Upload
victor-hugo-flores
View
219
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
1/20
2008 Ryder Scott Reserves ConferenceEvaluation Challenges in a Changing World
Tools for Evaluation A Review of the SOS Software
Scott Wilson-Sr. VP., Ryder Scott Company
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
2/20
1
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Reservoir Surveillance and Prediction. Production Engineering.
Integrated databases and custom features.
Easiest way to provide technology advances to
operations staff.
A Suite of Windows based
Petroleum Engineering programsoriginally developed by ARCO from 1980-2000
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
3/20
2
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Forecast Multi-Trend Decline AnalysisProCast Gas Field Deliverability Forecasting
SNAP Nodal Analysis and Artificial Lift
PTA Pressure Transient Analysis
EPEC Excel Based P.E. FunctionsTank Graphical Material Balance
Core Programs
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
4/203
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Low Usage Programs
Patternflood
BeamPump Rod Pump Analysis
Wellbore Wellbore Schematics
BubbleMap Time Variable Bubble mapping
Waterflood Pattern Balancing
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
5/204
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Designed and developed by ARCO Engineers and Specialistprogrammers.
An 18 year effort by a 5-10 person team. Specifically customized to meet
demonstrated operating district needs.
Growth Period 1980-1998
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
6/205
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Outsourced to Dwights and Geographix.
Suite broken into freestanding tools.
Formally abandoned whenBP acquired ARCO.
Harvesting Period 1998-2000
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
7/206
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
RSC acquired the rights to maintain and
distribute the programs in 2000. Specialized Oilfield Software (SOS)
registered users growing 2-5 users / day. Licenses are provided free to clients.
Significant enhancements funded each yearby BP, ConocoPhillips, Petroskills, others.
Maintenance & user funded enhancements
Starting in 2000
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
8/207
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
0 5 10 15 20 25
BP
ConocoPhillips
Devon Energy Corp.
Apache Corp.
Dominion E&P, Inc.
Chesapeake Energy Corp.
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips Canada
Repsol YPF
Saudi Aramco
Vico Indonesia
New field Exploration Co.
Niko Resources Ltd.
Petro-Canada
Weatherford
Aera Energy LLC
Edge Petroleum Corp.
EnCana Corp.
Oil India Ltd.
Samson
St. Mary Land & Exploration Co.
Sw ift Energy Co.
TNK-BP
BP AlaskaKhalda Petroleum Co.
Nance Petroleum Corp.
Newfield Exploration
Pertamina
Petrom S.A.
Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd
Petroproduccion
PetroSantander Inc.
Prize Petroleum Company L td.
Questar Exploration & Production
Rally Energy Corp.
Venoco, Inc.
W&T Off shore, Inc.
Whiting Petroleum Corp.
1 10 100 1000
USA
Canada
Indonesia
India
Argentina
Malaysia
United Kingdom
Australia
Russia
Colombia
Egypt
Venezuela
PakistanTrinidad and Tobago
Ecuador
Saudi Arabia
Vietnam
China
Romania
Mexico
Kazakhstan
Libya
Denmark
TurkeySpain
Japan
The Netherlands
Nigeria
France
Thailand
Algeria
Oman
Myanmar
Russian Federation
Brazil
United Arab Emirates
Bulgaria
Bolivia
Registered Users
950 Re istered users as of earl 2008
Company Distribution Country Distribution
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
9/208
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Large User Coordinators : Single Point of Contact (SPOC)ConocoPhillips : Tom Nations, Grant Dornan, David Lagerlef BP : Erin Authier- OBrien, Scott LaVoie (SLB)
Exxon Mobil : Juan UlibariCimarex : Eddie FetkovitchQuestar Market Resources : Chuck Stanley (?)
Weatherford : Toby Pugh
Approximately 2500 total userscoordinators, training licenses not tracked through registration
5-6 University Licenses Managed By Professors
Hundreds of Petroskills Nodal School Students
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
10/209
Six different Forecasting OptionsArps in 4 mouse clicksP/Z & Decline synchronizationWOR-CumGOR-CumDrilling Schedule / Type-well planning
Import Dwights Data, cut and paste, or
ODBC link directly to Client Databases
The first system to model multi-trend Declines
Multi-Trend Decline AnalysisForecast
Used to monitor 500,000 bopd at Prudhoe and Kuparuk
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
11/2010
Pipelines
Compressors
NGL Processing
An integrated Nodal/Network forecasting system
Integrated Gas Field Planning
Platforms
Flow Splitters
Well performance
Pre-defined rates
Manifolds
RO ASTP C
LNG Plant s
Line Loops
CO2 removal
nine well performance models
eight pipeline/tubing hydraulics models
CBM Langmuir / Hydrate models
User defined design/analysis objects
Spreadsheet and Network interfaces
Reservoir/well/facility rate forecasting
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
12/2011
Critical lifting rates, mixture velocities, erosionalvelocities, and PVT properties reported every 200 feet.
Complex wellbores with up-casing/tubing and down-annular for multi-zones
The standard gas lift design tool used by ConocoPhillips, BP, and soon Exxon
Links with fieldwide optimization models (Procast)
Fully editable presentation quality graphics
A state of the art Nodal system
Well Performance and Artificial Lift AnalysisNAPS
0
2000
4000
6000
0 40000 80000 120000 160000 200000 240000
B o
t t o m
H o
l e P r e s s u r e
( p s
i g )
Total Gas Rate (mscf/d)
Yacheng 13-1 A 1 static matchReservoir DataPressure = 5557kh = 18676.0Skin = -1.00
Yca11999match.snpDensity = 12.000Perf Diam = 0.50Penetration = 8.00
Rate vs. Pressure09-Feb-99 08:18:36Depth (MD) = 12130 WHPres = 3379Tubing I.D. = 6.184 (s1)
Consistently judged easier to learn and use than all other Nodal packages
Simulator Hydraulics table builder for Eclipse,VIP, PSIM, ACRES
Custom database connections for loading test data,archivin datasets and AI Batch troubleshootin .
Restriction and choke pressure drops
N u S n a p D e f a u l t D a t a S e t . s n p - S i mu l a t o r T a b l e O u t p u t : F T P - 5 0 0 . 0 0 0 W C U T - 0 . 0 0 0
6 5 4 96 0 0 65 4 6 34 9 2 14 3 7 83 8 3 63 2 9 32 7 5 02 2 0 81 6 6 511 2 2
58 0
Multi-zone completions with crossflow.
User defined PVT and IPR
Relative permeability effects
Perforated & GP Completion effectsAll meaningful Tubing Hydraulics correlations
Deviated, stimulated, and partially penetrated
Full featured multi-segment horizontal, multistage fractured wells, and PVT
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
13/20
12
Gas Well Heat Transf er Spreadsheet
INPUT:
variable: value: units: Comp mole %
True V Depth 14500 'TVD C1 90Flow ID 2.75 inches C2 10Roughness 0.00065 inches C3 0SG gas 0.7 (air = 1.00) C4 0%H2S 0.00 % C5 0%CO2 3.50 % C6 0%N2 0.00 % C7 0Qg (+ for prod) 5000 mcfpd C8 0P wh 1200 psi
Ambient Surface T 70 Deg FSI BHT 350 Deg FHeat Flux 0.992 btu/(hr-degf-ft) Est WHT = 54.25 Fheat cap 0.52 btu/(lb-degf)gas jt effect 0 deg/psiFrom Component AnalysisTc 380.7718 Deg RPc 674.8221 Psia total error 0 btu/hr SG Gas 0.60233 (air = 1.00) Solve Tol. 500 btu/hr heat cap 0.51474 btu/(lb-degf) Solve Loops 1 loops
Depth Fraction depth Amb temp WB temp WB prs density length delt temp ave temp dif heat loss/hr heat gain/hr diff
0 0 80 54 1200.00 5.531 145.0 -26 -18 -2574 -2574 00.02 290 60 50 1213.87 5.902 217.5 -10 0 -11 -11 00.05 725 40 50 1235.11 6.386 362.5 10 20 7260 7260 0
0.1 1450 30 60 1270.63 6.743 362.5 30 34 12132 12132 00.15 2175 40 77 1305.53 6.531 362.5 37 36 13038 13038 0
0.2 2900 60 95 1339.51 6.141 725.0 35 34 24214 24214 00.3 4350 100 132 1405.09 5.601 1450.0 32 30 43701 43701 00.5 7250 175 204 1529.61 4.991 1450.0 29 26 37497 37497 00.7 10150 250 273 1648.46 4.632 1087.5 23 23 25277 25277 0
0.85 12325 300 324 1735.15 4.457 1087.5 24 12 12739 12739 01 14500 350 350 1821.18 4.444 0 0 0
-16000
-14000
-12000
-10000
-8000
-6000
-4000
-2000
00 100 200 300 400Features
Widely used Petroleum Engineering Utilities In Single-Cell functions
Excel Petroleum Engineering CalculatorEPEC
Gas Formation Volume Factor & Standing z Value
Bg(RB/Mscf)
z (vol/vol)
0
2
4
6
8
0 2 4 6
Pressure (1000's of psia)
Bg
0.8
0.9
1.0
z
Viscosity
Mu Gas
Mu Oil
Mu Water
0.01
0.1
1
10
0 2 4 6
Pressure (1000's of psia)
Viscosity
(cp)
Compressibility
C gas
C oil (us)
C water
C oil(apparent)
1 E-6
1 E-5
1 E-4
1 E-3
1 E-2
0 2 4 6
Pressure (1000's of psia)
c(psi -1)
Formation Volume Factor & Solution GOR
Bo(RB/STB)
Bw(RB/STB)
Rs(Mscf/STB
)
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
0 1 2 3 4 5
Pressure (1000's of psia)
Boor Bw
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
Rs
PVT properties (HP41 Fluids Pak)
- Z factor (CO2, H2S, N2)- Viscosity
Utility Functions
- Table interpolation.
- Pressure Drops (static, 2, 3 phase).
- Text Parsing.
Incorporate complex math into Excel.
Functions are used in your spreadsheets.
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
14/20
13
State-of-the-art Well Test Design and Analysis
Pressure Transient AnalysisPTA
0.1 1.0 10.0 100.0 1000.0
0.10
1.00
10.00
100.00
tD/CD
P D
a n
d D e r i v a
t i v e
3-29-14-20 Pressure Build-up test
CalculatedPressureCalculated DerivativeMeasuredPressureMeasuredDerivative
Homogeneous (Storage and Skin) Permeability Skin East, No Flow West, No Flow North, No Flow South, Const. Press. Radius ofInvestigation
[md][0][ft][ft][ft][ft][ft]
10/23/06
=======
17-0.221142114274.1747137711:37:03
(Fixed)(Fixed)1.669e+0041.669e+00417.0839.64
CalculatedPressureCalculated DerivativeMeasuredPressureMeasuredDerivative
Homogeneous (Storage and Skin) Permeability Skin East, No Flow West, No Flow North, No Flow South, Const. Press. Radius ofInvestigation
[md][0][ft][ft][ft][ft][ft]
10/23/06
=======
17-0.221142114274.1747137711:37:03
(Fixed)(Fixed)1.669e+0041.669e+00417.0839.64
Oil, Gas, or Water wells
Design and analysis options
drawdown, build-up,injectivity, and fall-off testing.
Deliverability Analysis
Diagnostic Plots
Straight Line analysis
Manual Type Curve Matching
Automatic type curve matching
Text and graphical reports :Simple cut and paste capability
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
15/20
14
State-of-the-art Well Test Design and Analysis
Pressure Transient AnalysisPTA
0 50 100 1501000
2000
3000
1200
1700
2200
2700
Delta Time(hrs)
P r e s s u r e ( p s i )
R a t e ( M s c f / D )
Gauge Selection/Manipulation
Gauge BGauge AGauge CGas FlowRate
Gauge BGauge AGauge CGas FlowRate
Simulation of full test sequencefor test design and what-ifs
Multiple Gauges with effectively infinite point count
Well1 BUwith Pulse
Well2 BU withinterference
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
16/20
15
An integrated set of analytical tools
Oil, Gas, Aquifers
All common methods + Sills
Unique Outline Style user interface
A comprehensive Material Balance Program
Material Balance Analysis and ForecastingT ANK
Tank is a powerful analytical tool for reviewing and predicting the performance of combination drive oil and gas reservoirs. Tankcouples a general form of the material balance equation with a choice of analytical aquifer models, allowing it to handle a widerange of hydrocarbon fluid types and reservoir drive mechanisms. Given a reservoirs performance history, Tank can be used toestimate original hydrocarbons in place and aquifer size and strength. Once these parameters have been quantified, Tank may beused to review and redict reservoir and a uifer erformance usin a variet of anal tical techni ues.
Beampump Bubblemap
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
17/20
16
Programs available for customization and implementation
Beampump, Bubblemap,Patternflood, and Wellbore
Patternflood: A map based plotting and material balance packagethat balances voidage, influx, injection, and fluxthrough a fields waterflood patterns. Although datainput is significant, resulting pattern balancingresults can be used to more efficiently managewaterflood injection and withdrawal. The functionalityin this program is superseded by both DSS and OFM.
Tools for Evaluation :
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
18/20
17
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
Maintain and improve viable programs.Petroskills funded SI units upgrade to SNAP
Rebuild help files to be Windows Vista combatable.
Add steam lift for SAGD producers.
Confirm multi-stage fracture transient treatment incomplex wellbores.
Formalize relationships withWeatherford (jet pumps) and Exxon (Gas Lift).
Near-term Plans
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
19/20
Tools for Evaluation :
8/10/2019 Wilson Presentation 2008.Tools for Evaluation
20/20
19
Tools for Evaluation :A review of the SOS Software
www.ryderscott.com SOS Software menu item
1) Request passwords2) Download software
Mike Wysatta
Pam LeslieScott Wilson
Questions?