65
www.sakaiproject.org 1 Tests and Quizzes Tool (aka SAMigo) Marc Brierley, Stanford University T&Q Lead Designer http://bugs.sakaiproject.org/ confluence/display/SAM

Www.sakaiproject.org 1 Tests and Quizzes Tool (aka SAMigo) Marc Brierley, Stanford University T&Q Lead Designer

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

www.sakaiproject.org 1

Tests and Quizzes Tool(aka SAMigo)

Marc Brierley, Stanford University T&Q Lead Designer http://bugs.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SAM

www.sakaiproject.org 2

Agenda

• Design Origins• Feature Overview

– Focus on pedagogical flexibility using templates

• Short Demo• Futures

www.sakaiproject.org 3

Where did the design originate?• Formative Assessment (Homework)

– Stanford Assignment Tool for Human Biology

– CourseWork CMS with Language Tools (Andrew W. Mellon Foundation funded)

– OKI Tools Workshop to Specify Functionality(Andrew W. Mellon Foundation funded)

– OKI Formative Assessment Tool(Andrew W. Mellon Foundation funded)

• Summative Assessment (High-Stakes tests)– OnCourse Quiz Tool

www.sakaiproject.org 4

Where did the design originate?• OKI Tools Workshop

– Many schools met to define needs for a CMS

– One group specified the needs for an Assessment Tool

– Several hundred functional requirements identified

www.sakaiproject.org 5

Where did the design originate?• Assignment and Assessment Manager – Supports teaching and learning in large lecture science courses and in language instruction

– This OKI Tool was developed at Stanford

– Andrew W. Mellon Foundation funded

www.sakaiproject.org 6

Where did the design originate?• AAM design combined with OnCourse Quiz tool design “Navigo” (2003)

• Stanford and Indiana join Sakai project, Stanford rewrites tool to Sakai Style Guide TPP, tool renamed SAMigo (2004-present)

www.sakaiproject.org 7

What are T&Q’s features:• Assessment Authoring• Assessment Publishing• Assessment-taking Management• Assessment Grading• Question Pools Management• Template Management

www.sakaiproject.org 8

Organize & Publish Assessments• Core (pending) Assessments for a course

– Starting page for assessment authoring– Can be ex/imported in QTI XML format– When ready, published via settings

• Published Assessments for student assessment-taking– When students respond, scores link appears– Can change release, due, retract dates

www.sakaiproject.org 9

www.sakaiproject.org 10

Question Types• Multiple Choice (single and multiple correct)

• Multiple Choice Survey• True/False• Matching• Essay/Short Answer• Fill in the Blank• File Upload• Audio Recording** in future Sakai 2.x release

www.sakaiproject.org 11

www.sakaiproject.org 12

Rich-Text Everywhere• WYSIWYG editor

Fonts, style, layout, images, HTML, links

• In section headers, question texts, selections for responses, and feedback

www.sakaiproject.org 13

www.sakaiproject.org 14

Pedagogical Flexibility• Online test• Self-study questions• Homework, problem-sets• Paper, code, or project submission

• Language drills• Quick knowledge probes• Surveys• Others???

www.sakaiproject.org 15

Templates• Create assessment “types” for different disciplines, different uses

• Hide complexity by selecting what which settings are visible to the instructor.

• Pre-set defaults by making setting choices for the type (e.g., Self-study always has immediate feedback)

www.sakaiproject.org 16

Template Workflow

www.sakaiproject.org 17

www.sakaiproject.org 18

www.sakaiproject.org 19

www.sakaiproject.org 20

www.sakaiproject.org 21

www.sakaiproject.org 22

Online Test• Unique tests for each student

– Randomized order of questions– Randomized draw from question pools

• Timed test-taking during access window– Auto-submit at end of timed period

• One submission only per student• Higher Security

– IP Addresses restricted– Secondary Password (proctored)

• No late submissions accepted• Scores transferred to gradebook

www.sakaiproject.org 23

www.sakaiproject.org 24

Self-Study Questions

• Immediate feedback• Random access to Questions

– Table of contents– Marked for review list

• No record of score in gradebook• No due date; always available to student

• Unlimited submissions allowed

www.sakaiproject.org 25

www.sakaiproject.org 26

Homework/Problem Sets• Published with multiple release and due dates for different sections

• Multiple methods for handling late submissions

• Students can save work during assignment period.

• Auto-grading with methods for diagnosing learning problems

• Quick-reviews of student aggregate performance by instructors viewing histograms, statistics.

• Pools for organizing questions for reuse

www.sakaiproject.org 27

Essay and Project Submission• Use file upload question type for submitting any type of document

• Grader can download assignment; upload marked-up file to return to student

• Grades are recorded in gradebook

www.sakaiproject.org 28

Question Pools

• Organize questions into multiple subpools

• Author Questions from within Pool Mgr.

• Randomly draw from pools for an assessment

www.sakaiproject.org 29

www.sakaiproject.org 30

www.sakaiproject.org 31

Demo

www.sakaiproject.org 32

www.sakaiproject.org 33

www.sakaiproject.org 34

www.sakaiproject.org 35

www.sakaiproject.org 36

www.sakaiproject.org 37

www.sakaiproject.org 38

www.sakaiproject.org 39

www.sakaiproject.org 40

www.sakaiproject.org 41

www.sakaiproject.org 42

www.sakaiproject.org 43

www.sakaiproject.org 44

www.sakaiproject.org 45

www.sakaiproject.org 46

www.sakaiproject.org 47

www.sakaiproject.org 48

www.sakaiproject.org 49

www.sakaiproject.org 50

www.sakaiproject.org 51

www.sakaiproject.org 52

www.sakaiproject.org 53

www.sakaiproject.org 54

www.sakaiproject.org 55

www.sakaiproject.org 56

www.sakaiproject.org 57

www.sakaiproject.org 58

www.sakaiproject.org 59

www.sakaiproject.org 60

www.sakaiproject.org 61

T&Q 2.1 Highlights• “Section-Aware” grading - assessments filtered by section (e.g. discussion, lab)

• Workflow improvements (based on 2.0.1 usability testing)

• Code refactored to expose tool API– looser coupling to Sakai (or other CMS)

– clean stand-alone build

www.sakaiproject.org 62

T&Q post-2.1 Future

• Audio-recording question type (Stanford)

• Others– Export assessment results – Release assessments to specific classes and sections

– Department/school-level templates– Question Pool sharing by group, import/export

www.sakaiproject.org 63

NEW! Assessment Tools DG• First BOF

– Time: Thursday 7:30-8:30am– Location: Salon J

• Possible Topics– current usage and best use recommendations for assessment tools

within Sakai– assessment pedagogy (both formative and summative)– user interaction and tool design– assessment tool interoperability with other tools (e.g. Tests &

Quizzes with Gradebook) and standards compliance (e.g. IMS-QTI)– process for feature requests and prioritization– future plans for assessment tools

www.sakaiproject.org 64

Questions?

www.sakaiproject.org 65

ContactsMarc Brierley, Stanford University T&Q Lead Designer [email protected]

Lydia Li, Stanford University T&Q Project Manager [email protected]

Homepage:http://bugs.sakaiproject.org/confluence/display/SAM