Why I Killed Gandhi

� � �

�

�

(https://www.facebook.com/SanskritiCultureOfIndia) (https://twitter.com/IndianSanskriti)(https://plus.google.com/u/0/105871646788034619689/posts) (http://www.youtube.com

/user/SanskritiCulture/) (http://feeds.feedburner.com/sanskritimagazine/krKO)

MOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLESMOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLESMOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLESMOST POPULAR AND TALKED ABOUT ARTICLES

Why I Killed GandhiWhy I Killed GandhiWhy I Killed GandhiWhy I Killed Gandhi

Nathuram Godse’s Final Address to the Court

�(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/vedic_science/indias-mathematical-heritage/)

�(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/indian-religions/buddhism/heart-sutra/)

�(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/contact/)

↸(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/search/)

((((http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/))))

Our New Initiative: Water Booths (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/charitable-initiatives/new-initiative-water-booths/)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/history/akbar-great-monarch-

tyrant/)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/indian-religions/hinduism

/scientific-reason-behind-hanging-leaves-doors/)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/ethical_living/varakhsilver-

foil-vegetarian/)

‹ ›

Translate »

Share this with your friends

Why I Killed Gandhi http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/india/why-i-killed-gandhi/

1 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinated Gandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by

Nandlal Mehta at the Tughlak Road Police station at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera, began

on May 27, 1948 and concluded on February 10, 1949. He was sentenced to death.

An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then in session at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was

upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godse before the Court on the May

5, 1949.

Such was the power and eloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla, later wrote, “I

have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with

the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought a verdict of ‘not Guilty’ by an overwhelming

majority”

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/08FL_NOORANI_GODSE_1337247g.jpg)WHY I KILLED GANDHI(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/?s=gandhi&x=0&y=0)Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/indian-religions/hinduism/) religion, Hindu

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/indian-religions/hinduism/) history and Hindu culture

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/culture/). I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism

as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious

allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of

untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste

movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and

should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste

or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins,

27kLikeLike

34

Planting Potalibaba.com

Supplies Made to Order from World's Largest Supplier Base. Top Deals!






168K 539 15Share 195 169K

Translate »



2 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the

company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai

Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/india/) and some prominent countries like England , France ,

America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied

very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two

ideologies have contributed more to the molding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the

last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as

a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty

crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/india/) , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me

naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to

believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her

to render true service to humanity as well.

Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress

first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their

intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com

/india/was-gandhis-non-violence-really-true/) which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No

sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in

them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you

imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty

principles in its normal life from day to day.

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads

/2014/02/Jinnah_Gandhi.jpg)In fact, honour, duty and love

of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel

us to disregard non-violence

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/india/was-gandhis-

non-violence-really-true/) and to use force. I could never

conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is

unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to

resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by

use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a

tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness;

and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered

Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama,

Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of

human action.

In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and





(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/search/) Translate »



3 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower

and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s

towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has

merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought

untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the

Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to

them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded

me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/?s=gandhi&

x=0&y=0) should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold

the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he

developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or

wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand

aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02

/hqdefault.jpg)Against such an attitude there can be no halfway

house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to

be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity,

whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry

on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every

thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience

movement; no other could know the technique of that movement.

He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The

movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make

no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his

own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the

judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe

austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.

Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or

place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility

Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhi’s

pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It

is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the

beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims

did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is

no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken,

but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the

Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that

Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him

�(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/vedic_science/indias-mathematical-heritage/

�(





)

http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/indian-religions/buddhism/heart-sutra/)


4 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to

be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a

massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what

was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935

to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to

Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in

September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception,

but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they

were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign

as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord

Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted

of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the

bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the

Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy

and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over

power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave

us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved

after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls

‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally

burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd

and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When

top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country –

which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death

related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in

Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and

censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that

while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in

Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast

had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the

Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by

his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/3312431-9935.jpg)Gandhi is being

referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he

has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that

Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual

power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron

will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined,

and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all

my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the

Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be

powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be








5 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may

even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or

foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the

course founded on the reason which I consider to be

necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the

final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it

to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my

hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th

January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House.

I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and

destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be

brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually

but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly

favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due

to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are

at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of

season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the

theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement

towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I

have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be

considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish

that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action

has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest

writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

Also Check - The Little Known Dark Side of Gandhi ( http://www.sanskritimagazine.com

/india/the-little-known-dark-side-of-gandhi/)

You may also like:

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/history/secret-indian-army-of-hitler/)








6 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM








7 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com

/indian-religions

/sikhism/hind-

ki-chadar-

the-shielder-

of-the-hindus/)

HIND KI

CHADAR – The

Shielder of the

Hindus


/indian-religions

/sikhism/hind-

ki-chadar-

the-shielder-

of-the-hindus/)


/india/the-clay-

image-history-

of-indias-

clay-deities/)

The Clay Image

– History of

India’s Clay

Deities


/india/the-clay-

image-history-

of-indias-

clay-deities/)


/india

/was-gandhis-

non-violence-

really-true/)

Was Gandhi’s

Non-Violence

Really True ?


/india

/was-gandhis-

non-violence-

really-true/)


/india/hey-are-

you-indian/)

Hey! Are You

Indian?!!


/india/hey-are-

you-indian/)


/history/reality-

of-aurangzeb-

the-tyrant/)

Reality of

Aurangzeb, The

Tyrant


/history/reality-

of-aurangzeb-

the-tyrant/)


/india/relevance-

of-sanskrit-

in-the-

modern-age/)

Relevance of

Sanskrit in the

Modern Age


/india/relevance-

of-sanskrit-

in-the-

modern-age/)


/india/more-

to-indian-

food-than-curry-

spices/)

More to Indian

Food than “Curry

& Spices”


/india/more-

to-indian-

food-than-curry-

spices/)


/india/hindu-

is-a-coward/)

Hindu is a

Coward


/india/hindu-

is-a-coward/)


/history/gandhis-

principle-peace-

bogus/)

Gandhi’s

Principle of

Peace Was

“Bogus”: Gopal

Godse


/history/gandhis-

principle-peace-

bogus/)


/india/a-brief-

history-

of-reservations-

in-india/)

A Brief History of

Reservations in

India


/india/a-brief-

history-

of-reservations-

in-india/)


/history/qutub-

minar-or-dhurva-

stambha/)

Qutub Minar or

Dhurva Stambha


/history/qutub-

minar-or-dhurva-

stambha/)


/india/wake-

up-india-before-

it-is-too-late/)

Wake up India,

before it is too

late


/india/wake-

up-india-before-

it-is-too-late/)


/india/who-do-

we-actually-

owe-our-

freedom-to/)

Who Do We

Actually Owe

Our Freedom

To?


/india/who-do-


/india/kalka-

shimla-railway-

line/)

Kalka Shimla

Railway Line


/india/kalka-

shimla-railway-

line/)








8 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

55 Responses to "Why I Killed Gandhi"

Pingback: The Little Known Dark Side of Gandhi | Sanskriti - Culture of India (http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/india/the-little-known-dark-side-of-gandhi/)

Pingback: Gandhi’s Killer speaks about why he did what he di | Global Eyes Magazine(http://gemwinnipeg.wordpress.com/2014/02/03/gandhis-killer-speaks-about-why-he-did-what-he-di/)

27kLikeLike

34

� Asish Keshri

True!

� February 9, 2014 at 3:38 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=616#respond)

� Sampro

Certainly the tall claims of India only for Hindus makes me think, whether ever Godsethought of an egalitarian society about which he says he strived hard. I too would havebeen happy if the Indian sub-continent was 1 nation. See the fruits the seed of India’sdivision has reaped. Year after year riots and outrage hatred against each other in all thecountries of this sub-continent. But nevertheless the hope still stays alive. I want to see anegalitarian society.

� February 10, 2014 at 7:56 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Sheila

Godse was bang-on in his thoughts. Mohanlal Gandhi started acting like Mahatma.Demanding people treat him like one and that’s what happened. Which is why, Nehru andnot Vallabh bhai Patel became the PM. However, killing him didn’t solve anything. I respectGandhi for getting us to a place where he is today, but Godse is right in his own right.

� February 12, 2014 at 10:09 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=689#respond)� Biju

Its Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi.. and not Mohanlal. Mohanlal is a Kerala FilmStar…. Killing someone, whatever your reasons might be is not correct. If youcannot give life, you dont have the right to take one…. Also, Godse wascompletely illogical in his thoughts… One cannot discount the fact that he was astaunch supporter of Hinduism and ny other religion was unacceptable to him..Just like Jinnah wanted a Muslim state, he wanted a Hindu state…. No differencethere…. I wont say that MK Gandhi was the Father of the Nation or Mahatma…he was also selfish in his deeds… He was the prime factor responsible for thedivision of India… However, in effect, it was a right decision…. A gangrenousfoot, a cancerous organ needs to be removed to preserve the body…. Thegangrene that is Pak was removed….although in mistake…. So Godse can rantall he want… Killing someone is not right…. even if that person has committedgenocide…. there has to be a trial and teh courts will decide… thats whatdemocracies are for… else we descend into anarchy

� May 9, 2014 at 4:45 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi







168K

539

15Share

195

169K

Translate »



9 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

� vivek Singh Grewal

The article is welcome as it brings forward a different aspect of an important historic eventand healthy discussions from all sides is welcome. But I have seen people buying thisabove rhetoric and am compelled to comment on the fundamentally wrong underlyingassumptions that Godse here makes:

* That India, the then geographical identity is only for Hindus. Think for a second, does aMuslim child whose family has lived in U.P. for more than 30 generations not intrinsicallybelong to U.P. or India?

*That allaying the fears of minorities always amounts to appeasement. We need toremember the basic responsibility of the majority community -in democratic polity- to allaythe fears arising from possibility of majoritarian rule and exclusion. Think of being in a partof closed home of 10 people of which 2 are of a different (supposedly clashing) ideology.The fear of the 2 in minority -of being overpowered- would be immense. If one of the 8 here(=Gandhi) talks of listening to the 2 he must not be branded a appeaser rather a sympatiser.

* Godse lays the blame of partition blatantly on congress and Gandhi. Sure they did “allow”it to happen in the end but the rot that had already been set in, firstly by the divide and rulepolicy over decades and later capitalised upon by an opportuinistic section of muslim elites,has not been emphasised enough and the situational blame has been assumed to becompletely on congress. Though arguably some other options could have been take bycongress.

* That overzealous nationality -bordering on jingoism- based on religion or race can be avirtue. Veneration of the nation without adequate degree of moderation by a humanisticworldview would actually make the world all but a battleground as was the case in the worldwars.

* And most importantly he assumes that ‘offensive’ use of violence can be justified,especially in the modern world, that too by citing the barbaric medieval and mythologicaltimes in the name of patriots who fought in a different context.

Personally I feel Gandhi had often tried to keep aloof of influencing too much when some ofhis ideological preferences were too far off. For instance resigning from congress over theissue of council entry in 1934. He had also refused to formally join the servants of indiasociety in 1915 on realising that his ideology is different and it would be wrong to imose iton others. One must look into his lucid writings for a peek into his decision making processover such matters. That he did this to gain traction over congress decision making can onlybe said to be out of place from his overall personality.

Conversely the blame of imposition of one’s eccentric ideology onto the world aroundoneself can be put on Godse himself for more than anything else in taking such an extremedecision of committing murder admittedly ‘speaking to noone whatsoever’.


Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� SEO Company USA

I am sure your name is not what you have written. Any sensible Indian except forthe fanatic radicals cannot come upto this conclusion that you have drawn. Yourdays of appeasement are over. Its our nation, our culture, our history. FromKashmir to Kanyakumari, we have called upon our own demise by beingsubmissive tolerant to such barbaric savages. Not anymore, India has to knowakbar Babar and all their line of savages were tyrant cunts. India has to knowabout Bose Godse and the true colors of Gandhi.

Har Har Mahadev

� May 7, 2014 at 6:51 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi









10 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

� Arunima

Mr/Ms SEO Company USA, whatever is being talked of is history, andhistory is important to learn lessons- the right lessons. Imagine a lifewhere the religion, caste, creed etc of the person does not concernyou… life in such a world would be so simple. From these articles, ibelieve one should not concentrate on the endless debate of whetherGandhi was was a mahatma or a devil in disguise or whether godse wasa criminal or an angel in disguise…. we are not gaining anything fromthis debate- both are dead. i believe the important lesson her is to riseabove these divisive forces of nation, religion, language etc andrecognise and respect each person for what they inherently are- ahuman being.. why can’t people accept the greatness of every culture,language and religion??? who gives anybody the right to demean theother person’s social identity and declare your own as supreme? Bothconcentrated on divisive forces- in different ways- but none tried todissolve them… none tried to create a nation where all this are justmere labels but not THE most important thing… Godse accuses Gandhiof promoting Hindustani… but tell me one thing, what about the rest ofthe indian population who do not speak Hindi??? yes- Hindi is anOFFICIAL language- which is enough for the purpose of integratedcommunication. what is the requirement of a national language when nolanguage is one that is spoken by the majority?? We boast of Unity indiversity but we make every effort to wipe out diversity… the onlylesson to be learnt here is that Diversity is beautiful. the other thing iwant to point out is the nature of revenge. yes, we can punish thosePARTICULAR individuals who might have murdered/ raped the victimsbut you cannot blame the entire RELIGION for that… i hope you willagree with me.

� May 7, 2014 at 2:56 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� ajay

Dear,A nation which forgets its History is doomed to Repeat it.I was also thinking like u,but i have changed my notion.If ucheck History u will find out Hinduisim is not a predatorReligion so u can expect all others to live peacefully side byside..yes we cant blame the entire Religion but if u check theHistory u will have to Blame them.check what is the fate ofRed indians in US, Aborginals in Australia,Moaris in Newzelandthey r all silently wiped out by the saviors of Democracy.Theother culture silently poppulating to compete with the westernculture.All the problems in the world for the past 2000 yrs rb’cse of these two culture which want to show their God isGreat.our culture questions their very foundation of their belief&

� May 8, 2014 at 5:58 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Priyesh Pachori

Sir I will comment on your post in order of the comments that you have made.1. Sure if a person’s family has been living in the country for the past 30 centuriesthen that person irrespective of cast, religion, colour, etc. belongs to India andhas equal rights to any other citizen Hindu or otherwise. But the keyword here isEQUAL rights and not favouritism or bias. Gandhiji continuously showed biastowards the Muslim community ONLY. So it became a matter of favouritism. Hadhe done the same towards all other minorities it would not have been an issue.And on top of all this Muslims did not reciprocate in kind.

� May 7, 2014 at 1:17 pm







Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi



11 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

2. There is a difference between being an appeaser and being sympathetic. Dr.B.R. Ambedkar was sympathetic towards backward communities in general andthat is why he introduced the reservation system for the period of 10 years tohelp them grow. Where as Gandhiji only cared about appeasing the Muslims andthis shows time and again by the actions he took.3. Any major decision for the government is taken by the leaders of the country.Hence the division of the country was done after the consent of the leaders attime. Also, Muslim League led by Jinnah wanted the partition and not anyone else.This goes on to show how weak our leaders were that they could not prevent thepartition of the country, especially Gandhiji who was revered as the father of thenation.4. The point being made here by Godse is not about nationality. It is about theways of Gandhiji showing unwanted and unreciprocated favours towards theMuslim community. And if you take a moment to read about Godse you will cometo understand that he was not into jingoism. He was the member of RSS whichserved the people irrespective of their religion.5. As far as the issue of violence goes, let me tell you what he means by that.Suppose you are in your house and some random person walks in and gives youtwo slaps across your face. Will you simply smile at him and let it go? Though afollower of non-violence you might be, at the very least you will ask that personANGRILY the reasons for slapping you. In those days it was the same situation.The Britishers harassed us, bullied us, looted us, killed us in our own country.Then the muslims raped, plundered, killed the hindus during partition and the manyriots that took place. If after all this you think that using violence offensively toprotect ones family, sanity, possessions, simply to protect oneself as a humanbeing, is wrong then I think you need to grow a pair of balls.Though Gandhiji has done some amazing things for the country but his decisionshave led to severe loss of life, money, efforts and resources and no matter howgreat a human being he might have been the losses caused due to his decisionscannot be justified. The article presented above is just an excerpt. I suggest youread this book called “Murder of the Mahtma” written by G.D. Khosla to get a fullunderstanding of the facts. Here is an example for you. I am sure that you knowabout the Jalliawalabag massacre. It was peaceful gathering of sikhs in protest ofthe arresting two of their leaders. There were children, women, aged, in thegathering. 1152 rounds were fired, 900 people were killed without any provocationfrom there side and all Gandhiji did was start the Non-Cooperation Movement. Youwhat message this gives. This says that you can kill anyone you want in thiscountry and all this country will do is protest in a non-violent manner. So britisherskill thousands and all we do is not buy there goods. Admirable indeed.Good Day.

� Mohindar Chowday Moparthi

Hats off to you sir Godse.. You are one of the real sons this mother india has ever had…We need more number of godse’s in the current situation our country is in…

Jai Hind, Hari OM


Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=710#respond)� bali

Pardon my emotional outburst here but I know we all have our beliefs andopinions. Exactly like our religion or tatva called hinduism. no one clearlyunderstand it and explain in a simple way. We say its complex. Not easy. But it iseasy to bash Gandhi and do hats off to Godse. Its easy to tolerate age oldcorruption at all levels destroying India and we dont fight it. But we do hats off onfacebook or march with candles on street. How is this different from what Gandhidid ( Ahimsa ?) or restraint to fight . Infact when we did not have an army that

� May 5, 2014 at 6:32 pm







Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


12 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

could challenge British,Gandhi smartly made nonviolence as strategy and madeeveryone a soldier. When we were struggling to achieve unity historically, Gandhiadded Muslims to the freedom fight by not treating them like minority. But afterindependence, we did not need ahimsa. where is the fighting spirit of Shivaji,Bose and of the so called Hari Om walas? Shame you for you have not stood up (not even 60% voting in top cities to fight for the right government in the recentelections) . The so called RSS and shiv sena are counting how to get modi? Wehave failed as a nation which had the precious world leading foundation. But yes!we salute Godse every now and then…..and call the AAP leader a fool. Arent wea bunch of hypocrites? This is not to support Gandhi but to only question onesright to question Gandhi’s deeds


� Pranawa Nand

Gandhi Ji is political leader in 20th century same as current leader we have. He was nevera social reformer nor a patriotic fighter. Who knew very well how to play with words andexpress your thought to innocence people. There are few points which remain unanswered.

A) He is known for Non-violence. What was his mean of “Do or Die”. What to do, how to door How to die, why to die

B) He is so called father of nation. How he can be become father of nation ? He belongs tonation, nation can’t belongs to only single individual (Gandhi ji) . No individual or society orreligion can be above nation. But he became father of nation. Nation was before him, afterhim and so on . If it is not so, which nation fought against British Kingdom in 1857.

C) His early age of 25 yrs, He has no problem with british tortured and rule in india. Thesame age Bhagat Singh / Subhas Chandra / Chandasekhar Azaad / Veersavarkar / Sukhdev/ Rajguru / Vismilaakhan had been participated freedom fighting against British. And he wasplanning to go for further studies in South Africa. When he thrown out from the train in southAfrica then only he realize to stand against british.

D) If he is mahatma or priest or leader of nation. He should not had been blamed to favorfor any religion by religious communities. But he blamed by communities bacon his actionwas different what he wrote or said or promise to innocence people (of any communities).After partition he committed certain things to Pakistan and India . Neither he tried to full fillcommitment to Pakistan nor India.

How A Good father divide and vivisect his son in two parts. If he did so he has failed toperform his responsibility as father. He has no right to called for father by son. He mustaccept his duty which failed to perform towards his son. He never talked or write or expressabout it.

A real Mahatma or Priest or Leader can’t belongs to any religion / communities / Nation.These are belong to all human and communities

As same today’s any invention or scientist belongs to globe. It may be pride for nation /Communities but his invention for all humanities across the globe.

There is One Earth-One nation, There is One religion-which teach, guide and help all humanto achieve height of happiness and prosperous across the globe and universe. If differ fromthis it would be opinion, persuasion not religion.

I am not denying his role in fight for freedom. He fought his own way and had right to fighthis way but he misguided to innocence people of nation until his death.

We forgot few freedom fighters and their role for freedom, which are unknown to newgeneration. Whose are never recognized and claimed or blown their own triumph (there issaying “self praise has no recommendation)

� February 13, 2014 at 12:23 pm







Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi



13 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

That time humanities are tortured by British tyranny across the world. Every countries wantto overcome. Across globe stood against British tyranny and came together. Gandhi wasonly fighting against British in India with hunger strike.

Few example presents India’s contribution against British across the globe.

A) Sham jib krishna verma-who fought against British tyranny in London and globally. Hevisited France, Germany Established (Please check Wikipedia) India house in London tofind out patriot person who can fight with British Tyranny Veer savarkar one of them who gotscholar of India house and published against british tortured .That point of time Gandhi wasstudying in India and planning to go south Africa for further studies.B) Veer Swanker- British Tyranny was so afraid about his writing blog against them innewspaper across the globe. Appointed a committee and followed his daily writing.Savarkar left London and caught by British and put behind bar for two times lifepresentment-no person in this world got punishment before and after him. this was againstBritish law as well. (His punishment was challenged in international court Hedge)

C) Sub has Chandra Bose-He is one of freedom fighter who participated freedom fighting inIndia and out of India. There are so many.. (Please refer book written by Man math NathGupta (Friend of Chandra Sekhar Azad who died age of 92 yrs in 2000 book name-Historyof the Indian revolutionary movement).

� Human

The first question that I would like to ask is what is the purpose of religion? Fight??!!!

Why is that from time immemorial the religious minority is so heavily persecuted that theyfeel the need to be a separate state or community?! All religions preach the existence ofONE GOD. If you believe people who are not of your religion have been created by adifferent God….thats the utmost sin you can do….by NOT believing in the existence of onesupreme God who created mankind. Different religions are just various manifestations ofthe same God.

We are humans first and for people who believe in God….created by ONE God. And ourfirst duty towards each other has to be of brotherhood. How pointless is the fight in thename of religion!

� February 14, 2014 at 10:29 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� rohan

Of the three countries created from pre independence India, Pakistan is perhaps the leasttolernat and India is the most tolerant country towards various communities. Guess, whichcountry is a constant battle ground, dictatorships with little freedom or security of life &worse living standards? And which country has a working democracy, a disciplined armyand far more freedom. India is hardly perfact, but compare it with it’s neighbour. Thank god,India did not follow the message preached in this speech.


Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Ashalata Thosar

Nathuram Godase is right in his own right


Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Jayadev P

1. Sikhs getting slaughtered in thousand = A MISTAKE.

2. Hindus getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem.

3. Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust.








Reply

(/india

/why-i-


14 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Pingback: Giordano Bruno and Lord Kelvin | unGuide (http://unguide.org/2014/03/07/giordano-bruno-and-lord-kelvin/)

4. Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding.

5. Talking about Hindus and Hinduism = Communal.

6. Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular.

7. Kargil Attack = Government failure.

8. Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal.

9. Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular.

10. Reservations in Minority institutions =Communal.

11. Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism.

12. Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity.

13. Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal.

14. Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular.

15. BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 100 Indian hostages = Shameful.

16.Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one Daughter of its minister in Kashmir[Rubina Sayed]Political dilemma = Natural Dilemma

17.Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude.

18. Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders = Humanity andPolitical dilemma.

19. BJP questioning Islamic Terrorist Forces = Communal.

20. Congress questioning Lord Ram existence = Clerical Error.

killed-

gandhi


� Priyesh Pachori

Well said Sir, well said indeed.

� May 7, 2014 at 1:21 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11199#respond)� sudhir (http://tech4more.com)

Really this was an eye opening article. After reading some facts behind this decision, Ithink, Nathuram Godse was right. He done it to save our country..

� March 7, 2014 at 11:04 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Vijay

It is very unfortunate for someone to justify the action of a sick murderer. If one believesGodse’s reasoning then be ready to believe every murderer’s reasoning because everyonehas a reason. Contrarian view in this case is okay for an argument but will never live thetest of time or human value. Gandhi was a leading light not just for India but the whole world.His core value of nonviolence is the only reason we are the world’s largest and disciplineddemocracy.

Every persons action can be interpret as right or wrong depending from where you see it,but to view Gandhi’s action on India, Pakistan separation from Godse and RSS’s point of

� March 7, 2014 at 8:23 pm







Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi



15 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

view is unjustifiable.

� Mayank

mind that Murder for a Brahmin Pandit is next to denying presence of god.But he did it not for his sake but for our future.I am pretty sure that if Mahatma Gandhi lived few more years …India couldn’t be as stable as it is today….

� May 7, 2014 at 8:25 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11057#respond)� Jitu

Non-violence has only made us cowards or may be we support non-violencebecause we do not have guts to fight for the justice and truth.We are worldslargest country because of Muslim appeasement ,we gave away our land asBangladesh but getting their burden of 30 million muslims to live in our land.InPakistan they killed and converted most of the Hindus whereas here in India forvote bank poltics we allow them to grow through un limited procreations to finishour resources though 98% of those had voted for Pakistan in pre-partitionreferendum .Are we at all a disciplinesd Democracy!!! Thanks for a good Joke. Myname is Jitu and I am not a member of RSS.

� May 7, 2014 at 10:16 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Priyesh Pachori

Well what you say is surely correct, but I Godse was not a retard who murderedGandhiji for kicks. He knew full well what he was getting into and knew very wellwhat will the consequences be. He was very well educated, was a writer byprofession before he joined the freedom struggle. I suggest that you read thisbook called “Murder of the Mahtma” written by G.D. Khosla before labelling Godseas a murderer. Just a heads up, it is very difficult to find this book at anyrespectable book store these days because congree has banned the publishingand retailing of this book. So you will have to search for it. Its a small book around80 pages or so. I am sure your opinion will change once you go through this book.

� May 7, 2014 at 1:27 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Ebrahim

Godse over a period of time built up a hatred toward Gandhi I presume mainly due to theunsatisfactory results of Gandhi’s methods. Godse decided to focus his anger towardGandhi eventually which led to the killing but in hindsight the killing seems to have achievednothing, did any of the problems get resolved? that is what its all about right.. findingsolution.. making things better..

Ofcourse the only reason I can say that things haven’t improved is because I have thebenefit of witnessing all the years after the killing and realising that most of those problemsstill persist today. I’m not sure if Godse thought the solution to all the problem was killingGandhi but if it was he was not correct.

The point is Godse possibly could not know all the consequences of his actions but we asobservers of history do know the consequences, did the killing make things better? I thinkyou know the answer to that..

� March 16, 2014 at 7:39 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi









16 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

� Jitu

Godse was late because of his confusion perhaps, India would have been abetter place if it had happened before his fasting drama at Calcutta.,at least wewouldn’t have any pretensions to be secular sic anti-Hindu.

� May 7, 2014 at 10:21 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11106#respond)� Andrew

After 200 years of slavery and those fights which had brought nothing more other maybe killa thousand more, and killing that man cause he didn’t think right for both the parties!! Yougotta be nothing more than simply insane! It’s preposterous! Dealing with these wickedpeople around him is no easy task! How about killing Jinnah itself ! Oh that’s right he can’t!

� March 24, 2014 at 2:58 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=1820#respond)� Bhairav sheth

Godse was like RAJ THAKEREY of those days,Read about his history.

At least Raj Thakerey does not murder people from UP/Bihar he just injures them….Godse was just for “Hindus” and by this logic there would be many countries in india ,

Because “Hindu” is not just 1 religion there are many”Hindus” like kathyawadihindus,kannadiga hindus,maratha hindus,konkani hindus,etc…

Then everyone will justify killing people from other regions because they don’t belong tothem.

� April 15, 2014 at 1:38 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� ratan das

The Article is eye opener indeed for those who are ignorant of facts or mesmerised byGandhi/Nehru concept of pseudo-secularism which clearly was & sadly still is appeasementwith Muslims thus sacrifice Hindus. Gandhi was clever enough to hide this from worldopinion at a time when Brits was desperate to leave India for all kinds of reason includingInternational / American pressure.Godse clearly was a true nationalist and a Patriot that Gandhi / Nehru could not tolerate.There was a place for such millions of patriots during that era.

� May 3, 2014 at 9:11 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Secular Humanist

Does me being a parsi or a christian or a buddhist or a sikh make me any less indian? It’samazing how these extremists keep going on about their own faction like they own thiscountry. I share the same blood as every Indian in this country, i might not be Hindu, but canwe really say this country belongs to just the hindus in India? We can keep going on andthen finally arrive at saying this country belongs to the neanderthals and the pagans thatlived here 1000′s of years ago. How can there be all this talk of religion in politics. The 42ndamendment! Secularism! Wished we practiced it in this country, the greatest gift India wasever given, that and India’s diplomatic stand on global issues. Too much talk of religion inthe political arena, it should be banned because it makes no sense in a secular country.Religion is a sensitive issue and has no place. None at all in politics! If you ask me, nationover religion!

� May 4, 2014 at 3:06 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Jitu

In India secular means anti-hinduism and appeasement of Muslims for Politicalgain.

� May 7, 2014 at 10:26 am

Reply

(/india








17 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Kannan S

was wondering if any of Gandhi’s direct family members got affected by this riots ornon-hindus, what will be Gandhi’s stand? still the same?

� May 5, 2014 at 6:15 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Hari

Everybody has a right to follow ones will, the problem is when one tries to impose it onanother. It was a pity that a learned man like Godse though that one could be born a Hinduand killing of Gandhi would have solved the problem. The rot had already started whenKarna was called one of a lower stature in Mahabharata and when Ravan was called anAsura inspite of being a bramhin by birth and deeds, however Ram being called a Godinspite of all his shortfalls. The pity is, the nation is made to believe that Gandhi andCongress was the root causes of all failures and Godse and Hinduism the solution of allevils.

� May 5, 2014 at 8:25 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Harsha

Now I know why my dad used to hate Gandi and Nehru. Thanks for an enlightening article.

� May 5, 2014 at 8:35 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Neethi (http://[email protected])

Its not because of Gandhi we got Freedom in 1947, The real History is different. it wasbecause of USA we were given freedom by the British. The Atlantic Charter was theReason for our Freedom. Can any body remember from when Gandhi asked for Indianindependence? when u do research on this, the real History will be seen

� May 5, 2014 at 1:19 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=10411#respond)� Ajay

The real Reason for us to get freedom.There r many Reason.The Great Indian Navy Revolt ( Rss influence of Sikhs & Jats )2nd world War ( weakened the British empire )mutual understanding by the Christian Nations to Omit colonisation & replace itwith another secular form of controlling their economy.

� May 8, 2014 at 6:29 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� [email protected] (http://[email protected])

Godse did the right thing,I have also read other articles related to this,where one of themain reason for killing him is ,he did not stop the punishment of our heroes,Bhagatsingh,Sukh dev,Rajguru.And also many hindu were killed and our sisters and mothers werebeing raped in pakistan,but this gandhi did not looked at them,the other imp thing was,whenhindus were being sent to India from pakistan,gandhi told them to go back to pakistan asnow they belong to that country,but in reality there were wars in between hindu and muslimin pakistan.

� May 5, 2014 at 1:25 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Sarhanzy

I am surprised at the people proud of Godses action of killing Gandhi, and hisfundementalist ideologies. It’s pretty sad that there are people out there as can be seen inthe comments who believe that religion is the makeup of Indian civilsation. Does someonenot Hindu in India not deserve to be Indian, who are you or for the matter Godse to decidethis pretty idiotic idealogy.

� May 6, 2014 at 1:00 pm







Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


18 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Relegion should never overshadow or decide politics or a common Indian. I can see howeasily the gullible can be swayed to religious extremism and reading this justification andthe fact that he couldn’t even reason with Gandhi through dialogue but through violence.

India as a country should have open minded people, and, not people such as some of theones posting here, who are closed minded fundementalists, it is only then that India willprogress. How can a country progress when people hate each other in the name of thereligion to the extent that they think it’s justified that the father of the nation was killed by afundementalist.

I would like to conclude this ever so long statement by saying to the people with suchideologies, take your mind out of the gutter, religious intolerance serves no benefit. Let’swork together to be better human beings and build a better tomorrow.


� Jagadish

You said no different that what we have been doing since the muslim invasion.You welcome everyone.. they come and screw you up. We are being tolerant and‘secular’. Are you saying that we as a country are happy now?.. Who isperpetrating terrorist acts not only in India, but in the entire world?.

Godse’s statement was for people like you. Only those who cannot fight real war,talk about peace.

� May 9, 2014 at 3:14 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Mukundhan Radhakrishnan

many movements started by gandhi were self controled. no one else had a chance ofparticipating in decision making. what kind of sense does it make.its not his personalintrest.its actually for the country.its not like when ever he needs to start a movement hecan and stop wen he wish.he was just better of many in those days who can speak well andonly that made him look better. pepole were desparate .they were in need of freedom andgandhi convinced them better in getting freedom.just for few reasons like this calling aperson father of nation is a kind of exagerating one leaving others behind, who had bettrehand in the struggle.Godse was a good obsever cum good decision maker,who had guts tocome forward to assassin a person like this for well being of the same society were helived.

� May 6, 2014 at 4:06 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� piyush

Ghandi was the worst thing to happen to india, second was nehru, if these two criminalswere never born, India would be in a much better place today without division and fullyunited.

� May 7, 2014 at 6:00 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11006#respond)� Sati

Who broke the Gandhi Tatva ??

Gandhi himself broke the Gandhi tatva by Making Chutiya Nehru as first Prime Minster ofHindustan instead of “Sardar Patel” .

� May 7, 2014 at 12:23 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi









19 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

� Devang

Nathuram was so full of crap, also he did not state what did he gain by killing Gandhi, hisaction was without any cause at least so called terrorist have a cause. He was a psychoand his own mind killed him and Gandhi. no one should share this and make more psycho….

� May 7, 2014 at 2:36 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11233#respond)� vsiyer

sector4charkop

really an eye opener…. Godse, would have been pardoned …why appreciated today , ifhappened today.

� May 8, 2014 at 3:43 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11518#respond)� khapgode

its seems to be some mental issues with godse. killer is killer. he cannot justify hisimaginative theories to kill father of nation.

� May 8, 2014 at 5:59 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Hiral

Though i think that Ghodse may not be totally right in his approach towards muslims… it isthe religions that led to the divide and that had our so – called father of the nation tried, wecould have very well been India minus terrorism and without kashmir disputes, without riotsand a bigger sub-continent. By secretly consenting to partition, no one gained. We lost ourfellow citizens and territories, they lost kashmir and in the end a lot of lives were lost andare still being lost. Undivided India could have been achieved, but Gandhi, for whom hispredicament would be final, could not be retraced. He built a wall and it became a border.No one gained!

� May 8, 2014 at 7:31 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Keshav

What’s wrong in our mentality is that we think gandhi resorted to non-violence because hewas a coward. The true fact is that he was prudential. He knew that the British were animperialistic force who’ve fought battles since the birth of their nation and have won each ofthem and India had no chance of winning a violent battle against the british. Talking ofapproach through violence, what fruit did revolt of 1857 bear apart from stricter laws andincreased armed “whites” in the country?Talking of heeding to M.A Jinnah’s demands, it wasa very small price we paid. And as it is even if this partition wouldn’t have happened, thehindus and the current pakistani muslims(As they chose to move out) would still remainsegregated and it would be forceful to keep them together leading in even more violence.As it is we’ve got enough to say euphemistically, diversity with 28 states and I dont think wecould want more of this “Diversity” with another few states. Land acquisation brings nopeace and is no sign of prestige of which the soviet russia is or was I dont know what tosay a great example. Things could have beem a lot more worse as very few people in India-Pakistan understand the we are humans before being hindus or muslims and humanity byitself is a religion and those who do not preach this religion are scientifically calledpsycopaths

� May 8, 2014 at 5:03 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Banumathy

Because of partition only chain of great bad events took place. If there was no partition ,there wont be these countries Pakistan, Bangladesh. they would be part of India. No Indochina war, no kargil war.ni Kashmir problem We would not have allowed the Chinese to takeover a part of Arunachal Pradesh. would not have allowed other countries to interfere in our

� May 8, 2014 at 5:08 pm







Reply

(/india

/why-i-


20 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

internal problems. there wont be any religious enmity amongst us. So who are all part to thispartition, should be let known to our future generation. To satisfy Jinnah who wanted to be aruler , this partition took place.

killed-

gandhi


� MKG

In my personal view, Ghodse was a fanatic Hindu! I will tell you a story and let you guys bejudge of what is right and what is wrong. For a moment, let’s forget about Gandhi or Godseand let’s just concentrate on the below story.Once upon a time there was a man named Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, he lived in asmall house. He had 2 sons and their names were Hindu and Muslim. They were all livinghappily together until one day; a group of thieves attacked their house. Gandhi along withhis 2 sons struggled to defend his house and after continuous struggle, they managed todrive the thieves away. Gandhi was very proud of his 2 children, the way they cametogether to get rid of their common enemy.As in any other house in India, few days later, his son Muslim came to Gandhi and said thathis family is growing now and he needs his part of the house. Gandhi tried to convince himthat it is better to stick together because if the thieves will attack again then they candefend the house again as a bigger force however Muslim was not ready to listen. Fewdays later, even Hindu came with the same demand of his share of the house. Gandhi washeart-broken but he decided not to divide the house and thought that after sometime theywill forget it and will stay together again as brothers. However, as the time passed theconflict among Hindu and Muslim started to aggravate.Gandhi did not know how to divide the house since Hindu had a bigger family than Muslimand since both were his children he wanted to do justice to both. He was in big dilemma andhoped that his 2 sons will reconcile someday. Hindu and Muslim both were unpleased withtheir father that he is not making a decision, so they decided to divide the house withinthemselves. Since, Hindu had a bigger family so he took the major share of the house andgave the rest Muslim.When Gandhi came to know about it, he was heart-broken. He realized that Muslim got theless share of the house and like any other father he wanted to make sure that Muslim isable to support itself and his family. So, he decides to take some money from Hindu andgive it to his Muslim son. In the meantime his Hindu son came to know about it and gotreally furious and in the fit of rage he decided to kill his father.Gandhi as usual was getting ready for the temple to offer his morning prayers, his Hinduson came up to him, touched his feet, took out his pistol and shot his 79 years old father inhis chest. Gandhi looked at his son, smiled, said “Hey Ram” and died on the spot!His son Hindu pleads guilty and gives the justification of injustice for killing his 79 year oldfather.Will you as Jury or as a human being pardon him???

� May 8, 2014 at 6:45 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


� Aaron

HOLY CRAP!!! Talk about being delusional moron… its funny how you created thisimaginary fable to justify your idea of gandhi being all good and all holy andwhoever stood against his stupidity was evil….

� May 8, 2014 at 7:19 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11815#respond)� Jagadiesh

Thank you for a very funny story!!!!… It started with a big illusion that have beenset firmly in the minds of many Hindus including some who posted here..

/*There were all living happily together*/

Really?.. The so-called ‘muslim’ brother invaded from outside. Because this‘Hindu’ brother is always accommodative as his culture says “Vasudaiva

� May 9, 2014 at 3:06 am







Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi


21 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Kutumbam” and accepts all faiths as true unlike these fanatic religions, was kindenough to give shelter to the other brother. Mind you, we always heard aboutMuslim Kings killing/converting Hindus and destroying their temples in spite of theirminority, you never heard about Hindus being in majority resorting to such acts inthe history…I know you will bring up 1992 and Modi which is two-way violenceanyway, but I am talking about history. That was the tolerance of the HIndubrother.

To extend your story, ‘a group of theives’ was Muslims coming to India… It wasonly a matter of time. British came in 16th Century where as Muslims came in11th century… If Muslims can claim themselves as brothers, then they cannot sayBritish as thieves…

So, the muslim brother simply took the advantage of so called group of thieves tosteal a major portion of the house because he himself is a thief..

Gandhi being a coward, allowed it in the name of non-violence. In fact whatGodse feared is happening now. The same pseudo secular policy is inherited byhis followers now.

If you tell the right story, then people will be able to judge if it is right or wrong. Acock-and-bull story will only make them to decide between chicken sh1t or bullsh1t and the sh1t alwys floats and shows up..


� SK

Some people have really warped ideology when it comes to the killing of “bapuji” – the oneman who practically ripped India apart and caused immense atrocities and butchering in thename of secularism. The guy was a lunatic who knew how to play mind games – a sick manwho knew how to manipulate the crowd, especially at a time when most Indians were notallowed to be educated by the British.

You are crying about one man being killed but what about what about all those massacredbefore and after the partition? Ok, never mind that – how about today when countries likeUS and its allies send their troops into whichever country they choose to bully and controlpeople in the name of war against terrorism. I don’t see anyone crying about that. Howabout when people are murdered in Muslim countries to appease their Sharia laws, girlskidnapped, raped and murdered.

Here’s a few things that are wrong with Gandhi:- slept naked with young women, including his niece to test his manhood.- had an affair with a British guy and abused his own wife for him, wrote several letters tohim that were just bought by the Indian government to hide his fallacies.- called freedom fighters terrorists, happy that people like Bhagat Singh were put to death- Dr. Ambedkar once said: “A person who cheats and keeps other people in dark, if you callsuch person a Mahatma, then Gandhi is a Mahatma”- racist against the South African Blacks, was happy they were treated like animals by theWhites- ostracized people like Netaji, Sardar Patel and many other freedom fighters who gave upfar more than this guy who had both his arms hanging around young women.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

Tell me – if someone today asks you to let your daughter and wives be raped and that youshould just die off of the greater good, WOULD YOU DO IT?? So instead of ranting andcrying over a useless man who sadly died a very swift death – when countless otherssuffered – GET REAL instead of blaming Hindu fanatics or RSS or any other tooth fairy thatyou can think of!

� May 8, 2014 at 7:40 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi









22 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

�

↸

� calebsingh

Whatever one would say about partition and it’s horrors,the split of pre independent Indiawas good for it future,otherwise modern India would have ungovernable,it would be likeBosnia, nigeria torn apart by religious insurgency and ethnic cleansing and countlessmillions would continue to die

� May 8, 2014 at 11:47 pm

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi

/?replytocom=11897#respond)� Jagadish (http://yahoo.com)

This is the first time I am seeing the perspective of Godse and I can’t help myself than topraise him. In all the literature I have studied so far, Godse appears as an evil man andGandhi a God…While his entire statement was eloquent with excellent reasoning andliterary values, the gems are below..

/*It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, theMahatma betrayeda total ignorance of the springs of human action*/

/*His (Gandhi) inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which somuch is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless.*/

/*There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and forthis reason I fired those fatal shots..*/

/* No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved fromthe inroads of Pakistan.*/

I feel guilty for living in such world of illusion…Of course, I never believed Godse was sofoolish to do this act, but I never had chance to look at his view.

He is a true patriot and a true martyr…. Take a bow Godse and kudoes to your bravery.. Iam proud of you…Rarely people like you come onto the earth and most of them get brandedas you.. but

One should not be judged by the actions to label him as a terrorist.. It should be the endresult.. Gandhi might have not killed millions by taking up the gun, but his policy and actionsdid… So, why not then call him a terrorist under the disguise of Mahatma….

/* I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true valuethereof someday in future*/

Well, the future is here now..

� May 9, 2014 at 2:07 am

Reply

(/india

/why-i-

killed-

gandhi




�(




http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/contact/)


23 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Post Comment

Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail

Search the website

Search in site...

Translate to your Language:

Select Language

Like us on Facebook

Sanskriti

37,856 people like Sanskriti.

Facebook social plugin

LikeLike

Ads to support Mission Awareness








24 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Follow us on Twitter

Follow @IndianSanskriti

(http://feedburner.google.com

/fb/a/mailverify?uri=sanskritimagazine/krKO&loc=en_US)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/category/most_popular/)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/contact/)

(http://www.sanskritimagazine.com/contact/)

(https://safeweb.norton.com/report

/show?url=www.sanskritimagazine.com)

(http://www.weeklyvoice.com)

(https://www.indocanadians.ca)








25 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Who is visiting right now

Read According to Topics

Select Category








26 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

�Facebook

(https://www.facebook.com/SanskritiCultureOfIndia)

�Twitter

(https://twitter.com/IndianSanskriti)

�Google+

(https://plus.google.com/u/0/105871646788034619689/posts)

�RSS

(http://feeds.feedburner.com/sanskritimagazine/krKO)

↑ Sanskriti – Indian Culture © All images and artworks are designed by our creativestaff | Website Designed by CreativeNerds

(mailto:[email protected])








27 of 27 5/9/2014 3:23 PM

Documents

Why I Killed Gandhi