Social Europe
The EU Working Longer Agenda
Fritz von Nordheim European Commission DG EMPL D3: Social Protection
Europe’s Ageing Demography ILC–UK event
hosted by The European Economic and Social Committe 74 rue de Trèves, Brussels
Social Europe
From Dividend to Deficit in Demographics
Social Europe
The demographic challenge
-2.000.000
-1.000.000
0
1.000.000
2.000.000
3.000.000
1996 2006 2016 2026 2036 2046 2056
20-59 60+
60-69
Year-on-year change in the adult population, EU27
Social Europe
The power of longer working lives
EU-27 old-age dependency ratios, 2010-2060, under four exit
assumptions (working ages from 20 to 59 through 69)
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060
20 to 59 / 60+ 20 to 63 / 64+ 20 to 66 / 67+ 20 to 69 / 70+
Social Europe
Demographic vs economic dependency ratios
Source: Josef Wöss / Erik Türk - Austrian Federal Chamber of Labour
EU-27 / 2050 (“EU 2020plus scenario”)
demographic dependency ratio: 50%
economic dependency ratio: 79%
EU-27 / 2010
demographic dependency ratio: 26%
Economic dependency ratio: 65%
Yellow: employed population
Red: unemployed, pensioners
Grey: other inactive
Social Europe
Employment rates by gender, EU15,1970 & 2005
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
15-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+
% o
f ag
e g
rou
p p
op
ula
tio
n
Men 1970 Men 2008 Women 1970 Women 2008
Social Europe
How we arrived here: –The imbalancing of
years in work and retirement 1960-2000
• Relative share of work in life / duration of working life reduced through combination of:
• 4-5 years Later Entry (longer education & training)
• 4-5 years Earlier Exit (longer retirement)
• 5-6 years Longevity Growth (longer retirement)
• Was it individual preferences or policy conditioning that drove changes?
Social Europe
Where we are now: 15 years of improvements
Major reversal of retirement trends since 2000:
• Exit ages rising
• Empl rates 55-64 rising – primarily 55-59
• Empl rates of 65-69 rising
• Holding up in crisis
Causes:
• Key Helping hand: Changes in age, sector, gender and educational level composition of older workers
• Pension reforms – closing of early exit routes
• Changes in Age Management in work places & LMs
Social Europe
Employment rates 55-64, 2013
Social Europe
N/W->S/E gender bias in OW Empl rates
Social Europe
Gender bias in underemployment of 55-64 In 2011 total employment rates for workers aged 55-64 ranged from 31.2 in SK to 72.3 in SE, i.e. varying by more than a factor 2.
The rate for the EU-27 was 47.4.
Eight countries had rates below 40 (BE, EL, IT, LU, HU, MT, PL, SI).
For females the rate ranged from just 13.8 in MT to 68.9 in SE, i.e. varying by a factor 5. The rate for the EU-27 was 40.2. • Five countries had rates below 30 (EL, IT, MT, PL, SI).
Barriers to female older workers’ employment are found in
• pension systems (e.g. lower pensionable age for women), • work-life balances (e.g. insufficient access to child & eldercare) • workplaces & labour markets (e.g. poor age & gender
management).
Social Europe
Gender employment gap of 55-64 reducing 2000 to 2010
Social Europe
Exit ages 2001-2009
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
IE*
LV
*
CY
SE
UK
PT
DK FI
EL** EE
NL
DE
ES
EU
27 IT
AT
CZ
LT
FR
HU
MT
SK
BE
*
LU
*
PL
SI*
**
2001 2009
Social Europe
Employment rates 55-64 rising - even in crisis
Source: Eurostat, labour force survey
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
2013 2007
Social Europe
10y N->S Gradient in Working Life Duration
Social Europe
Where we are heading: Scenarios 2010-2060
The double challenge:
• structural longevity growth of +6-7 years
• transition from baby-boomers to baby-busters
The end of the unique demographic dividend
Greying of the labour Market: only will 50+ grow
Demography not fate –
But coping will depend on our ability to employ a much larger share of 50-69 year olds
Social Europe
Reforms have improved pension sustainability (change 2010-2060 in percentage points) - 2009 and 2012 AR
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
LV PL EE IT DK PT FR SE EL BG UK
EU27 EA AT D
E CZ HU FI LT NL ES RO IE N
O SK MT BE SI CY LU
2009 AR 2012 AR
+1.5 p.p. (2012 AR)
+2,3 p.p. (2009 AR)
Social Europe
Decomposition of the increase
in pension expenditure Dep. effect Empl. effect Coverage effect Benefit effect
PensExp = Pop>65 x Pop (15-64) x PensNo x PensExp/PensNo
GDP Pop(15-64) EmplNo Pop>65 GDP/EmplNo
8.9
-2.6
-1.0
-2.7
-0.6
2.0
8.7
-2.9
-0.9
-2.8
-0.6
1.5
-4.0
-2.0
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
Dependency ratio Coverage ratio Employment effect Benefit ratio Interaction effect Total
EA EU27
(%) of GDP)
Social Europe
Challenges to future pension adequacy
Projected
change in
replacement
rates of
statutory and
supplementary
pension
schemes
between 2008
and 2048 (in
pp.)
-35
-25
-15
-5
5
15
25P
T
SE
PL
FR IT
CZ
DK
EL
DE FI
MT
HU
SK
LV
BE
LT
LU
NL
AT IE ES
UK
EE
CY
BG SI
RO
Change in gross replacement rates between 2008-2048 owing to total Statutory pension schemes (percentage
points change)
Change in gross replacement rates between 2008-2048 owing to Occupational and other supplementary pension
schemes (percentage points change)
Social Europe
Balancing Adequacy & Sustainability
4th Key message of 2012 Pension Adequacy Report :
• The greater sustainability of public pensions in most Member States has, to a significant extent, been achieved through reductions in future adequacy.
• The challenge is therefore to devise means by which people can recoup the decline in replacement rates.
EU policy Goals:
• Early retirement actuarially punished,
• Working longer sufficiently rewarded &
• Cost-effective schemes for retirement savings available 20
Social Europe
The impact of working longer
Social Europe
Ageing or Exit Age problem?
Adult life spent in retirement EU27
2010 2060 2010 2060
54.5 66.7 38.6 60.3
21.6 21.6 23.6 23.6
62.5 64.3 61.7 63.8
18.9 22.7 22.7 26.0
31.7 34.7 37.4 39.3
2.0 1.3
Requested exit postponement in years
(to keep % life spent in retirement
constant)
Men Women
Average entry age
Employment rate of older workers (55-64)
Average exit age
Life expectancy at the time of w ithdrawal
% of adult life spent in retirement
Social Europe
Interdependence of pension and employment policies
• Tax/benefit incentives affect late-career labour supply
• With pensions increasingly based on career average contributions, future pension adequacy will depend on the ability of labour markets to provide opportunities for longer and less interrupted contributory careers
• The success of pension reforms that raise the pensionable age and possibly link this or the benefit level to longevity gains depends crucially on their underpinning through work place and labour market measures that enable and encourage women and men to work longer.
23
Social Europe
Pension adequacy depends on longer & less broken working lives
• There are clear limits to how much age management practices at work can be influenced by incentive structures in pensions.
• Tackling the pension adequacy challenge will require determined efforts to promote longer and healthier working lives through employment and industrial relations policies.
24
Social Europe
Linking the pensionable age to longevity
• Benefit versus Age linking?
• Retirement not resulting from individual decision about income optimisation, consequence of complex set of factors in work places and labour markets and constrained by collective agreements
• Adjusting pension norm with narrative: ”as we live longer we work longer” and reach ” a better balance between years spent in work and retirement”
• Implicit: Working to higher ages becomes permanent agenda for the labour market
Social Europe
Implicit agenda of linking
• Collective pension norm: age moves w. longevity
• Tabels turned: SP off-loading onto labour markets
• Fixing pensions through longer working lives
• Taking adjustments in duration of working life
• Challenge moved to social partners in WPs & LMs
• Required: Changes in age management in work places and labour markets to encourage and enable women and men to work to higher ages
Social Europe
Key challenge of longer working lives
Creating ‘late-career’ labour markets the main challenge.
Nowhere in Europe a labour market for people aged 55+.
Longer working lives are fully possible through RETENTION
with the same employer.
But if people 55+ lose their job the chances of finding
another are so remote that longer working lives through
REHIRING almost is non-existent.
27
Social Europe
Scenarios for a Greying Labour Market
Pensionable age as Collective Norm or Individual preference?
Pensions from social protection to income smoothing (from collective to individual responsibility)?
Working to a certain Income more than a certain Age?
Or Auto-piloting as pension design ideal - not everyone having to learn to navigate his own retirement plane!
New Collective norms of retirement and pensionable ages: 'As we live longer we work longer' ??
Social Europe
Scenarios for a Greying Labour Market
• A multi-tier structure in longer working lives: The emergence of a labour market with End-of–Career-Jobs
• Retiring from 1st career at 60 or 65, but continuing in 2nd career until 70 or 75 with less responsibility/hours
• Working Until & Working After the Pensionable Age •
Social Europe
Scenarios for a Greying Labour Market
•
Overcoming paradoxes of protection / seniority pay: – more retention but no hiring of OW – more pay but no jobs for 55+
From open ended to fixed term contracts; from seniority to productivity based pay..?
Cannot manage work organisations without standard age, where one retires from a career span – retirement invented for reason:
Need new norms for when1st careers end and the pensionable age begins, with both moving up with rise in life expectancy at 65….?
Social Europe
Thank you for your attention