23
Wind Loading on Historic Covered Bridges Covered Bridges F Michael Bartlett J Peter C King F. Michael Bartlett Civil & Enviro. Engg. J. Peter C. King Boundary Layer Wind T lL b Western Engineering London, Canada Tunnel Laboratory London, Canada

Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

F Michael Bartlett J Peter C KingF. Michael BartlettCivil & Enviro. Engg.

J. Peter C. KingBoundary Layer Wind T l L bWestern Engineering

London, CanadaTunnel LaboratoryLondon, Canada

Page 2: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

This Afternoon’s RoadmapThis Afternoon s Roadmap

• Introduction• Introduction• Existing Wind Provisions for

C d B idCovered Bridges• Wind Tunnel Tests• Data Analysis

– “Cladding” (Roofing and Siding) Loadsg ( g g)– Forces in Main Members

• ConclusionsConclusions

Page 3: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

This project p jinitiated in

OhioOhio…

8th Historic Bridge Conference, Columbus, April 2008

Page 4: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

A gap between bridges and buildings…

• AASHTO Guide Specifications for• AASHTO Guide Specifications for Design of Pedestrian Bridges (1997) specifies 3 6 kPa (75 psf)specifies 3.6 kPa (75 psf)– Seems excessive! May require

t th i d t l ithstrengthening end portals with structural steel

• ASCE Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures less stringent

Page 5: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Some confusion in practiceSome confusion in practiceBridge Source Design LoadBridge Source Design LoadBurkeville Lee & Brenner

(2008)0.58 kPa (12 psf)

Hutchins Bicja (2008) Walls: +/-1.41 kPa (29 psf)Roof: +0.33/-0.88 kPa

(+7/-18 psf)(+7/-18 psf)AASHTO (1997) 3.6 kPa (75 psf)

Research Objective: What load should be used?What load should be used?

Page 6: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Western’s Boundary Layer Wind T l L b tTunnel Laboratory

Page 7: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

“Boundary Layer”

ucdavis.edu

Page 8: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Maumee River Bridge in tunnel

Page 9: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Getting by with a little help from our friends…

H l T & A i t I• Hoyle, Tanner & Associates Inc. graciously provided:

– Drawings of a representative historic covered bridgehistoric covered bridge

– STAAD computer model

– Thoughtful feedback and advice throughout the project!throughout the project!

Page 10: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

H t hi C d B id b fHoyle, Tanner & Assoc., Inc.

Hutchins Covered Bridge – before rehabilitation

Page 11: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

1:40 model by David Mizzeny

204 pressure taps in204 pressure taps in roof, walls, soffit

Page 12: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

P i it M d l Di i WTProximity Model Disc in WT

Page 13: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Test ProgramTest Program

10 i d• 10 wind angles

• 3 water• 3 water clearances

• 3 side opening ratios

Page 14: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Data AnalysisData Analysis

• Cladding pressures• Cladding pressures• Main member force effects• Worst cases for walls with:

– small openingsp g– any water clearance

wind from any direction– wind from any direction

Page 15: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

30 psf 35 psf

Peak Positive NetRoof End

Peak Positive Net Cladding Pressures

Side 45 psf

Soffit

Page 16: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

-80 psf40 psf

-75 psf-40 psf

Peak Negative NetRoof End

Peak Negative Net Cladding Pressures

35 psfSide

-35 psf

Soffit

Page 17: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Hurricane Hugo, North C li 1989Carolina, 1989

Gable Roof Damaged Hip Roof UndamagedGable Roof Damaged Hip Roof Undamaged

Page 18: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Member Forces Analysis

Time historyTime history of pressures

Time historyTime history of member

forcesforces

Page 19: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Comparison of Member ForcespMember

(Force type)WT

AASHTOWT

ASCE 74 5 (Force type) AASHTO ASCE 71 (F) 0.56 0.762 (M) 0.65 0.84

14 5

3 (M) 0.61 0.834 (F) 0.67 1.034 (M) 0.62 0.70

2( ) 0 6 0 0

5 (F) 0.64 0.905 (M) 0.66 0.94Avg 0 63 0 86Avg. 0.63 0.86

3ASCE 7 stringentASCE 7 stringent

AASHTO very stringent

Page 20: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

ConclusionsConclusions1. Check main wind-load resisting g

members using wind loads from ASCE 7 as those specified in pAASHTO (1997) are excessive.

2 The 3 6 kPa (75 psf) press re2. The 3.6 kPa (75 psf) pressure specified by AASHTO is accurate for cladding suctions at the ridge andcladding suctions at the ridge and eave at the end of the roof but is excessive elsewhereexcessive elsewhere.

Page 21: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Paper AvailablePaper Available

Mizzen D King J P C and BartlettMizzen, D., King, J.P.C., and Bartlett, F.M. (2010): “Wind Loading on Historic Covered Bridges” Proceedings of theCovered Bridges . Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Short and Medium Span Bridges Niagaraand Medium Span Bridges, Niagara Falls, Canada.

Request from: [email protected]

Page 22: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Acknowledgementsg• D. Mizzen and T. Scott, Western

Engineering U/G Thesis Students • J. Bicja, S. James and M. Low, Hoyle, j , , y ,

Tanner & Associates Inc., Manchester, New Hampshire , p

• B. Schmidt, Dillon Consulting Ltd., London CanadaLondon, Canada

• Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaResearch Council of Canada

Page 23: Wind Loading on Historic Covered BridgesCovered Bridges

Questions?Q

West Montrose Covered Bridge, Waterloo Region, Ontario (T. Scott photos)

Later: f m bartlett@uwo caLater: [email protected]