1

Why Explosive Nuclear Devices

May Not Exist

by Jeremy James

"There is a conspiracy of her [false] prophets in the midst thereof, like a roaring lion ravening the prey;

they have devoured souls..." – Ezekiel 22:25

The ancient Greek mathematicians struggled for centuries to solve a problem which

they did not realize had no solution. They were trying to "square the circle", that is to

devise a valid method in geometry whereby, using only a ruler and compass, a square

could be constructed whose enclosed area was exactly equal to the area enclosed by a

given circle. The problem was very easy to understand, but the solution was

unbelievably difficult to find. As it turned out, they could not discover a solution

because there was none. What is more, it took over two thousand years before

mathematicians were able to prove that the problem had no solution!

This is why the expression 'to square the circle' means to attempt the impossible.

Einstein is credited with discovering the famous equation, e=mc2, in 1905. However,

the equation was already implied by Maxwell's equations, published in 1873, which

describe the fundamental dynamics of electromagnetic radiation. (James Clerk

Maxwell, a Scotsman and a born-again Christian, was probably the greatest physicist

of all time.)

2

The equation, e=mc2, purports to express the amount of energy contained in a given

amount of matter. In other words, if it were possible to convert matter into pure

energy, this is the amount of energy that would be released. The amount is truly

phenomenal, but it is also theoretical. The equation is not stating that matter can be

converted instantaneously into pure energy, but only that, if it could, this is the

amount that would probably be released.

We have been led to believe that this revolutionary transmutation was actually

achieved on 16 July, 1945, when the Americans detonated the first nuclear fission

device known as 'Trinity' in Alamogordo, New Mexico. We have also been led to

believe that an explosive device, using nuclear fission, was deployed on two

occasions under wartime conditions for strategic purposes. Our aim in this paper is to

examine the evidence for this claim and whether the strategic targets in question, the

cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan, were actually destroyed by nuclear

weapons or by something else.

It took mankind over two thousand years to learn that the circle could not be 'squared'.

In the meantime, however, mathematicians continued to devise proofs which they

claimed were correct. No doubt these had their admirers until closer inspection

revealed their hidden flaws. Time after time fresh attempts were made until, finally, in

1882, a German mathematician devised a proof which demonstrated conclusively that

the problem had no solution.

It is doubtful whether man is capable to coming up with a method for converting

matter into pure energy, as implied by e=mc2. In fact, the LORD may have so

designed the fundamental laws of physics that such a catastrophic transmutation is not

even possible. Perhaps some day an insightful physicist who will come along and

prove that it cannot be done.

Hiroshima, 6 August, 1945 The building in the photo below was occupied by a branch of the Bank of Japan in

1945. It can still be seen today. In fact the photo is quite recent. The photo on the next

page shows the same building as it appears in Google Street View (2015).

3

What is so special about this building, you may ask? Well, we are led to believe that

70 years ago a nuclear bomb exploded just 1800 feet above it.

The following map shows the location of the bank relative to the exact center of the

nuclear blast:

4

Given that a nuclear bomb exploded only 1,300 feet away, how did the blast affect the

building? See for yourself. The photo below was taken just three months later:

Apparently services at the bank resumed just two days after the blast!

And the current status of the building? It is used by the municipal authority of

Hiroshima as a venue for cultural activities.

Here is another photo of the same building, this time just a few days after the blast.

Note the large number of trees that were growing in front of it. Clearly nothing stood

between the epicenter of the blast and the building itself, which was situated just

1,300 ft away! Remember also that the bomb exploded 1,800 ft above the ground.

5

A larger building, which was even closer to the epicenter of the blast, suffered

extensive structural damage but a significant remnant withstood the force of the

explosion:

This housed the Hiroshima chamber of industry and commerce (also known as The

Commercial Museum). You can see where it was located on the map above [p.3] and

its close proximity to ground zero – just 450ft away!

The following photo shows the building in its intact state before the blast:

6

Perplexing questions These photos raise a number of very perplexing questions. How could any building

within a quarter of a mile of a nuclear explosion remain substantially intact? How

could any part of the structure of a building within 450ft of a nuclear explosion even

remain standing? How could hundreds of trees directly beneath a nuclear explosion

remain upright?

As one reads accounts of the damage caused by the blast, it is almost impossible to

distinguish it from the damage caused by the firebombing of around seventy Japanese

cities in the latter part of the war. If Hiroshima had not been subjected to a nuclear

attack but had been firebombed instead, the visual evidence of its devastation would

hardly have been any different. Eyewitness accounts, which had not been filtered

through the US military apparatus, reported scenes in Hiroshima in the days following

the explosion which, according to their testimony, were no different from the scenes

of devastation that they had witnessed in other Japanese cities.

Photo of an ER62 cluster bomb containing a number of M69 firebombs manufactured by the Rockefeller company, Standard Oil.

To appreciate what this means, we need to consider the 'science' behind the large scale

use of incendiary devices. Carpet bombing is a brutally destructive method of warfare.

As an inhumane, Satanic device, the firebomb is hard to beat. It is designed to

incinerate the target population – mostly women and children – and tear asunder the

local infrastructure. The cluster-based napalm bomb that Rockefeller devised was

specifically designed to destroy Japanese civilian houses, the majority of which were

built of timber, even in the larger metropolitan areas. The burning napalm or gasoline

gel which discharged on impact could travel up to 300ft and burn furiously on

contact. In addition to napalm gel, incendiary devices could also contain magnesium,

oil, thermite, or white phosphorous. Around 80 million pounds of napalm were

manufactured by Rockefeller during the war, a large proportion of which was used to

incinerate nearly seventy Japanese cities, including Tokyo, Osaka, Kobe, Nagoya,

Tokushima, Yokahama, Toyama, Shizuoka, Kawasaki, Shimizu, Kuwana, Matsuyama,

Imabari, Nobeoka, Omura, and Hamamatsu [See map overleaf].

7

1 Nagasaki 25 Nagaoka 49 Tokushima

2 Omura 26 Maebashi 50 Imabari

3 Sasebo 27 Isesaki 51 Kochi

4 Saga 28 Aomori 52 Uwajima

5 Fukuoka 29 Sendai 53 Kitakyushu

6 Moji / Yawata 30 Utsonomiya 54 Oita

7 Shimonoseki 31 Hitachi 55 Omuta

8 Ube 32 Mito 56 Nobeoka

9 Tokuyama 33 Choshi 57 Kumamoto

10 Hiroshima 34 Kumagaya 58 Miyazaki

11 Kure 35 Chiba 59 Miyakonojo

12 Fukuyama 36 Kawasaki 60 Kagoshima

13 Okayama 37 Yokahama 61 Matsuyama

14 Himeji 38 Hiratsuka 62 Ogaki

15 Akashi 39 Numazu 63 Gifu

16 Kobe 40 Shizuoka 64 Ichinomiya

17 Nishinomiya 41 Hamamatsu 65 Nagoya

18 Amagasaki 42 Kuwana 66 Okazaki

19 Osaka 43 Yokkaichi 67 Toyohashi

20 Tsuruga 44 Tsu 68 Shimizu

21 Fukui 45 Ujiyamada / Ise 69 Hachioji

22 Sakai 46 Nara 70 Kofu

23 Toyama 47 Wakayama

24 Tokyo 48 Takamatsu

8

Deceiving the American public Given the extensive photographic, medical, radiological, and other evidence that is

now available, it is clear that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were firebombed in a similar

fashion. The only difference was that these two cities were the last to be firebombed

and could therefore be cited for propaganda purposes as 'evidence' that a new type of

explosive device had been developed. After all, these 'bombs' had brought an

immediate end to the war, so they must have been 'special'.

Of course, the American public did not know that the Japanese high command had

been seeking surrender terms for several months and were only facilitated by the

Allies after the so-called atomic bombs had been dropped. American citizens were

also largely unaware of the awful destruction caused by the firebombing of dozens of

Japanese cities. They were never provided with photographic evidence of the

devastation that firebombing can cause, therefore they assumed that the newsreel

footage of the damage inflicted on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was irrefutable proof that

nuclear devices had been used.

The nuclear arms race As several historians have suggested, the alleged nuclear bombs were dropped on

Hiroshima and Nagasaki in order to convince the war-weary masses that mankind was

now faced with an entirely new geopolitical threat and the real possibility of

extinction. This gave rise to the nuclear arms race, the high political drama of the

Cold War, and the horrifying prospect of 'mutual assured destruction'. Alas, the

historians themselves believed the propaganda (or professed to do so). Only today,

after so many high-level lies and deceptions have been exposed – lies by the military,

by governments, by bankers, by the controlled media, and by amoral scientists in

receipt of generous grants and emoluments – is the official account beginning to

unravel.

Propaganda When one looks at the official documentaries produced at the time, purporting to

show the test site evidence and collateral damage, where houses and other structures

were supposedly demolished by the explosive shock wave, they look decidedly

amateurish. These propaganda newsreels were produced to convince the public that

nuclear 'bombs' could actually work. This in turn gave rise to a massive industry, paid

for entirely by American taxpayers. A small number of powerful industrialists made

staggering profits on the back of this sinister subterfuge, while a phony 'Cold War'

was created whereby even greater profits could be made through the accelerated

production of conventional arms. The so-called test explosions conducted on Bikini

Atoll and other remote sites were nothing more than hundreds of tons of high

explosive, detonated from a distance. Since naive observers were generally assembled

in the same location, a solar-powered 'flash' – using directional mirrors – could be

timed to occur in tandem with the explosion.

9

Where is the radiation? If these test explosions were genuine, the nuclear radiation produced would have

posed a serious threat to life in the region. For example, when the meltdown occurred

at Chernobyl in Belarus in 1986 (without a nuclear explosion), dangerous nuclear

particles were supposed to have travelled as far as Norway, carried on ambient air

currents. Given that the tests on Bikini Atoll and elsewhere involved the use of

thermonuclear devices, hundreds of times more powerful than the devices that were

allegedly used on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the radiation transmitted into the

atmosphere should have been detectable for years afterwards and should have caused

severe genetic damage to life in the region. And yet, significantly, there is not the

slightest evidence that anything of the kind occurred.

Nuclear missiles and floppy disks It was widely reported in January, 2014, that the 450 or so Minuteman missiles, which

are secreted – ready-for-action – in silos across America, each armed with a nuclear

warhead, are activated by computer instructions stored on an 8-inch floppy disk.

Think about this for a moment. If the survival of the entire United States could at

some point depend on the immediate activation of these missiles, then why are they

critically dependant on technology that is 30 years out of date? How many computer

systems that depend on floppy disks will reliably work after just five years, not to

mention thirty? Silos are cold damp places in the depths of winter. It is

incomprehensible – unless the missiles were never intended for use in the first place!

If that is the case, then the entire charade actually makes sense.

Firestorms The carpet-bombing of wooden buildings with thousands of napalm incendiary

devices creates a huge firestorm. The gases produced in the conflagration reach such a

high temperature that they explosively ignite, causing shock waves that are powerful

enough to demolish buildings in the immediate vicinity. Generally speaking, the only

structures that are able to withstand this combination of heat and pressure are those

made of reinforced concrete.

The photo overleaf – which depicts the dropping of thousands of incendiaries on

Toyama – shows how easily an entire city can be utterly destroyed by intensive

firebombing.

The next six photos [1-6] show the aftermath of the firebombing campaign conducted

against several Japanese cities. The scenes depicted do not differ in any significant

way from those depicted in photos 7 and 8.

10

The firebombing of Toyama [aerial view]

1. Tokushima

11

2. Tokyo

3. Shizuoka

12

4. Hamamatsu

5. Kobe

13

6. Osaka

7. Hiroshima

14

8. Nagasaki

Tianjin, 2015 The explosions at an industrial site in Tianjin, China, on 12 August 2015, which was

widely reported in the media, caused extensive damage and created an enormous blast

crater:

15

According to CNN and the BBC, seismographs revealed that the two explosions had a

combined explosive magnitude of 24 tons of TNT:

"The first explosion was huge, and the second was even more

powerful: the equivalent of 21 metric tons of TNT or a magnitude-2.9

earthquake, according to the China Earthquake Networks Center." –

CNN Report, 14 August 2015, by By Will Ripley, Steven Jiang and

Jethro Mullen [http://edition.cnn.com/2015/08/13/asia/china-tianjin-explosions/]

"The China Earthquake Networks Centre said the magnitude of the

first explosion was the equivalent of detonating three tons of TNT,

while the second was the equivalent of 21 tonnes of the explosive." –

BBC Report, China blasts: Tianjin port city rocked by explosions, 13

August 2015 [http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-china-33896292]

Seismographs of the two explosions in Tianjin

[http://www.extremetech.com/extreme/212093-massive-explosion-devastates-

chinese-port-city-of-tianjin-hundreds-injured]

According to The Telegraph, "The explosion was so powerful it was registered as

seismic activity by the US Geological Survey at a monitoring station 90 miles away in

Beijing." – Nicola Davison, Telegraph, 13 August 2015

When one considers the damage caused by these explosions and the size of the

resulting blast crater – over 600 feet in diameter – it is sobering to realize that this was

all caused by just 24 tons of TNT. The atomic bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima

had an explosive power equivalent 15,000 tons of TNT. In other words it was over

600 times more powerful, and yet it left no blast crater and failed to completely

demolish a building that was just 450ft away.

16

It is curious also that many eyewitnesses in Tianjin compared the blast to that of a

nuclear explosion. Indeed it even produced the fantastic flash that one normally

associates with a nuclear blast:

Tianjin 'flash' – the photos are shown in chronological sequence

17

18

The 'nuclear bomb' analogy even extends to the production of a 'mushroom cloud':

19

Given the absence of both nuclear radiation and a powerful electromagnetic pulse

(EMP), the Tianjin explosion(s) were not caused by a nuclear device. On the other

hand, if the cause was not chemical, it was probably a high-speed kinetic rod of some

kind, projected at Mach 10 or thereabouts from a rail-gun in the upper atmosphere.

This kind of technology was not available in 1945 (as far as we know), but the Allies

had the necessary technology during WW2 to produce powerful thermobaric devices.

Such a device, exploded two thousand feet or so above Hiroshima, would have

produced the huge 'flash' that was reported (if the reports are reliable) and a very

powerful shock wave (which would demolish concrete buildings), as well as causing

extensive fire damage and the gruesome incineration of human bodies. Since a

thermobaric bomb also consumes all of the oxygen in the surrounding atmosphere, it

creates a massive vacuum which can suck out lungs and eyeballs. Such phenomena

were reported by the Japanese after Hiroshima and Nagasaki but denied by the US

military.

A kinetic rod launched from a rail-gun device in the upper atmosphere could also be

used to simulate a meteor strike. A co-ordinated series of such explosions would

create a state of extreme panic in any advanced economy, including America, and

could be used as a trigger event for the imposition of martial law.

A very powerful lie A detailed analysis of the large body of evidence that either refutes or contradicts the

popular belief in the existence of nuclear weapons would go far beyond the scope of

this paper. Instead, we must confine our case to the facts already presented and invite

readers to consider the wider context in which such weapons were supposedly

developed.

It should be noted, for example, that the emergence of a new type of destructive

weapon at the close of World War II made it much easier to engineer the conditions

needed to create World War III. This weapon could then be redesigned on an ongoing

basis until its collective destructive power was supposedly great enough to destroy the

earth itself. This planted in the thoughts and imagination of all mankind the belief that

man now possessed the ability to undo all that God had done when He created the

world. In a perverse and unexpected way man – with god-like genius – had

transcended the confines of Biblical truth and needed a new or higher truth to

constrain his ambitions.

This is a very powerful lie. The possibility of mutually assured destruction gave birth

to the widespread belief that some form of world government would be needed to

maintain international peace. It paved the way for the creation of the United Nations,

which was formally established in October, 1945, just two months after the so-called

atomic bombs were dropped.

Seeing through the illusion The two cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, were reoccupied just days after the 'atomic'

bombs exploded. Seemingly, as far as the local population was concerned, there were

few if any reported health risks from lethal radiation, either at the time or in the

months and years thereafter. Most health conditions related to napalm burns – which

often required years of clinical treatment – or the inhalation of toxic pollutants

produced by incendiary devices.

20

Journalists were banned from visiting the city for months afterwards and from

interviewing eyewitnesses. For reasons of 'national security', every nuclear test since

1945 has been conducted on terrain that is off-limits to the public, so no independent

inspection of the aftermath of these supposed explosions has ever been conducted.

The vast majority of people will reject the idea that explosive nuclear devices do not

exist. But true Christians should at least be aware that the Father of Lies will use

every possible illusion and deception to strengthen his hold on mankind and prepare

the way for the arrival of his 'son', the Antichrist:

"And the conspiracy was strong; for the people increased continually with Absalom." (2 Samuel 15:12)

Does this mean that 'nuclear' devices will never be used? Unfortunately there exists a

different category of explosive ordnance, known as the fuel-air bomb or thermobaric

device, which can have an enormously destructive impact in a confined area. Twenty

or thirty such devices could create a shock wave so destructive that it would utterly

devastate a large part of a medium-sized city. If the military leaders declared

afterwards that the city had been destroyed by a nuclear explosion, there would be

few, if any, to question their assertion, especially if the area was later seeded with

radioactive material.

____________________

Jeremy James

Ireland

August 30, 2015

For further information visit www.zephaniah.eu

Copyright Jeremy James 2015