Click here to load reader
Upload
elrepositoriodelpueblo
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/12/2019 What's the Matter With Today's Experimental Music. Organised Sound Too Rarely Heard by Leigh Landy - Denis S…
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/whats-the-matter-with-todays-experimental-music-organised-sound 1/3
What's the Matter with Today's Experimental Music? Organised Sound Too Rarely Heard byLeigh LandyReview by: Denis SmalleyLeonardo Music Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1 (1992), pp. 120-121Published by: The MIT Press
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1513227 .
Accessed: 07/07/2013 00:23
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
The MIT Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Leonardo Music Journal.
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 146.164.3.22 on Sun, 7 Jul 2013 00:23:43 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
8/12/2019 What's the Matter With Today's Experimental Music. Organised Sound Too Rarely Heard by Leigh Landy - Denis S…
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/whats-the-matter-with-todays-experimental-music-organised-sound 2/3
nar (inthe editions n Russian) swell
as a listof the publications f Soviet
authors n Leonardo.
REPRESENTATIONSOF
MUSICALSIGNALSby Giovannide Poli,Aldo Piccialli
and CurtisRoads,eds.MITPress,Cambridge,MA,U.S.A.488pp., illus.
ReviewedyMarcBattier,REAM,1,
rueSaint-Mem,-75004Paras,rance.
Italy eemsto be a placeof choicefor
speculationon the conceptsof music
representation.There,in 1982, n the
context of a symposium n Musical
GrammarsndComputerAnalysis r-
ganized n Modena,CurtisRoadspre-
senteda substantial urvey n this
topic. Several ears ater,Roads,alongwith several talianresearchers,
gatheredmanycomputer-musicrac-titioners n Sorrento,a townon the
cliffsof the Mediterranean ea.Sev-
eral papers rom thisgatheringhave
been collected for thisbook, al-
thoughthey havebeen considerablyrevisedand augmented;otherpapers
were specifically ommissioned.The
book is a newadditionto a series,dedicated o recentadvancesn the
field of computermusic,publishedby
MITPress.The topicof representations f mu-
sical signals s intenselyobservedandresearched hesedays. n a way,com-
puter musichasalways een preoccu-pied by it. Afterall, the seminalwork
of MaxMathewsn soundsynthesis
and, more generally,n the design of
acousticcompilerspresenteda par-
ticularviewof the question,a view
sharedwith the electronic nstrument-buildersof its time:Olson and Belar,
creatorsof the RCA lectronicsynthe-sizer,and Hugh LeCaine, nventorof
various oundsynthesisdevices[1].
RepresentationsfMusical ignalsscomposedof 14 previously rlpuSlished exts,gatherednto fivesections:Time-frequency epresentationsf
MusicalSignals(fourtexts),Granular
Representationsf MusicalSignals
(two texts),PhysicalModelRepre-sentationof MusicalSignals(three
texts), Architecture nd ObjectRepre-sentationsof MusicalSignals(three
nar (inthe editions n Russian) swell
as a listof the publications f Soviet
authors n Leonardo.
REPRESENTATIONSOF
MUSICALSIGNALSby Giovannide Poli,Aldo Piccialli
and CurtisRoads,eds.MITPress,Cambridge,MA,U.S.A.488pp., illus.
ReviewedyMarcBattier,REAM,1,
rueSaint-Mem,-75004Paras,rance.
Italy eemsto be a placeof choicefor
speculationon the conceptsof music
representation.There,in 1982, n the
context of a symposium n Musical
GrammarsndComputerAnalysis r-
ganized n Modena,CurtisRoadspre-
senteda substantial urvey n this
topic. Several ears ater,Roads,alongwith several talianresearchers,
gatheredmanycomputer-musicrac-titioners n Sorrento,a townon the
cliffsof the Mediterranean ea.Sev-
eral papers rom thisgatheringhave
been collected for thisbook, al-
thoughthey havebeen considerablyrevisedand augmented;otherpapers
were specifically ommissioned.The
book is a newadditionto a series,dedicated o recentadvancesn the
field of computermusic,publishedby
MITPress.The topicof representations f mu-
sical signals s intenselyobservedandresearched hesedays. n a way,com-
puter musichasalways een preoccu-pied by it. Afterall, the seminalwork
of MaxMathewsn soundsynthesis
and, more generally,n the design of
acousticcompilerspresenteda par-
ticularviewof the question,a view
sharedwith the electronic nstrument-buildersof its time:Olson and Belar,
creatorsof the RCA lectronicsynthe-sizer,and Hugh LeCaine, nventorof
various oundsynthesisdevices[1].
RepresentationsfMusical ignalsscomposedof 14 previously rlpuSlished exts,gatherednto fivesections:Time-frequency epresentationsf
MusicalSignals(fourtexts),Granular
Representationsf MusicalSignals
(two texts),PhysicalModelRepre-sentationof MusicalSignals(three
texts), Architecture nd ObjectRepre-sentationsof MusicalSignals(three
nar (inthe editions n Russian) swell
as a listof the publications f Soviet
authors n Leonardo.
REPRESENTATIONSOF
MUSICALSIGNALSby Giovannide Poli,Aldo Piccialli
and CurtisRoads,eds.MITPress,Cambridge,MA,U.S.A.488pp., illus.
ReviewedyMarcBattier,REAM,1,
rueSaint-Mem,-75004Paras,rance.
Italy eemsto be a placeof choicefor
speculationon the conceptsof music
representation.There,in 1982, n the
context of a symposium n Musical
GrammarsndComputerAnalysis r-
ganized n Modena,CurtisRoadspre-
senteda substantial urvey n this
topic. Several ears ater,Roads,alongwith several talianresearchers,
gatheredmanycomputer-musicrac-titioners n Sorrento,a townon the
cliffsof the Mediterranean ea.Sev-
eral papers rom thisgatheringhave
been collected for thisbook, al-
thoughthey havebeen considerablyrevisedand augmented;otherpapers
were specifically ommissioned.The
book is a newadditionto a series,dedicated o recentadvancesn the
field of computermusic,publishedby
MITPress.The topicof representations f mu-
sical signals s intenselyobservedandresearched hesedays. n a way,com-
puter musichasalways een preoccu-pied by it. Afterall, the seminalwork
of MaxMathewsn soundsynthesis
and, more generally,n the design of
acousticcompilerspresenteda par-
ticularviewof the question,a view
sharedwith the electronic nstrument-buildersof its time:Olson and Belar,
creatorsof the RCA lectronicsynthe-sizer,and Hugh LeCaine, nventorof
various oundsynthesisdevices[1].
RepresentationsfMusical ignalsscomposedof 14 previously rlpuSlished exts,gatherednto fivesections:Time-frequency epresentationsf
MusicalSignals(fourtexts),Granular
Representationsf MusicalSignals
(two texts),PhysicalModelRepre-sentationof MusicalSignals(three
texts), Architecture nd ObjectRepre-sentationsof MusicalSignals(three
texts) and ParallelDistributedProc-essing Representations f MusicalSig-nals (three texts).These sectionsareclear reflectionson the natureof mu-sical sigrlalsndthe variouswayso con-sider hem.To help the readergrasp
texts) and ParallelDistributedProc-essing Representations f MusicalSig-nals (three texts).These sectionsareclear reflectionson the natureof mu-sical sigrlalsndthe variouswayso con-sider hem.To help the readergrasp
texts) and ParallelDistributedProc-essing Representations f MusicalSig-nals (three texts).These sectionsareclear reflectionson the natureof mu-sical sigrlalsndthe variouswayso con-sider hem.To help the readergrasp
thesevariousapproaches, achcate-
gory s introducedby one of the edi-
tors.
Somepaperspresentan overview
of a topic: n a verycoherent manner,
each of the five categorieshas a paper
thatto some extentcan be consid-
ereda surveypaper.Amongthe
broadest s the one byJean-Claude
Risset,a renownedcomposerand pio-neer in computermusic,on timbre
analysis ysynthesis.Hispaperhas a
substantial ibliography.Also ofwide
scope, the articleby GuyGarnett,a
composerand researcherrom the
Center or NewMusicand Audio
Technologies(CNMAT) t the Uni-
versity f California,Berkeley,dealsin a methodical ashionwith the ques-
tionof timeandtemporalproceduresin the variousaspectsof musicand sig-
nalrepresentations.Because t is athoroughand knowledgeable aper,
one can only wonderwhythe workof
recognized mportanceachievedby
StephenPope in this domain,which
hasappeared n variouspublications,
is not explicitlymentioned.
The book hasa comprehensiven-
dex section,composedof a name in-
dex and a wide subjectndex. Bothin-
dexes arequite impressiven both
size andchoice of entries.
Note
1. For more on the life and inventions of Hugh
Le Caine, see the review in this issue of Gayle
Young's TheSackbutBlues.
WHAT'STHE MATTER
WITHTODAY'S
EXPERIMENTAL
MUSIC? ORGANISED
SOUND TOO
RARELYHEAR1DbyLeigh Landy.HarwoodAcademic
Publishers, 991.308 pp. ISBN:3-7186-5168-8.SSN:0891-5415
Reviewed yDenis Smalley,Schoolof Mu-
sic, University f EastAnglia,Nonvich
NR4 7TJ,U.K
This bookis based on theassumption
that overthe last 15 years ewercom-
posers,musicians nd listenershavebeen interested n experimentalmu-
thesevariousapproaches, achcate-
gory s introducedby one of the edi-
tors.
Somepaperspresentan overview
of a topic: n a verycoherent manner,
each of the five categorieshas a paper
thatto some extentcan be consid-
ereda surveypaper.Amongthe
broadest s the one byJean-Claude
Risset,a renownedcomposerand pio-neer in computermusic,on timbre
analysis ysynthesis.Hispaperhas a
substantial ibliography.Also ofwide
scope, the articleby GuyGarnett,a
composerand researcherrom the
Center or NewMusicand Audio
Technologies(CNMAT) t the Uni-
versity f California,Berkeley,dealsin a methodical ashionwith the ques-
tionof timeandtemporalproceduresin the variousaspectsof musicand sig-
nalrepresentations.Because t is athoroughand knowledgeable aper,
one can only wonderwhythe workof
recognized mportanceachievedby
StephenPope in this domain,which
hasappeared n variouspublications,
is not explicitlymentioned.
The book hasa comprehensiven-
dex section,composedof a name in-
dex and a wide subjectndex. Bothin-
dexes arequite impressiven both
size andchoice of entries.
Note
1. For more on the life and inventions of Hugh
Le Caine, see the review in this issue of Gayle
Young's TheSackbutBlues.
WHAT'STHE MATTER
WITHTODAY'S
EXPERIMENTAL
MUSIC? ORGANISED
SOUND TOO
RARELYHEAR1DbyLeigh Landy.HarwoodAcademic
Publishers, 991.308 pp. ISBN:3-7186-5168-8.SSN:0891-5415
Reviewed yDenis Smalley,Schoolof Mu-
sic, University f EastAnglia,Nonvich
NR4 7TJ,U.K
This bookis based on theassumption
that overthe last 15 years ewercom-
posers,musicians nd listenershavebeen interested n experimentalmu-
thesevariousapproaches, achcate-
gory s introducedby one of the edi-
tors.
Somepaperspresentan overview
of a topic: n a verycoherent manner,
each of the five categorieshas a paper
thatto some extentcan be consid-
ereda surveypaper.Amongthe
broadest s the one byJean-Claude
Risset,a renownedcomposerand pio-neer in computermusic,on timbre
analysis ysynthesis.Hispaperhas a
substantial ibliography.Also ofwide
scope, the articleby GuyGarnett,a
composerand researcherrom the
Center or NewMusicand Audio
Technologies(CNMAT) t the Uni-
versity f California,Berkeley,dealsin a methodical ashionwith the ques-
tionof timeandtemporalproceduresin the variousaspectsof musicand sig-
nalrepresentations.Because t is athoroughand knowledgeable aper,
one can only wonderwhythe workof
recognized mportanceachievedby
StephenPope in this domain,which
hasappeared n variouspublications,
is not explicitlymentioned.
The book hasa comprehensiven-
dex section,composedof a name in-
dex and a wide subjectndex. Bothin-
dexes arequite impressiven both
size andchoice of entries.
Note
1. For more on the life and inventions of Hugh
Le Caine, see the review in this issue of Gayle
Young's TheSackbutBlues.
WHAT'STHE MATTER
WITHTODAY'S
EXPERIMENTAL
MUSIC? ORGANISED
SOUND TOO
RARELYHEAR1DbyLeigh Landy.HarwoodAcademic
Publishers, 991.308 pp. ISBN:3-7186-5168-8.SSN:0891-5415
Reviewed yDenis Smalley,Schoolof Mu-
sic, University f EastAnglia,Nonvich
NR4 7TJ,U.K
This bookis based on theassumption
that overthe last 15 years ewercom-
posers,musicians nd listenershavebeen interested n experimentalmu-
sic.The introductiondefines'experi-mental'and usesthe concept of the
'parameter'o help delineate experi-mentation.Part2 is concernedwithcontextualdeterminants:he media,technology,communityand accultura-
sic.The introductiondefines'experi-mental'and usesthe concept of the
'parameter'o help delineate experi-mentation.Part2 is concernedwithcontextualdeterminants:he media,technology,communityand accultura-
sic.The introductiondefines'experi-mental'and usesthe concept of the
'parameter'o help delineate experi-mentation.Part2 is concernedwithcontextualdeterminants:he media,technology,communityand accultura-
tion,and the politicaldimensionsof
music.Part3 reviewsopics such as
form and structure,notationand per-
forming echniquesand expandson
timbre,space and themedia. Part4 is
concernedwith today's rends: lec-
troacousticmusic,stylisticusions,
'neo-'tendencies (neotonality,neo-
simplicity, eo-romanticism,he re-
vivalof melody,etc.) and askswhycomposers ikeStockhausen,Boulez
andBerio havebecomemilder.Part5
exhortseducators,mediatorsand
composers o work oward duca-
tionalchange.The authorcallsfor
morecompositionalparticipationn
(inter)media,a consideredawareness
of technologicalapplications, con-
centrationon localmusicalvalues,a
consciousness f political ssues,an ex-
plorationof new parameters nd
sounds(rather hannotes), the devis-ing of new criteriaand terminologies,
more 'clues' n the musicso that is-
tenersare helped,more attention o-
cusedon new techniques/notations,
anda search or newexemplarymen-
tors.He lookstowards n 'experimen-
tal synthesis'basedon a reappraisalof pastexperience.Part6 comprises
studiesof musicconsideredexperi-
mental:worksby Ligeti,Berio, Carter,
Xenakis,Reich,Brown,Wolff,de
Leeuw,Rissetand Shinohara.
Landy's efinition f 'experimental'(p. 7) is unclear: musicn which theinnovative omponent(not in the
senseof newness oundin any artisticwork,but insteadsubstantialnnova-
tion as clearlyntendedby acomposer)
of anyaspectof a givenpiece takes
priority bovethe more general tech-
nicalcraftsmanshipxpectedof any
artwork.Thisdefinitiondoesnot correlate
with the worksdiscussed n part6. In-
novationbeforecraft?Perhapsn thecaseof BrownandWolff.For the oth-
ers it is rather nsulting. f I have mis-
understood he craft-innovationela-
tionship t is because this is not
explained. Substantialnnovatiorl?'Some(butnot all) of thesecomposers
mayhavebeen innovative,but notnecessarily ubstantiallyndnot neces-
sarily n theworkspresented.The
trouble s that measuring he doseofinnovations a difElcult istoricaland
increasinglyubjective ask.Whichhis-
tion,and the politicaldimensionsof
music.Part3 reviewsopics such as
form and structure,notationand per-
forming echniquesand expandson
timbre,space and themedia. Part4 is
concernedwith today's rends: lec-
troacousticmusic,stylisticusions,
'neo-'tendencies (neotonality,neo-
simplicity, eo-romanticism,he re-
vivalof melody,etc.) and askswhycomposers ikeStockhausen,Boulez
andBerio havebecomemilder.Part5
exhortseducators,mediatorsand
composers o work oward duca-
tionalchange.The authorcallsfor
morecompositionalparticipationn
(inter)media,a consideredawareness
of technologicalapplications, con-
centrationon localmusicalvalues,a
consciousness f political ssues,an ex-
plorationof new parameters nd
sounds(rather hannotes), the devis-ing of new criteriaand terminologies,
more 'clues' n the musicso that is-
tenersare helped,more attention o-
cusedon new techniques/notations,
anda search or newexemplarymen-
tors.He lookstowards n 'experimen-
tal synthesis'basedon a reappraisalof pastexperience.Part6 comprises
studiesof musicconsideredexperi-
mental:worksby Ligeti,Berio, Carter,
Xenakis,Reich,Brown,Wolff,de
Leeuw,Rissetand Shinohara.
Landy's efinition f 'experimental'(p. 7) is unclear: musicn which theinnovative omponent(not in the
senseof newness oundin any artisticwork,but insteadsubstantialnnova-
tion as clearlyntendedby acomposer)
of anyaspectof a givenpiece takes
priority bovethe more general tech-
nicalcraftsmanshipxpectedof any
artwork.Thisdefinitiondoesnot correlate
with the worksdiscussed n part6. In-
novationbeforecraft?Perhapsn thecaseof BrownandWolff.For the oth-
ers it is rather nsulting. f I have mis-
understood he craft-innovationela-
tionship t is because this is not
explained. Substantialnnovatiorl?'Some(butnot all) of thesecomposers
mayhavebeen innovative,but notnecessarily ubstantiallyndnot neces-
sarily n theworkspresented.The
trouble s that measuring he doseofinnovations a difElcult istoricaland
increasinglyubjective ask.Whichhis-
tion,and the politicaldimensionsof
music.Part3 reviewsopics such as
form and structure,notationand per-
forming echniquesand expandson
timbre,space and themedia. Part4 is
concernedwith today's rends: lec-
troacousticmusic,stylisticusions,
'neo-'tendencies (neotonality,neo-
simplicity, eo-romanticism,he re-
vivalof melody,etc.) and askswhycomposers ikeStockhausen,Boulez
andBerio havebecomemilder.Part5
exhortseducators,mediatorsand
composers o work oward duca-
tionalchange.The authorcallsfor
morecompositionalparticipationn
(inter)media,a consideredawareness
of technologicalapplications, con-
centrationon localmusicalvalues,a
consciousness f political ssues,an ex-
plorationof new parameters nd
sounds(rather hannotes), the devis-ing of new criteriaand terminologies,
more 'clues' n the musicso that is-
tenersare helped,more attention o-
cusedon new techniques/notations,
anda search or newexemplarymen-
tors.He lookstowards n 'experimen-
tal synthesis'basedon a reappraisalof pastexperience.Part6 comprises
studiesof musicconsideredexperi-
mental:worksby Ligeti,Berio, Carter,
Xenakis,Reich,Brown,Wolff,de
Leeuw,Rissetand Shinohara.
Landy's efinition f 'experimental'(p. 7) is unclear: musicn which theinnovative omponent(not in the
senseof newness oundin any artisticwork,but insteadsubstantialnnova-
tion as clearlyntendedby acomposer)
of anyaspectof a givenpiece takes
priority bovethe more general tech-
nicalcraftsmanshipxpectedof any
artwork.Thisdefinitiondoesnot correlate
with the worksdiscussed n part6. In-
novationbeforecraft?Perhapsn thecaseof BrownandWolff.For the oth-
ers it is rather nsulting. f I have mis-
understood he craft-innovationela-
tionship t is because this is not
explained. Substantialnnovatiorl?'Some(butnot all) of thesecomposers
mayhavebeen innovative,but notnecessarily ubstantiallyndnot neces-
sarily n theworkspresented.The
trouble s that measuring he doseofinnovations a difElcult istoricaland
increasinglyubjective ask.Whichhis-
toricalpath does one create?Landy s not sufficiently areful
withtermsand definitions for in-stance, imbre' It is looselydiscussedon pages 13,8v85, 95-97and 181-182.Although imbre s one area
toricalpath does one create?Landy s not sufficiently areful
withtermsand definitions for in-stance, imbre' It is looselydiscussedon pages 13,8v85, 95-97and 181-182.Although imbre s one area
toricalpath does one create?Landy s not sufficiently areful
withtermsand definitions for in-stance, imbre' It is looselydiscussedon pages 13,8v85, 95-97and 181-182.Although imbre s one area
120 Reviews20 Reviews20 Reviews
This content downloaded from 146.164.3.22 on Sun, 7 Jul 2013 00:23:43 AMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
8/12/2019 What's the Matter With Today's Experimental Music. Organised Sound Too Rarely Heard by Leigh Landy - Denis S…
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/whats-the-matter-with-todays-experimental-music-organised-sound 3/3