19
Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization? Morio Nagahata , Rei Kondo*, Shinjiro Saito*, Atsuhito Takemura**, Toru Hatayama** Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan * Department of Neurosurgery, Yamagata City Hospital SAISEIKAN, Japan **Department of Neurosurgery, Aomori City Hospital, Japan

Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Simple technique? Combination with adjunctive technique? such as balloon / stent assistance Selection of the microcatheter How about the steam shaping of the catheter tip? Interventional neuroradiologists often worry about the appropriate coiling procedure

Citation preview

Page 1: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Morio Nagahata, Rei Kondo*, Shinjiro Saito*, Atsuhito Takemura**, Toru Hatayama**

Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan

* Department of Neurosurgery, Yamagata City Hospital SAISEIKAN, Japan**Department of Neurosurgery, Aomori City Hospital, Japan

Page 2: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Introduction

paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm

Coil embolization is not always easy due to its anatomical location

or shape of the aneurysm.

Page 3: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

• Simple technique?• Combination with adjunctive technique?

such as balloon / stent assistance• Selection of the microcatheter• How about the steam shaping of the catheter tip?

Interventional neuroradiologists often worry about the appropriate coiling procedure

Page 4: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Does the maneuver of

– exchanging microcatheter / coils

– combined adjunctive technique (assist balloon) lead to more frequent ischemic complication?

60F, unruptured left ICA aneurysm diameter: 6mm

coiling with balloon assistance

silent infarction

Page 5: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Purpose

To analyze the factors

which increase the frequency of thromboembolic events

during the coil embolization of the unruptured

paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysms.

Page 6: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Materials and Methods• December 2007 – April 2010• 14 consecutive patients with unruptured paraclinoid

internal carotid aneurysms– Treated with GDCs.– 1 male, 13 females– Aged 40-71, mean 58.6 y.o.– Max. diameter of aneurysm: 3.4-8.5, mean 5.5mm– Simple coiling in 7 patients– Balloon assisted technique in 7 patients

Page 7: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

All patients

• Received dual antiplatelet agents preoperatively.

• Systemic heparinization during the procedure.

• Posttreatment DWI was performed within 4 days.

• A neuroradiologist and a neurosurgeon evaluated the DWI.

Page 8: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Analysis

Existence of the hyperintense lesion on postoperative DWI (within 4 days).

– Patients’ age, sex.– Maximum diameter of the aneurismal dome.– Coil packing density.– Use of assistant balloon.– Exchange of microcatheter.– Withdrawal of undetached coil.

Page 9: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Results• Neurologically symptomatic complications did not

occur in our series. • Silent procedure-related infarction was detected on

postoperative DWI in 6 cases (35.7%).

49 F, left ICA aneurysmaneurysm diameter: 4.0mmballoon assistance (+)

exchange of microcatheter (+)withdrawal of undetached coil (+)

packing density: 29.5%

silent infarcts (++)

Page 10: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.

Sex M/F

Age (mean)

y.o.

max. diameter of aneurysm

(mean)mm

Coil packing density (VER)

(mean)%

ischemiccomplication

+

0 / 6 49-68(58.8)

3.4-6.0(4.72)

18.9-32.0(26.3)

ischemiccomplication

-

1 / 7 40-71(65.5)

4.1-8.5(6.10)

15.6-47.8(29.7)

Page 11: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

withballoon

assistance

withoutballoon

assistance

ischemiccomplication

+3 3

ischemiccomplication

-4 4

Assist balloon (HyperGlide)

n.s.

Page 12: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Exchange of microcatheter

+

Exchange of microcatheter

-ischemic

complication

+3 3

ischemiccomplication

-1 7

Exchange of microcatheter during the procedure

n.s.

Page 13: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Withdrawalof coil

+

Withdrawalof coil

-ischemic

complication

+6 0

ischemiccomplication

-3 5

Withdrawal of undetached coilduring the procedure

P=0.031

Page 14: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

• Silent infarcts found in 35.7% of our cases – 66.7% cases in which we needed to withdraw the

undetached coil during the procedure – versus 0% in patients without intraprocedural coil

withdrawal. (P=0.03)

• Patient’s age, sex• Aneurysm diameter• Packing density• Balloon-assisted technique• Exchanging maneuver of microcatheter

did not increase the frequency of silent infarcts.

Page 15: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Discussion

Previous reports (cerebral aneurysms treated by coils)– Symptomatic thromboembolic complication: 1-31%– Silent infarcts observed on postoperative DWI: 20-61%– Perioperative antiplatelet management reduce the risk

Our complication rate (IC paraclinoid aneurysm): 35.7%– Asymptomatic infarcts observed on DWI– Using dual antiplatelet agents.– May be acceptable rate!

Page 16: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Thromboembolic complication can occur more frequently – large or wide-neck aneurysms,– balloon-assisted technique

Soeda M, et al. AJNR 24: 127-132, 2003

Risky maneuvers during the balloon-assisted coiling– microcatheter repositioning, – coil removal and repositioning

Albayram S, et al. AJNR 25: 1768-1777, 2004

Page 17: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

In the present study,

• Withdrawal of the unreleased coil the only factor increasing the rate of silent

infarcts.

• Aneurismal size, • Use of the assist balloon,

• Exchange of microcatheter during the procedure did not increase the frequency of silent infarcts.

Page 18: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

• It has not been known which maneuver during the procedure may be responsible for most thromboembolic events.

• We should make an appropriate selection of the coil to avoid the coil withdrawal which may lead to thromboembolic complication.

Page 19: Which factor increases procedural thromboembolic events in patients with unruptured paraclinoid internal carotid artery aneurysm treated by coil embolization?

Conclusion

Coil embolization of unruptured IC paraclinoid aneurysms

• Only the withdrawal of undetached coil from the aneurysm increased the frequency of the postoperative DWI abnormalities in our series.

• Appropriate coil selection, which may reduce the necessity of coil withdrawal, is important to perform safer embolization.