Winecoff_Y669_Fall2013

Fall 2013 / Th 4:45 - 6:45pm / Some Room

Political Science 669: International

Political Economy

William Kindred Winecoff

Indiana University at BloomingtonOffice: Woodburn [email protected]

course description

This seminar provides an overview of theoretical and empirical work inInternational Political Economy (IPE). IPE is an interdisciplinary field –drawing from international relations, comparative politics, economics, so-ciology, and other realms – concerned with the interaction of politics andeconomics in the global system. In addition to providing a broad surveyof the development of thought in IPE, we will explore substantive topicsincluding the politics of trade, investment, and development. In so doing,this course will mix classic theoretical works with contemporary empiricalanalyses, for the purpose of laying a foundation for future research intothe global political economy. Students will be expected to write a seminarpaper exploring an IPE topic in some depth, as well as shorter analyses ofassigned readings.

requirements

This is a seminar course. Attendance at each meeting is mandatory andabsences will not be excused barring truly unfortunate circumstances. I

1

2

expect you to come to each meeting have read the assigned material care-fully, and to participate in discussions. The other requirements involvewriting:

1. Three short writing assignments (2 - 4 pages single-spaced) reactingto material assigned for that week, to be circulated to the class atleast 24 hours before meeting. There is a sign-up sheet posted atURL HERE. These are writing and thinking exercises intended tospur discussion of the readings; they are not scholarly treatises andthey do not need to cover every bit of every reading. However, theyshould be thoughtful. Everyone is required to read the responses forthat week before class.

2. An article-length paper (~8k - 10k words) on a topic of your choos-ing. Ideally this will be a practice run at your two-year paper or adissertation chapter, depending upon where you are in the program.A successful paper will:

· Survey the relevant literature succinctly.

· Formulate an appropriate research design: theory, hypotheses,methodology.

· Perform the analysis.

The goal is to have an article which is close to submittable to a con-ference and/or journal by the end of the semester. I understand thatfor some of you this will be the first (or one of the first) substantivearticles you have written, so I do not expect these to be publish-able in the APSR by December. However, successful completion ofthis assignment should further your research agenda in a tangibleway. Therefore, I insist that this paper be on a topic related to yourdissertation even if that takes you somewhat far afield from the ma-terial we read in this class. I also insist that it contain a “scientific”component, which in almost all cases should be empirical.

We will discuss this further over the course of the semester but thefirst step will be getting my approval for your paper. This will requirethe submission of an abstract that describes the research question,the theoretical approach, the hypotheses, and the method used toevaluate them. If the method is quantitative then I would also like a

3

list of data sources you intend to use and the modeling approachesyou intend to use. (I can help you find appropriate data if you arenot sure where to look.) If the method is not quantitative then youwill need to explain what other empirical, textual, or critical method-ology you wish to employ. Replication papers are allowed, and evenencouraged, so long as there is a theoretical or methodological ex-tension that would provide an original contribution.

At the end of the semester these papers will be presented to theclass in standard conference format: 12-15 minutes of presentationfollowed by my comments (as discussant) and a question and answersession.

I understand that this will be painful, but believe me: you need thepractice.

approach

International Political Economy (IPE) is both old and new. As a distinctacademic subdiscipline IPE has only existed since around 1970, the timewhen the postwar Bretton Woods system was fraying, and to this day IPEexists almost exclusively in the Anglophone world. But IPE is concernedwith the things that all the old “worldly philosophers” were concernedwith: the wealth of nations, the power of capital, the development andevolution of societies. IPE became necessary because both economics(post-“marginal revolution”) and international relations neglected thesetopics of critical importance. 99% of world politics is about butter, notbombs, and domestic politics cannot be understood without reference tothe global context within which it occurs. So IPE is important, but in itscurrent form it is also somewhat immature. In many ways it is not well-connected to its historical antecedents: Smith, Mill, Marx, Schumpeter,Keynes, Polanyi, etc. Unfortunately we do not have the time to read allthese folks, but hopefully we’ll be able to connect some dots back to themover the course of the semester.

Contemporary IPE has two general “schools”: the British and the Amer-ican. The British tends to be historical, interpretivist, and critical. TheAmerican tends to be more materialist, quantitative (or otherwise neopos-itivist), and driven by positive theory. This mostly has to do with IPE’sorigins: in the U.S., the original IPE scholars came from international

4

economics (e.g. Kindleberger, Cohen) or international relations (e.g. Keo-hane, Nye); in Britain the pioneer was a journalist with little formal aca-demic training. We will read material from both schools, as well as somehybrids of them and debates between them.

Within these schools have existed paradigms that loosely map onto theso-called “grand” theoretical traditions in international relations: neoreal-ism, neoliberalism, and neo-Marxism. We will not be reading much of thisstuff, as the discipline seems to have moved on from the big debates, butin terms of contextualizing readings it is worth remembering that thesetheoretical traditions have informed various approaches in IPE.

For these reasons the course may seem a bit disjointed: a little of this,a little of that. In some ways this is unfortunate, but the alternatives – onlyassign material from the past ten years, squeeze in bits from every impor-tant theoretical tradition, etc. – are even worse. As such, consider thisclass as a base for future study. I strongly encourage you to read widelyinside the subdiscipline and outside of it. You will find relevant materialwritten by sociologists, anthropologists, comparative political scientists,economists, journalists, normative theorists, historians, physicists, geog-raphers, and many others.

Finally, we will approach IPE differently than many other courses. In-stead of taking things topically – a week on foreign direct investment, thenone on interest group lobbying over trade policy, etc. – we will try to thinkof the global IPE systemically. We will focus on approaches to this systemrather than topics. This is an experiment. It may fail. But if it succeeds Ibelieve it will be much more interesting than previous approaches.

readings

The articles should all be available via the University’s library website. Ifyou can’t find something let me know right away. Some books will needto be ordered. If you do not have much background in IPE or moderneconomic history, I recommend the following as optional resources (in thisorder):

Thomas Oatley. International Political Economy. Longman, 5th edition, 2011.

David N. Balaam and Bradford Dillman. Introduction to International PoliticalEconomy. Longman, 2010.

Robert Gilpin. Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Eco-nomic Order. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001.

5

If you have a poor understanding of economic history in the era ofcapitalism try (in no particular order):

Jeffry A. Frieden. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century.W.W. Norton and Company, New York, NY and London, 2006.

Barry Eichengreen. Globalizing Capital. Princeton University Press, Princeton,NJ, 1996.

Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff. This Time Is Different: Eight Cen-turies of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009.

Charles P. Kindleberger and Robert Aliber. Manias, Panics, and Crashes: A His-tory of Financial Crises. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ, fifth edition,2005.

Mark Blyth. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press,Oxford, 2013.

There are plenty of other great books on economic and political econ-omy history. (Karl) Marx, (Angus) Maddison, (Deidre) McCloskey, and(Barrington) Moore just on the ‘M’s. Much can be learned from GregoryClark, Jared Diamond, David Graeber, Eric Hobsbawm, Tony Judt, DavidLandes, and Karl Polanyi, even if they have their flaws. I can give manymore recommendations if you like. Old (i.e. cheap) editions of any ofthese are fine. Unfortunately, given the constraints of the class, we will bespending almost all of our time in the post-World War II era and almost allof it in the post-Bretton Woods era.

i: whence we came (sept. 5)

Required

Benjamin J. Cohen. International Political Economy: An Intellectual History. Prince-ton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008.

Read the Introduction only.

David A. Lake. Open economy politics: A critical review. The Review of Interna-tional Organizations, 4(3):219–244, 2009.

Robert O. Keohane. The old IPE and the new. Review of International PoliticalEconomy, 16(1):34–46, 2009.

Daniel Maliniak and Michael J. Tierney. The American school of IPE. Review ofInternational Political Economy, 16(1):6–33, 2009.

Mark Blyth. Torn between two lovers: Caught in the middle of british and ameri-can ipe. New Political Economy, 14(3):329–336, 2009.

6

Benjamin J. Cohen. Are ipe journals becoming boring? International StudiesQuarterly, 54:887–891, 2010.

Leonard Seabrooke. Varieties of economic constructivism in political economy:Uncertain times call for disparate measures. Review of International Polit-ical Economy, 14(2):371–385, 2007.

John M. Hobson. Part 1 - revealing the eurocentric foundations of ipe: A criti-cal historiography of the discipline from the classical to the modern era.Review of International Political Economy, Forthcoming, 2013.

ii: materialist approaches, 1 (sept. 12)

Required


Read chapter 1 only.

Jeffry A. Frieden. Invested Interests: The Politics of National Economic Policiesin a World of Global Finance. International Organization, 45(4):425–451,1991.

Stephan Haggard and Sylvia Maxfield. The Political Economy of Financial In-ternationalization in the Developing World. International Organization,50(1):35–68, 1996.

Layna Mosley. Room to Move: International Financial Markets and National Wel-fare States. International Organization, 54(4):737–773, 2000.

Edward D. Mansfield, Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. Free to trade:Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. American Political Sci-ence Review, 94(2):305–321, 2000.

iii: structuralist approaches, 1 (sept. 19)

Required


Read chapters 2 and 3 only.

Charles Kindleberger. The World in Depression, 1929-1939. University of Cali-fornia Press, Berkeley, CA, 1973.

NOTE: Just the portion I’ll circulate. You don’t need to purchase thebook.

7

Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist Sys-tem: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Comparative Studies in Societyand History, 16(4):387–415, 1974.

Stephen D. Krasner. State power and the structure of international trade. WorldPolitics, 28(3):317–347, 1976.

Susan Strange. The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organiza-tion, 41(4):551–574, 1987.

iv: ideationalist approaches, 1 (sept. 26)

Required

Edward D. Mansfield and Diana C. Mutz. Support for Free Trade: Self-Interest,Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. International Organization,63(3):425–457, 2009.

Benjamin O. Fordham and Katja B. Kleinberg. How can economic interests in-fluence support for free trade? International Organization, 66(2):311–328,2012.

Alexandra Guisinger. Determining trade policy: Do voters hold politicians ac-countable? International Organization, 66(3):533–557, 2009.

Jeffrey Chwieroth. Neoliberal Economists and Capital Account Liberalization inEmerging Markets. International Organization, 61(2):443–463, April 2007.

Jeffrey M. Chwieroth and Timothy J. Sinclair. How you stand depends on how wesee: International capital mobility as social fact. Review of InternationalPolitical Economy, 20(3):457–485, 2013.

Donald Mackenzie. Opening the black boxes of global finance. Review of Inter-national Political Economy, 12(4):555–576, 2005.

v: institutionalist approaches, 1 (oct. 3)

Required

Robert O. Keohane. The demand for international regimes. International Organi-zation, 36(2):325–355, 1982.

Judith Goldstein. Ideas, Institutions, and American trade policy. InternationalOrganization, 42(1):179–217, 1988.

Stephen D. Krasner. Global Communications and National Power: Life on thePareto Frontier. World Politics, 43(3):336–366, 1991.

8

Judith L. Goldstein, Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz. Institutions in Interna-tional Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATT and the WTO onWorld Trade. International Organization, 61(1):37–67, January 2007.

Tim Büthe and Helen V. Milner. The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment intoDeveloping Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agree-ments? American Journal of Political Science, 52(4):741–762, October 2008.

Joanne Gowa. Alliances, market power, and postwar trade: explaining the gatt/wto.World Trade Review, 9(3), 2010.

vi: critical and historical approaches (oct. 10)

Required

Kenneth L. Sokoloff and Stanley L. Engerman. History lessons: Institutions, fac-tor endowments, and paths of development in the new world. The Journalof Economic Perspectives, 14(3):217–232, 2000.

Christopher Farrands and Owen Worth. Critical theory in global political econ-omy: Critique? knowledge? emancipation? Capital & Class, Spring:43–61,2005.

V. Spike Peterson. How (the meaning of) gender matters in political economy.New Political Economy, 10(4):499–521, 2005.

Santhi Hejeebu and Deirdre McCloskey. The reproving of karl polanyi. CriticalReview, 13(3/4):285–314, 1999.

William R. Thompson and Kentaro Sakuwa. Was wealth really determined in 8000bce, 1000 bce, 0 ce, or even 1500 ce? Cliodynamics, 4(1), 2013.

Ronen Palan. The new dependency theory. New Left Project, January 9 2013.

vii: materialist approaches, 2 (oct. 17)

Required

Xiaobo Lu, Kenneth Scheve, and Matthew J. Slaughter. Inequity aversion and theinternational distribution of trade protection. American Journal of PoliticalScience, 56(3):638–654, 2013.

Thomas Oatley and Robert Nabors. Redistributive Cooperation: Market Fail-ure, Wealth Transfers, and the Basle Accord. International Organization,52(1):35–54, January 1998.

Mark S. Copelovitch and David Andrew Singer. Financial Regulation, Mone-tary Policy, and Inflation in the Industrialized World. Journal of Politics,70(3):663–680, 2008.

9

W. Kindred Winecoff. Bank regulation, monetary incentives, and macroeconomicmanagement in oecd economies. International Studies Quarterly, forth-coming, 2014.

Sarah Blodgett Bermeo and David Leblang. Foreign interests: Immigration andthe political economy of foreign aid. International Organization, forthcom-ing, 2014.

viii: structuralist approaches, 2 (oct. 24)

Required

Beth A. Simmons and Zachary Elkins. The Globalization of Liberalization: PolicyDiffusion in the International Political Economy. American Political ScienceReview, 98(1):171–189, February 2004.

Erik Wibbels. Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Business Cycles,and Social Spending in the Deveioping Worid. International Organization,60:433–469, 2006.

Yonatan Lupu and Vincent A. Traag. Trading communities, the networked struc-ture of international relations, and the kantian peace. Journal of ConflictResolution, 2013.

Michael D. Ward, John S. Ahlquist, and Arturas Rozenas. Gravity’s rainbow: Dy-namic networks models of international commerce. Network Science, 1(1),2013.

Xun Cao. Global networks and domestic policy convergence: A network explana-tion of policy changes. World Politics, 64(3):375–425, 2012.

W. Kindred Winecoff. Global banking as a complex political economy. WorkingPaper, 2013.

ix: ideationalist approaches, 2 (oct. 31)

Required

Jens Hainmueller and Michael J. Hiscox. Learning to love globalization: Educa-tion and individual attitudes toward trade. International Organization, 60,2006.

Rawi Abdelal, Mark Blyth, and Craig Parsons. Constructivism as an approach tointernational political economy. In Rawi Abdelal, Mark Blyth, and CraigParsons, editors, Constructing the International Economy. Cornell Univer-sity Press, Ithaca, NY, 2010.

10

Helen V. Milner and Dustin H. Tingley. Who supports global economic engage-ment? the sources of preferences in american foreign economic policy. In-ternational Organization, 65(1):37–68, 2011.

Henry Farrell and John Quiggin. Consensus, dissensus and economic ideas: Therise and fall of keynesianism during the economic crisis. Working Paper,2012.

Qingxin K. Wang and Mark Blyth. Constructivism and the study of internationalpolitical economy in china. Review of International Political Economy,forthcoming, 2013.

x: institutionalist approaches, 2 (nov. 7)

Required

David Leblang and Shanker Satyanath. Institutions, Expectations, and CurrencyCrises. International Organization, 60(1):245–262, 2006.

Daniel Yuichi Kono. Democracy and Trade Discrimination. The Journal of Politics,70(4):942–955, September 2008.

Moonhawk Kim. Costly Procedures: Divergent Effects of Legalization in theGATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures. International Studies Quar-terly, 52(3):657–686, September 2008.

Randall W. Stone. The Scope of IMF Conditionality. International Organization,62(4):589–620, October 2008.

Mark Copelovitch. Master or servant? common agency and the political economyof imf lending. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1):49–77, 2010.

xi: the crisis and great decession (nov. 21)

Required

Eric Helleiner. Understanding the 2007-2008 global financial crisis: Lessons forscholars of international political economy. Annual Review of Political Sci-ence, 14:67–87, 2011.

Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin. Capitalist crises and the crisis this time. SocialistRegister, 2011.

Thomas Oatley, W. Kindred Winecoff, Sarah Bauerle Danzman, and Andrew Pen-nock. The political economy of global finance: A network model. Perspec-tives on Politics, 11(133-153), 2013.

Thomas B. Pepinsky. The global economic crisis and the politics of non-transitions.Government and Opposition, 47(2):135–161, 2012.

11

Sean Starrs. American economic power hasn’t declined – it globalized! sum-moning the data and taking globalization seriously. International StudiesQuarterly, forthcoming, 2013.

W. Kindred Winecoff. Financial power and the global crisis. Working Paper.

xii: pulling it all together

Required

Thomas Oatley. The political economy of imbalance. Manuscript, 2013.

xiii: break (nov. 28)

NO CLASS: Thanksgiving Break.

xiv: whither we go? (dec. 5)

NOTE: Papers due.

Required

Benjamin J. Cohen. The international monetary system: diffusion and ambiguity.International Affairs, 84(3):455–470, 2008.

Read chapter 7 only.

Thomas Oatley. The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politics in the GlobalEconomy. International Organization, 65(2):311–341, 2011.

Benjamin J. Cohen. A grave case of myopia. International Interactions, 35(4):436–444, 2009.

Leonard Seabrooke and John M. Hobson. The case for an everyday internationalpolitical economy. International Center for Business and Politics, Copen-hagen Business School, Working Paper no. 26, 2006.

Kate Bedford and Shirin M. Rai. Feminists theorize international political econ-omy. Signs, 36(1):1–18, 2010.

John M. Hobson. Part 2 - reconstructing the non-eurocentric foundations of ipe:From eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational politicaleconomy. Review of International Political Economy, Forthcoming, 2013.

12

xv (dec. 12)

Presentations.

13

additional readings

Sociology and Philosophy of IPE

Jeffry A. Frieden and Lisa Martin. International political economy: The state ofthe sub-discipline. In Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Milner, editors, PoliticalScience: The State of the Discipline, pages 118–146. Norton, New York,NY, 2002.

Helen V. Milner. Reflections on the field of international political economy. InMichael Brecher and Frank Harvey, editors, Millenial Reflections on Inter-national Studies, pages 623–636. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor,MI, 2002.

David A. Lake. International Political Economy: A Maturing Interdiscipline. InBarry R. Weingast and Donald Wittman, editors, The Oxford Handbook ofPolitical Economy, pages 1–41. Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.

David A. Lake. TRIPs across the Atlantic: Theory and epistemology in IPE. Reviewof International Political Economy, 16(1):47–57, 2009.

David Leblang and Sonal Pandya. The financial crisis of 2007: Our waterloo ortake a chance on ipe? International Interactions, 35(4):430–435, 2009.

Benjamin J. Cohen. The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are American and British IPESo Different? Review of International Political Economy, 14(November):197–219, 2007.


Daniel Maliniak, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. Trip around the world:Teaching, research, and policy views of international relations faculty in 20countries. Published by the TRIP Project, The Institute for the Theory ofPractice of International Relations at the College of William and MaryMa,2012.

14

Politics of Trade

Andrew K. Rose. Do WTO members have more liberal trade policy? Journal ofInternational Economics, 63(2):209–235, 2004.

Andrew K. Rose. Do we really know that the wto increases trade? The AmericanEconomic Review, 94(1):98–114, 2004.

Layna Mosley. Global Capital and National Governments. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

David Andrew Singer. Capital Rules: The Domestic Politics of International Reg-ulatory Harmonization. International Organization, 58(3):531–565, 2004.

David Andrew Singer. Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the InternationalFinancial System. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2007.

Michael J. Hiscox. International Trade & Political Conflict. Princeton UniversityPress, Princeton, NJ, 2002.

Edward D. Mansfield. The Concentration of Capabilities and International Trade.International Organization, 46(3):731–764, 1992.

Alexandra Guisinger and David Andrew Singer. Exchange rate proclamationsand inflation-fighting credibility. International Organization, 64(2):313–337, 2010.

Helen V. Milner. The political economy of international trade. Annual Review ofPolitical Science, 2:91–114, 1999.

15

Politics of Finance

Randall D. Germain. The International Organization of Credit. Cambridge Uni-versity Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

Jeffry A. Frieden. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twentieth Century.W.W. Norton and Company, New York, NY and London, 2006.

Ethan B. Kapstein. Resolving the Regulator’s Dilemma: International Coordina-tion of Banking Regulations. International Organization, 43(2):323–347,1989.

Eric Neumayer and Thomas Plümper. Spatial effects in dyadic data. InternationalOrganization, 64(1):145–166, 2010.

16

Yadda Yadda

Kathlenn McNamara. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics in the EuropeanUnion. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1999.

Mark Blyth. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Institutional Changein the Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA,2002.

Mark Blyth. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. Oxford University Press,Oxford, 2013.

Rawi Abdelal. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance. Harvard Uni-versity Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.


Jeffrey M. Chwieroth. Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberal-ization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009.

Donald Mackenzie. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Mar-kets. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.

17

Recommended

Robert O. Keohane. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Po-litical Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1984.

Susan Strange. Cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis. InternationalOrganization, 36(2):479–496, 1982.

Gene M. Grossman and Elhanan Helpman. Protection for Sale. The AmericanEconomic Review, 84(4):833–850, 1994.

18

Bibliography

[1] Rawi Abdelal. Capital Rules: The Construction of Global Finance.Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2007.

[2] Rawi Abdelal, Mark Blyth, and Craig Parsons. Constructivism as anapproach to international political economy. In Rawi Abdelal, MarkBlyth, and Craig Parsons, editors, Constructing the InternationalEconomy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 2010.

[3] David N. Balaam and Bradford Dillman. Introduction to Interna-tional Political Economy. Longman, 2010.

[4] Kate Bedford and Shirin M. Rai. Feminists theorize internationalpolitical economy. Signs, 36(1):1–18, 2010.

[5] Sarah Blodgett Bermeo and David Leblang. Foreign interests: Im-migration and the political economy of foreign aid. InternationalOrganization, forthcoming, 2014.

[6] Mark Blyth. Great Transformations: Economic Ideas and Insti-tutional Change in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge, MA, 2002.

[7] Mark Blyth. Torn between two lovers: Caught in the middle ofbritish and american ipe. New Political Economy, 14(3):329–336,2009.

[8] Mark Blyth. Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. OxfordUniversity Press, Oxford, 2013.

[9] Tim Büthe and Helen V. Milner. The Politics of Foreign Direct In-vestment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through Inter-

19

national Trade Agreements? American Journal of Political Science,52(4):741–762, October 2008.

[10] Xun Cao. Global networks and domestic policy convergence: A net-work explanation of policy changes. World Politics, 64(3):375–425,2012.

[11] Jeffrey Chwieroth. Neoliberal Economists and Capital AccountLiberalization in Emerging Markets. International Organization,61(2):443–463, April 2007.

[12] Jeffrey M. Chwieroth. Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Fi-nancial Liberalization. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,2009.

[13] Jeffrey M. Chwieroth and Timothy J. Sinclair. How you stand de-pends on how we see: International capital mobility as social fact.Review of International Political Economy, 20(3):457–485, 2013.

[14] Benjamin J. Cohen. The Transatlantic Divide: Why Are Americanand British IPE So Different? Review of International Political Econ-omy, 14(November):197–219, 2007.

[15] Benjamin J. Cohen. The international monetary system: diffusionand ambiguity. International Affairs, 84(3):455–470, 2008.

[16] Benjamin J. Cohen. International Political Economy: An IntellectualHistory. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2008.

[17] Benjamin J. Cohen. A grave case of myopia. International Interac-tions, 35(4):436–444, 2009.

[18] Benjamin J. Cohen. Are ipe journals becoming boring? InternationalStudies Quarterly, 54:887–891, 2010.

[19] Mark Copelovitch. Master or servant? common agency and thepolitical economy of imf lending. International Studies Quarterly,54(1):49–77, 2010.

[20] Mark S. Copelovitch and David Andrew Singer. Financial Regu-lation, Monetary Policy, and Inflation in the Industrialized World.Journal of Politics, 70(3):663–680, 2008.

20

[21] Barry Eichengreen. Globalizing Capital. Princeton University Press,Princeton, NJ, 1996.

[22] Christopher Farrands and Owen Worth. Critical theory in globalpolitical economy: Critique? knowledge? emancipation? Capital &Class, Spring:43–61, 2005.

[23] Henry Farrell and John Quiggin. Consensus, dissensus and eco-nomic ideas: The rise and fall of keynesianism during the economiccrisis. Working Paper, 2012.

[24] Benjamin O. Fordham and Katja B. Kleinberg. How can economicinterests influence support for free trade? International Organiza-tion, 66(2):311–328, 2012.

[25] Jeffry A. Frieden. Invested Interests: The Politics of National Eco-nomic Policies in a World of Global Finance. International Organi-zation, 45(4):425–451, 1991.

[26] Jeffry A. Frieden. Global Capitalism: Its Fall and Rise in the Twenti-eth Century. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, NY and London,2006.

[27] Jeffry A. Frieden and Lisa Martin. International political economy:The state of the sub-discipline. In Ira Katznelson and Helen V. Mil-ner, editors, Political Science: The State of the Discipline, pages118–146. Norton, New York, NY, 2002.

[28] Randall D. Germain. The International Organization of Credit. Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.

[29] Robert Gilpin. Global Political Economy: Understanding the Inter-national Economic Order. Princeton University Press, Princeton,NJ, 2001.

[30] Judith Goldstein. Ideas, Institutions, and American trade policy.International Organization, 42(1):179–217, 1988.

[31] Judith L. Goldstein, Douglas Rivers, and Michael Tomz. Institutionsin International Relations: Understanding the Effects of the GATTand the WTO on World Trade. International Organization, 61(1):37–67, January 2007.

21

[32] Joanne Gowa. Alliances, market power, and postwar trade: explain-ing the gatt/wto. World Trade Review, 9(3), 2010.

[33] Gene M. Grossman and Elhanan Helpman. Protection for Sale. TheAmerican Economic Review, 84(4):833–850, 1994.

[34] Alexandra Guisinger. Determining trade policy: Do voters holdpoliticians accountable? International Organization, 66(3):533–557, 2009.

[35] Alexandra Guisinger and David Andrew Singer. Exchange rateproclamations and inflation-fighting credibility. International Orga-nization, 64(2):313–337, 2010.

[36] Stephan Haggard and Sylvia Maxfield. The Political Economy of Fi-nancial Internationalization in the Developing World. InternationalOrganization, 50(1):35–68, 1996.

[37] Jens Hainmueller and Michael J. Hiscox. Learning to love globaliza-tion: Education and individual attitudes toward trade. InternationalOrganization, 60, 2006.

[38] Santhi Hejeebu and Deirdre McCloskey. The reproving of karlpolanyi. Critical Review, 13(3/4):285–314, 1999.

[39] Eric Helleiner. Understanding the 2007-2008 global financial cri-sis: Lessons for scholars of international political economy. AnnualReview of Political Science, 14:67–87, 2011.

[40] Michael J. Hiscox. International Trade & Political Conflict. Prince-ton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2002.

[41] John M. Hobson. Part 1 - revealing the eurocentric foundations ofipe: A critical historiography of the discipline from the classical tothe modern era. Review of International Political Economy, Forth-coming, 2013.

[42] John M. Hobson. Part 2 - reconstructing the non-eurocentric foun-dations of ipe: From eurocentric ‘open economy politics’ to inter-civilizational political economy. Review of International PoliticalEconomy, Forthcoming, 2013.

22

[43] Ethan B. Kapstein. Resolving the Regulator’s Dilemma: Interna-tional Coordination of Banking Regulations. International Organi-zation, 43(2):323–347, 1989.

[44] Robert O. Keohane. The demand for international regimes. Interna-tional Organization, 36(2):325–355, 1982.

[45] Robert O. Keohane. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord inthe World Political Economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton,NJ, 1984.

[46] Robert O. Keohane. The old IPE and the new. Review of Interna-tional Political Economy, 16(1):34–46, 2009.

[47] Moonhawk Kim. Costly Procedures: Divergent Effects of Legaliza-tion in the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures. InternationalStudies Quarterly, 52(3):657–686, September 2008.

[48] Charles Kindleberger. The World in Depression, 1929-1939. Uni-versity of California Press, Berkeley, CA, 1973.

[49] Charles P. Kindleberger and Robert Aliber. Manias, Panics, andCrashes: A History of Financial Crises. John Wiley and Sons, Hobo-ken, NJ, fifth edition, 2005.

[50] Daniel Yuichi Kono. Democracy and Trade Discrimination. The Jour-nal of Politics, 70(4):942–955, September 2008.

[51] Stephen D. Krasner. State power and the structure of internationaltrade. World Politics, 28(3):317–347, 1976.

[52] Stephen D. Krasner. Global Communications and National Power:Life on the Pareto Frontier. World Politics, 43(3):336–366, 1991.

[53] David A. Lake. International Political Economy: A Maturing Inter-discipline. In Barry R. Weingast and Donald Wittman, editors, TheOxford Handbook of Political Economy, pages 1–41. Oxford Univer-sity Press, New York, 2006.

[54] David A. Lake. Open economy politics: A critical review. The Reviewof International Organizations, 4(3):219–244, 2009.

23

[55] David A. Lake. TRIPs across the Atlantic: Theory and epistemol-ogy in IPE. Review of International Political Economy, 16(1):47–57,2009.

[56] David Leblang and Sonal Pandya. The financial crisis of 2007:Our waterloo or take a chance on ipe? International Interactions,35(4):430–435, 2009.

[57] David Leblang and Shanker Satyanath. Institutions, Expectations,and Currency Crises. International Organization, 60(1):245–262,2006.

[58] Xiaobo Lu, Kenneth Scheve, and Matthew J. Slaughter. Inequityaversion and the international distribution of trade protection.American Journal of Political Science, 56(3):638–654, 2013.

[59] Yonatan Lupu and Vincent A. Traag. Trading communities, the net-worked structure of international relations, and the kantian peace.Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2013.

[60] Donald Mackenzie. Opening the black boxes of global finance. Re-view of International Political Economy, 12(4):555–576, 2005.

[61] Donald Mackenzie. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Mod-els Shape Markets. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006.

[62] Daniel Maliniak, Susan Peterson, and Michael J. Tierney. Triparound the world: Teaching, research, and policy views of inter-national relations faculty in 20 countries. Published by the TRIPProject, The Institute for the Theory of Practice of International Re-lations at the College of William and MaryMa, 2012.

[63] Daniel Maliniak and Michael J. Tierney. The American school of IPE.Review of International Political Economy, 16(1):6–33, 2009.

[64] Edward D. Mansfield. The Concentration of Capabilities and Inter-national Trade. International Organization, 46(3):731–764, 1992.

[65] Edward D. Mansfield, Helen V. Milner, and B. Peter Rosendorff. Freeto trade: Democracies, autocracies, and international trade. Amer-ican Political Science Review, 94(2):305–321, 2000.

24

[66] Edward D. Mansfield and Diana C. Mutz. Support for Free Trade:Self-Interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. Interna-tional Organization, 63(3):425–457, 2009.

[67] Kathlenn McNamara. The Currency of Ideas: Monetary Politics inthe European Union. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1999.

[68] Helen V. Milner. The political economy of international trade. An-nual Review of Political Science, 2:91–114, 1999.

[69] Helen V. Milner. Reflections on the field of international politicaleconomy. In Michael Brecher and Frank Harvey, editors, MillenialReflections on International Studies, pages 623–636. University ofMichigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, 2002.

[70] Helen V. Milner and Dustin H. Tingley. Who supports global eco-nomic engagement? the sources of preferences in american foreigneconomic policy. International Organization, 65(1):37–68, 2011.

[71] Layna Mosley. Room to Move: International Financial Marketsand National Welfare States. International Organization, 54(4):737–773, 2000.

[72] Layna Mosley. Global Capital and National Governments. Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2003.

[73] Eric Neumayer and Thomas Plümper. Spatial effects in dyadic data.International Organization, 64(1):145–166, 2010.

[74] Thomas Oatley. International Political Economy. Longman, 5th edi-tion, 2011.

[75] Thomas Oatley. The Reductionist Gamble: Open Economy Politicsin the Global Economy. International Organization, 65(2):311–341,2011.

[76] Thomas Oatley. The political economy of imbalance. Manuscript,2013.

[77] Thomas Oatley and Robert Nabors. Redistributive Cooperation:Market Failure, Wealth Transfers, and the Basle Accord. Interna-tional Organization, 52(1):35–54, January 1998.

25

[78] Thomas Oatley, W. Kindred Winecoff, Sarah Bauerle Danzman, andAndrew Pennock. The political economy of global finance: A net-work model. Perspectives on Politics, 11(133-153), 2013.

[79] Ronen Palan. The new dependency theory. New Left Project, Jan-uary 9 2013.

[80] Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin. Capitalist crises and the crisis thistime. Socialist Register, 2011.

[81] Thomas B. Pepinsky. The global economic crisis and the politics ofnon-transitions. Government and Opposition, 47(2):135–161, 2012.

[82] V. Spike Peterson. How (the meaning of) gender matters in politicaleconomy. New Political Economy, 10(4):499–521, 2005.

[83] Carmen M. Reinhart and Kenneth S. Rogoff. This Time Is Differ-ent: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press,Princeton, NJ, 2009.

[84] Andrew K. Rose. Do we really know that the wto increases trade?The American Economic Review, 94(1):98–114, 2004.

[85] Andrew K. Rose. Do WTO members have more liberal trade policy?Journal of International Economics, 63(2):209–235, 2004.

[86] Leonard Seabrooke. Varieties of economic constructivism in politi-cal economy: Uncertain times call for disparate measures. Reviewof International Political Economy, 14(2):371–385, 2007.

[87] Leonard Seabrooke and John M. Hobson. The case for an everydayinternational political economy. International Center for Businessand Politics, Copenhagen Business School, Working Paper no. 26,2006.

[88] Beth A. Simmons and Zachary Elkins. The Globalization of Liber-alization: Policy Diffusion in the International Political Economy.American Political Science Review, 98(1):171–189, February 2004.

[89] David Andrew Singer. Capital Rules: The Domestic Politics of In-ternational Regulatory Harmonization. International Organization,58(3):531–565, 2004.

26

[90] David Andrew Singer. Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for theInternational Financial System. Cornell University Press, Ithaca,NY, 2007.

[91] Kenneth L. Sokoloff and Stanley L. Engerman. History lessons: In-stitutions, factor endowments, and paths of development in the newworld. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3):217–232, 2000.

[92] Sean Starrs. American economic power hasn’t declined – it global-ized! summoning the data and taking globalization seriously. Inter-national Studies Quarterly, forthcoming, 2013.

[93] Randall W. Stone. The Scope of IMF Conditionality. InternationalOrganization, 62(4):589–620, October 2008.

[94] Susan Strange. Cave! hic dragones: a critique of regime analysis.International Organization, 36(2):479–496, 1982.

[95] Susan Strange. The persistent myth of lost hegemony. InternationalOrganization, 41(4):551–574, 1987.

[96] William R. Thompson and Kentaro Sakuwa. Was wealth really deter-mined in 8000 bce, 1000 bce, 0 ce, or even 1500 ce? Cliodynamics,4(1), 2013.

[97] Immanuel Wallerstein. The Rise and Future Demise of the WorldCapitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis. Compara-tive Studies in Society and History, 16(4):387–415, 1974.

[98] Qingxin K. Wang and Mark Blyth. Constructivism and the study ofinternational political economy in china. Review of InternationalPolitical Economy, forthcoming, 2013.

[99] Michael D. Ward, John S. Ahlquist, and Arturas Rozenas. Gravity’srainbow: Dynamic networks models of international commerce.Network Science, 1(1), 2013.

[100] Erik Wibbels. Dependency Revisited: International Markets, Busi-ness Cycles, and Social Spending in the Deveioping Worid. Interna-tional Organization, 60:433–469, 2006.

[101] W. Kindred Winecoff. Financial power and the global crisis. WorkingPaper.

27

[102] W. Kindred Winecoff. Global banking as a complex political econ-omy. Working Paper, 2013.

[103] W. Kindred Winecoff. Bank regulation, monetary incentives, andmacroeconomic management in oecd economies. InternationalStudies Quarterly, forthcoming, 2014.

Documents

Winecoff_Y669_Fall2013