16
A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

  • View
    218

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

A Case study of Severe Winter Convection in the Midwest

Written by;Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle,

and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades

Presentation by;Marcello Andiloro

Page 2: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Introduction and BackgroundOn the evening of 11 Feb. 2003 a line a severe

thunderstorms moved through southeast Iowa and northwest and central Illinois with winds in excess of 50 kt.

Storms were associated with a passing cold front and resembled a small squall line.

Along with the wind gusts, they produced brief heavy snow, causing blinding conditions.

First severe thunderstorm warning was issued in Marshall County, Illinois at 0002 UTC on Feb. 12.

Page 3: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Introduction and BackgroundWhy is this case important?

It resembled a warm season convective squall line, but was in the cold season.

There is little in the way of literature explaining events like this that occur in the cold season.

This specific case was atypical to thundersnow cases because it was not a case of elevated convection. Resembled warm season severe weather rooted in

the planetary boundary later.

Page 4: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Synoptic-scale AnalysisBulk of precipitation started out behind the cold

front, then as the storms started to grow the storms pushed ahead of the cold front.

There was a high pressure gradient both behind the cold front as well as in the warm sector.

Indications of cold front passage:Several stations showed the passage of cold front

with temperatures dropping along with dew points.Thirty-three minute intense snow shower and

clearing of skies under and hour after the shower at Davenport, Iowa.

Page 5: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro
Page 6: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Synoptic-scale AnalysisPolar jet analysis:

A 300 hPa polar jet flowed southward out of central Canada with a centered core over the Ohio Valley and wind speeds of up to 135 kt.

Southern Iowa and central Illinois were toward the left entrance region, which is atypical for the ideal occurrence of severe weather. Where strong mass convergence below and strong

mass divergence aloft are preferred

Page 7: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Synoptic –scale AnalysisA low amplitude shortwave trough axis was present

at 500 hPa from just west of Hudson Bay, southwest through Wisconsin revealed a significant slope into the cold air, consistent with a strong cold front.

Circular absolute vorticity maximum in base of shortwave trough suggested quasigeostrophic forcing for ascent downstream across eastern Iowa and northern Illinois.

Q-vector convergence over central Illinois at 0000 UTC supported evidence of midtropospheric forcing for ascent.

Page 8: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Synoptic-scale AnalysisTrough at 850 hPa running parallel to surface

cold front extending from Great Lakes to Iowa and Missouri. Along trough axis, dew point depressions were low, indicating a moist environment.

Temps behind trough dropped drastically, indicating a front at this level.Evidence of prefrontal moisture and a frontal

lifting mechanism were present at this level.

Page 9: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Mesoscale AnalysisAt 2100 UTC Feb. 11 925 hPa frontogenesis was

found along and behind the location of the surface cold front (using the 20-km RUC initial fields).

Along with significant region of ω along the frontal zone of values less than -15 μbs-1

As well as CAPE values blossoming and maximized in area and magnitude, exceeding 50 Jkg-1 over a large area coincident with the area where ω were less than -10 μbs-1

This arrangement coincided with the area of the bulk of the precipitation at this time.

Page 10: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Mesoscale AnalysisHourly analyses showed a gradual decrease in

CAPE.However, vertical motion values of -20 μbs-1

were collocated with the small area of CAPE and the region ahead of the front where precip was occurring along with whiteout conditions.

These analyses depicted a dynamically forced region of ascent immediately along and ahead of the surface cold front capable of raising near surface parcels to their LCL.

Page 11: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro
Page 12: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Sounding AnalysisLincoln, Illinois Davenport, Iowa Feb. 11 1200 UTC flew under

mostly cloudy skies. Very cold temperatures existed in the lowest 100 hPa. The wind profile showed

significant veering in lowest 100 hPa.

Weakly sheared unidirectional flow above boundary layer.

Feb 12 0000 UTC revealed much warmer, moister environment in lowest 200 hPa

Noteworthy that the atmospheric profile was nearly dry adiabatic from 860~625.

Feb. 11 1200 UTC similar to Lincoln, very cold air near surface. Similar unidirectional shear

signature Feb. 12 0000 UTC also in

parallel with Lincoln Significant 12-h warming in the

lowest 200 hPa, and 12-h moistening in the lowest 100 hPa.

In contrast, cooling and drying in the midtroposphere which encouraged the creation of potential instability.

Page 13: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Radar AnalysisThe strongest reflectivities were located along a

line parallel to the fast-moving surface cold front.Max dBZ values never exceeded 40-45.Storm tops also never exceeded 3.7 km and the

highest reflectivities were restricted to the lower portions of the strongest cells.

Showed no traits of traditional severe weather producing squall linesNo rear-inflow jet, no stratiform precip region, or

front-to-rear flowNor did it evolve through the stages of squall-line

evolution.

Page 14: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Radar AnalysisInstead we see a convective line along the cold frontal

zone that most closely resembled the parallel stratiform mesoscale convective system.But no stratiform precip developed. There was no

tendency even for cell decay on the left flank or new cell generation on the right as would be expected with the parallel stratiform MCS.

Furthermore, the convective line was found to tilt slightly down shear that was likely due to the lack of CAPE.

Therefore, the severe winds were a result of vertical mixing associated with the mesoscale and synoptic systems.

Page 15: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

Lightning AnalysisA total of 101 cloud-to-ground flashes were detected

by Vaisala’s National Lightning Detection Network. Four of which were positive strikes.

The 26 flashes that were associated with the severe wind reports were all negative cloud-to-ground strikes.This fact contrasted the larger body of work on winter

lightning where most winter lightning documented was of positive polarity.

These results actually validated the work of Taniguchi et al. (1982) and Brooke et al. (1982) that shear in the cloud layer may have some control over the polarity of a given lightning flash.

Page 16: Written by; Brian P. Pettegrew, Patrick S. Market, Raymond A. Wolf, Ronald L. Holle, and Nicholas W.S. Demetriades Presentation by; Marcello Andiloro

SummaryThis was a unique winter storm event:

Strong background pressure gradient and windsSignificant low-level frontogenesis Presence of modest near-surface CAPEDry-adiabatic near-surface layer .

This all allowed for shallow convection and the subsequent mixing of winds to the surface in excess of the severe criterion.

Therefore, a severe thunderstorm warning was the best response to this event as opposed to a high wind warning.