th
● Walkthrough buckets*○ Targeted small-group instruction, Modeling, Checks for
understanding● Visioning work done to support All-Honors approach● Delegated planning, CT lesson refining● BOY Assessment developed and given● Strategy ladder used to examine evidence of student learning
on unit pre-assessment and plan small groups● Teachers pulling small groups
● Walkthrough buckets:○ Scaffolds, discourse
● Aligning in planning by establishing expectations when lessons are delegated
8th
● Walkthrough buckets*○ Targeted small-group instruction, time students spend
reading/writing/discussing● Unpacked U1, revised/designed common assessments● BOY assessment given● U1-Subunit 1 complete● Data dialogue on subunit 1 common summative completed● Lesson planning template in use● Delegated planning, CT lesson refining
● Walkthrough buckets*○ Modeling skills, checks for
understanding● Lesson planning template not yet used● BOY assessment just given● Unit 1 not yet begun
Science Progress Monitoring
Reporting Category
SOL8th grade
EOY8th grade BOY 7th grade BOY 6th grade BOY
1819 1819 1920 1819 1920* 1920* 1819
Overall66%
(unadj)73% 38%
(N=497)41%
(N=482)27%
(N=575)30%
(N=589)31%
(N=531)
2--Matter*, Energy*, Force/Motion
(15 Qs on SOL)62% 55% 14% 19% n/a 19% 47%
5--Earth/Space Systems (6)
(11 Qs on SOL)58% 59% 37% 32% 13% 47% 33%
1--Scientific Investigation (6-8)
(10 Qs on SOL)66% 83% 60% 60% 39%
4--Ecosystems (7)(7 Qs on SOL)
66% 76% 59% 59% 20%
3--Life Systems (7)(7Qs on SOL)
64% 67% 41% 44% 35%
Science 8 BOY Data
Overall% Pass
38% (N=497)
AA
86% (N=124)
Honors
30% (N=225)
Gen Ed
15% (N=78)
TT SpEd
4% (N=23)
TT ESOL
0% (N=18)
SC SpEd
4% (N=28)
Teacher 51% (N=45) 24% (N=34) 0% (N=10)
Teacher 40% (N=90) 7% (N=15)
Teacher 80% (N=51) 10% (N=20) 0% (N=7)
Teacher 9% (N=90)
Teacher 0% (N=11)
Teacher 8% (N=13) 4% (N=28)
Teacher 90% (N=73)
Science 7 BOY Data
Overall% Pass
27% (N=575)
AA
67% (N=161)
Honors
14% (N=331)
TT ESOL
0% (N=19)
TT SpEd
0% (N=38)
SC SpEd
0% (N=26)
Teacher 6% (N=18) 0% (N=19)
Teacher 20% (N=40)
Teacher 23% (N=26)
Teacher 21% (N=70)
Teacher 0% (N=38) 0% (N=7)
Teacher 0% (N=19)
Teacher 73% (N=26) 16% (N=88)
Teacher 2% (N=89)
Science 6 BOY Data
Overall% Pass
30% (N=589)
AA
71% (N=122)
Honors
29% (N=200)
Gen Ed
12% (N=209)
TT SpEd
9% (N=58)
SC SpEd
Teacher 29% (N=75) 11% (N=47)
Teacher 69% (N=42) 6% (N=35)
Teacher 7% (N=29) n/a
Teacher
Teacher 34% (N=68)
Teacher 10% (N=29)
Teacher 75% (N=69) 17% (N=81)
Teacher 55% (N=11)(Immersion)
23% (N=57)
Science 7 Strategy Ladder + Small-group Plans
Strategy Ladder
Moving a 1 to a 2 means practice making, talking about, and writing observations in order to develop and use scientific vocabulary.
Moving a 2 to a 3 means using evidence to support observations and introducing claim/evidence/reasoning scaffold.
Department Meetings - Science
October 14
● All teams will come together to examine SOL data + Pre-Assessment data by reporting category
● Teams will develop a plan to support spiraling essential content throughout every unit; we will use MOY and EOY to check students’ progress and compare to last year
Next Steps - Science
6th 7th 8th
Walkthrough debriefs this week with teachers and CT
Use walkthroughs to shift instruction from mostly teacher led to student led with a focus on high-level academic tasks
Use lesson refining process to find opportunities to embed small group instruction and modeling in lessons
Walkthroughs and debriefs this week
Cycles pre-assessment
Cycles strategy ladder to inform small group instruction
Observe HLMs and provide feedback
SOL pre-assessment data dialogue
Strategy ladder used to inform small group instruction
FIT restructured to support the spiraling of 6th, 7th, and 8th grade content
October PM Meeting
• Updates
• SIIP Goals
• English
• Math
• Science
• Individuals & Society
Individuals & Society
Progress Monitoring:
• Formative assessment data dialogues– Civics
• Citizenship formative data dialogue• Year over year unit assessment comparisons (both
formative and summative)
– 7th • Data dialogues focused on Standard 1 skills
(evidenced based writing, using evidence to support a claim), not content
– 6th • Data dialogue (upcoming) - Unit 3 European Explorers • Unit 2 reflection
Civics Unit 1 (Citizenship) Data
Overall% Pass94.9%
(n=549)
AA Honors Gen Ed Int Team TT SpEd TT ESOL SC SpEd SC ESOL
Teacher 100% (n=56)
95% (N=41)
Teacher 70% (n=20) 72% (n=29)
Teacher 99% (n=75)
100% (n=18)
Teacher 100% (n=72)
100% (n-51)
Teacher 100% (n=25)
82% (n=11)
81% (n=32)
Teacher 100% (n=19)
Teacher 97% (n=91)
Teacher 100% (n=9)
Individuals & Society
Upcoming Department Mtg
• Department Area of Focus– Workshop, specifically:
• Modeling of thinking (both in mini-lesson and small group instruction);
• Using Data/CFU to purposefully form small groups; • Academic conversation/discourse during work time
• Upcoming Department Meeting - October 14– Debrief Walkthroughs– Teams develop a plan to address trends that
emerged through walkthroughs and HLMs
Next Steps - I & S
6th
• HLM observations– Embed
walkthrough buckets into CT planning to support workshop
• Refine lesson planning document to support high level academic tasks and time spent reading, writing, and discussing
• Unit 3 - Utilize formatives to plan focus lessons and small group instruction
7th
• HLM observations– Embed
walkthrough buckets into CT planning to support workshop
• Data Dialogues– Guide CT-wide
instructional steps for evidence based student writing
– Determine whole group and small group instruction
8th
• HLM observations– Embed
walkthrough buckets into CT planning to support workshop
• Train and support new CT Lead– PLC cohort– Facilitation PD– Weekly Check-ins
with admin/coach– Weekly planning of
CT agenda with coach