Transcript
  • 12/27/2014 AntiDefectionlaw|Erewise

    data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Ch1%20itemprop%3D%22name%22%20style%3D%22outline%3A%200px%3B%20margin%3A%200px%200px%2010px 1/3

    13

    AntiDefectionlaw20Jan2014 Comments(0)

    IntroductionDefectionsimplybydictionarymeaningmeanswithdrawingsupportorhelpdespiteallegianceorresponsibility.Inrelationtopolitics,defectionmeanswithdrawingonesloyaltytowardshisownpoliticalparty&acceptingotherpartysmembership.Defectionwasverycommonin1980sand1990sandhencetheAntiDefectionlawwasenactedin1985soastomaintainthepoliticalstability.WhatisAntiDefectionLaw?

    AntiDefectionisthelawbywhichthepersonswhododefectionarepunishedaccordingtotherulesofthelaw.ApersonsofounddoingdefectionisdisqualifiedtobeamemberofParliamentorstatelegislature(asthecasemaybe).

    SomepointstorememberaboutAntiDefectionLawAntiDefectionLawcreatedby52ndAmendmentAct,1985.Itchangedfourarticlesintheconstitution&addedtenthscheduletotheconstitution.By91stAmendmentAct,2003,aprovisionwasomittedinthelaw.Itomittedanexceptionprovisioni.e.disqualificationongroundofdefectionnottoapplyincaseofsplit.

    NoteontheAntiDefectionLawUnderthetenthschedulefollowingprovisionaregivenforthedisqualificationofmembersofparliamentandstatelegislatureonthegroundofdefection:

  • 12/27/2014 AntiDefectionlaw|Erewise

    data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Ch1%20itemprop%3D%22name%22%20style%3D%22outline%3A%200px%3B%20margin%3A%200px%200px%2010px 2/3

    1.PowerofthePresidingofficerThepresidingofficercanmakerulestogiveeffecttotheprovisionofthetenthschedule,allsuchrulesmustbeplacedinhousebeforethe30days.Themembersofhousemayapproveormodifyordisapproveit.Thepresidingofficercanresorttodefectiononlyifanymemberofhousegivesacomplaintagainstit(bynewSupremeCourtDecisionAnypersonwhoisnoteventhememberofthehousecancomplainttothePresidingofficeraboutthedefection).Presidingofficerhastogiveachancetotheaccusedpersontoputhissideinfrontofthehousebeforetakingthefinaldecision.

    2.Disqualification:A.ForaPoliticalpartymemberApersonisdisqualifiedofbeingamemberofthehouseif

    Thatmembervotesordoesntgivevotewhichiscontrarytohispoliticalpartysdecision.Priorpermissionofthepartyisneededinsuchacase.Thatmembergivesuphismembershipofthepoliticalpartyonhisowni.e.byselfdecision.

    Inshort,amemberofapoliticalpartyhastoobeyallthedirectionsgivenbytheparty.B.ForanindependentmemberAnindependentmemberisdisqualifiedtobeamemberofthehouseifhejoinsanypoliticalpartyaftertheelections.Thisprovisionhasbeenputbecauseanindependentmemberwinselectiononhisown&notbecauseofanypoliticalparty.Joiningapartyamountstocorruption&thatiswhysuchaprovisionhasbeenput.C.ForanominatedmemberNominatedmembersofthehouseareallowedtojoinanypoliticalpartywhichtheywishfor.Buttheyhavetodothisinadefinitetimeframe.Theyneedtojoinapoliticalparty(iftheywish)withinaperiodofsixmonthsfromthedateofjoiningofanyofthehouse.Iftheyjoinanypoliticalpartyaftersixmonthsfromthedateofjoiningthehouse,theyaredisqualifiedtobeamemberofthathouse.3.SomeExceptionstothelawDisqualificationbecauseofdefectiondoesnotapplyinthefollowingtwocases:

    Ifanymemberofthehouseresignsfromhispoliticalpartybecauseofthereasonthathispoliticalpartyhasgotmergedwithsomeanotherpoliticalparty.(Mergertakesplaceiftwothirdmembersofthepoliticalpartyinquestionarereadyforsuchamerger)Ifanymemberofhouseresignsfromhispoliticalpartybecauseofthereasonthatsuchamemberhasbeenelectedasthepresidingofficerofthathouse.(PresidingofficerofLokSabhaSpeaker,DeputySpeaker.PresidingofficerofRajyaSabhaViceChairman.ChairmanisnotincludedinthiscaseasheistheVicePresidentofIndia.)

    4.DecisionmakingauthorityAllthedecisionsinregardtodefectionunderthetenthscheduleisdecidedbythepresidingofficerofthehouse(IncaseofLokSabhaSpeaker/DeputySpeaker.IncaseofRajyaSabhaChairman/ViceChairman)Initiallythedecisionofthepresidingofficerwasconsideredasfinal&wasnotallowedtobequestionedinthecourtoflaw.ButSupremeCourtinKihotoHollohanCase(1993)ruledthatthewayinwhichthepresidingofficerfunctionundertenthscheduleislikeatribunal.Hence,unlikeallothertribunals,thedecisionofthepresidingofficerissubjecttoreview.Inshort,SupremeCourtdeclaredtheprovisionofpresidingofficers

  • 12/27/2014 AntiDefectionlaw|Erewise

    data:text/htmlcharset=utf8,%3Ch1%20itemprop%3D%22name%22%20style%3D%22outline%3A%200px%3B%20margin%3A%200px%200px%2010px 3/3

    decisionasfinalasconstitutionallyinvalid&asittakesawaythepowerofSupremeCourt&HighCourt.

    USESOFTHEACTdiscourageandpreventpoliticaldefections.Itstabilizesthepoliticalparties.ItsmainintensionistostrengthentheIndianparliamentarydemocracybycurbingunprincipledandunethicalpoliticaldefection.

    ADVANTAGESItreducesthepoliticalcorruption.Itgivesthegreaterstabilityinpoliticalbodiesbyavoidingthemovingfromonepoliticalpartytoanother.Itgivesconstitutionalrecognitiontotheexistencesofpoliticalparties.

    CRITICISMVestingallthedecisionmakingpoweronsuchanimportantmatterofi.e.defectioninthepresidingofficeriscriticizedontwogrounds:1.Presidingofficermaynotactinanimpartialmannerashealsobelongstooneortheotherparty.2.Presidingofficerlacksthelegalknowledgeandexperiencetogivedecisionsonsuchcases.

    DefectionVs.Dissent:Nodifferencehasbeenputaboutthesetwoterms.Dissentmeansusingoneownsopinionincaseofvotingonsometopicinthehouse.AccordingtoAntiDefectionlaw,amemberhastofollowhispartysdecision&hecantusehisownopinionwhilecastingavote.Inshort,thislawmakesthepoliticalpartytheboss&hencethehighcommandcultureflourishes.NominatedVs.Independent:Thislawisbiasedagainstnominated&independentmembersofthehouse.Anynominatedmemberisallowedtojoinanypoliticalpartywhileanindependentmemberisnotallowedtojoinanypoliticalparty.IndividualVs.GroupDefection:Thislawworksonlyinthecaseofindividualdefection.Ifagroupinanypoliticalpartydefects,thenthislawcantbeappliedinthatcase.Thislawdoesnotprovideforexpulsionofalegislatorfromhispartyforhisactivitiesoutsidethelegislature.

    Amendment91stAmendmentActof2003broughtaboutsomechangeswhichhelpedtolimitthesizeoftheCouncilofMinisters,sothatdefectors(personsfoundunderdefection)cantholdanypublicoffice.

    ForCenter:Thetotalnumberofministers,includingthePrimeMinister,intheCentralCouncilofMinistersshallnotexceed15%ofthetotalstrengthoftheLokSabha.ForState:TheTotalnumberofministers,includingtheChiefMinister,intheCouncilofMinistersinastateshallnotexceed15%ofthetotalstrengthoftheLegislativeAssemblyofthestate.Butthenumberofministers,includingtheChiefMinister,inastateshallnotbelessthan12.Adefectorcantbeappointedasaminister.(itappliesinthecaseofcentralaswellasstatelegislature.Adefector(incentralorstatelegislature)cantholdanyremunerativepoliticalpost.Theprovisionofthetenthschedule(antidefectionlaw)pertainingtoexemptionfromdisqualificationincaseofsplitbyonethirdmembersofthelegislaturepartyhasbeendeleted.Itmeansthatthedefectorshavenomoreprotectionongroundsofsplits.


Recommended