Works and Community Committee - City of Ryde...2011/05/03 · Works and Community Committee Page 4 ITEM 1 (continued) ATTACHMENT 1 Agenda of the Works and Community Committee Report

Works and Community Committee

AGENDA NO. 7/11

Meeting Date: Tuesday 3 May 2011 Location: Committee Room 1, Level 5, Civic Centre, 1 Devlin Street, Ryde Time: 4.30pm

NOTICE OF BUSINESS Item Page 1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Meeting held on 19 April 2011.................... 2 2 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 43 Cecil Street, Denistone East

INSPECTION ................................................................................................... 7 3 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 4-6 Harvard Street, Gladesville

INSPECTION ................................................................................................. 10 4 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 57 Acacia Avenue, Ryde

INSPECTION ................................................................................................. 13 5 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 27 Wood Street, Eastwood

INSPECTION ................................................................................................. 16 6 TRAFFIC & PARKING MATTERS PRESENTED TO RYDE LOCAL

TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MEETING held on 31 March 2011........................... 19

Works and Community Committee Report Page 2

Agenda of the Works and Community Committee Report No. 7/11, dated Tuesday 3 May 2011.

1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Meeting held on 19 April 2011

File No.: GRP/11/5/4/5 - BP11/116

In accordance with Clause 3.4.4 of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, a motion or discussion with respect to such minutes shall not be in order except with regard to their accuracy as a true record of the proceedings. RECOMMENDATION: That the Minutes of the Works and Community Committee 06/11, held on Tuesday 19 April 2011, be confirmed. ATTACHMENTS 1 Minutes - Works and Community Committee - 19 April 2011

Works and Community Committee Page 3 ITEM 1 (continued) ATTACHMENT 1


Works and Community Committee

MINUTES OF MEETING NO. 6/11

Meeting Date: Tuesday 19 April 2011 Location: Committee Room 1, Level 5, Civic Centre, 1 Devlin Street, Ryde Time: 4.30pm Councillors Present: Councillor Maggio (Chairperson) and Councillors Perram and Petch. Apologies: Councillors Campbell, Li and Tagg. Staff Present: Group Manager – Community Life, Group Manager - Public Works, Manager Waste and Fleet, Manager Open Space, Manager Governance, Coordinator Natural Areas, Tree Management Officer and Meeting Support Coordinator. DISCLOSURES OF INTEREST There were no disclosures of interest. COMMITTEE REPORTS 1 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - Meeting held on 5 April 2011 RESOLUTION: (Moved by Councillors Perram and Petch) That the Minutes of the Works and Community Committee 05/11, held on Tuesday 5 April 2011, be confirmed. Record of Voting For the Motion: Unanimous Note: This is now a resolution of Council in accordance with the Committee’s delegated powers. 2 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 69 Ford Street, North Ryde Note: The Committee inspected the site at 69 Ford Street, North Ryde. RECOMMENDATION: (Moved by Councillors Maggio and Perram) That the one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 69



Ford Street, North Ryde be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree of a similar species that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Record of Voting For the Motion: Unanimous Note: This matter will be dealt with at the Council Meeting to be held on 10 MAY 2011 as

- substantive changes were made to the published recommendation. 3 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 2-8 Belmore Street, Ryde Note: The Committee inspected the site at 2-8 Belmore Street, Ryde. RECOMMENDATION: (Moved by Councillors Maggio and Perram) That the twelve (12) Casuarina cunninghamiana (River She-oak), seven (7) Callistemon viminalis (Bottlebrush), one (1) Celtis australis (European Hackberry/Nettle Tree) and one (1) Pittosporum undulatum (Sweet Pittosporum) located on the property of 2-8 Belmore Street, Ryde be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 10 trees that are 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Record of Voting For the Motion: Unanimous Note: This matter will be dealt with at the Council Meeting to be held on 10 MAY 2011 as

- substantive changes were made to the published recommendation. 4 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 124 Ryde Road, Gladesville Note: The Committee inspected the site at 124 Ryde Road, Gladesville. RECOMMENDATION: (Moved by Councillors Petch and Maggio) That the one (1) Corymbia maculata (Spotted Gum) located on the property of 124 Ryde Road, Gladesville be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Record of Voting For the Motion: Unanimous Note: This matter will be dealt with at the Council Meeting to be held on 10 MAY 2011 as

- substantive changes were made to the published recommendation.



5 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 3 Zanco Road, Marsfield Note: The Committee inspected the site at 3 Zanco Road, Marsfield. RECOMMENDATION: (Moved by Councillors Maggio and Petch) That the one (1) Eucalyptus elata (River Peppermint) located on the property of 3 Zanco Road, Marsfield be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Record of Voting For the Motion: Unanimous Note: This matter will be dealt with at the Council Meeting to be held on 10 MAY 2011 as

- substantive changes were made to the published recommendation. 6 RECOGNITION OF BUSINESSES THAT HAVE BEEN IN LONG TERM

SERVICE IN THE CITY OF RYDE RESOLUTION: (Moved by Councillors Petch and Perram)

(a) That when Council is approached by businesses and clubs, for the celebration of either 50, 75 or 100 year anniversaries Council provide a plaque recognising the services provided to the community which includes the group’s name, the celebration occasion and the names of the Mayor, 11 Councillors and the General Manager.

(b) That the General Manager has the delegation to approve an approach from a

business or club to celebrate an anniversary and that it is reported to Councillors through the Councillor Information Bulletin.

(c) That businesses and clubs are invited to attend a Council meeting to receive

the recognition plaque. Record of Voting For the Motion: Unanimous Note: This is now a resolution of Council in accordance with the Committee’s delegated powers.



7 PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP - Bevillesta & City of Ryde - Signage

Rights, Southern Pedestrian Bridge, North Face - Status Report. RECOMMENDATION: (Moved by Councillors Petch and Perram) That a further report be submitted to Council once the Expression of Interest process has been completed. Record of Voting For the Motion: Councillors Petch and Perram. Against the Motion: Councillor Maggio. Note: This matter will be dealt with at the Council Meeting to be held on 10 MAY 2011 as

- dissenting votes were recorded.

The meeting closed at 5.58pm.

CONFIRMED THIS 3RD DAY OF MAY 2011.

Chairperson



2 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 43 Cecil Street, Denistone East

Report prepared by: Co-ordinator Natural Areas Report dated: 1/04/2011 File No.: GRP/10/2/001/5 - BP11/263

INSPECTION

Report Summary To report to Council the request for a Review of Determination on the Tree Management Application TMA2011/0059 for the removal of one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 43 Cecil Street, Denistone East. RECOMMENDATION: That the application to remove one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 43 Cecil Street, Denistone East be refused. ATTACHMENTS 1 REV2011/11 Cecil Street 43, Denistone East. Review of Tree

Management Application re TMA2011/59. Details removed for Council report - UNDER SEPARATE COVER

21 Pages

Report Prepared By: Adam Smith Co-ordinator Natural Areas Report Approved By: Simon Harrison Manager Open Space Simone Schwarz Group Manager - Community Life

Works and Community Committee Report Page 8 ITEM 2 (continued)


Background A Tree Management Application TMA2011/0059 (attached – UNDER SEPARATE COVER) was received on 14 February 2011 for the removal of one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 43 Cecil Street, Denistone East. An Independent Consultant Arborist (AQF 5) inspected the trees on 22 February 2011. As outlined in Council’s letter, refusal was given for the removal of the one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) as insufficient reason, under the provisions of the Development Control Plan (DCP) 2010 Part 9.6 Tree Preservation, had been provided. Pruning of the tree was approved to remove deadwood as stated under Clause 7.2.2 of Australian Standard 4373-2007 ‘Pruning of Amenity Trees’. Minor reduction pruning was also recommended in order to reduce the number of long branches overhanging the rear yard. Under the City Of Ryde’s Development Control Plan part 9.6: Tree Preservation, the following shall not generally be considered as valid reasons to remove a tree:

• The tree, its trunk, or its root system is causing damage to a structure and the damage cannot be controlled by measures such as the installation of a root barrier;

• Insects - these are not a basis for removal of a tree, but may be a warning to provide some form of remedial treatment. Inspection and recommendation should be sought from an AQF 5 qualified Arborist prior to applying for tree removal,

• The tree is damaging other property, retaining walls and the like, and root pruning or modification of the property cannot stop further damage,

• Council will not consider the removal of trees that have entered a drainage or sewer system where the system is found to be in poor condition or in disrepair,

• To erect a front fence, internal fence or a fence adjoining a public reserve, • To avoid leaf drop into gutters, downpipes or pools, • To increase natural light, • To improve the effect of street light, • To enhance views, • To reduce shade, • To reduce fruit, resin or bird droppings, • Minor lifting of driveways or paths, • Unapproved bushfire hazard control, • Potential damage to sewer mains without written expert advice.

Report At Council’s Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010 it was resolved:

(a) That Council adopt the proposed revised Tree Management Process as outlined in the report subject to the appeal fee being



set at $50 and removing the need for an Arborist’s report at the Notice of Intent stage.

The revised Tree Management Process now requires all requests for a Review of Determination to be reported directly to Council for resolution. On 28 March 2011 a Review of Determination was requested (REV2011/11, attached) for one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum). Consultation Internal Council business units consulted included:- • Not Applicable Internal Workshops held:- • Not Applicable City of Ryde Advisory Committees consulted included:- • Not Applicable External public consultation included:- • Not Applicable Critical Dates There are no critical dates or deadlines to be met. Financial Impact Adoption of the option(s) outlined in this report will have no financial impact. Policy Implications There are no policy implications through adoption of the recommendation. Other Options Council could resolve that the one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 43 Cecil Street, Denistone East be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Conclusion As per Council’s resolution at the Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010, this matter is being reported directly to Council for determination. No further inspections of the trees have been undertaken and further information is not available thus the original determination remains in place.



3 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 4-6 Harvard Street, Gladesville


INSPECTION

Report Summary To report to Council the request for a Review of Determination on the Tree Management Application TMA2010/0634 for the removal of one (1) Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) and one (1) Eucalyptus nicholii (Narrow-leafed Peppermint Gum) located on the property of 4-6 Harvard Street, Gladesville. RECOMMENDATION: That the application to remove one (1) Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) and one (1) Eucalyptus nicholii (Narrow-leafed Peppermint Gum) located on the property of 4-6 Harvard Street, Gladesville be refused. ATTACHMENTS 1 REV2011/9 Harvard Street 4-6, Gladesville. Review of Tree

Management Application TMA2010/634. For Council report, 1 April 2011 - UNDER SEPARATE COVER

19 Pages




Background A Tree Management Application TMA2010/0634 (attached – UNDER SEPARATE COVER) was received on 10 December 2010 for the removal of one (1) Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) and one (1) Eucalyptus nicholii (Narrow-leafed Peppermint Gum) located on the property of 4-6 Harvard Street, Gladesville. An Independent Consultant Arborist (AQF 5) inspected the trees on 9 February 2011. As outlined in Council’s letter, refusal was given for the removal of the one (1) Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) and one (1) Eucalyptus nicholii (Narrow-leafed Peppermint Gum) as insufficient reason, under the provisions of the Development Control Plan (DCP) 2010 Part 9.6 Tree Preservation, had been provided. Pruning of the trees was approved to remove deadwood as stated under Clause 7.2.2 of Australian Standard 4373-2007 ‘Pruning of Amenity Trees’. Under the City Of Ryde’s Development Control Plan part 9.6: Tree Preservation, the following shall not generally be considered as valid reasons to remove a tree:






Report At Council’s Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010 it was resolved: (a) That Council adopt the proposed revised Tree Management Process as outlined in the report subject to the appeal fee being set at $50 and removing the need for an Arborist’s report at the Notice of Intent stage.



The revised Tree Management Process now requires all requests for a Review of Determination to be reported directly to Council for resolution. On 18 March 2011 a Review of Determination was requested (REV2011/9, attached) for one (1) Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) and one (1) Eucalyptus nicholii (Narrow-leafed Peppermint Gum). Consultation Internal Council business units consulted included:- • Not Applicable Internal Workshops held:- • Not Applicable City of Ryde Advisory Committees consulted included:- • Not Applicable External public consultation included:- • Not Applicable Critical Dates There are no critical dates or deadlines to be met. Financial Impact Adoption of the option(s) outlined in this report will have no financial impact. Policy Implications There are no policy implications through adoption of the recommendation. Other Options Council could resolve that the one (1) Citharexylum spinosum (Fiddlewood) and one (1) Eucalyptus nicholii (Narrow-leafed Peppermint Gum) located on the property of 4-6 Harvard Street, Gladesville be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Conclusion As per Council’s resolution at the Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010, this matter is being reported directly to Council for determination. No further inspections of the trees have been undertaken and further information is not available thus the original determination remains in place.



4 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 57 Acacia Avenue, Ryde


INSPECTION

Report Summary To report to Council the request for a Review of Determination on the Tree Management Application TMA2011/0052 for the removal of one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 57 Acacia Avenue, Ryde. RECOMMENDATION: That the application to remove one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 57 Acacia Avenue, Ryde be refused. ATTACHMENTS 1 REV2011/8 Acacia Avenue 57, Ryde. Review of Tree Management

Application TMA2011/52. Details removed for Council report, 31 March 2011 - UNDER SEPARATE COVER

6 Pages




Background A Tree Management Application TMA2011/0052 (attached – UNDER SEPARATE COVER) was received on 31 January 2011 for the removal of one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 57 Acacia Avenue, Ryde. An Independent Consultant Arborist (AQF 5) inspected the trees on 25 February 2011. As outlined in Council’s letteR, refusal was given for the removal of the one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) as insufficient reason, under the provisions of the Development Control Plan (DCP) 2010 Part 9.6 Tree Preservation, had been provided. Pruning of the tree was approved to remove deadwood as stated under Clause 7.2.2 of Australian Standard 4373-2007 ‘Pruning of Amenity Trees’. Under the City Of Ryde’s Development Control Plan part 9.6: Tree Preservation, the following shall not generally be considered as valid reasons to remove a tree:






Report At Council’s Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010 it was resolved:

(a) That Council adopt the proposed revised Tree Management Process as outlined in the report subject to the appeal fee being set at $50 and removing the need for an Arborist’s report at the Notice of Intent stage.

The revised Tree Management Process now requires all requests for a Review of Determination to be reported directly to Council for resolution.



On 25 March 2011 a Review of Determination was requested (REV2011/8, attached) for one (1) Eucalyptus elata (River Peppermint). Consultation Internal Council business units consulted included:- • Not Applicable Internal Workshops held:- • Not Applicable City of Ryde Advisory Committees consulted included:- • Not Applicable External public consultation included:- • Not Applicable Critical Dates There are no critical dates or deadlines to be met. Financial Impact Adoption of the option(s) outlined in this report will have no financial impact. Policy Implications There are no policy implications through adoption of the recommendation. Other Options Council could resolve that the one (1) Eucalyptus saligna (Sydney Blue Gum) located on the property of 57 Acacia Avenue, Ryde be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Conclusion As per Council’s resolution at the Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010, this matter is being reported directly to Council for determination. No further inspections of the trees have been undertaken and further information is not available thus the original determination remains in place.



5 TREE MANAGEMENT REVIEW - 27 Wood Street, Eastwood


INSPECTION

Report Summary To report to Council the request for a Review of Determination on the Tree Management Application TMA2011/0087 for the removal of one (1) Washingtonia filifera (Cotton Palm) located on the property of 27 Wood Street, Eastwood. RECOMMENDATION: That the application to remove one (1) Washingtonia filifera (Cotton Palm) located on the property of 27 Wood Street, Eastwood be refused. ATTACHMENTS 1 REV2011/10 Wood Street 27, Eastwood. Review of Tree Management

Application TMA2011/87. Details removed for Council report, 31 March 2011 - UNDER SEPARATE COVER

15 Pages




Background A Tree Management Application TMA2011/0087 (attached – UNDER SEPARATE COVER) was received on 25 February 2011 for the removal of one (1) Washingtonia filifera (Cotton Palm) located on the property of 27 Wood Street, Eastwood. An Independent Consultant Arborist (Cert. 5) inspected the trees on 28 February 2011. As outlined in Council’s letter, refusal was given for the removal of the one (1) Washingtonia filifera (Cotton Palm) as insufficient reason, under the provisions of the Development Control Plan (DCP) 2010 Part 9.6 Tree Preservation, had been provided. Pruning of the tree was approved to remove deadwood as stated under Clause 7.2.2 of Australian Standard 4373-2007 ‘Pruning of Amenity Trees’. Under the City Of Ryde’s Development Control Plan part 9.6: Tree Preservation, the following shall not generally be considered as valid reasons to remove a tree:






Report At Council’s Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010 it was resolved: (a) That Council adopt the proposed revised Tree Management Process as outlined in the report subject to the appeal fee being set at $50 and removing the need for an Arborist’s report at the Notice of Intent stage. The revised Tree Management Process now requires all requests for a Review of Determination to be reported directly to Council for resolution.



On 24 March 2011 a Review of Determination was requested (REV2011/10, attached) for one (1) Washingtonia filifera (Cotton Palm). Consultation Internal Council business units consulted included:- • Not Applicable Internal Workshops held:- • Not Applicable City of Ryde Advisory Committees consulted included:- • Not Applicable External public consultation included:- • Not Applicable Critical Dates There are no critical dates or deadlines to be met. Financial Impact Adoption of the option(s) outlined in this report will have no financial impact. Policy Implications There are no policy implications through adoption of the recommendation. Other Options Council could resolve that the one (1) Washingtonia filifera (Cotton Palm) located on the property of 27 Wood Street, Eastwood be conditionally approved for removal. The condition being that prior commitment is given to include the replacement planting of 1 tree that is 1.5 metres at the time of planting and will reach a minimal height of 8 metres at maturity. Conclusion As per Council’s resolution at the Committee of the Whole Meeting No. 18/10 held on 7 December 2010, this matter is being reported directly to Council for determination. No further inspections of the trees have been undertaken and further information is not available thus the original determination remains in place.



6 TRAFFIC & PARKING MATTERS PRESENTED TO RYDE LOCAL TRAFFIC COMMITTEE MEETING held on 31 March 2011

Report prepared by: Traffic Engineer; Senior Traffic Engineer Report dated: 14/04/2011 File No.: GRP/11/3/6/5 - BP11/295

Report Summary The Ryde Traffic Committee (RTC) is a technical advisory committee which advises on and approves matters referred to it by Council. The Minutes, containing recommendations, of the Ryde Traffic Committee Meeting held on 31 March 2011 are ATTACHED (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) for Council’s consideration. Council refers traffic related matters to the RTC prior to exercising its delegated functions, in accordance with the current RTA’s “A Guide to the Delegation to Councils for the Regulation of Traffic – including the operation of Traffic Committees”. Matters relating to classified State roads or functions are referred direct to the RTA, and are not dealt with by Council. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the traffic and parking measures involving: ITEM 1 WATTS ROAD, RYDE, PORTER STREET, MEADOWBANK GLADSTONE AVENUE, RYDE - Parking restrictions

a. Statutory ‘No Stopping” in Watts Road on the south eastern corner of

Roland Avenue and Watts Road intersection and “No Parking” extend across No. 7A and No.7 frontage with Watts Road. The warrant for the “No Parking” restriction is to be reviewed annually.

b. “No Stopping” restriction for 6 metres in length along Porter Street opposite to the driveway access of industrial property no. 2 Porter Street.

c. “No Parking” restrictions across the frontage of No’s 28, 30 and 32 Gladstone Avenue and that this be reviewed in 6 months which would allow for the development on the opposite side of the street to be completed.

ITEM 2 ANTHONY ROAD AND PARK AVENUE, WEST RYDE Intersection safety

a. That two (2) warning signs “CAUTION DRIVEWAYS” (W2-206) be

installed in Anthony Road, north of Park Avenue facing southbound traffic for a period of 6 months.

b. That additionally, driveway delineation lines be extended on the oncoming side by one (1) metre.



ITEM 3 Railway Parade and May Street, Eastwood Change to Weekend Parking Restrictions

Changes to the parking restrictions on the weekend are not proposed at this time along Railway Parade and May Street.

ITEM 4 HERBERT STREET, WEST RYDE Short Term Parking

The installation of 1P (8.30am to 6pm, Mon-Fri; 8.30am to 12.30pm, Sat) for four (4) parking spaces in Herbert Street on the south side closer to the shops.

ITEM 5 COX’S ROAD, NORTH RYDE Time Restricted parking along the frontage of KU Preschool

Install restricted P15minute (AM: 8.30 to 10.00; PM: 2.00 to 4.00, Mon – Fri) parking along the frontage of K U Preschool located at 147-151 Cox’s Road, North Ryde.

ITEM 6 BELMORE STREET, RYDE Pedestrian Access

A pedestrian refuge along Belmore Street be investigated, designed and estimated prior to a further report being presented to the Traffic Committee and that this include budgetary timing.

ITEM 7 WATERLOO ROAD, MACQUARIE PARK Additional bus zones Waterloo Road, Macquarie Park – Additional Bus Zones

a. To further enhance one-way traffic movements westbound, Council place appropriate signage, line marking and parking controls at the intersections formed by the service road and Waterloo Road.

b. Council install a 42 metre bus stop/lay over zone within the existing service road, along the frontage of the old school campus in Waterloo Road between Eden Park Drive and Wicks Road.

c. Council place zones/controls only until such time as the Macquarie Park DCP Road No.11 junction is constructed with Waterloo Road, after which the bus operator will need to secure alternative arrangements.



ITEM 8 HERRING ROAD, MACQUARIE PARK

Council note that the Traffic Committee advised that due to change of circumstances, this proposal is now not applicable and therefore withdrawn.

ITEM 9 WEST RYDE EASTER FAIR (LATE ITEM)

That Council approve the application received from the West Ryde Easter Festival Committee for the road closure of Market Street on Saturday, 16 April 2011 between 7.00am and 4.00pm subject to the conditions within the Traffic Management Plan, which must have the concurrence of the RTA.

ATTACHMENTS 1 ATTACHMENT REPORT - RTC Meeting held 31 March 2011 - Report

BP11/295 Report Prepared By: Ramesh Desai Traffic Engineer Harry Muker Senior Traffic Engineer Report Approved By: Terry Dodds Group Manager - Public Works



Background This report discusses each traffic and/or parking matter separately, and provides discussion and recommendations on how Council may proceed with the proposed measures. All of the items were presented to the Ryde Traffic Committee at its meeting held on 31 March 2011, with the result of the RTC consideration provided. ITEM 1

WATTS ROAD, RYDE, PORTER STREET, MEADOWBANK GLADSTONE AVENUE, RYDE - Request for parking restrictions File No. D10/92880, D10/102783; D10/104366; D10/104376; D10/104628, CRM 1246922

Report Council has received requests at several locations for “No Stopping” or ‘No Parking” restrictions around driveways to improve ease of access to and from the driveway and improve visibility to oncoming traffic while entering the roadway. These locations are: • 7 Watts Road, Ryde who has reduced mobility restrictions – resident request • industrial unit at 2 Porter Street, Meadowbank – business manager – on the basis

rigid trucks can not get access to the property due to cars parked on the opposite side.

• Gladstone Avenue, Ryde to improve access in Gladstone Avenue to property driveways at 26, 28, 30 and 32. - petition from four (4) residents – on the basis blocking by tradesman’s vehicles and construction vehicles.

This issue was dealt with in the general terms of the principles involved in a report to Works Committee meeting of 7th December 2011, with Council resolving: “That any requests for on street parking restrictions to increase sightlines for egress from driveways be advised that Council does not generally support this measure as it does not consistently or equitably address the loss of on street parking for other residents and road users but will assess each request on a case by case basis.” This report deals with case where the matter has been assessed and the measures are supported. Consideration The circumstances of each location are discussed in the following sections. In each case, as the restriction would only affect parking on the kerbside outside the requesting property, it is proposed to agree to implement the restriction. However, as there is a loss of parking, and the request is to satisfy the driving and parking preferences of the property owner, the restriction should not endure in perpetuity. Similar to disabled parking zones for specific properties, the restriction should be periodically reviewed and removed if the occupant of the premises



changes. Should the new occupants request the restriction remain, the control can be reviewed based on the circumstances at the time. Surveys of residents who would have parking outside their property affected have been carried out and no objections have been received for proposed parking restrictions on the locations. The proposed parking restrictions are shown in the ATTACHMENT REPORT. Watts Rd Because the resident has reduced mobility they rely on special needs vehicles and the community bus for transport which are larger in size than a standard car. Watts Road is 8.0m wide (kerb to kerb) and when vehicles are parked on both sides of the street the roadway width is reduced to 4.0m or vehicles are parked either side of their driveway there is insufficient space to accommodate the swept turning path for a car or larger vehicle entering or exiting No.7’s driveway . The resident says it is difficult to manoeuvre their larger size vehicles as there is restricted access outside the property due to the high demand for on-street parking from bus commuters and customers accessing the adjacent local shops as well as cars parked immediately adjacent or encroaching into the driveway. Consultation has been undertaken with the adjoining neighbour who is directly affected. This adjacent house, No. 7A Watts Road is located on the corner of Roland Avenue and Watts Road and whose owner is the parents of the resident of No.7 Watts Road. No.7A has off-street parking and access from Roland Avenue. The owner(s) of No.7A confirm that they have no objection to parking restrictions being implemented along their frontage to Watts Road. Observations on site indicate that the high demand for on-street parking in Watts Road and Roland Avenue would require the resident of No. 7 to travel an unreasonable distance and it would be difficult for the mobility impaired resident to access an alternative pick-up and drop-off location in an adjacent street. The resident has provided sufficient evidence of their disability. Under these circumstances the parking restrictions across and either side of No. 7’s Watts Road driveway are proposed improve access to and from No. 7’s Watts Road driveway. Statutory ‘No Stopping” would apply in Watts Road on the south eastern corner of Roland Avenue and Watts Road intersection and “No Parking” extend across No. 7A and 7 frontage with Watts Road. The warrant for the “No Parking” restriction is to be reviewed annually. Porter St The property is located along mid block in Porter Street and width of Porter Street is 8 metres and parking is unrestricted in the vicinity of no. 2 Porter Street. This industrial property is located in front of Hays Reserve and it is proposed to restrict



parking for one car length opposite to the driveway access would allow trucks to access property without difficulty. Affected business operator has indicated that that he gets two to three deliveries by rigid trucks per week and pick up by trucks also occur from the site. There are other units at the same address occupied by other businesses use the same driveway in Porter Street for access. Survey of on-street parking was carried out on three (3) different times of the day and cars were parked on both sides of Porter Street in the vicinity of this property. During the inspection on 16 March 2011 it was noted that the rigid truck has difficulty accessing the property when a car was parked in Porter Street just opposite to the driveway. Gladstone Ave It is not uncommon for on-street parking demand to increase when construction activity occurs along a residential street, as tradespersons can at times occupy numerous on-street parking locations that are generally left clear, by the residents, to maintain adequate sight lines when they exit their driveway. Gladstone Avenue has a narrow roadway width that measures 7.0m. Access to No’s 26, 28 and 30 is via relative narrow and steep driveways due to the gradient of the land. To exit the driveways in a safe manner residents reverse into the driveways, so they can exit in a forward direction. With vehicles are parked opposite and/or adjacent to the driveways the roadway narrows, making manoeuvring into and out of their driveways difficult. The road carriageway width provides for either a traffic lane in each direction with no on-street parking or a single traffic lane catering for movements in both directions and on-street parking on one side. The roadway vertical alignment is very steep and horizontal alignment straight. The visibility is considered adequate, although the resident’s petition explains that when vehicles park in the street or they are negotiating the manoeuvre into or out of their driveways their have been occasions when vehicles have been brought into a potential conflict. The residents have also raised concern that the 16 unit development once completed will attract additional on-street parkers; visitors, tradesman, removalists and residents vehicles. Again reasonable access to their driveways will be restricted. To improve and maintain access the petition requests “No Parking” be implemented on the eastern side of Gladstone Avenue across the frontage of No’s 28, 30 and 32. Parking would remain on the western side of the street. Restrictions will therefore only directly affect those who are signatures to the request for the “No Parking” restrictions. Consequently further resident consultation in Gladstone Avenue is not considered necessary



The Committee members supported the following parking restrictions, as listed below: (a) Statutory ‘No Stopping” in Watts Road on the south eastern corner of Roland

Avenue and Watts Road intersection and “No Parking” extend across No. 7A and No.7 frontage with Watts Road. The warrant for the “No Parking” restriction is to be reviewed annually.

(b) “No Parking” restriction for 6 metres in length along Porter Street opposite to the driveway access of industrial property no. 2 Porter Street.

(c) “No Parking” restrictions across the frontage of No’s 28, 30 and 32 Gladstone Avenue.

ITEM 2

ANTHONY ROAD AND PARK AVENUE, WEST RYDE Address intersection safety File No: CRM 1239463

Report A local resident has requested parking restrictions, through Councillor Perram, in relation to the sight visibility while reversing out of their property in Anthony Road. This issue is dealt with separately to ITEM1 as the restrictions are not supported, but is presented to this Committee so that Council through the Works Committee can assess the request. Consideration The property is located at the intersection of Anthony Road and Park Avenue. The driveway access from the property is in Anthony Road opposite Park Avenue. It has been observed that sight visibility for drivers reversing out from the property reduces due to parked cars close to the driveway. Council has installed driveway delineation lines on both sides of driveways. Consultation Affected resident of Anthony Road has indicated that while reversing out from the property the visibility is very poor due to parked cars along Anthony Road. He has mentioned that he has no objection to restrict parking in front of his property. All other properties along Anthony Road have similar conditions due to parked cars on both sides. Any parking restrictions considered for one property would set precedence for similar restrictions along Anthony Road. It has been suggested that warning signs for ‘ Caution Driveways’ along Anthony Road be considered which will alert drivers to watch out for cars exiting from the properties. Observations Survey of on-street parking was carried out on three (3) different times of the day and cars were parked on both sides of Anthony Road. Council has implemented driveway delineations lines on both sides of driveways along Anthony Road between Betts Street and Park Avenue so that cars are parked away from the actual driveway.



An investigation of the Roads and Traffic Authority’s (RTA) accident database for the five (5) year period 2004 to 2009 indicates that no vehicle-vehicle incidents have occurred at junction formed by Anthony Road and Park Avenue, West Ryde. The Committee members supported the installation of two (2) warning signs “CAUTION DRIVEWAYS” signs (W2-206) in Anthony Road, north of Park Avenue facing southbound traffic. ITEM 3

Railway Parade and May Street, Eastwood Proposed Change to Weekend Parking Restrictions File No. D10/83484

Report A resident request has been received, via Councillor Li, for a review of the weekend 1/2P and 1 P on-street parking restrictions in Railway Parade and May Street, Eastwood. Consideration Council has been requested to change the 1/2P and 1P on-street parking restrictions in Railway Parade and May Street so they do not apply for the whole of the weekend. In Railway Parade and May Street between Rowe Street and Ball Avenue there are a total of 42 on-street and off-street car spaces. • 6 - ½ hour parking spaces 8am - 6pm Monday to Sunday and 9 - 1 hour parking

spaces 8am - 6pm Monday to Sunday on-street car spaces on the western side. • 13 - ½ hour parking spaces 8am - 6pm Monday to Sunday on-street car spaces

on the eastern side. • 14 - 2 hour parking spaces 8am - 6pm Monday to Sunday in Council’s off-street

carpark at the western end of Rowe Street. Proposed changes could include: • Extending the parking time e.g. 1/2P to 1P or 2P • Shortening the parking time e.g. 1P to 1/2P • Shortening the operation period; 8am to 6pm; Monday – Sunday to 8am to

6pm;Monday – Friday;8:30am to 12:30pm Saturday. Consultation To gauge the views of business owners/proprietors consultation has been undertaken in Railway Parade, May Street and Ethel Street. A total of 150 business questionnaires were distributed to owners/residents in the Eastwood Eastside, Shopping Village. The consultation period closed on the 16 December 2010, and 20 responses have been received.



Support Proposal to Review Status

Quo Undecided No Reply

14 6 0 130 The very high level of no reply can be taken three ways:

• the “silent” majority are accepting of the proposal, or • they wish to retain the current arrangements, but have not bothered to

respond, or • they don’t care whether the arrangements are changed or not

In these situations, the assumption of acceptance is reasonably taken, with any implementation then allowing a notification period in case there are significant and reasonable objections from those who elected to not reply. Discussion Seventy (70%) of the business owners/residents that responded supported the proposal to review the on-street parking restrictions in Railway Parade and May Street on a Saturday and Sunday. There is some sentiment that a longer period of time is required to undertake business transactions or take lunch at the local restaurants. There is already a mix of 1/2P, 1P and 2P off-street and on-street parking restrictions in Railway Parade and May Street and within the rest of the shopping village which are within walking distance to all shops. Past studies (e.g. Eastwood Town Centre Transport Management and Access Plan) indicate that the eastside Eastwood Shopping Village has a high utilization rate and parking turn-over should be encouraged to provide shoppers better access to businesses. This matter was instigated by a sole resident and there is a minority interest from the business owners/proprietors in extending the parking duration in Railway Parade and May Street on the weekend. The Committee members supported that parking restrictions (on the weekend) are not proposed (at this time) along Railway Parade and May Street, Eastwood. ITEM 4

HERBERT STREET, WEST RYDE Short Term Parking File No: D11/12640

Report Council has received a request from the café owner located at the corner of Herbert Street and Hermitage Road to consider parking restrictions in Herbert Street so that customers can get parking in the close proximity.



Consideration A mix use development is located at the corner of Herbert Street and Hermitage Road. There are four (4) retail businesses is located at the ground floor of the building and facing Hermitage Road. A bus zone is located in Hermitage Road in front of this property and unrestricted parking in Herbert Street. Access for basement parking is from Hermitage Road and pedestrian access to the resident foyer is located in Herbert Street. There are about 8 to 9 parking spaces located in Herbert Street which are occupied by commuters between Monday to Friday. Consultation Affected business operator has indicated that their customers have complained that they could not get parking in close proximity to the shops. There are four businesses located and all agree to introduce short term parking for their customers. Viability of any businesses depends upon accessibility of their customers. Door knock survey was carried out of all businesses and all agree to the 1P parking between 8am to 6pm (Mon-Fri) and 8.30am to 12.30pm, Sat along property frontage on Herbert Street. A letter box drop was also carried out to the residents of the street block to gauge support or other wise for the proposed parking restrictions in Herbert Street. (letter and survey form within the ATTACHMENT REPORT) Businesses doorknock survey response Description No of Responses No of properties surveyed 4 1P (8.30am to 6pm, Mon-Fri;8.30am to 12.30pm, Sat) 4 Status Quo (No change to existing traffic arrangement) Nil

Undecided Nil Residents letterbox drop survey response Description No of Responses No of properties surveyed 70 1P (8.30am to 6pm, Mon-Fri;8.30am to 12.30pm, Sat) 4 Status Quo (No change to existing traffic arrangement) 5

Undecided Nil Discussion Survey of on-street parking was carried out on three (3) different times of the day and cars were parked on both sides of Herbert Street in the vicinity of this property. As per survey results it has been suggested that 1P parking be introduced in Herbert Street for four (4) parking spaces closer to the shops.



The Committee members supported the installation of 1P (8.30am to 6pm, Mon-Fri; 8.30am to 12.30pm, Sat) for four (4) parking spaces in Herbert Street on the south side closer to the shops. ITEM 5

COX’S ROAD, NORTH RYDE Request for Time Restricted parking along the frontage of KU Preschool File Ref: D11/12619

Report Council has received correspondence from the Director of K U North Ryde Preschool via the Mayor, Councillor Etmekdjian, for time restricted parking to be installed along the business frontage (Cox’s Road) to assist with pick-up / drop-off during peak periods, namely 8:30am to 10:30am; 2:00pm to 4:00pm. The Director has provided the following commentary with respect to the parking issues within and along the boundary of the preschool. 1. We now have commuters parking in front of the centre all day. Some days are

worse than others. While I understand that commuters need parking it is important that parents have access to the centre at drop-off and pick-up times.

2. Since the bus stop has been moved we have had a car door taken off while being opened and a number of near misses with regards to accidents. Entering and exiting the preschool has become increasingly difficult to see oncoming traffic due to the cars parked along the side of the road. We would appreciate a resolution to this issue as it has been ongoing for some time.

Council staff have spoken with the Director of K U Preschool and confirmed the preferred parking time restrictions as follows: “P15minute (AM: 8.30 to 10.00; PM: 2.00 to 4.00, Mon – Fri)” Background The relocation of the bus zone along the frontage of K U Preschool North Ryde has provided an opportunity for short term parking to be considered along the business frontage for pick-up / drop-off. Council has on a previous occasion considered a request for P15minute (AM: 8.30 to 10.00; PM: 2.00 to 4.00, Mon – Fri) parking along the northern side of Cox’s Road between the preschool and Blamey Street. The results of the survey were as follows:

Cox’s Road – Residents Survey Total Number Surveyed = 3

SUPPORT for restrictions Nil

DO NOT SUPPORT restrictions 2

STATUS QUO Nil



NO RESPONSE 1 Base on the results of the above survey responses, Council did not support the application for short-term parking along the northern side of Cox’s Road between the preschool and Blamey Street, North Ryde, as follows on the 17 November 2009: (a) That Council notes the information contained within the report. (b) That Council not accede to the request to install short term parking on Cox’s Road

near K U North Ryde Preschool. Consideration An independent Road Safety Audit has been carried out by a traffic consultant to review “at grade” safety risks associated with the potential pick-up / drop-off of preschool children within or along the confines of the centre, as the letter from the Director of K U Preschool North Ryde identified a number of issues (refer to the comments in italics under the section heading “Report”) The RSA report extract below “Summary and Conclusions” (refer to the ATTACHMENT REPORT for the complete report) affirms that there is no risk if “drop-off / pick-up” is from the building frontage.



Consultation Not required in this instance as the preschool is an advocate for restricted parking along their business frontage. Accident History An investigation of the Roads and Traffic Authority’s (RTA) accident database for the four (4) year period 2005 to 2008 indicates that there have been two (2) recorded incidents along Cox’s Road between 143 Cox’s Road and 1 Blamey Street, North Ryde.

Accident Year No of Accidents RUM Code

2005 0 Not Applicable 2006 0 Not Applicable 2007 1 47 (outside 143 Cox’s Road) 2008 1 72 (outside 1 Blamey Street)

Notes on “RUM” codes: >> RUM: 47 off carriageway to the right >> RUM: 72 emerging from driveway It is recommended that the Local Traffic Committee supports the installation of time restricted (P15minute (AM: 8.30 to 10.00; PM: 2.00 to 4.00, Mon – Fri) parking along the frontage of K U Preschool located at 147-151 Cox’s Road, North Ryde. The Committee members supported the installation of P15minute (AM: 8.30 to 10.00; PM: 2.00 to 4.00, Mon – Fri) parking along the frontage of K U Preschool located at 147-151 Cox’s Road, North Ryde. ITEM 6

BELMORE STREET, RYDE Pedestrian Access File Ref: D11/19642

Report Council has received a written request from a resident in Belmore Street, Ryde for a ‘marked’ or Zebra Pedestrian Crossing along Belmore Street in the vicinity of Rothesay Avenue. Consideration Belmore Street is classified as a local road under Council’s adopted road hierarchy with a carriageway width of 11 metres kerb to kerb (between Rothesay Avenue and the adjacent roundabout). The RTA practices for numerical warrants for Pedestrian (Zebra) Crossing are now referred to as a Supplement Guide to Traffic Management, Part 6, Section 8 of the Austroads Publication Series (Part 10).



In summary, under ‘normal’ conditions the following applies for a Zebra Crossing (RTA extract): (a). The product of the measured pedestrian flow per hour (P) and the measured

vehicle traffic flow per hour (V), PV, is equal or greater than 60,000 and; (b). The measured flows, P and V are equal of greater than 30 and 500 respectively; (c). The measured flows apply for three periods of one hour in any day. An onsite audit undertaken from the 8 March 2011 to 10 March 2011 respectively identified the following pedestrian and vehicle movements, which are summarised in the following tables:.



Pedestrian Count on Belmore Street between Parsonage Street and Rothesay Avenue

Pedestrians

Date Time Travelling in East West Direction

Travelling in West East Direction

8:15am - 8:30am 3 1 8:30am - 8:45am 3 0

8:45am-9:00am 1 1 9:00am -9:15am 2 1

Hourly Total 9 3 Hourly Total in Both Directions 12

12:30pm -12:45pm 2 3 12:45pm – 1:00pm 2 2 1:00pm - 1:15pm 1 4 1:15pm - 1:30pm 2 2


3:20pm - 3:35pm 1 2 3:35pm - 3:50pm 2 0 3:50pm - 4:05pm 1 1 4:05pm - 4:20pm 0 3

Hourly Total 4 6

8/03/2011 Tuesday

Hourly Total in Both Directions 10

8:15am - 8:30am 2 0 8:30am - 8:45am 3 1

8:45am-9:00am 4 2 9:00am -9:15am 3 2





Hourly Total 6 12

9/03/2011 Wednesday




8:15am - 8:30am 4 1 8:30am - 8:45am 4 0

8:45am-9:00am 3 3 9:00am -9:15am 5 2



Hourly Total 7 11



Hourly Total 7 15

10/03/2011 Thursday


Vehicle Count on Belmore Street between Parsonage Street and Rothesay Avenue

Vehicles

Date Time Travelling in North South Direction

Travelling in South North Direction

8:15am - 8:30am 107 116 8:30am - 8:45am 117 119

8:45am-9:00am 110 150 9:00am -9:15am 87 100

Hourly Total 421 485


12:30pm -12:45pm 39 63 12:45pm – 1:00pm 53 63 1:00pm - 1:15pm 52 53 1:15pm - 1:30pm 29 58




8/03/2011 Tuesday




8:15am - 8:30am 96 123 8:30am - 8:45am 117 147

8:45am-9:00am 96 139 9:00am -9:15am 76 71






9/03/2011 Wednesday


8:15am - 8:30am 109 108 8:30am - 8:45am 104 122

8:45am-9:00am 91 130 9:00am -9:15am 83 105






10/03/2011 Thursday

Hourly Total in Both Directions 491 Applying the numerical warrants to the most desirable vehicle and pedestrian movement combination confirms that the warrants for a ‘marked’ pedestrian crossing have not been satisfied. However, in such circumstances a pedestrian refuge could be considered in lieu of a Zebra Crossing, as the pedestrian movement potential is in the range 15 < X < 30 on a particular day and would allow pedestrians to cross Belmore Street in two (2) stages, that would assist safe passage in busy periods.



Accident History An investigation of the Roads and Traffic Authority’s (RTA) accident database for the four (4) year period 2005 to 2008 indicates that there have been one (1) accidents recorded along Belmore Street, Ryde close to Rothesay Avenue.

Accident Year No of Accidents RUM Code

2005 0 Not Applicable 2006 0 Not Applicable 2007 1 63 2008 0 Not Applicable

Notes on “RUM” codes: >> RUM: 63 Vehicle Door The Committee members supported the installation of a pedestrian refuge along Belmore Street, between Rothesay Avenue and the adjoining roundabout at Parsonage Street. ITEM 7

WATERLOO ROAD, MACQUARIE PARK Request for bus zone File No: D10/97112 Report Cabcharge /Hillsbus (CDC) propose a 42m bus stop/layer over zone in the existing service road along the frontage of the old school campus in Waterloo Road between Eden Park Drive and Wicks Road. Background Council over the period 2009/2010 has received several requests for additional on-street kerb space for bus zones and bus layovers in the Macquarie Park. At the Works and Community meeting held on 17 August 2010 it was resolved as follows: MACQUARIE PARK CBD – Additional Bus Zones, Macquarie Park.

(i) That Council note that Council’s staff, Sydney Buses (State Transit Authority)

and the ComfortDegroCabCharge (Hillsbus & Westbus) are working together on the details to settle on suitable bus zone locations within Macquarie Park.

(ii) That the request for additional bus zones be re-tabled at the next meeting of the Ryde Traffic Committee to be held on 16 September 2010.

(iii) That a further report be prepared for the Committee’s consideration.”



Consideration Comfort Delgro Cabcharge Pty Ltd (Hillsbus/Westbus) has been pursuing locations in Macquarie Park for a bus stop and layover zone since October, 2010. E-mail responses and discussions have been undertaken over this time to encourage the bus service provider to choose a bus stop layover location that will not have significant impacts on the existing parking supply or metered parking arrangements in Macquarie Park. Comfort Delgro Cabcharge Pty Ltd Planning Manager advises that the additional sites allocated to Sydney Buses recently (Report to Council 28th September - Item 9 Macquarie Park CBD – Additional Bus Zones, Macquarie Park) are fully utilized. The most appropriate site appears to be the existing service road along Waterloo Road frontage of the 144 Wicks Road (School Campus) between Eden Park Drive and Wicks Road. The proposal is to occupy 42meters along the service road southern kerb which would accommodate 3 buses. On site measurements indicate that the service road has a min. width of 6.1/6.2m which will accommodate the bus parking against the kerb (2.9m) and allow a car to pass (3.2m). The current parking restriction is P5 minute along service road along Waterloo Road. CDC advised they have undertaken parking surveillance in the service road. The parking is infrequently used, with coaches occasionally servicing the Thomas Hockey Centre Field. CDC advised they have undertaken consultation with affected properties owners and businesses. Nought to Five Early Childcare Centre advised they have no objection provided the following additional traffic management is included with the bus stop/layer over proposal. Their requests are considered below. • The service road is made one-way east to west to remove the potential conflict

between buses and vehicles using the service road because the service road currently allows traffic to flow in both directions. The service road is 6.2m wide and when a bus parks against the kerb, this reduces the carriageway to a single traffic lane. There is potential for oncoming vehicles to come into conflict. The formalization of the one-way movement will improve road user safety. A TMP will need to be prepared to support changing the two-way service road into and one-way service road. This part of the proposal will be referred to the RTA before it can be considered by the LTC.

• The intersections formed by the service road and Waterloo Road are treated with

‘Do Not Queue Across Intersections’, as it is difficult entering & exiting in the peak



periods. This measure should to be supported by “Keep Clear” and transverse pavement markings. The use of this measure is consistent with current traffic management practice. This is to be referred to the LTC for their consideration.

Consultation The Dexus Property Group, the owner of 144 Wicks Road (School Campus) is supportive of the proposal and has confirmed this in writing. However, the bus zone would require modification in the future when Macquarie Park DCP Road No.11 junction is constructed with Waterloo Road. At that time CDC would seek a new bus stop/layer over zone in Macquarie Park. The proposal is supported by the affected business and property owner (refer to the ATTACHMENT REPORT). Council would require Comfort Delgro Cabcharge/Hillsbus Pty Ltd to meet all costs associated with the installation of the bus stop/layover zone and traffic management measures. The Committee members supported the following traffic management measures, as listed below: (a) one-way traffic movement westbound in the service road and “Keep Clear”

pavement markings and “Do Not Queue Across Intersection” signs at the intersections formed by the service road and Waterloo Road.

(b) a 42 m bus stop/lay over zone within the existing service road along the frontage of the old school campus in Waterloo Road between Eden Park Drive and Wicks Road

(c) the zones/controls be in place only until such time as the Macquarie Park DCP Road No.11 junction is constructed with Waterloo Road, after which the bus operator will need to secure alternative arrangements.

ITEM 8

HERRING ROAD, MACQUARIE PARK Bus Zone and Kiss and Ride Zone File No: D10/20853

Report Cabcharge /Hillsbus (CDC) propose a adjustment to the existing bus zone and kiss and ride zone along Herring Road on the western side outside Macquarie University Railway Station. Background Council over the period 2009/2010 has received several requests for additional on-street kerb space for bus zones and bus layovers in the Macquarie Park. At the Works and Community meeting held on 17 August 2010 it was resolved as follows:



MACQUARIE PARK CBD – Additional Bus Zones, Macquarie Park. (i) That Council note that Council’s staff, Sydney Buses (State Transit Authority)

and the ComfortDegroCabCharge (Hillsbus & Westbus) are working together on the details to settle on suitable bus zone locations within Macquarie Park.

(ii) That the request for additional bus zones be re-tabled at the next meeting of the Ryde Traffic Committee to be held on 16 September 2010.

(iii) That a further report be prepared for the Committee’s consideration. Consideration Comfort Delgro Cabcharge Pty Ltd (Hillsbus/Westbus) has requested that due to influx of university students using Herring Road bus stop. CDC buses (611,619,621 and 561) use Herring Road bus stop to access M2 heading to the North West. Comfort Delgro Cabcharge Pty Ltd Planning Manager advises that the crowding of passengers at the existing bus stop is unsafe for the other pedestrians as there is not enough width available in the vicinity of the existing bus shelter. The proposal is swap kiss and ride which is at the end of rank and bus zone which is ahead the rank. The existing bus shelter is in confined space due to rock cutting at the back. At the present time bus shelter will not be relocated to the new location because of the cost involved in relocation. Also, the actual bus stop would not be at the shelter and which is not ideal situation for passengers to wait in extreme weather conditions. CDC advised they have undertaken few inspections and it has been suggested to install kiss and ride zone at the beginning of the rank and bus zone to follow where there is wider footpath available. It has been noted that even the existing interchange at Macquarie Sopping Centre is very congested due to Sydney Buses and CDC buses from the North West use limited space along Herring Road. Consultation The Hillsbus, Sydney Buses, Busways, Macquarie University, Transport NSW and City of Ryde met on site on 9 March 2011 to discuss few options to address safety of pedestrians. The Committee members supported the swap of the “bus zone” and “kiss & ride zone” indicated in the body of the report subject to confirming all parties involved (Railcorp, Sydney Buses, Macquarie University, CDC, Busways and Transport NSW) being in agreement with the proposed changes to the exiting bus stop along Herring Road.



ITEM 9

WEST RYDE EASTER FAIR (LATE ITEM) File No: COR 2009/206

Report Late notification was received from the West Ryde Easter Festival Committee seeking approval to hold the Annual West Ryde Easter Fair on Saturday, 16 April 2011 from 9am to 3pm in Market Street, West Ryde. Discussions took place at the time of the meeting which covered traffic and pedestrian requirements for the day. Consideration The Festival Committee provided details of their members who would be present on the day and assisting with co-ordinating activities at West Ryde on the day. The Committee members supported the following traffic management measures, as listed below: That Council approve the application received from the West Ryde Easter Festival Committee for the road closure of Market Street on Saturday, 16 April 2011 between 7.00am and 4.00pm subject to the conditions within the Traffic Management Plan, which must have the concurrence of the RTA. Consultation Internal Council business units consulted included:- • Council’s Business Units, as required Internal Workshops held:- • Not Applicable City of Ryde Advisory Committees consulted included:- • Bicycle Advisory Committee External public consultation included:- • NSW Police, RTA, STA, relevant Local Members of Parliament and community

organisations • Community Surveys on specific items, as indicated Critical Dates There are no critical dates or deadlines to be met Financial Impact All items apart from Item No.6 titled “Belmore Street, Ryde – Pedestrian Access” will be covered under the operating budget for traffic facilities and signage. The cost to construct the pedestrian refuge is estimated at $10,000 (exclusive of GST) and could be funded in the 2012/13 financial year following budget consideration.



Policy Implications There ate no policy implications through the adoption of the recommendation Other Options Other options have been considered and listed where appropriate in each Report. Conclusion The ATTACHED (provided UNDER SEPARATE COVER) Minutes are tabled at Council for consideration and endorsement.





































































Documents

Works and Community Committee - City of Ryde...2011/05/03 · Works and Community Committee Page 4 ITEM 1 (continued) ATTACHMENT 1 Agenda of the Works and Community Committee Report