Upload
priyanka-choudhary
View
218
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 1/11
THE YELLOW BEAN
CONTROVERSY
BY-BIJOYA BANIK(214) & DEEPIKA
BOHRA(222)
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 2/11
• In 1994, Larry Proctor, the owner of a U.S.-
based seed company, purchased a bag of
commercial bean seeds in Sonora, Mexico. He
carried the beans back to the United States,
where he picked out the yellow-colored
beans, planted them and allowed them to
self-pollinate.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 3/11
• Two years later, Proctor applied for and won a
U.S. patent on any dry bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris) having a seed color of a particular
shade of yellow. He also obtained a plant
variety protection certificate on the yellow
bean variety he called “Enola.”
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 4/11
• In late 1999, armed with the patent and
breeders’ right certificate, Proctor sued two
companies that sell Mexican beans in the
United States, charging that they were
infringing upon his patent monopoly.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 5/11
• As a result, shipments of Mexican yellow
beans had been routinely stopped at the U.S.
border, forcing Mexican bean farmers to
forfeit valuable export income. In November
2001, Proctor also filed a suit against 16 small
bean seed companies and farmers in
Colorado.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 6/11
• In December 2000 the International Center for
Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) filed a formal
request for re-examination of U.S. patent no.
5,894,079—also known as the yellow bean or
“Enola bean” patent—with the U.S. Patent &
Trademark Office (PTO) in Washington, D.C.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 7/11
• CIAT is an international plant breeding
institute that maintains a gene bank
containing more than 27,000 samples of
Phaseolus seeds collected from farmers’
fields, including beans that are identical to
Proctor’s patented yellow bean.
• CIAT legally challenged the patent to keepthese beans in the public domain.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 8/11
Section 161 - In order to be granted a patent,
the inventor must show that the invention:
(1) is new or a new improvement on an already
existing invention,
(2) is novel,
(3) has utility, and
(4) is non-obvious.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 9/11
• Under Secion102(a)
the invention cannot be “known or used in thiscountry, or patented or described in a printed
publication in this or a foreign country.” • Document shows use in the United States of
similar beans of Mexican origin dating back the1930s.
• Mexico also claims that a bean registered inSinaloa, Mexico in 1978 has the same geneticfingerprint as the Enola bean.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 10/11
• The US Patent and Trademark office, in 2008,
overturned the controversial patent on the
breed of yellow beans.
8/2/2019 Yellow Bean
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/yellow-bean 11/11
CONCLUSION
• The yellow bean controversy starkly illustratesthe power of exclusive monopoly patents to blockagricultural imports
•To disrupt or destroy export markets for ThirdWorld farmers
• To legally appropriate staple food crops or sacredmedicinal plants.
• Similar predatory patent examples - South Asianbasmati, Bolivian quinoa, Amazonian ayahuasca,Peruvian maca and Indian chickpeas