Why the artworld is the New Communist International

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Why the artworld is the New Communist International

    1/1

    ArtReview44

    Cover of issue 6 of the English-language

    version ofThe Communist International, October 1919

    Mike Watson Why the artworld is the new Communist International

    During his 1996 party conference speech,

    Tony Blair famously said, Ask me my three

    main priorities for government and I tell you:

    education, education and education. In part

    for the audacity of such a sentence it sets out

    to identify three priorities for government and

    settles for one and in part for the shift in focus

    that it at least ostensibly embodied, this line

    has entered the consciousness so much as to be

    instantly recognisable 17 years later. On reflec-

    tion, the sincerity of Blairs sentiments is

    questionable. The former prime minister did

    preside over the introduction of tuition fees

    after a commitment to keep to Conservative

    party spending plans in the first term of oce,

    and then a further rise in fees. Indeed it was

    Labour that commissioned the education review

    that led to the recent third rise in fees in the

    , to between 6,000 and 9,000 per year.

    The corporatisation of higher education is a

    trajectory that crosses over party boundaries

    and has gained so much momentum as to be

    beyond challenge through conventional

    political channels. It is arguably for this reason

    that education has increasingly taken the centre

    ground in political and social discourse in the

    period since Blair made his famous speech.

    Where education was once seen as a soft

    policy area secondary in mainstream politics to

    economics, fiscal policy, foreign policy and law

    and punishment, it is now seen as fundamental

    to political discourse both at a mainstream and

    alternative level. This shift in focus is arguably

    motivated by two principal factors. Firstly,

    the final collapse of Soviet Communism during

    the late 1980s and early 1990s, followed by a

    massive collapse in the worldwide economy that

    started in 2007, and the inability of the political

    left to mobilise with convincing alternatives to

    capitalism in the intervening 17 years, has left

    us in need of new modes of thinking and new

    strategies for which our current knowledge

    base is clearly inadequate. Secondly, while the

    academic left fails to provide convincing

    alternative social models, funding has been

    stripped in the and this is increasingly

    reflected throughout Europe from the subject

    areas that might most reasonably be expected

    to deliver those alternatives. We have a situation

    in which people need to get into debt to study

    a narrowing range of subjects that are increas-

    ingly reflective of the needs of industry. Taken

    to its ultimate conclusion, such a system will

    soon be lending money to as many people as

    possible to school them in the principles of the

    financial model which they will pay into when

    they graduate and begin to work in the interests

    of that same model.

    With the nation state in the being

    hollowed out, emptied of its social responsi-

    bility and reduced to the position of a defender

    of the rights of the powerful without losing any

    of its power to enforce law and intimidate,

    it must fall to others to pose a viable alternative

    to the current system. In light of the diminish-

    ment of the states role, a nonstatist option must

    be prepared by the political left, regardless of

    whether individuals personally veer towards

    a statist vision of politics. This is simply because,

    following the current trajectory, we will soon

    have a situation in which the state resembles

    little else than a malevolent giant guarding the

    palace against the hordes. Without an alterna-

    tive to the values that it enforces through

    a mixture of instruction and coercion, the sum

    of human knowledge will become reducible

    to what is useful to the financial machine

    the aforementioned palace.

    What relevance does this have to art?

    Well, as Mark Fisher put it, talking at

    a conference entitled Joan of Art: Towards

    a Free Education, organised by myself and

    held at , Rome, in April of this year, the

    artworld in a sense replaces the Communist

    International as a worldwide network and

    refuge for alternative thought.

    In light of a convincing

    alternative existing in reality,

    it is left to the artworld to

    feign one: to grow an alterna-

    tive within the empty husk

    left over from the dismantling

    of the state.

    Joan of Art:

    Towards a Free

    Education is

    in residence

    with Gervasuti

    Foundation,

    Venice, for

    the duration of

    the Biennale