YFSIM1465

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    1/7

    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached

    copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research

    and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution

    and sharing with colleagues.

    Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or

    licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third partywebsites are prohibited.

    In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the

    article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or

    institutional repository. Authors requiring further information

    regarding Elseviers archiving and manuscript policies are

    encouraged to visit:

    http://www.elsevier.com/copyright

    http://www.elsevier.com/copyrighthttp://www.elsevier.com/copyright
  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    2/7

    Author's personal copy

    Parenteral immunization offish, Labeo rohita with Poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolicacid (PLGA) encapsulated antigen microparticles promotes innateand adaptive immune responses

    T. Behera a, P.K. Nanda a, C. Mohanty b, D. Mohapatra a, P. Swain a,*, B.K. Das a,P. Routray a, B.K. Mishra a, S.K. Sahoo b

    a

    Fish Health Management Division, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture, Kausalyaganga, Bhubaneswar-751002, Indiab Nanomedicine Laboratory, Institute of Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar-751023, India

    a r t i c l e i n f o

    Article history:

    Received 27 August 2009

    Received in revised form

    5 November 2009

    Accepted 9 November 2009

    Available online 14 November 2009

    Keywords:

    Aeromonas hydrophila

    Immune response

    MicroparticlesOuter membrane proteins

    PLGA

    a b s t r a c t

    Immunogenicity of different antigen preparations of outer membrane proteins (OMP) of Aeromonas

    hydrophila such as Poly D, L-lactide-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) microparticles, oil emulsion, neat OMP and

    bacterial whole cells were compared through intra-peritoneal injection in fish, Labeo rohita. Among these

    preparations, PLGA encapsulated antigen stimulated both innate and adaptive immune parameters and

    the immunogenicity exhibited by PLGA microparticles was significantly higher (p < 0.05) at both 21 and

    42 days post-immunization suggesting that the above delivery system would be a novel antigen carrier

    for parenteral immunization in fish, Labeo rohita

    2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Vaccination is one of the methods for prevention of infectious

    diseases of human and other animals, including fish [1]. Inefficiency

    of currently used conventional vaccine is due to lack of appropriate

    adjuvants and/or suitable vaccine carrier. The new generation of

    vaccines mainly contain purified proteins (isolated from microor-

    ganisms or recombinant proteins) and peptides (by direct chemical

    peptide synthesis), which are poorly immunogenic. Therefore, the

    search for harmless and effective adjuvants is urgently needed in

    modern vaccinology. Use of several adjuvants like particulates

    (aluminium salts, ISCOMS, virosomes, chitosan, QS-21 and lipo-

    somes); microbialproducts (microbial toxins,live viraland bacterial

    delivery vectors, monophosphoryl lipid A); and oil emulsions

    {Freund's incomplete adjuvant (FIA), Freund's complete adjuvant

    and MF-59} have been extensively reviewed [2]. Although each one

    creates its own type of immune modulation, they also exert some

    side effects [3]. Further, their ineffectiveness to certain antigens and

    their inability to elicit cell-mediatedimmuneresponses,particularly

    cytotoxic T-cell responses, limits their application against intracel-

    lular parasites and viral infections. When new vaccine formulations

    are being sought, there are many aspects to consider such as effec-

    tiveness in inducing the correct immune response, stability in the

    host, toxicity and economic aspects. One such highly promising

    technology is based on polymeric microparticles, which permit

    a sustained or pulsed release of encapsulated antigen thus mini-

    mizing the requirements for repeated administration and dose of

    antigen ensuring long-term protection.

    In contrast to other carriers, microparticles are more stable and

    elicit both humoral as well as cellular immunity [4]. Evidence from

    mammalian studies indicate that biodegradable microparticles

    may act as efficient antigen delivery vehicles due to their potential

    advantages of reducing the number of injections, enhancing the

    immune response and reducing the total antigen dose needed to

    achieve protection [5e7]. Among the polymeric systems developed,

    PLGA microspheres have been widely used for controlled delivery

    of peptides [8], native and synthetic proteins [9] and nucleic acids

    [10] because of their excellent tissue compatibility, biodegrad-

    ability, non-toxic nature and their approval by the Food and Drug

    Administration for safe use in human [6]. The PLGA can also be

    made into any micro- and nano sizes, with a capability of encap-

    sulating almost any molecule [11]. In vivo, the polymer undergoes

    random non-enzymatic hydrolysis and forms the endogenous

    metabolites, lactic and glycolic acids [7], which areinnocuous to the* Corresponding author.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (P. Swain).

    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

    Fish & Shellfish Immunology

    j o u r n a l h o m e p a g e : w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m /l o c a t e / f s i

    1050-4648/$ e see front matter 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2009.11.009

    Fish & Shellfish Immunology 28 (2010) 320e325

  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    3/7

    Author's personal copy

    body and are eliminated by the Kreb's cycle as carbon dioxide and

    in urine [12]. Several encouraging trials have been conducted

    providing data to confirm the superior efficacy of this system over

    other adjuvants in several vaccines [13e15]. Today PLGA particles

    are used in different marketed products, medical and pharmaceu-

    tical fields, and are capable of releasing peptides and proteinsslowly and continuously from 1 to 4 months [11]. Further, PLGA

    particles have been shown to be taken up in vivo by the main

    antigen presenting cells (APC) in mammals, dendritic cells, and

    enhance antigen-presentation efficacy by 10e100 fold [16e18]. The

    easy manufacture of this microparticle and the possibility of

    administration by different routes offered the additional advan-

    tages for its use as a vaccine carrier [19].

    Fish vaccinology faces similar problems that are encountered in

    vaccine design for human and mammals,as they are considered to be

    very important in reducing economic losses in aquaculture caused by

    some diseases [20e22]. This must be considered for developing

    effective vaccines to face old challenges with new possibilities in the

    21st century. In this regard, the use of biodegradable microparticles

    as an antigen delivery system in fish is a relatively new area of

    research. Among the biodegradable microparticles, PLGA micropar-

    ticles as a vaccine carrier infish have only been investigated through

    oral vaccination in rainbow trout [23]. Moreover, PLGA microparti-

    cles alone also stimulate certain non-specific immune parameters

    and pro-inflammatory cytokine production through intraperitonial

    injection in fish [24], but there is no report for PLGA as an antigen

    carrier in fish through parenteral administration.

    Hence the present study was undertaken to evaluate PLGA

    microparticles as an antigen carrier using low molecular weight

    protein antigen such as outer membrane proteins (OMP) of Aero-

    monas hydrophila, a known bacterial pathogen of fish and the

    results obtained herewith found that it stimulated both specific and

    innate immune parameters.

    1. Materials and methods

    1.1. Bacteria

    Aeromonas hydrophila strain (Ahv), isolated from Channa striatus

    showing dropsy conditions was preserved in a lyophilized condi-

    tion in our laboratory and was used throughout the study.

    1.2. Isolation of outer membrane proteins

    The OMP ofA. hydrophila (Ahv) were prepared according to the

    method of Nikaido [25] with minor modifications. The pellet

    obtained from 1 L culture ofA. hydrophila was washed twice in40 ml

    of0.15 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), once in 40 ml of

    20 mM Trise

    HCl (pH 7.5) and centrifuged at 13,000 g for 10 min.Thecells were then resuspended in 20 ml TriseHCl and disrupted by

    sonication for 30 min at 10 W at an interval of 30 s. Unbroken cells

    and cellular debris were removed by centrifugation at 4000 g for

    15 min. The supernatant was then further centrifuged at 10,000 g

    for 1 h at 4 C. The pellet was suspended in 20 ml of 2% (w/v) sar-

    cosine and incubated at room temperature for 30 min to solubilize

    the inner membrane. The solution was then centrifuged at

    10,000 g f o r 1 h a t 4 C. The resultant pellet of sarcosine-insoluble

    components wasfreeze-driedand stored at20 C until use.Protein

    concentration of OMP was determined using Genei TM protein esti-

    mation kit (Bangalore genei, India) by the BCA method.

    1.3. Antigen formulations

    Three forms of antigen preparations were done as described

    below.

    1.3.1. Preparation of PLGA microparticle encapsulated OMP

    PLGA (copolymer ratio 50:50, I.V 0.76) was purchased from Bir-

    mingham polymers, Inc. (Birmingham, AL). Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA,

    average MW 30,000e70,000) was purchased from SigmaeAldrich Co.

    (St Louis, MO 63195, USA). All reagents used were of analytical grade

    from E-merck, India and organic solvents used were of HPLC grade.Microparticles containing different antigens were formulated using

    a double emulsion-solvent evaporation technique [26] with little

    modification. In this method, aqueous solution of antigen dissolved in

    300 ml of distilled water was emulsified with 100 mg of PLGA in

    chloroform solution (3% w/v) followed by vortexing for 2 min to get

    a primary emulsion. The primary emulsion was further emulsified in

    an aqueous PVA solution (12 ml, 5% w/v) to form an oil-in-water

    emulsion. For preparation of microparticles, the emulsion was

    homogenized for 2 min andstirred forovernight at room temperature

    to allow the evaporation of organic solvent. Microparticles were

    recovered by normal centrifugation at 5000 g for 10 min using

    SIGMA 3K30 (Germany) centrifuge. The process of centrifugation was

    repeated three times to remove excess PVA and un-encapsulated

    antigens. The recovered microparticle suspensions were lyophilized

    for two days (80 C and

  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    4/7

    Author's personal copy

    buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2). Finally, the bacteria were sus-

    pended at 109 cells ml1 in PBS.

    1.4. Emulsification with FIA

    OMP(20 mg) in1 mlPBSwas emulsified with an equal volume ofFIA and stored at 4 C until further use.

    1.5. Immunization protocol

    Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (rohu), juveniles of average

    weight ranging from 30 to 40 g were acclimatized in the wet

    laboratory of Fish Health Management Division of Central Institute

    of Freshwater Aquaculture (CIFA), Kausalyaganga, India, 15 days

    prior to the start of the experiment. The fish were fed with artificial

    carp diet with constant aeration and daily one-third water

    exchange. Water temperature of the experimental tanks was 27 C

    to 30 C. Fish were separated into 5 groups, 10 fish in each group

    were immunized separately with 0.1 ml of different preparations @

    20 mg of OMP and 0.1 ml (109 cells ml1) bacterial whole cell

    antigen (WC), whereas controls were injected with PBS. The fish of

    all the treated groups including the control group were bled at an

    interval of 3-weeks (at 21 and 42 days) post-injection to study

    various immune parameters.

    1.6. Preparation of anti-rohu-globulin rabbit serum

    The rabbit anti-rohu globulin was prepared as per a standard

    method [28] using sera obtained from healthy adult rohu of

    average weight 250e300 g. Briefly, serum was collected from

    healthy rohu and pooled to 10e15 ml. An equal volume of satu-

    rated ammonium sulphate solution was mixed with the pooled

    sera drop by drop and then placed on a magnetic stirrer overnight

    at 4 C. The sample mixture was centrifuged at 10,000 g for

    10 min at 4 C and the precipitate was dissolved with 5 ml car-

    bonateebicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6). The sample was then centri-

    fuged at 10,000 g for 10 min at 4 C. The pellet was collected and

    the volume was made to 2 ml with carbonateebicarbonate buffer

    (pH 9.6). The globulin solution was dialyzed using dialysis

    membrane (Snakeskin, Pierce Chemical Company, USA) with 7000

    molecular weight cut off against PBS (pH 7.2) for 72 h at 4 C, after

    which the globulin was collected. The anti-rohu globulin sera were

    raised in a New Zealand white rabbit as per the method of Lund

    et al. [29].

    1.7. Immunoresponse studies

    1.7.1. Myeloperoxidase activity

    For determination of myeloperoxidase activity, 15 ml of serumwas diluted in 135 ml of Hank's balanced salt solution (Ca2, Mg2

    free) and then 50 ml of 20 mM, TMB (3, 30,5,50-tetra methyl

    benzidine) and 5 mM H2O2 were added. The reaction was stopped

    after 2 min by adding 50 ml of 4 M sulphuric acid and the optical

    density (O.D) was read at 450 nm [30] using UVeVIS spectropho-

    tometer, Thermo Spectronic, UK.

    1.7.2. Respiratory burst assay

    The respiratory burst activity was measured by the reduction of

    nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) by intracellular superoxide radicals

    [31]. Briefly,100 ml of heparinised blood fromfish of eachgroup was

    mixed with 100 ml of 0.2% NBT (Sigma, USA) solution and incubated

    for 30 min at 25 C. After incubation, 50 ml from the above was

    mixed with 1 ml of N, N diethylmethyl formamide (Qualigens,India) and then centrifuged at 6000 g for 5 min. The O.D of the

    supernatant was measured at 540 nm.

    1.7.3. Bacterial agglutination activity

    The agglutination test was conducted in U-shaped microtitre

    plates. Two-fold serial dilution of 25 ml fish serum was made with

    an equal volume of PBS in each well, to which 25 ml of formalin-

    killed A. hydrophila (107 cells ml1) suspension was added. The

    plates were incubated overnight at room temperature. The titrewas calculated as the reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum

    showing complete agglutination of the bacterial cells.

    1.7.4. Haemagglutination activity

    The haemagglutination activity of serum samples was carried

    out using a standard method [32]. This assay was done in

    U-shaped microtitre plates by serial two-fold dilution of 50 ml

    serum with PBS (pH 7.2). Then 50 ml of freshly prepared 1% New

    Zealand white rabbit red blood cell (RBC) suspension was added

    to each well. The plates were kept at room temperature

    (28e30 C) for 2 h or overnight at 4 C if agglutination was not

    visible within 2 h. The titre was calculated as the reciprocal of

    the highest dilution of serum showing complete agglutination

    of RBC.

    1.7.5. Haemolytic activity

    The haemolytic titre of serum was determined in a similar

    manner as described for HA titre [32] by using fresh sera from

    all the groups. Titre was expressed as the reciprocal of the

    highest dilution of serum showing complete haemolysis of the

    rabbit RBC.

    1.8. Triple antibody indirect enzyme linked immunosorbent assays

    The triple antibody indirect ELISA was conducted as per the

    method of Swain et al. [28] with slight modifications using 96

    well microtitre polystyrene plates (Nunc, Denmark). The wells

    were separately coated with 50 ml of purified outer membrane

    proteins from A. hydrophila (Ahv) (1e

    2 mg/well) diluted in car-

    bonateebicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) overnight at 4 C. The plates

    were then washed in PBS containing Tween-20 (PBS-T, pH 7.2)

    and blocked with 100 ml of 3% skim milk powder for 2 h at 37 C.

    The wells were further washed in PBS-T. The fish sera raised

    against several antigens was two fold diluted after initial dilu-

    tion of 1:10 with PBS (pH 7.2) as first antibody and added to

    homologous antigen-coated wells in duplicate per serum dilu-

    tion. The plates were incubated at 37 C for 45 min and washed

    thrice in PBS-T. Rabbit anti-rohu sera (the second antibody) at

    a dilution of 1:20 was added to each well and incubated at 37 C

    for 45 min. Then the anti-rabbit-HRPO conjugated goat serum

    (the third antibody) was added and incubated for 45 min. The

    wells were then thoroughly washed and added with 50 ml of

    substrate solution (5 mg of O-phenylene diamine tetra hydro-chloride and 10 ml of H2O2 (38%, v/v) in 5 ml of acetate buffer,

    pH 5.0). The plates were incubated at 37 C for 5 min in a dark

    chamber and finally O.D was recorded at 450/655 nm in

    a microplate reader (BIO-RAD, USA). The antibody activity was

    expressed in terms of O.D value after subtracting the values

    obtained by unimmunized healthy sera.

    1.9. Statistical analysis

    The statistical analysis system (SAS) software (version 6.12) was

    used to analyse all the data [33]. One-way analysis of variance

    followed by Duncan's multiple range tests were done to compare

    the variations in various immuneparameters at significance level of

    difference (p < 0.05) in different injected groups. The mean stan-dard error (S.E) of assayed parameters was calculated for each

    group offish.

    T. Behera et al. / Fish & Shellfish Immunology 28 (2010) 320e325322

  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    5/7

    Author's personal copy

    2. Results

    2.1. Physico-chemical characterization of antigen

    loaded microparticles

    Antigen loaded microparticles were prepared from the PLGA

    polymer using double emulsion method. Antigen was efficiently

    loaded in the PLGA microparticles, reaching encapsulation effi-ciency of 25 1.3%. DLS analysis revealed that the formulated

    microparticles had an average diameter of 1121 10.6 nm (Fig. 1).

    Topology and size of the microparticle as observed by SEM analysis

    confirmed the smooth and spherical nature of OMP-loaded PLGA

    microparticles (Fig. 2). The average size of these microparticles was

    in the range of 1 mm.

    2.2. Immune response studies

    2.2.1. Non-specific immune responses

    The non-specific immune parameters of fish following the

    injection with different antigen preparations(PLGA-OMP, FIA-OMP,

    OMP and WC), at 21 and 42 days post-immunization are presented

    in Figs. 3e7. All these parameters i.e. myeloperoxidase, respiratory

    burst activity, haemagglutination, hemolytic and bacterial aggluti-nation titrewere significantly higher (p< 0.05) in alltreated groups

    than the control. The PLGA-OMP treated group showed signifi-

    cantly higher (p< 0.05) titre than other groups (FIA-OMP, OMP and

    WC). These parameters did not vary much in all treated groups at

    21 and 42 days post-immunization.

    2.2.2. Specific immune responses

    The serum antibody titre, as measured by indirect ELISA, was

    expressed in terms of mean OD values (after subtracting the values

    obtained by unimmunized healthy sera) (S.E.) and presented in

    Fig. 8. The antibody titres at 21 and 42 days post-immunization

    were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the PLGA- encapsulated

    antigen and FIA treated groups than the OMP and WC treated

    groups. However, no significant difference (p > 0.05) in the anti-

    body level at 21 and 42 days post-immunization was recorded

    between these two groups.

    3. Discussion

    PLGA has been proven to be a very useful antigen delivery

    system in mammals since it provides long lasting immunity

    [34e36]. So, we attempted to evaluate the potential use of PLGA

    microparticles as antigen carrier in fish using the OMP of Gram-

    negative bacteria, A. hydrophila.

    The isolated OMP of A. hydrophila was encapsulated in PLGA

    microparticles and the resulted microspheres were tested for

    immunogenicity in fish along with other antigenic preparations.

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    1 10 100 1000 10000

    )%(ytisnetnI

    Size (d.nm)

    Fig.1. Typical size distribution of PLGA microparticles as determined by dynamic light

    scattering.

    Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrograph of outer membrane proteins loaded PLGA

    microparticles (bar 1 mm).

    c

    c

    c

    b

    a

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    CONTROL PLGA-

    OMP

    FIA-OMP OMP WC

    Treatment

    mn045ta

    eulavDO

    21 days

    42 days

    Fig. 3. The respiratory burst activity (measured by NBT assays) of blood ofLabeo rohita

    in different treated groups at 21 and 42 days post-immunization (Values are mean OD

    values S.E.). Mean values bearing same superscript are not statistically significant

    (p > 0.05) at 21 and 42 days post-immunization.

    cc

    c

    b

    a

    0

    0.05

    0.1

    0.15

    0.2

    CONTROL PLGA-

    OMP

    FIA-OMP OMP WC

    Treatment

    mn054taeulavDO

    21 days

    42 days

    Fig. 4. The myeloperoxidase activity of sera of Labeo rohita in different treated groups

    at 21 and 42 days post-immunization (Values are mean OD values S.E.). Mean values

    bearing same superscript are not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at 21 and 42 days

    post-immunization.

    T. Behera et al. / Fish & Shellfish Immunology 28 (2010) 320e325 323

  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    6/7

    Author's personal copy

    A successful micro particulate system has a high loading capacity to

    reduce the quantity of the carrier required for administration. In

    this study, antigen was efficiently loaded in PLGA microparticles,

    reaching encapsulation efficiency of 25 1.3% with average size

    diameter of 1121 10.6 nm. In an earlier study, similar results e.g.

    size rangew1080 nm with encapsulation efficiency ofw25% were

    obtained by using bovine serum albumin as a model protein

    antigen in PLGA microparticles [37].

    Both specific andnon-specific immune parameters were studied

    and all four preparations of vaccines used (PLGA-OMP, FIA-OMP,

    OMP and WC) elicited immune responses in the fish at varying

    levels as compared to the control. The PLGA-OMP treated groupshowed significantly higher immune responses than the other

    groups at both 21 and 42 days post-immunization. PLGA micro-

    particles have been found to enhance phagocytosis by macro-

    phages [38], and neutrophils [18] in mouse and human,

    respectively. Comparable results were also found by the use of

    PLGA alone in mammal [16] as well as in fish, rainbow trout [24].

    The specific antibody titres of the sera were higher in both FIA-

    OMP and PLGA-OMP treated groups with no significant difference

    (p < 0.05) between them. Similar results were also found when

    PLGA was used as carrier for peptide vaccine in mammals [39] and

    in mice through subcutaneous route using BSA as a model antigen

    [40]. Moreover, the superiority of PLGA microspheres over alum

    adjuvant in eliciting high antibody responses was seen in mice

    through subcutaneous administration [41]. In this study the supe-riority of PLGA microparticles was recorded without any side

    effects, which is usually noticed in FIA formulation [3]. The serum

    antibody titres detected at 21 days persisted for at least 42 days.

    According to O'Hagan et al. [42], the level of antibody remained

    high even one year after injection through subcutaneous route in

    mice which indicates the injectable PLGA microparticles control the

    release of antigen over a period of several weeks. So, the use of

    PLGA microparticles as a vaccine carrier can reduce the number of

    administrations and induce both innate and adaptive immunity.

    Among these four preparations of OMP of A. hydrophila, PLGA

    microparticles showed encouraging results without any adverse

    effects on fish health. Therefore, it can be considered to be a useful

    antigen carrier for inducing both cellular and humoral immune

    response in fish through parenteral immunization.

    Acknowledgements

    The authors are thankful to the Director, Central Institute of

    Freshwater Aquaculture, Bhubaneswar and the Director, Institute of

    Life Sciences, Bhubaneswar for providing all necessary facilities to

    carry out the above study.

    References

    [1] Potter AA, Babiuk LA. New approaches for antigen discovery, production anddelivery: vaccines for veterinary and human use. Current Drug Targets -Infectious Disorders 2001;1:249e62.

    [2] Gupta RK, Siber GR. Adjuvants for human vaccines-current status, problemsand future prospects. Vaccine 1995;13:1263e76.[3] Mutoloki S, Reite OB, Brudeseth B, Tverdal A, Evensen Q. A comparative

    immunopathological study of injection site reactions in salmonids following

    c

    cc

    b

    a

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    Control PLGA-

    OMP

    FIA-OMP OMP WC

    Treatment

    )2gol(retiT

    21 days

    42 days

    Fig. 5. The haemagglutinating activity of sera of Labeo rohita in different treated

    groups at 21 and 42 days post-immunization (Values are mean log2 titre values S.E).

    Mean values bearing same superscript are not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at

    21 and 42 days post-immunization.

    cc

    c

    b

    a

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    67

    Control PLGA-

    OMP

    FIA-OMP OMP WC

    Treatment

    )2gol(retiT

    21 days

    42 days

    Fig. 6. The heamolysin titre of sera ofLabeo rohita in different treated groups at 21 and

    42 days post-immunization (Values are mean log2 titre values S.E). Mean values

    bearing same superscript are not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at 21 and 42 dayspost-immunization.

    cc

    c

    b

    a

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    control PLGA-

    OMP

    FIA-OMP OMP WC

    Treatment

    )2gol(re

    tiT

    21 days

    42 days

    Fig. 7. The bacterial agglutination activity of sera in different treated groups of Labeo

    rohita at 21 and 42 days post-immunization (Values are mean log2 titre values S.E).

    Mean values bearing same superscript are not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at

    21 and 42 days post-immunization.

    bb

    aa

    0

    0.02

    0.04

    0.06

    0.08

    0.1

    0.12

    PLGA-OMP FIA-OMP OMP WC

    Treatment

    mn054taeulavDOnaeM

    21 DAYS

    42 DAYS

    Fig. 8. The mean OD values (S.E.) of specific antibody level in different treated groups

    of Labeo rohita detected through indirect ELISA at 21 and 42 days post-immunization

    Mean values bearing same superscript are not statistically significant (p > 0.05) at21 and 42 days post-immunization.

    T. Behera et al. / Fish & Shellfish Immunology 28 (2010) 320e325324

  • 8/7/2019 YFSIM1465

    7/7

    Author's personal copy

    intraperitoneal injection with oil-adjuvanted vaccines. Vaccine 2006;24:578e88.

    [4] Men Y, Thomasin C, Merkle HP, Gander B, Corradin G. A single administrationof tetanus toxoid in biodegradable microspheres elicits T cell and antibodyresponse similar or superior to those obtained with aluminum hydroxide.Vaccine 1995;7:683e9.

    [5] Eldridge JH, Hammond CJ, Meulbroek JA, Staas JK, Gilley RM, Tice TR.

    Controlled vaccine release in the gut-associated lymphoid tissues. I. Orallyadministered biodegradable microspheres target the Peyer's patches. Journalof Controlled Release 1990;11:205e14.

    [6] Eldridge JH, Staas JK, Meulbroek JA, McGhee JR, Tice TR, Gilley RM. Biode-gradable microspheres as a vaccine delivery system. Molecular Immunology1991;28:287e94.

    [7] O'Hagan DT, Jeffery H, Roberts MJJ, McGee JP, Davis SS. Controlled releasemicroparticles for vaccine development. Vaccine 1991;9:768e71.

    [8] Partidos CD, Vohra P, Jones D, Farrar G, Steward MW. CTL responses induced bya single immunization with peptide encapsulated in biodegradable micro-particles. Journal of Immunological Methods 1997;206:143e51.

    [9] O'Donnell GB, Reilly P, Davidson GB, Ellis AE. The uptake of human gammaglobulin incorporated into poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticlesfollowing oral intubation in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. Fish and ShellfishImmunology 1996;6:507e20.

    [10] Sourabhan S, Kaladhar K, Sharma CP. Method to enhance the encapsulation ofbiologically active molecules in PLGA nanoparticles. Trends in Biomaterialsand Artificial Organs 2009;22:207e11.

    [11] Wenlei J, Rajesh KG, Mangesh CD, Steven PS. Biodegradable poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles for injectable delivery of vaccine antigens.Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 2005;57:391e410.

    [12] Bazile DV, Ropert C, Huve P, Verrecchia T, Marland M, Frydman A, et al. Bodydistribution of fully biodegradable 14C-poly(lactic acid) nanoparticles coatedwith albumin after parenteral administration to rats. Biomaterials 1992;13:1039e1102.

    [13] Cleland JL, Lim A, Barrn L, Duenas ET, Powell MF. Development of a single-shot subunit vaccine for HIV-1: part 4. Optimizing microencapsulation andpulsatile release of MN rgp120 from biodegradable microspheres. Journal ofControlled Release 1997;47:135e50.

    [14] O'Hagan DT, McGee JP, Boyle R, Gumaer D, Li X-M, Potts B, et al. The prep-aration, characterization and pre-clinical evaluation of an orally administeredHIV-1 vaccine, consisting of a branched peptide immunogen entrapped incontrolled release microparticles. Journal of Controlled Release 1995;36:75e84.

    [15] Singh M, Singh O, Talwar GP. Biodegradable delivery system for a birth controlvaccine: immunogenicity studies in rats and monkeys. PharmaceuticalResearch 1995;12:1796e1800.

    [16] Newman KD, Elamanchili P, Kwon GS, Samuel J. Uptake of poly (D, L-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres by antigen-presenting cells in vivo. Journal ofBiomedical Materials Research A 2002;60:480e6.

    [17] Sun H, Pollock KG, Brewer JM. Analysis of the role of vaccine adjuvants inmodulating dendritic cell activation and antigen presentation in vitro. Vaccine2003;21:849e55.

    [18] Yoshida M, Babensee JE. Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) enhances maturation ofhuman monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Journal of Biomedical MaterialsResearch A 2004;71:45e54.

    [19] Lima KM, Rodrigues Junior JM. Poly-DL-lactide-co-glycolide microspheres asa controlled release antigen delivery system. Brazilian Journal of Medical andBiological Research 1999;32:171e80.

    [20] Ellis AE, do Vale A, Bowden TJ, Thompson K, Hastings TS. In vivo production ofA-protein, lipopolysaccharide, iron-regulated outer membrane proteins and70- kDa serine protease by Aeromonas salmonicida subsp. salmonicida. FEMSMicrobiology Letters 1997;149:157e63.

    [21] Rahman MH, Kawai K. Outer membrane proteins of Aeromonas hydrophilainduce protective immunity in goldfish. Fish and Shellfish Immunology2000;10:379e82.

    [22] Ebanks RO, Dacanay A, Goguen M, Pinto DM, Ross NW. Differential proteomicanalysis of Aeromonas salmonicida outer membrane proteins in response tolow iron and in vivo growth conditions. Proteomics 2004;4:1074e85.

    [23] Lavelle EC, Jenkins PG, Harris JE. Oral immunization of rainbow trout withantigen microencapsulated in poly (L-lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles.Vaccine 1997;15:1070e6.

    [24] Stine MM. Expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in Atlantic salmon

    (Salmo salar) after intraperitoneal injection of PLGA [poly ( D-L-lactide-co-glycolic) acid] particles. , M.Sc thesis submitted to the University of Tromso.

    [25] Nikaido H. Isolation of outer membranes. In: Patrik LC, editor. Bacterialpathogenesis. London: Academic Press; 1997. p. 113e22.

    [26] Sahoo SK, Panyam J, Prabha S, Labhasetwar V. Residual polyvinyl alcohol associ-ated with poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles affects their physicalproperties and cellular uptake. Journal of Controlled Release 2002;82:105e14.

    [27] Janes KA, Alonso MJ. Depolymerised chitosan nanoparticles for proteindelivery: preparation and characterization. Journal of Applied Polymer Science2003;88:2769e76.

    [28] Swain P, Nayak SK, Sahu A, Mohapatra BC, Meher PK. Bath immunization ofspawns, fries and fingerlings of Indian major carps using a particulate antigenand determination of age, dose and duration of antigen exposure. Fish andShellfish Immunology 2002;13:133e40.

    [29] Lund V, Jorgensen T, Holm KO, Eggset G. Humoral immune response inAtlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., to cellular and extracellular antigens of Aero-monas salmonicida. Journal of Fish Diseases 1991;14:443e52.

    [30] Quade MJ, Roth JA. A rapid, direct assay to measure degranulation of bovineneutrophil primary granules. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology1997;58:239

    e48.

    [31] Anderson DP, Siwicki AK. Duration of protection against Aeromonas salmoni-cida in brook trout immunostimulated with glucan or chitosan by injectionand immersion. Progressive Fish Culturist 1994;56:258e61.

    [32] Blazer VS, Wolke RE. The effects ofa-tocopherol on the immune response andnon-specific resistance factors of rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri Richardson).Aquaculture 1984;37:1e9.

    [33] SAS Institute Inc. SASR system for regression. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS InstituteInc; 1991. p. 210.

    [34] Gupta RK, Singh M, O'Hagan DT. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles forthe development of single-dose controlled-release vaccines. Advanced DrugDelivery Reviews 1998;32:225e46.

    [35] Johansen P, Men Y, Merkle HP, Gander B. Revisiting PLA/PLGA microspheres:an analysis of their potential in parenteral vaccination. European Journal ofPharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 2000;50:129e46.

    [36] McKeever U, Barman S, Hao T, Chambers P, Song S, Lunsford L, et al. Protectiveimmune responses elicited in mice by immunization with formulations ofpoly (lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles. Vaccine 2002;20:1524e31.

    [37] Panyam J, Dali MM, Sahoo SK, Ma W, Chakravarthi SS, Amidon GL, et al.Polymer degradation and in vitro release of a model protein from poly(D,L-lactide- co-glycolide) nano- and microparticles. Journal of Controlled Release2003;92:173e87.

    [38] Tabata Y, Ykada Y. Macrophage phagocytosis of biodegradable microspherescomposed of L-lactic acid/glycolic acid homo- and copolymers. Journal ofBiomedical Materials Research 1988;22:837e58.

    [39] Ertl HC, Varga I, Xiang ZQ, Kaiser K, Stephens L, Otvos Jr L. Poly (D L lactide- co-glycolide) microspheresas carriers for peptidevaccine. Vaccine1996;14:879e85.

    [40] Pedraz JL, Igartua M, Hernandez RM, Esquisabel A, Gascon AR, Calvo B. Long-term immune response in mice following subcutaneous administration ofBSA-PLGA microspheres. Proceedings of International Symposium onControlled Release of Bioactive Materials 1997;24:879e80.

    [41] Uchida T, Goto S, Foster T. Particle size studies for subcutaneous delivery ofpoly (lactide-co-glycolide) microspheres containing ovalbumin as vaccineformulation. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 1994;47:556e60.

    [42] O'Hagan DT, Jeffery H, Davis SS. Long-term antibody responses in micefollowing subcutaneous immunization with ovalbumin entrapped in biode-gradable microparticles. Vaccine 1993;11:965e9.

    T. Behera et al. / Fish & Shellfish Immunology 28 (2010) 320e325 325