35
Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie 1 , I. Ghetti 2 , P. Milevski 1 1 Floodplain Management Engineer, Wollongong City Council, Wollongong, Australia E-mail: [email protected] 2 Unit Leader Floodplain Management Team, Wollongong City Council, NSW, Australia

Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models

R Van Drie1 I Ghetti 2 P Milevski 11Floodplain Management Engineer Wollongong City Council Wollongong Australia

E-mail rudybalancerndcomau2Unit Leader Floodplain Management Team Wollongong City Council NSW Australia

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- Scott Hoganrsquos Acronymhellip C H A N G E- As an industry do we need to just breathehellip and take philosophical look at ourselves

- (Interesting discussionshellip Similar issues )

- Why am I here

- What is our role

- Keeping our Communities from Harm - (what is hampering this evolving at a better rate)

httpswwwdropboxcomsz8sqex9dcpl6c8s2018_ASFPM_VanDrie_etal_Finalpdfdl=0

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- What are we connected by (What is the common thread)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- As an industry do we need to just breathehellip and take philosophical look at ourselves

- Why am I here

- What is our role

- What do I know - about HAZARD- VxD

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

VxDhellipfor RayhellipQuestion

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Models (amp the Wollongong Context)

This presentation is generally about the need to check a flood model but specifically about the experiences at Wollongong City Council- About Wollongong- About Flooding (in Wollongong)- About Responsibility (for flood models)- What we currently do - What the future holdshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 2: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- Scott Hoganrsquos Acronymhellip C H A N G E- As an industry do we need to just breathehellip and take philosophical look at ourselves

- (Interesting discussionshellip Similar issues )

- Why am I here

- What is our role

- Keeping our Communities from Harm - (what is hampering this evolving at a better rate)

httpswwwdropboxcomsz8sqex9dcpl6c8s2018_ASFPM_VanDrie_etal_Finalpdfdl=0

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- What are we connected by (What is the common thread)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- As an industry do we need to just breathehellip and take philosophical look at ourselves

- Why am I here

- What is our role

- What do I know - about HAZARD- VxD

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

VxDhellipfor RayhellipQuestion

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Models (amp the Wollongong Context)

This presentation is generally about the need to check a flood model but specifically about the experiences at Wollongong City Council- About Wollongong- About Flooding (in Wollongong)- About Responsibility (for flood models)- What we currently do - What the future holdshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 3: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- What are we connected by (What is the common thread)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- As an industry do we need to just breathehellip and take philosophical look at ourselves

- Why am I here

- What is our role

- What do I know - about HAZARD- VxD

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

VxDhellipfor RayhellipQuestion

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Models (amp the Wollongong Context)

This presentation is generally about the need to check a flood model but specifically about the experiences at Wollongong City Council- About Wollongong- About Flooding (in Wollongong)- About Responsibility (for flood models)- What we currently do - What the future holdshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 4: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Mmm hellip Time for changes- As an industry do we need to just breathehellip and take philosophical look at ourselves

- Why am I here

- What is our role

- What do I know - about HAZARD- VxD

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

VxDhellipfor RayhellipQuestion

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Models (amp the Wollongong Context)

This presentation is generally about the need to check a flood model but specifically about the experiences at Wollongong City Council- About Wollongong- About Flooding (in Wollongong)- About Responsibility (for flood models)- What we currently do - What the future holdshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 5: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

VxDhellipfor RayhellipQuestion

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Models (amp the Wollongong Context)

This presentation is generally about the need to check a flood model but specifically about the experiences at Wollongong City Council- About Wollongong- About Flooding (in Wollongong)- About Responsibility (for flood models)- What we currently do - What the future holdshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 6: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Models (amp the Wollongong Context)

This presentation is generally about the need to check a flood model but specifically about the experiences at Wollongong City Council- About Wollongong- About Flooding (in Wollongong)- About Responsibility (for flood models)- What we currently do - What the future holdshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 7: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Wollongong Flood HistoryIn the past 50 years Wollongong has experienced over 30 floods classified as

serious severe or very severe During this period there were also three floods that

were classified as extreme In February 1984 850mm of rain fell in a 24 hour period

The last widespread extreme flood occurred in 1998 causing millions of dollars worth ofdamage and one fatalityNoting that a similarly localised floodoccurred in 1999 (1 year later )

- This is not unique to Australia as has

been shown in the US in Baltimorehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 8: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Hydrologic Features of Wollongong

bull Triangular Coastal Strip ndash 0km ndash 15km wide (N-S)

bull Orographic effectsbull Multiple catchmentsbull Small catchmentsbull Fast responsebull Early Development

(Clearing)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 9: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Development- Heavily Cleared of Vegetation- Progressed from the Ocean to

the Mtn- Flood capacity not considered

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 10: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

More issueshellipbull Watercourses run Perpendicular to major

transport infrastructure (Road and Rail)bull Lack of staff with expertise to check Modelsbull Worrying Trends in the Industry

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 11: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Flood Studies

bull 320km2 of catchment run directly from the Escarpment to the sea

bull LGA (Red) bull East flowing catchments

(Lgreen)bull Studies completed

(orange)bull ~ $5-10million

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 12: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Historic Level of Checking

bull Flood Studies have been conducted under a jointly funded structure since 1982 (with State and Federal monies and state oversight)ndash However with very limited technical oversight from

State authorities

bull Corporatisation of Local Government has resulted in a loss of internal expertise (1990rsquos)ndash Once had technical staff to undertake checking

bull Including at times independent modelling checks

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 13: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Found1 Instabilities at culverts and bridges2 Culverts poorly or wrongly placed 3 Culvert data wrong (size etc)4 Poor model construction glass walls5 Poor hydrology used as in input (in Hydraulic Model)6 Poor Sub Area subdivision in hydrologic model7 Use of lumped storage in 2D model8 Missing minor tributaries9 Missing major overland flow paths and areas10 Cross catchment flows not identified11 Cross section locations and spacing resulting in unrepresentative flow path capacity

(or restriction) 1D12 Poorly defined Mannings Roughness13 Poor description of building polygons resulting in excessive obstruction to flow14 Extent of model insufficient to cover flow width extent15 Poor production of Maps with errors (Eg 120 yr level higher then 1100 year level)bull hellipetc etc

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 14: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull In the context of a single catchment

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 15: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Drilling down into the catchment resultsndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth ndash Connection of 1D elements interfacehellip

01

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 16: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Errors Exposed in Design Processndash Placement of Hydrograph impact on Depth

02

From Flood StudyAdoptedhellip(Ins) etc

Through Design Process

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 17: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Artificially high Flat pond ndash Properties (wrongly) identified as flood prone

03

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 18: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellip

bull Model predicting velocities that make no sense ndash Peak velocity through a house

bull Impact on Hazard definitionhellip

04

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 19: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Model error and post processing plotting

errorndash 5yr extent of flooding larger than 100 year

15 year Event

1100 year Event

05

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 20: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Errors Exampleshelliphelliphellipbull Poor Practices

ndash Glass wallsbull False raised flood heightbull (not picked up adopted)

ndash Study Redonebull Similar issues in new one

06

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 21: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Impact of Errorsbull Organisation embarrassed to have to identify errors publicallybull COST TO REDO Flood Study (s) Multiple timeshellipbull COST OF Issuing incorrect information (to developers etc)bull Impacts of Flood Insurancehellip

bull Some errors (placing hydrograph in wrong location) have resulted in houses being built where models show no flooding But reality

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 22: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Checking Capabilitybull In Australia most Local Authorities have very

limited capacity (especially since corporatization)

bull Larger councils (WCC amp Brisbanehellip) have staff with expertisendash The only real viable approach to date was limited to

reading the report reviewing data reviewing results plots etc Realistically non effective

bull Very limiting given its over a total catchment

ndash Many more errors uncovered in time with using the resultshellip

bull Water level enquiries for development (S149 certificates)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 23: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Better Approachesbull Model build Report

ndash Steps taken by consultant to create their flood models including all data input and changeshellip

bull Warranty Clausehellipbull Shadow Check Models

ndash Availability of Free Open Source Modelbull ANUGA (and its capabilities)

ndash A Model Frameworkbull Built on ANUGA and Python codebull Know your Maths (more laterhellip)

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 24: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA bull Finite Volume shock capturing discontinuous

rainfall on grid flexibly sized triangular gridbull Flexible to apply due to Pythonic controlsbull Single output file holds Full time history

bull Momentum ElevationStage any otherbull Open source increasing contributors in time

ndash Eg Mareila Perignon (Univ Colorado)bull ANUGA Featured at the University of Colorado (Community

Surface Dynamics Modeling System) CSDMS ANUGA Clinic 24 May 2018

httpsenwikipediaorgwikiANUGA_Hydro

httpsgithubcomGeoscienceAustraliaanuga_core

httpscsdmscoloradoeduwikiHydrological_Models

Run Eg 1 Run Eg 2

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 25: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 26: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 27: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 28: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Why ANUGA

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 29: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

IMPACT of ANUGA bull FAST MODEL DEVELOPMENTbull Fast to determine Flow Paths

ndash Used to aid consultant in setting up models

bull Shadow Check modelsndash Have uncovered many problems with consultants

modelsndash Used to assist in correcting mistakesndash Used to compare volume and Hydrographs

bull Improved outcome for Flood Studies

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 30: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Frameworkbull What is a Framework

bull Systematic structured approach whereby complex computationally intensive tasks can be reproduced (and updated) consistently and efficiently

bull Additional Outcomeshellipndash Flash Flood Warning System

bull (linked to Radar Rainfall)

ndash Community Flood Feedback Frameworkndash Design input tool for Council projectshellip

bull Proof of Concepthellipbull The Maths

httpswwwfloodplainconferencecompapers2014Rudy20Van20Driepdf

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 31: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

Conclusionbull Of the now 100rsquos of flood studies conducted for

WCC since 1982 not a single one has been free of significant errorsndash Modelling Errors Processing Errors

bull How to Check Modelsndash WCC Shadow check models

bull Leading to a FRAMEWORK (Autonomous Flood Modelling)

bull Who is Responsiblebull We are ALL Responsiblehellip (bring back honesty)

ndash Burdened (the Authority)ndash Leverage (Contractually)

bull Limitedhellip -Warranty Concepts

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 32: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

RECOMMENDATIONS

bull Hold your Consultants Accountable ndash Warranty Period Concepts

bull Withholding payments till study has been used and tested for 12 months

bull Building and maintaining library of Modelsndash (That are owned and kept active and up to date)

bull Consideration of a In-house Modelling Framework (Using ANUGA FOSS)ndash Autonomous Modelling

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 33: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Make your Consultants Accountable

Consider how to develop Checking Methods

Check Models

Benefit of Organisational Autonomous Flood Model Framework hellip

We are all responsiblehellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 34: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

KAHOOT

Please use your device to log into

KAHOOTit

We will progress through 5 questionshellip

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me

Page 35: Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models · 2019-10-21 · Who is Responsible for Checking Flood Models R. Van Drie1, I. Ghetti 2, P. Milevski 1 1Floodplain Management Engineer,

rudybalancerndcomauDirect any Questions to

Session F1 330 ndash 500pm 20052018

QUESTIONS

bull rudybalancerndcomau

If any one has any questions about- this presentation or - the ANUGA model or - Training in the use of ANUGA

- I would like to propose to prepare a Workshop on the use of ANUGA- 2019 (would there be any interest )

Feel free to contact me