Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
100.00% 52
Q1 Please enter a date:Answered: 52 Skipped: 0
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Date
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment
Result - IRAQ
IRAQ
51.92% 27
11.54% 6
13.46% 7
17.31% 9
5.77% 3
0.00% 0
Q3 Do you work for?Answered: 52 Skipped: 0
TOTAL 52
Internat ionalNGO
NGO
UN Organizat ion
Nat ionalAuthorit y
Donor
Other (pleasespecify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
International NGO
NGO
UN Organization
National Authority
Donor
Other (please specify)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
74.51% 38
15.69% 8
0.00% 0
9.80% 5
Q4 The organization you work for is a:Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
Cluster member
Clusterobserver*
Don't know
Other (pleasespecify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Cluster member
Cluster observer*
Don't know
Other (please specify)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.1.1
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
1.96% 1
43.14% 22
54.90% 28
0.00% 0
Q6 Are you satisfied with the frequency of cluster meetings?Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
No meet ingshave been held
Not at allsat isfied
Ratherunsat isfied
Fairlysat isfied
Very sat isfied
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No meetings have been held
Not at all satisfied
Rather unsatisfied
Fairly satisfied
Very satisfied
Do not know
88.24%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.1.2
0.00% 0
1.96% 1
11.76% 6
27.45% 14
58.82% 30
0.00% 0
Q7 How frequently has your organization participated in clustermeetings?Only answer this question if the following conditions are
met:The answer was 'Not at all satisfied' or 'Rather unsatisfied' or 'Fairlysatisfied' or 'Very satisfied' at question '5 [q111]' (Are you satisfied with
the frequency of cluster meetings?)Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
Never
Rarely
Somet imes
Often
Always
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Never
Rarely
Sometimes
Often
Always
Do not know
85.78%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.1.3
0.00% 0
3.92% 2
41.18% 21
54.90% 28
0.00% 0
Q8 Could your organization participate fully in cluster meetings? (Forexample, were meetings in accessible locations? Could participants
speak in a range of languages?)Only answer this question if the followingconditions are met:The answer was 'Not at all satisfied' or 'Rather
unsatisfied' or 'Fairly satisfied' or 'Very satisfied' at question '5 [q111]'(Are you satisfied with the frequency of cluster meetings?)
Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
It was verydifficult to...
It was quitedifficult to...
It was fairlyeasy to at te...
It was veryeasy to at te...
I don't know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
It was very difficult to attend and participate in cluster meetings
It was quite difficult to attend and participate in cluster meetings
It was fairly easy to attend and participate in cluster meetings
It was very easy to attend and participate in cluster meetings
I don't know
86.77%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.1.4
56.86% 29
41.18% 21
1.96% 1
Q9 Did the staff who represented your organization at cluster meetingshave decision-making authority and were they able to follow-up on
decisions made?Only answer this question if the following conditions aremet: Answer was 'Not at all satisfied' or 'Rather unsatisfied' or 'Fairly
satisfied' or 'Very satisfied' at question '5 [q111]' (Are you satisfied withthe frequency of cluster meetings?) and Answer was 'Rarely' or
'Sometimes' or 'Often' or 'Always' at question '6 [q112]' (How frequentlyhas your organization participated in cluster meetings? )
Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
They had fulldecision-mak...
They hadlimited...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
They had full decision-making authority and were fully able to follow-up on decisions made
They had limited decision-making authority and some ability to follow-up on decisions made
Do not know
83.83%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.1.5
0.00% 0
11.76% 6
47.06% 24
41.18% 21
0.00% 0
0.00% 0
Q10 Have cluster meetings been able to identify and discuss needs, gapsand response priorities?Only answer this question if the followingconditions are met:The answer was 'Not at all satisfied' or 'Rather
unsatisfied' or 'Fairly satisfied' or 'Very satisfied' at question '5 [q111]'(Are you satisfied with the frequency of cluster meetings?)
Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
No
To a l imitedextent
Quite a lot
Definitely
I don't know
Other (pleasespecify)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No
To a limited extent
Quite a lot
Definitely
I don't know
Other (please specify)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
79.42%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.1.6
1.96% 1
1.96% 1
25.49% 13
56.86% 29
13.73% 7
0.00% 0
Q11 Has the cluster taken strategic decisions about the direction of thehumanitarianresponse?
Answered: 51 Skipped: 1
TOTAL 51
No st rategicdecisions we...
St rategicdecisions we...
St rategicdecisions we...
St rategicdecisions we...
St rategicdecisions we...
I don't know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No strategic decisions were taken
Strategic decisions were taken but they were not useful
Strategic decisions were taken and they were somewhat useful
Strategic decisions were taken and they were mostly useful
Strategic decisions were taken and they were very useful
I don't know
69.61%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment Result
1.2.1
2.00% 1
4.00% 2
0.00% 0
10.00% 5
28.00% 14
48.00% 24
0.00% 0
8.00% 4
Q12 Has your cluster regularly mapped what partners are doing andwhere they areworking (via 3W and similar mechanisms)? Has your
organization contributed?Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 50
No mapping hasbeen done
Mapping hasbeen done bu...
Mapping hasbeen done an...
Mapping hasbeen done an...
Mapping hasbeen done an...
Mapping hasbeen done an...
Do not know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No mapping has been done
Mapping has been done but my organization did not contribute
Mapping has been done and my organization contributed far less often than required
Mapping has been done and my organization contributed less often than required
Mapping has been done and my organization contributed almost as often as required
Mapping has been done and my organization contributed as often as required
Do not know
Not applicable (for example, because my organization is a donor)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment Result
84.5%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
1.2.2
0.00% 0
12.00% 6
6.00% 3
6.00% 3
Q13 Has your organization contributed to analyses by the cluster of gapsand overlaps (capacity and complementarity), derived from this mapping?Only answer this question if the following conditions are met:The answerwas 'Mapping has been done but my organization did not contribute' or'Mapping has been done and my organization contributed far less often
than required' or 'Mapping has been done and my organizationcontributed less often than required' or 'Mapping has been done and my
organization contributed almost as often as required' or 'Mapping hasbeen done and my organization contributed as often as required ' or 'Donot know' or 'Not applicable (for example, because my organization is adonor)' in question '11 [q121]' (Has your cluster regularly mapped what
partners are doing and where they are working (via 3W and similarmechanisms)? Has your organization contributed?)
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
No analyses ofcapacity and...
Analyses havebeen done bu...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
I don't know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No analyses of capacity and complementarity have been undertaken
Analyses have been done but my organization was not invited to participate
My organization was invited to participate but did not do so
My organization participated but its contribution was not adequately taken into account
84.5%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
34.00% 17
36.00% 18
0.00% 0
6.00% 3
TOTAL 50
My organization participated and its contribution was taken into account somewhat adequately
My organization participated and its contribution was adequately taken into account
I don't know
Not applicable (for example, because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment Result
1.2.3
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment Result
Q14 Has your organization taken decisions based on the cluster’sanalysis of gaps andoverlaps (capacity and complementarity), derivedfrom this mapping?Only answer this question if the following conditionsare met:The answer was 'Mapping has been done, but my organization
did not contribute' or 'Mapping has been done, and my organizationcontributed far less often than required' or 'Mapping has been done, and
my organization contributed less often than required' or 'Mapping hasbeen done, and my organization contributed almost as often as required'or 'Mapping has been done, and my organization contributed as often asrequired ' or 'Do not know' or 'Not applicable (for example, because my
organization is a donor)' at question '11 [q121]' (Has your cluster regularlymapped what partners are doing and where they are working (via 3Wand similar mechanisms)? Has your organization contributed?) and
Answer was 'Analyses have been done, but my organization was notinvited to participate' or 'My organization was invited to participate but did
not do so' or 'My organization participated but its contribution was notadequately taken into account' or 'My organization participated and its
contribution was taken into account somewhat adequately' or 'Myorganization participated and its contribution was adequately taken intoaccount' or 'Do not know' or 'Not applicable (for example, because my
organization has observer status or is not engaged in this clusteractivity.)' in question '12 [q122]' (Has your organization contributed to
analyses by the cluster of gaps and overlaps (capacity andcomplementarity), derived from this mapping?)
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
2.00% 1
10.00% 5
20.00% 10
38.00% 19
28.00% 14
2.00% 1
TOTAL 50
Never
Seldom
Somet imes
Often
Always
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Never
Seldom
Sometimes
Often
Always
Do not know
69%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
2.1.1
6.00% 3
14.00% 7
8.00% 4
30.00% 15
20.00% 10
16.00% 8
6.00% 3
Q16 Has your organization used sectoral needs assessment tools andguidelines agreed by cluster partners?
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 50
No assessmenttools and...
Assessmenttools and...
Assessmenttools and...
Assessmenttools and...
Assessmenttools and...
Assessmenttools and...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No assessment tools and guidance have been agreed
Assessment tools and guidance have been agreed but my organization has not used them
Assessment tools and guidance have been agreed but my organization has seldom used them
Assessment tools and guidance have been agreed and my organization has sometimes used them
Assessment tools and guidance have been agreed and my organization has often used them
Assessment tools and guidance have been agreed and my organization has always used them
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
66.00%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
2.1.2
10.00% 5
20.00% 10
8.00% 4
20.00% 10
16.00% 8
12.00% 6
2.00% 1
12.00% 6
Q17 Has your organization been involved in coordinated sectoral needsassessment and surveys?
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 50
No coordinatedassessments ...
Coordinatedassessments ...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
I don't know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No coordinated assessments or surveys have been done
Coordinated assessments and surveys have been done but my organization has not been involved
My organization has rarely been involved in coordinated assessments and surveys
My organization has sometimes been involved in coordinated assessments and surveys
My organization has been involved in most coordinated assessments and surveys
My organization has been involved in all coordinated assessments and surveys
I don't know
Not applicable (for example because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
52.00%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
2.1.3
4.00% 2
4.00% 2
18.00% 9
16.00% 8
30.00% 15
14.00% 7
2.00% 1
12.00% 6
Q18 Has your organization shared reports of its surveys andassessments with the cluster?
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 50
No surveys orassessments...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
I don't know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No surveys or assessments have been done
My organization has shared none of its survey or assessment reports
My organization has shared few of its survey and assessment reports
My organization has shared some of its survey and assessment reports
My organization has shared most survey and assessment reports
My organization has shared all its survey and assessment reports
I don't know
Not applicable (for example because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
66.00%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
2.2.1
62.00%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
62.00% 31
36.00% 18
2.00% 1
Q19 Has your organization done situation analyses together with clusterpartners?
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 50
Yes
No
I don't know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Yes
No
I don't know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
2.2.2
76%GOOD
Q20 Have these analyses identified risks, needs, gaps, the capacity torespond, and constraints?Only answer this question if the following
conditions are met:The answer was 'Yes' at question '18 [q221]' (Hasyour organization done situation analyses together with cluster partners?)
Please choose the appropriate response to each item:Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
12.00%6
16.00%8
52.00%26
18.00%9
2.00%1
50
2.82
10.00%5
10.00%5
50.00%25
28.00%14
2.00%1
50
3.02
10.00%5
18.00%9
50.00%25
20.00%10
2.00%1
50
2.86
10.42%5
16.67%8
43.75%21
27.08%13
2.08%1
48
2.94
12.00%6
14.00%7
52.00%26
18.00%9
4.00%2
50
2.88
Risks
Needs
Gaps inresponse
Capacity torespond
Const raints torespond
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
NOTIDENTIFIED
PARTIALLYIDENTIFIED
MOSTLYIDENTIFIED
FULLYIDENTIFIED
DO NOTKNOW
TOTAL WEIGHTEDAVERAGE
Risks
Needs
Gaps inresponse
Capacity torespond
Constraints torespond
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
2.2.3
IRAQ
78%GOOD
Q21 Have these analyses considered cross-cutting issues? Only answerthis question if the following conditions are met:The answer was 'Yes' at
question '18 [q221]' (Has your organization done situation analysestogether with cluster partners?) Please choose the appropriate response
to each item:Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
14.00%7
18.00%9
46.00%23
18.00%9
4.00%2
50
2.80
12.24%6
14.29%7
53.06%26
16.33%8
4.08%2
49
2.86
16.00%8
34.00%17
34.00%17
12.00%6
4.00%2
50
2.54
14.00%7
30.00%15
34.00%17
16.00%8
6.00%3
50
2.70
10.00%5
30.00%15
46.00%23
10.00%5
4.00%2
50
2.68
16.00%8
34.00%17
34.00%17
8.00%4
8.00%4
50
2.58
28.57%14
26.53%13
34.69%17
4.08%2
6.12%3
49
2.33
Age
Gender
Diversit y(other than ...
Human Rights
Protect ion(incl. sexua...
Environment
HIV/AIDS
Disabil it y
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
NOTIDENTIFIED
PARTIALLYIDENTIFIED
MOSTLYIDENTIFIED
FULLYIDENTIFIED
DO NOTKNOW
TOTAL WEIGHTEDAVERAGE
Age
Gen
Div an age andgen
Hu
Prot exual andgen lence)
Envi
HIV/
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
10.00%5
28.00%14
48.00%24
8.00%4
6.00%3
50
2.72
Disability
2.3.1
84%GOOD
0.00% 0
24.00% 12
40.00% 20
32.00% 16
4.00% 2
Q22 Have these analyses supported response planning andprioritization?Only answer this question if the following conditions are
met:The answer was 'No' at question '18 [q221]' (Has your organizationdone situation analyses together with cluster partners?)
Answered: 50 Skipped: 2
TOTAL 50
Never
Somet imes
Often
Always
I don't know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Never
Sometimes
Often
Always
I don't know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
79%GOOD
0.00% 0
4.08% 2
6.12% 3
2.04% 1
28.57% 14
44.90% 22
0.00% 0
14.29% 7
Q24 Has your organization helped to develop a cluster strategic plan?Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 49
The clusterhas not ...
A plan hasbeen develop...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
I don't know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
The cluster has not developed its strategic plan
A plan has been developed but my organization was not asked to participate
My organization was asked to help develop the plan but it did not contribute
My organization helped develop the plan but its contribution was not adequately taken into account
My organization helped develop the plan and its contribution was taken into account somewhat adequately
My organization helped develop the plan and its contribution was adequately taken into account
I don't know
Not applicable (for example, because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
3.1.1
2.04% 1
TOTAL 49
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
80.1%GOOD
3.1.2
2.04% 1
0.00% 0
14.29% 7
34.69% 17
46.94% 23
Q25 []Has the cluster strategic plan guided the response of yourorganization in the last six months? *Only answer this question if the
following conditions are met:Answer was 'A plan has been developed, butmy organization was not asked to participate' or 'My organization was
asked to help develop the plan, but it did not contribute' or 'Myorganization helped develop the plan but its contribution was not
adequately taken into account' or 'My organization helped develop theplan, and its contribution was taken into account somewhat adequately' or
'My organization helped develop the plan, and its contribution wasadequately taken into account' or 'Do not know' or 'Not applicable (for
example, because my organization has observer status or is not engagedin this cluster activity.)' in question '23 [q 11]' (Has your organization
helped to develop a cluster strategic plan?)Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
A st rategicplan exists ...
The st rategicplan has bee...
The st rategicplan has bee...
The st rategicplan has bee...
The st rategicplan has bee...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
A strategic plan exists but it has not been shared with my organization
The strategic plan has been shared but my organization has not used it
The strategic plan has been shared and my organization has sometimes used it
The strategic plan has been shared and my organization has often used it
The strategic plan has been shared and my organization has always used it
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
80.1%GOOD
3.2.1
2.04% 1
2.04% 1
14.29% 7
20.41% 10
57.14% 28
4.08% 2
Q26 Have cluster partners agreed on technical standards and guidanceand have your organization applied them?**Technical standards and
guidelines may be issued either by specific technical working groups oremerge from cluster discussions.
Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 49
No technicalstandards/gu...
Technicalstandards/gu...
Technicalstandards/gu...
Technicalstandards/gu...
Technicalstandards/gu...
I don't know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No technical standards/guidelines have been agreed
Technical standards/guidelines have been agreed but my organization has not used them
Technical standards/guidelines have been agreed and my organization has sometimes used them
Technical standards/guidelines have been agreed and my organization has often used them
Technical standards/guidelines have been agreed and my organization has always used them
I don't know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
80.6%GOOD
0.00% 0
2.04% 1
12.24% 6
30.61% 15
51.02% 25
4.08% 2
Q27 Have cluster partners participated in prioritizing proposals under thestrategic plan? Were transparent criteria agreed?
Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 49
No t ransparentcriteria wer...
Transparentcriteria hav...
Transparentcriteria wer...
Transparentcriteria wer...
Transparentcriteria wer...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No transparent criteria were agreed and partners did not jointly prioritize proposals
Transparent criteria have not been agreed but partners jointly prioritized proposals
Transparent criteria were agreed but partners did not jointly prioritize proposals
Transparent criteria were agreed and partners jointly prioritized proposals to some extent
Transparent criteria were agreed and partners were fully involved in prioritizing proposals
Do not know
3.3.1
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
76.2%GOOD
3.3.2
4.08% 2
0.00% 0
4.08% 2
30.61% 15
51.02% 25
10.20% 5
Q28 Were proposals prioritized against the strategic plan in a manner thatwas fair to all partners?
Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 49
Proposals werenot priorit i...
Proposals werepriorit ized ...
Proposals werepriorit ized ...
Proposals werepriorit ized ...
Proposals werepriorit ized ...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Proposals were not prioritized against the strategic plan
Proposals were prioritized but in a manner that was unfair to partners
Proposals were prioritized in a manner that was unfair to the majority of partners
Proposals were prioritized in a manner that was fair to the majority of partners
Proposals were prioritized in a manner that was fair to all partners
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment SurveyMonkey
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
84.18%GOOD
3.3.3
0.00% 0
6.12% 3
0.00% 0
36.73% 18
55.10% 27
2.04% 1
Q29 How often has the cluster coordinator reported on the cluster’sfunding status against needs*?*For example, tracking funds received
against SRP and other appeals and proposals.Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 49
Never
Far less oftenthan needed
Less oftenthan needed
Almost asoften as needed
As often asneeded
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Never
Far less often than needed
Less often than needed
Almost as often as needed
As often as needed
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment SurveyMonkey
81.12%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
4.1.1
4.08% 2
6.12% 3
2.04% 1
4.08% 2
75.51% 37
2.04% 1
6.12% 3
Q31 Have issues requiring advocacy been identified and discussedtogether with your organization?
Answered: 49 Skipped: 3
TOTAL 49
No advocacyissues have...
Advocacyissues have...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Do not know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No advocacy issues have been discussed
Advocacy issues have been discussed but my organization was not invited to participate
My organization was invited to discussions of advocacy issues but did not participate
My organization participated in advocacy discussions but its views were not adequately considered
My organization participated in advocacy discussions and its views were adequately considered
Do not know
Not applicable (for example, because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment SurveyMonkey
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
73.96%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
4.2.1
4.17% 2
8.33% 4
0.00% 0
20.83% 10
56.25% 27
2.08% 1
8.33% 4
Q32 Has your organization participated in cluster advocacy activities?Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
The clusterhas undertak...
The clusterhas undertak...
The clusterinvited my...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Do not know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
The cluster has undertaken no advocacy
The cluster has undertaken advocacy but my organization was not invited to participate
The cluster invited my organization to participate in its advocacy, but it did not do so
My organization has participated in some of the cluster’s advocacy activities
My organization has participated in most of the cluster’s advocacy activities
Do not know
Not applicable (for example, because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
82.81%GOOD
2.08% 1
2.08% 1
10.42% 5
33.33% 16
52.08% 25
0.00% 0
Q34 Have cluster bulletins or updates highlighted risks, gaps andchanging needs, and has this information influenced your organization’s
decisions?Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
Clusterbullet ins an...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Cluster bulletins and other reports have not highlighted risks, gaps and changing needs.
My organization has not used cluster information on needs, risks and gaps for decision-making
My organization has sometimes used cluster information on needs, risks and gaps for decision-making
My organization has often used cluster information on needs, risks and gaps for decision-making
My organization has always used cluster information on needs, risks and gaps for decision-making
Do not know
5.1.1
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultCluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
81.77%GOOD
5.1.2
2.08% 1
2.08% 1
8.33% 4
25.00% 12
58.33% 28
4.17% 2
Q35 Has your organization used programme monitoring and reportingformats agreed by the cluster?
Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
No standardsfor monitori...
Standards havebeen agreed ...
Standards havebeen agreed ...
Standards havebeen agreed ...
Standards havebeen agreed ...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No standards for monitoring and reporting have been agreed
Standards have been agreed but my organization does not use these formats for reporting
Standards have been agreed and my organization has sometimes used these formats when it reports
Standards have been agreed and my organization has regularly used these formats when it reports
Standards have been agreed and my organization has used these formats very regularly for reporting
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultCluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
82.29%GOOD
5.1.3
2.08% 1
0.00% 0
2.08% 1
2.08% 1
43.75% 21
47.92% 23
2.08% 1
Q36 Has your cluster taken account of the distinct needs, contributions,and capacities of women, girls, men, and boys in its response and
monitoring?*Answer “Not applicable” if the cluster’s activities do notinvolve direct contact with affected populations, or do not directly affect ordetermine the selection or use of resources, goods or services accessed
by affected populations.Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
Not applicable
No
To a smallextent
Part ially
Most ly
Fully
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
Not applicable
No
To a small extent
Partially
Mostly
Fully
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment Result
76.65%GOOD
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
6.1.1
4.17% 2
4.17% 2
0.00% 0
6.25% 3
70.83% 34
4.17% 2
10.42% 5
Q38 Has your organization helped to develop or update preparednessplans (including multisectoral ones) that address hazards and risks?
Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
A preparednessplan has not ...
A preparednessplan was...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Myorganizat ion...
Do not know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
A preparedness plan has not been written or updated
A preparedness plan was drafted/updated but my organization was not invited to participate
My organization was invited to help develop/update the preparedness plan but did not do so
My organization helped develop/update the preparedness plan but its contribution was inadequate
My organization helped develop/update the preparedness plan and its contribution was adequate
Do not know
Not applicable (for example because my organization has observer status or is not engaged in this cluster activity.)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultCluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
75%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
6.1.2
8.33% 4
12.50% 6
68.75% 33
2.08% 1
8.33% 4
Q39 Has your organization committed staff or resources that can bemobilized when preparedness plans are activated?Only answer this
question if the following conditions are met:Answer was 'A preparednessplan was drafted/updated but my organization was not invited to
participate' or 'My organization was invited to help develop/update thepreparedness plan but did not do so' or 'My organization helpeddevelop/update the preparedness plan but its contribution was
inadequate' or 'My organization helped develop/update the preparednessplan and its contribution was adequate' or 'Do not know' or 'Not applicable
(for example because my organization has observer status or is notengaged in this cluster activity.)' in question '37 [q61]' (Has your
organization helped to develop or update preparedness plans (includingmultisectoral ones) that address hazards and risks?)
Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
No staff orresources ha...
Limited staffor resources...
Adequate staffor resources...
Do not know
Not applicable(for example...
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No staff or resources have been committed
Limited staff or resources have been committed
Adequate staff or resources have been committed
Do not know
Not applicable (for example because my organization has observer status or is not engaging in this cluster activity.)
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment Result
56.77%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
7.1.1
18.75% 9
16.67% 8
2.08% 1
27.08% 13
18.75% 9
12.50% 6
4.17% 2
Q41 Have cluster partners agreed on mechanisms (procedures, tools ormethodologies) for consulting and involving affected people in decision-making?* Has your organization applied them?**in line with CAAP (IASC
principals’ commitments on accountability to affected populations).Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
No mechanismsfor...
Mechanismshave been...
Mechanismshave been...
Mechanismshave been...
Mechanismshave been...
Mechanismshave been...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No mechanisms for consultation/involvement have been agreed
Mechanisms have been agreed but my organization has not applied them
Mechanisms have been agreed but my organization has seldom applied them
Mechanisms have been agreed and my organization has sometimes applied them
Mechanisms have been agreed and my organization has often applied them
Mechanisms have been agreed and my organization has always applied them
Do not know
Cluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultCluster Coordination Performance Monitoring - Partners' Assessment ResultIRAQ
59.89%Satisfactory
needs minor improvements
16.67% 8
14.58% 7
2.08% 1
20.83% 10
27.08% 13
12.50% 6
6.25% 3
Q42 Have cluster partners agreed on mechanisms (procedures, tools ormethodologies) to receive, investigate and act on complains by affected
people? Does your organization apply these mechanisms?Answered: 48 Skipped: 4
TOTAL 48
Noinvest igat io...
Aninvest igat io...
Aninvest igat io...
Aninvest igat io...
Aninvest igat io...
Aninvest igat io...
Do not know
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES
No investigation/complaint mechanism has been agreed
An investigation/complaint mechanism has been agreed but my organization has not applied it
An investigation/complaint mechanism has been agreed but my organization has seldom applied it
An investigation/complaint mechanism has been agreed and my organization has sometimes applied it
An investigation/complaint mechanism has been agreed and my organization has often applied it
An investigation/complaint mechanism has been agreed and my organization has always applied it
Do not know
7.1.2