1
Why, Why, Why DELILA? Catherine Robertson University of Birmingham Background 1 Aims 2 Work packages 3 1) IL Audit 2) Mapping of digital/information literacy to HEA framework 3) Review of content, to ensure content can be made open 4) Conversion of material to appropriate format (licensing etc) 5) Repository customisation 6) Deposit of content 7) Dissemination and publicity 8) Quality control and evaluation 5 4 To provide a model for embedding digital and information literacy support into teacher training at HE level; To release digital and information literacy open educational resources (OERs) for embedding into institutional teacher training courses eg PGCerts; To customise local repositories to provide access to these resources. DELILA - Developing Educators’ Learning and Information Literacy for Accreditation PGCert could make use of generic Information and Digital Literacy material Many librarians have already created valuable resources Sharing helps model best practice and saves time and money. It is also good for your institution and your reputation Lessons learned Key points Keep IL/DL material in a single place Make OER considerations a key part of creator workflow eg embedding Creative Commons information Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is a big issue and needs to be discussed at the highest institutional levels – need institutional permission to release institutional OERs Creative Commons licences - we agreed to use 3.0 but plug-in for automatic integration into word/PPT automatically attributes 2.5 Audit of material – a great way of identifying material which may otherwise be overlooked. Mapping to main frameworks - UK Standard Professional Framework; Sconul 7 Pillars, FutureLab Digital Literacy Framework; CORRE framework (Content. Openess. Re-Use and Repurpose. Evidence.) Conversion to OER format – Simple changes such as addition of Creative Commons licence, creating alternative versions in different formats, etc Customisation of Institutional Repository – better look and feel; metadata amended to allow framework metadata to be added; links to Web 2.0 options Deposit – once items are deposited in the IR, we want to utilise auto- harvesting into OpenJorum http://delilaopen.wordpress .com/ http:// epapers.bham.ac.uk /DELILA Catherine Robertson [email protected] k

Why, Why, Why DELILA? Catherine Robertson University of Birmingham

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Why, Why, Why DELILA? Catherine Robertson University of Birmingham. 4. 1. Background. Lessons learned. 5. DELILA - Developing Educators’ Learning and Information Literacy for Accreditation PGCert could make use of generic Information and Digital Literacy material - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Why, Why, Why DELILA? Catherine Robertson University of Birmingham

Why, Why, Why DELILA?Catherine Robertson

University of Birmingham

Background1

Aims2

Work packages3

1) IL Audit2) Mapping of digital/information literacy to

HEA framework3) Review of content, to ensure content can

be made open4) Conversion of material to appropriate

format (licensing etc)5) Repository customisation6) Deposit of content7) Dissemination and publicity8) Quality control and evaluation

5

4

To provide a model for embedding digital and information literacy support into teacher training at HE level;

To release digital and information literacy open educational resources (OERs) for embedding into institutional teacher training courses eg PGCerts;

To customise local repositories to provide access to these resources.

DELILA - Developing Educators’ Learning and Information Literacy for Accreditation

PGCert could make use of generic Information and Digital Literacy materialMany librarians have already created valuable resources

Sharing helps model best practice and saves time and money. It is also good for your institution and your reputation

Lessons learned

Key points

Keep IL/DL material in a single place

Make OER considerations a key part of creator workflow eg embedding Creative Commons information

Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is a big issue and needs to be discussed at the highest institutional levels – need institutional permission to release institutional OERs

Creative Commons licences - we agreed to use 3.0 but plug-in for automatic integration into word/PPT automatically attributes 2.5

Audit of material – a great way of identifying material which may otherwise be overlooked.

Mapping to main frameworks - UK Standard Professional Framework; Sconul 7 Pillars, FutureLab Digital Literacy Framework; CORRE framework (Content. Openess. Re-Use and Repurpose. Evidence.)

Conversion to OER format – Simple changes such as addition of Creative Commons licence, creating alternative versions in different formats, etc

Customisation of Institutional Repository – better look and feel; metadata amended to allow framework metadata to be added; links to Web 2.0 options

Deposit – once items are deposited in the IR, we want to utilise auto-harvesting into OpenJorum

http://delilaopen.wordpress.com/

http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/DELILA

Catherine Robertson

[email protected]